The Erstad Issue
Darin Erstad went 1-for-14 during his rehab, and then he actually took himself out of a game. As Scioscia put it, "For Erstad to take himself out of a game, it's significant." He is hurt, and we may not see him for the rest of the season.
Question: Is this the proverbial "blessing in disguise"? Reluctantly, I think so.
We can talk about the Intangibles that Erstad brings: his clubhouse leadership, his work ethic, etc. But given his diminishing contributions on the field, I think it's best to give his job to a Morales or a Kotchman. And that's coming from a big Erstad/Intangibles fan. I mean, shit, Erstad's PHIL rating is through the roof! haha.
The Angels face the potential of Erstad being out the rest of the season, when he will become a FA. What should the Angels do with its longtime clubhouse leader?
67 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
erstad
1B: Morales - a legit power hitter, taking him out of the lineup would be a shame, and it would be hard for him to DH with salmon and anderson taking these duties for the time being.
Kotchman - Most likely our everyday first basemen for the next couple years if he actually recovers from mono. While his hitting style is different than morales (i think mo has more pop), this is the guy that has been on our depth charts since he was drafted.
CF:Figgins - Sure, we all get nervous when a fly ball comes to him, but he has the speed and can move on the basepaths. He's my pick to be the fixture in CF for the years to come, if mcpherson and kendrick can prove themselves.
Murphy - He's flashed the leather and robbed a home run, his bat will come around but i don't see him being an everyday player until 2008, or 2007 if anderson can't play the field anymore.
Basically, Erstad is where salmon was at this point in 2004(coincidenitally with the same amount of time left on his contract as salmon did at the time), and he is bruised, broken, and unable to hit.
I mean, sure Erstad is good at the rbi groundout, otherwise known as the "productive out" by hatch and scioscia, but i have to unfortunately say that Erstad is dead weight on our team, and he is only going to hurt our depth by being on our bench. The problem is that I don't even want to think about giving Ersty the DFA, even if he has had only one truly productive season on the Angels, his scowls will warm my heart any day.
Simple
The 2007 lineup should look like this:
C: Napoli/Mathis
1B: Kotch
2B: Kendrick
SS: Cabrera
3B: D-Mac/Quinlan
LF: Garret/Rivera
CF: Figgins
RF: Vlad
DH: Morales
That's both pretty good and pretty cheap. We've got $30 million coming off the books (Erstad, Alfonzo, Weaver, Kennedy, Yan, etc.), no F.A. needs for the rotation ... so either the extra money should be spent on Vernon Wells types, putting Figgy back into his Rover role, or Stoneman should package some spare shortstops, AAA SPs, prospects and whoever the hell else for Miguel Cabrera.
agree pretty much entirely....
I know you love Kotchman, but I'd be fine with Morales at 1B for years to come and trading Kotchman for help elsewhere. I like Kotchman, his attitude, his glove, his price tag, etc. I just don't think his ceiling is that high. 15 HR 1st basemen that don't bring speed to the table aren't a huge commodity in this day and age.
Sometimes stud prospects can almost handicap you a little, although it is a nice problem to have. For instance, there's almost no doubt that we'd be better off THIS YEAR with the Hillenbrand/McPherson/Kendrick package than we are with Kennedy/McPherson/Quinlan, but if we do this trade we risk stunting McPherson's growth as a player.
I personally would like to see McPherson get as many ABs as possible this year against righties and lefties, even though I have no doubt in my mind we'd be better off in '06 with Hillenbrand taking alot of those at bats and playing somewhere on this team every day.
The GM job is a tough one. Even tougher on good teams with great prospects. I'm just glad we're in this situation unlike the past Angels teams.
Wells
There's not all that much good stuff available next offseason. Carlos Lee and Alfonso Soriano might be the best available power hitters, but neither of them would help out the team OBP much.
I'd trade Brandon Wood and whatever other young players the Marlins might want and try to pry Cabrera away from them.
Thar she blows
And no, I don't care if it's not an exact literary parallel.
Roster
1B Kotchman
2B Kendrick
SS Wood/Aybar
3B D-Mac/Wood
Lf Morales/D-Mac/Mathis
Cf Murphy
Rf Vlad/D-Mac
C Napoli/Mathis
DH Whoever is not in the field.
I had heard or read that D-Mac had played outfield somewhere in his past.
if we go all young...
We're better off working them in a player or two at a time to keep the good mix. There is absolutely no reason to replace a guy like OC at this point.
I hear you
Is it me
or something to that effect when a veteran gets a hit or productive out?
Hud was the 25th man on the roster
Molina
Ehhhhhh
by Anaheim of Anaheim on Jun 8, 2006 9:33 AM PDT reply actions
I think
As Matt points out, we will be freeing up $20m plus, and assuming Bart is fit, will have no need to find a starter.
Cabrera would be a huge signing, and worth giving a lot for.
yes he would...
With that said, Cabrera may be the best hitter in the game not named Pujols for the next 10 years and will fill in that 'superstar that carries your team' role after Vlad retires/gets injured very nicely.
Ersty...
Let the youth movement go into effect, but still keep a few veterans around, as the Rooks gotta learn from somebody.
I told someone early this year when I heard Ersty was gonna be playing CF, he wouldn't make it to the All-star break without going on the DL... well, it looks like it's pretty bad now...
Jeff
One Correction
But I agree that his lingering injury problems may ultimately benefit the team, because it prevents Scioscia from wasting a spot in the lineup on a guy who we know will be unproductive, rather than giving a chance to a younger player who might be productive. This year is about player development as much as anything else...really, sort of like the A's last year. The Angels aren't too far out of it & could still take the division, but it's patently obvious that it's time to start integrating the yunguns into the lineup to find out if they're going to make it here and whether they have trade value as ML-ready players.
thanks for the correction
We can have the best of both worlds
not happening
Or..
Rory and Terry
less bloody
Next year
every team goes through it
Speaking of GA
please no
If he's hitting coach our entire team is stepping into the dugout before their swing (1st base dugout for lefties and 3rd base for righties). It has worked for GA, but only because his talent level is rediculous.
Deadspin
Link:
http://www.deadspin.com/sports/baseball/so-weve-got-some-affidavit-names-179400.php
i dont give a damn
J-someone or other
Someone could probably figure out some of the names based on the context and the amount of space taken up by the letters in the names.
I
I think the government is going a little overboard.
criminal
erstad in the line up
Erstad 0-1
Erstad 0-2 (1-16)
Erstad 0-3 (1-17)
Erstad 0-4 (1-18)
scratch that 1-4
Time to
why would we do that?
I wouldn't be that hard.
HK
Trading Kennedy
1b is a lock with Morales and eventually Kotchman if he isn't traded.
2b goes to HK by next season if not sooner.
Cabrera is one of the most valuable SS's in MLB when you take into account his bat AND glove (with Wood knocking on the door for for 08 or 09).
3b is McPherson's unless we decide to gived up on him just as he is starting to come into his own.
RF is Vlad.
CF is Figgins because there is nowhere else to play him.
LF/DH goes to some combination of Anderson, Morales, Salmon and Rivera
Our only real need is a solid veteran reliever and I haven't heard of any being available.
by akathelorax @ Halos Heaven on Jun 8, 2006 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Who says
The Angels don't have to play Figgins in CF (or anywhere else) if they can get a better one. They don't have to play McPherson or Figgins at 3B if they get someone appreciably better.
I agree that you really can't knock GA out of the lineup, not at his salary, and at least not this year.
A useful arm for the bullpen would also be nice.
Figgins
I am totally against trading Kennedy for prospects. That is exactly what this team does not need. We need to upgrade what we have now and not obtain more prospects to clog up the 40 man roster so that we lose guys like Jenks and Turnbow. Not that I disagree with dropping those guys from the 40, but we have don't want to keep losing quality prospects...
by akathelorax @ Halos Heaven on Jun 8, 2006 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions
maybe
One more on 6-6-6
by SocalAngelFaninOC on Jun 8, 2006 7:49 PM PDT reply actions

by 

























