Adenhart is the sticking point...
I didn't see this on here yet. According to the Miami Herald, the Angels are willing to give up Kendrick, Willits, and Mathis, but the Marlins are holding out for Nick Adenhart.
http://www.miamiherald.com/591/story/317722.html
Would the Marlins take Figgins + Adenhart + cash instead of Kendrick?
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
63 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If Adenhart is seriously the sticking point
by Caseys Kiss of Death on Nov 24, 2007 11:36 AM PST reply actions
My point
GMJ LF/RF
Hunter CF
Vlad DH/OF
GA DH/OF
Cabrera 3B
Wood SS
Figgy 2B
Kotch 1B
Napoli C
Bench: Starting Pitch: Pen:
Izturis Escobar Bootcheck
Rivera Lackey Oliver
Morales Weaver Speier
Catcher Saunders Shields
INF Garland Rodriguez
Santana
Kendrick is
I don't believe it
yeah
by ihearhowie2.0 on Nov 24, 2007 12:26 PM PST up reply actions
I hope so.
bye bye to HK
by Philly Angels Fan on Nov 24, 2007 12:35 PM PST reply actions
Indeed
I would rather play
Point being I do not see a fit with Iguchi.
Tad is the man!
by Philly Angels Fan on Nov 24, 2007 9:32 PM PST up reply actions
Another Philly Angels fan concurs
by ghostofwallyjoyner on Nov 25, 2007 4:12 AM PST up reply actions
no
ha
some of ya'll are crazy
by The Halowed One on Nov 24, 2007 12:55 PM PST up reply actions
I see how
2010
by Angel Aviator on Nov 24, 2007 4:51 PM PST up reply actions
It's not
Up and In
by Angel Aviator on Nov 24, 2007 9:46 PM PST up reply actions
Orgasmic...
That's a start...
I still do NOT give up Kendrick. He's no longer a prospect. He's now somewhat proven.
Even IF (big if) we get weight clauses thrown into his new contract, we still don't get Kendrick back when Fatty doesn't make the weight.
At least with Tejada, you don't have any of the same worries that you get with Cabrera. His only concern is mileage.
by thehasegawaexpress on Nov 24, 2007 2:29 PM PST up reply actions
mielage and steroids
Being the senior member of your team at 24
He is young & has maturity issues but watching your entire team get traded away while going form Champions to last place is not easy I would imagine.
You are Right
With M-Cab you have three worries (with three answers):
1.) Defense (not a great 3b, but certainly worthy of the spot until he can move to the outfield).
2.) Signability (you better believe Arte will pay to keep him here long term if we get him... it would be a joke if otherwise).
3.) Weight (pretty sure exercise and a revitalized work ethic from playing for a legitimate contender in front of more than 700 fans would do the trick).
My point is that you are putting way more emphasis on his weight than necessary. I would be much more concerned with the aging body of a former-roider who is exiting his prime than the extra flab on a baby boy who is destined to enter the history books. One of those things can be fixed. The other is just a matter of time.
#1) What makes anyone think
2) The long term signing is the problem. We're talking about making an obese and immature party-animal the face of the franchise for the next several years. And we'll be losing Kendrick along with at least 2 other top-tier prospects just to get him. If he doesn't pan out the franchise is in the toilet. By the way, good luck getting weight clauses in that contract. If Tejada doesn't pan out, we're only on the hook for 2 years/$26 million.
and #3) I wish I shared your confidence in him all of a sudden growing self-control with food, but IMO, if it was that easy, he never would have ballooned in the first place. He and his agent both knew his weight gain was messing with a likely $150 to $200 million dollar contract. Apparently, that wasn't enough to motivate him. At least he won't be bringing his appetite and metabolism with him if/when he gets here?
by thehasegawaexpress on Nov 25, 2007 3:27 AM PST up reply actions
1) With an outfield of....
- As long as he's producing, and he's not beating his wife, I'm OK with this. If you're willing to use Mo Vaughn as his comparable (which I disagree with), then you have 7-8 years until his production suddenly drops off.
- I don't think anyone truly buys his recent statements about getting in shape, but at the same time it's better that he is bringing it up than shrugging it off altogether.
Cabrera has outfield experience. But...
The weight thing is a giant concern to me. We're committing approximately $200 million AND a ton of our current Grade A prospect pool to a guy that doesn't act like a professional. He's obviously a freak natural talent, but he seems to have no appreciation for it. Are there no personal trainers in MIAMI?
Just don't give up Howie and get weight clauses in the contract, is all I'm saying.
by thehasegawaexpress on Nov 25, 2007 12:11 PM PST up reply actions
Fat AND Orgasmic, just like Rosie O'Donnell!
Howie Kendrick
Mathis
I mean, Budde came up, had one game-winning hit, but didn't do anything else. I'm pretty much asking because I've realized I know nothing about our catching depth in the minors. Just curious.
by Ty Webb on Nov 24, 2007 2:28 PM PST reply actions
I think Budde would contribute alot more
Are you seriously worrying about who
Bobby Wilson
by Angel Hawker on Nov 25, 2007 8:19 AM PST up reply actions
I'm just curious, really
by Ty Webb on Nov 24, 2007 4:10 PM PST reply actions
?? Headline
"Angels' deal could be sign Cabrera is next"
Someone explain it, please.
sign
by ihearhowie2.0 on Nov 24, 2007 9:49 PM PST up reply actions
That's interesting....
I was a big Stoneman supporter...spoke with him on multiple occasions, and he seemed to have a sound understanding of how to obtain long term success. I've also met Mr. Reagins, and he is a very smart, savvy individual, who will certainly lean on the rest of the Angels braintrust along with Big Mike for all important decisions.
Watch the rest if the offseason play out...
and come talk to me about Mr. Reagins when we win our 2nd world championship this year...unless as a retrohalo...you're just not big on winning...
by UCSBhalo on Nov 25, 2007 1:21 AM PST up reply actions
second world championship
Yeah
by DChalofan on Nov 25, 2007 6:04 AM PST up reply actions
actually, now that you mention it,
a position of strength? you mean shortstop? you mean the position that will not become a glut if wood and hk goes? with no oc, no hk, and no wood, what's our option at ss? aybar? mighty mouse? figgy can't, he has to play second. so what position of strength? you don't mean ss, do you?
Yes
You are dumb
As the poster above already explained, it is a glut to have Cabrera, Izturis, Figgins, Aybar, and Wood all able to play one middle infield position. Your claims about whether we will have a glut after trading Kendrick and Wood are irrelevant -- a) it is not at all clear that will happen and b) even if it does, we still would be able to fill the position with Izturis and Aybar.
As for Hunter, you do not deny that he was the best available free agent. Instead, you claim that we overpaid. When JD Drew, a mediocre outfielder, signs a five-year contract for $14M per season and MLB announces record revenues the following season, you can expect a seven-time gold glove centerfielder who is averaging 30 HR to sign an even more lucrative contract. Do you really believe that we could have signed him for less?
Stupid.
by DChalofan on Nov 26, 2007 5:42 AM PST up reply actions
if reagins doesn't make a move
who the fuck cares if he was the best free agent available? we didn't need another aging outfielder, we already had three. since when did torii hunter average 30 homeruns a year? was it that one time when he did it once?
you're stupid.
Gotta' Keep Howie
Don't get me wrong I want the Angels to get Cabrera. But, they really need to do all they can to hang onto Howie in the process. They now have a extra amount of pitching and OF help. Hopefully, they can tap into that to get the deal done.
Goddamn, am I ever sick
Imagine if the Yankees used weight as a reason to not trade for Babe Ruth.
The kid fucking mashes, and there is every single bit as much reason to believe that he really does want to lose the weight ($$$$$$$$$$), as to believe that he will want to keep it on.
by Caseys Kiss of Death on Nov 25, 2007 11:12 AM PST reply actions
Yeah, I'm with you on this Casey
If that's so true, then cool, Vaughn dropped off at age 32. That gives us 7 ultra-productive years of Cabrera.
We gotta get this done.
D'Angelo
"This winter, I'm really going to work on my physical condition in order to be in the best shape possible for spring training," Cabrera told LasMayores.com. "I've been at it for four weeks now at a gym that specializes in professional athletes, and I'll be there until the spring."
"I'll keep at it in order to get to spring training in the best shape possible, to have the best season possible for the team I end up on," he said.

Hip Hop Hooray
Totally right
by DChalofan on Nov 25, 2007 12:15 PM PST up reply actions
Now try adding
by thehasegawaexpress on Nov 26, 2007 1:06 AM PST up reply actions
Those 80 pounds
And I believe it's actually 63 pounds, but who's counting?
Seriously though, the only way I can possibly rationalize people dumping on Cabrera's weight so consistently is just as an overly-defensive mechanism against losing some of our own players in order to get him.
Anyone who thinks this guy isn't a perennial .330/35/120 guy waiting to happen for another MINIMUM of seven or so years is just flat out lying to themselves and everyone else. PERIOD. That's all there is to the matter. Say whatever the fuck you want about him, he's going to produce, and no bitch-tits or man-bras are gonna change that fact.
by Caseys Kiss of Death on Nov 26, 2007 1:11 AM PST up reply actions
Sultan of Swat
by MH25 on Nov 25, 2007 2:27 PM PST up reply actions
Some of you guys are too much in love with Howie..
by vincanity @ Halos Heaven on Nov 25, 2007 1:52 PM PST reply actions

by 


















