Garret Anderson Has Left the Building
The Angels offered arbitration to 4 of their 5 arbitration eligible free agents, holding back on only veteran outfielder Garret Anderson.
Looking at the chance to get a possible 7 draft picks before the 2nd round begins, the Angels offered arbitration to Mark Teixeira, Francisco Rodriguez, Darren Oliver and Jon Garland.
Complete Guide to Every MLB Team's Arbitration Decisions
This closes the door on Anderson's 18.5 years with the club. He was drafted in the 4th round of the June 4, 1990 amateur draft. He leaves at or near the top of every offensive counting statistic in franchise history. Having recently retained the services of Scott Boras as his agent, the Angels seemed in no mood to risk him calling their arbitration bluff, not with the possibility of Boras presenting the case to the independent arbitrator.
The four players extended arbitration offers have a week to accept. It seems most likely that the Angels will target Darren Oliver for a two year deal rather than let him go. The other three players are more likely content to test the free agent market despite the gloomy economy looming for the 2009 baseball season.
0 recs |
41 comments
|
Comments
smart move by the Halos
that’s all i have to say.
Kotch would've had that.
by howiestheman on Dec 1, 2008 6:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Finally !! Some baseball news.
I can’t stand November thru February because of the lack of baseball. Anything baseball.
When I'm not at the stadium, I'd rather be watching my Halos back in Costa Rica!
by Dono Romantico on Dec 1, 2008 6:07 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Rev you missed SOOOOOOO much of this story
1. They did G.A. a favor – other teams will not hesitate to sign him – they will not be losing draft picks to do so.
2. This gives them the inside track on Teixeira because other teams will balk at losing their first round pick – even more balking for Oliver will bring him to us cheaply.
3. Garland might accept the offer – but they could trade him if he does – but still another chess move.
HARD EIGHT
by Side Salad on Dec 1, 2008 6:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Isn't GA a Type B free agent?
If so, the signing team wouldn’t have had to lose a draft pick had the team offered arbitration. I think the reason for not offering him arbitration was simply financial. And smart.
by snowhor on Dec 1, 2008 6:47 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
garlands not accepting
his services will be wanted elsewhere. like seattle
by ihearhowie2.0 on Dec 1, 2008 7:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
GA
I think the odds would have been pretty good that GA would accept arbitration. At most, he’s looking at a 2 year contract but more than likely a one year deal. If a potential suitor had to give up draft pick as well, it might just push GA back into our arms.
by HungryHunter on Dec 1, 2008 6:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Merry Christmas Garland
What this does is set Garland up in a no-lose situation. If a long-term deal to his liking doesn’t seem likely, he will get one year at an inflated salary to redeem himself and hit free agency next year. I will miss GA.
by JeffJoiner on Dec 1, 2008 7:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I dont know if this is a credible source or anything......
But I was reading MMQB over at CNNSI (Peter King) and in his article on the last page he says something about the Halos being the frontrunner for Teix according to what he’s heard….
I realize its Peter King in a football article……but Im sure he’s connected in the sports world..so he may know something…….but it was interesting nonetheless.
Here is his quote:
a. Starting to hear Mark Teixeira is going to sign for seven or eight years somewhere, probably in Anaheim. And no, I don’t call a team an hour outside of Los Angeles "Los Angeles.’’
Here is the link if you wanna check for yourselves:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/11/30/week13/5.html
PIPE DREAM: Jim Harbaugh for the Bills next head coach.
by norcaliangelsfan on Dec 1, 2008 7:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
nice
who knows if it’s true, but i’m gripping onto any hope out there.
Kotch would've had that.
by howiestheman on Dec 1, 2008 7:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
peter king is an idiot
who is a blowhard red sox fan. i give this no value. A nice find, none the less.
by ihearhowie2.0 on Dec 1, 2008 7:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
a red sox fan....who seemed a bit disappointed that Teix and the Chowds arent becoming one?
thats my take on it.
PIPE DREAM: Jim Harbaugh for the Bills next head coach.
by norcaliangelsfan on Dec 1, 2008 7:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Abreu
was not given arbitration
Im hoping that doesnt make him more appealing to us
by ihearhowie2.0 on Dec 1, 2008 7:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i also hope not
…bad fielder of all bad fielders…
by Rev Halofan on Dec 1, 2008 7:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
GA
I hope that he stays healthy and gets 3,000 career hits. This is a good business move but a tough one because with GA’s retirement the 1990 Angels (Edmonds, Salmon, Finley, Erstad) are all gone from the team. I like continuity of players from year to year.
GA’s three run double in Game 7 sent me into the air, screaming in relief that the Angel jinx was about to end. That and his monster night against the Yankees in August, 2007 will always stick out in my mind as GA’s finest moments. Good luck GA. I hope that you return to the Big A to be honored one day as one of the two or three Angel hitters of all time.
Angels in 09!
by tanana40 on Dec 1, 2008 8:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Oh Crap!
I saw Finley’s name and first thought of Steve Finley!
Please no more nightmares!
Peanuts...Get your Overpriced Peanuts!
by Angel Hawker on Dec 2, 2008 12:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You too?
2005 was rather traumatic that way, wasn’t it?
Angels fan since '67
by red floyd on Dec 2, 2008 6:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes, I'm still pining for Steve Finley, ha!
Angels in 09!
by tanana40 on Dec 2, 2008 7:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What If....
GA signs with the A’s ? How will we all look at him if this happens??
Will he be considered a traitor, particularly if, for some miracle, the A’s are competitive.
Seattle: I will feel sorry for him.
Texas: see above.
When I'm not at the stadium, I'd rather be watching my Halos back in Costa Rica!
by Dono Romantico on Dec 1, 2008 8:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
the A's dont covet guys who dont walk
by ihearhowie2.0 on Dec 1, 2008 9:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
token
You never know what the A’s will do, they may zig when you think they’ll zag. For the right price on a 1 year deal they might take GA as a platoon LF.
Also, I don’t see how this closes the door on GA. The May 1 rule is no longer in effect, the Angels can bid for his services just like anyone else, and I really don’t see Garrett getting an expensive contract anywhere else.
by elricsi on Dec 1, 2008 11:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sweet!
Now – who plays LF? Kendry? Figgy (with BWood at 3B)…
Now it gets interesting.
Here’s hoping Garland signs with someone, we resign Teix and Oliver.
If Frankie is really looking at 3 year deals now – I say we go 3 years/$39 million and see what happens…
Anyway, the next month will be interesting…
Jim Scully
by jimmuscomp on Dec 1, 2008 8:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Manny in LF
When I'm not at the stadium, I'd rather be watching my Halos back in Costa Rica!
by Dono Romantico on Dec 1, 2008 9:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If no Teix, then I guess that is possible.
I still hope he just becomes a DH platoon w/ Vlad if he ends up an Angel.
I don’t like bringing in Manny if the deal is longer than 3 years – and it certainly is going to be longer than 3 years.
Teix or bust, I say.
Jim Scully
by jimmuscomp on Dec 1, 2008 9:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Concur on the contract years for Manny
But why can’t the Halos sign both Tex and Manny??
When I'm not at the stadium, I'd rather be watching my Halos back in Costa Rica!
by Dono Romantico on Dec 1, 2008 9:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LA Times think Garland will accept arbitration
That sure seems like it would make a trade necessary if CC was around. Still dont see it happening though
by ihearhowie2.0 on Dec 1, 2008 10:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
neither do i
but i guess you could do worse… he’s not a bad #4-5 starter.
Kotch would've had that.
by howiestheman on Dec 1, 2008 10:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Luck GA, I will miss you
GA was nothing short of exceptional almost his entire career getting the runner home from third with less than 2 outs. Fundamental Angel baseball, alas, it’s time to replace that with a little more of the walk, walk, 3 run bomb. A better mix of power and patience is what this team needs.
by LosAngel on Dec 1, 2008 10:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
GA, we hardly knew ye...
I for one(and I know i’m the exception) will miss GA. GA helped lead us through the highs, and very,very many lows. You will be missed. GA was an enigma, extremely understated, and unassuming. A player that would go out and bat for .265, and hit 10 to 20 HR’s,almost year in and year out. I sincerely hope and pray GA is successful in his future endeavors, just not to the Halo’s detriment, like Ryan, Downing, Joyner and Abbott.
YOU DON'T KNOW THE POWER OF THE DARKSIDE.....
by halofolife on Dec 2, 2008 12:31 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
No, you're not an exception
GA was the man. A consummate professional. A man so talented, who made it look SO easy, that people thought he was lazy when he wasn’t.
He will be missed.
Angels fan since '67
by red floyd on Dec 2, 2008 6:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
GA
Tragedy.
Garland. Borderline whether he will sign elsewhere or accept arbitration.
Frankie. May not get as much per year as he could get from a 1year arbitration.
Trade Weaver and Kendrick for Peavy.
Angel Pitching, Angel Defense - get past that.
by vladtheimpaler on Dec 2, 2008 12:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I didn't notice GA that much this year
bad or good
dont marry the bank teller
by jockoautry on Dec 2, 2008 1:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, he blended in pretty well. I think Sosh purposefully played GMJ and Mathis so much to overshadow GA's decline.
by snowhor on Dec 2, 2008 5:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That sounded sarcastic
but it kinda rings true.
by Rev Halofan on Dec 2, 2008 7:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who says GA is gone?
There was zero chance the Angels would offer arbitration, since by MLB agreement the least he would get in arbitration was 80% of his 2008 salary, or just under $10M. That, plus the $3M buyout, and he’d nearly make the $14M salary option the Angels—that negates the purpose of declining the option.
Boras will look at the offers out there, but it wouldn’t surprise me to see GA sign a 1 year deal, with a base of $2M to $3M and a ton of incentives, for one last season before retiring. He might be sentimental enough to want to wear one uni in his entire career.
by George Kaplan on Dec 3, 2008 4:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
2006 he was league minimum
but he got paid $10 mil for ’04 and ’05 and played about half of ’04 and NONE of ’05.
by Rev Halofan on Dec 3, 2008 11:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















