Halos Heaven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Larry Johnson's Future in Kansas City Bar-right-arrows



Fine, I'll be the one to say it...

I BUMPED THIS TO THE FRONT PAGE - If you have bugs to report or SOLUTIONS to some of the obvious problems here on HH2.0, please use this thread. Needless bitching about new things, though, is, well, not needed... (Rev out)

- - - -

This new format SUCKS. Seriously. I've given it some time, and I usually adjust to major changes like this, but this is TERRIBLE. Here's the thing: SBNation was one of the few remaining sites that actually loaded in milliseconds on a standard broadband connection. This meant that a.) I could read Halos Heaven on my Blackjack at work and b.) actually going to and from the page was not a multimedia nightmare.

This is, as far as a concern, a stupid way to fix something that wasn't broke. No, the blogs as a whole were not particularly professional looking, and the format was clearly outdated, but does this look any better to you? Millions of interstitial ads (mention your ad-blocker and I will discount every opinion you ever have from now on) combined with ridiculous avatars and a posting scheme which, somehow, managed to be worse than the original.

Oh, and Firefox hates this place.

If I give someone like $20 or something can I have my old HH back?

Let me put this as simply as I can: I spend about a quarter as much time here as I did before the redesign. I spend much of that extra time at as-of-yet unchanged format sites. This change is not attracting more users, because the type of people interested in this blog aren't going to come here for avatars and "recs" on "fan posts." They're gonna come here for Angels news. And now I'm trying to find a less garish place to find that.

-Marcus

This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan and may or may not be a reflection of human evolution, divine enlightenment or nine cans into a 12-pack.

3 recs | Comment 64 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

It has made my life easier

The old format could have been outdated on operating systems in the coming years, whereas this platform was built from scratch - they are working out the bugs and can make fixes for all operating systems that are not patchwork.

by Rev Halofan on Mar 24, 2008 10:46 PM PDT   0 recs

Brownie points...

...I like it.

by Sethy on Mar 24, 2008 10:58 PM PDT   0 recs

To give you a fair shake, Carl

I would love to hear about your revenue model in the age of content aggregators that basically harvest all unique site content despite copyright - cannot get google numbers for advertisers based on content when it is being stolen by copy-n-paste spiders or RSS-fed all over the internet wihtout residual "visits" being logged (visit numbers that attract advertisers).

Since the content model (centering on the "just news" you love so much) is basically history (copyright be damned and subscriptions/ad revenue models be laughed at), SBN wants to build a superior community platform, one that is not some clunky messageboard with tit-n-ass pictures but rather a destination for people with a common allegiance for more than just content. The belief is that the lingering eyeballs will build brand loyalty that attracts committed advertising buys.

But let me know how your format - the one that is sinking newspapers every day - let me know how my boss can make money off it and I will pass the word on...

by Rev Halofan on Mar 24, 2008 11:28 PM PDT   0 recs

I agree

Capitalism is where Americans venture. If one does not like it, then it's time to cheat on your taxes or beat the misses or the meat.

I'm Hudd! Goodbye Phys!

by Hudd on Mar 25, 2008 1:42 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Here's the basic issue:

All this redesign, all this extra crap, the flash overlays, the fanposts....none of these things actually improve the CONTENT of the site. This is like adding flames to a Civic. It looks kinda cool, but it's not functionally better. I'd argue it's functionally worse since it's harder to load, so I visit it less.

And to say the old format would have been rendered obsolete by newer operating systems is asinine. Simplicity tends to maintain compatibility. Next thing you know, we're all gonna have to install Silverlight to view multimedia streaming video avatars. And that's dumb.

I'm 20 years old. I'm a child of new media and I respect it. But I'm not arguing that. I'm saying that this site looks terrible and it does.

Northeastern University Huskies: Mediocre hockey, guaranteed.

by Carl Johnson on Mar 25, 2008 4:43 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

IMO

The fanshots/fanposts DO add the type of content I like. Being a photographer, with the Angels as one of my favorite subject , naturally I love to see others' photos of our players, stadium, etc. On the old site there was never a really good place for photos to be posted.

I'm not superstitious, but I'm a little stitious.

by lightupthehalo on Mar 25, 2008 8:18 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

IMO

Flames on a Civic are gay.

by Sethy on Mar 25, 2008 10:26 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Word.

Northeastern University Huskies: Mediocre hockey, guaranteed.

by Carl Johnson on Mar 25, 2008 12:06 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

appreciate the feedack

Since you asked, yes, overall we are happy with the redesign. However, we don't consider our work done. As I pointed out in my welcome post, we are still in a public beta with the new features and the design. That means we take all input and feedback seriously. And it also means we'll be evolving the platform based on what we hear. I appreciate that you care enough about this community to author a passionate post with your feedback and hopefully you'll stick around to help us improve the platform that powers it. Let me address a few things you mentioned so we can keep a constructive conversation going:

Load time - We're very sensitive to this issue. We tested this before we launched, but nothing beats the 'real world' data we collect. We have an ongoing special project to tweak and tune the load times. We're making progress, but aren't where we want to be yet. You mentioned Firefox as being particularly problematic and you're right - we've seen the same thing - and we're focusing on figuring out why that specific browser loads are pages slower than the rest.

Mobile - You brought up reading the blog on your Blackjack and we are absolutely committed to providing a mobile version of all our blogs. Not just something that is workable on your phones and PDAs - but a version of the site designed for that format. We hope to get you something soon. In the meantime, we're exploring short-term ways for Halos Heaven to work on mobile better.

"posting scheme" - I assume this means the FanPost editor. If you have any feedback on why you don't like this, we're listening. We've already made several rounds of adjustments to it based on the input of multiple SB Nation communities. So fire away and we'll see what we can do to improve it for you and everyone else. Or maybe you're talking about the comment posting?

Avatars - Feedback on this addition has been about 50/50 with the edge going to those who enjoy them and find them useful as a visual short-hand for reading comments and seeing who has published FanPosts lately. We are exploring ways to keep them out of the way for those who prefer not to see them.

"Interstitial Ads", "Multimedia", "Flash Overlays" - Just for the record, we don't do any of these things as part of the content in our sites. It's possible that some of the ads that are served from our ad network use Flash, but we don't utilize any multimedia beyond the occasional YouTube. We have zero plans to start using Flash or Silverlight.

Visual design - This is another area where we are collecting feedback from all our communities and making adjustments. 'Garish' and 'extra crap' is what I heard. Do you not like the colors? Is it just that we've added avatars? Apart from the load time, what do you not like about the new visual design? Specific input is more than welcome.

Finally, I'll just say that the changes we made were meant to elevate the content of the site. We added recs so that the community could highlight the best of your own FanPosts. We added FanShots so that FanPosts wouldn't be cluttered with posts containing only one link or video. We added a WYSIWYG editor for FanPosts so that those members who don't know HTML can publish well-formatted writing. We added avatars to reward those who contribute to the community with their face (or cat or logo or whatever) is on the front-page. We added auto-refreshing comments so that the great conversations around team news could fly fast and furious without a refresh. We added scores, schedules, rosters and stats content for the Angels and every MLB team. So we agree with you that the content is important, but would just add that community is the special sauce that makes SB Nation blogs like Halos Heaven even better. We're trying to find the balance. We'll only get their with your help. That goes for everyone else too - feel free to jump in.

I'm one of the guys that built the new SB Nation

by clockwerks on Mar 25, 2008 6:06 AM PDT   0 recs

Here's a good example of why I don't like the new format, and it touches on a couple topics I wrote about previously and that you subsequently mentioned.

I was on Athletics Nation this morning trying to watch poor A's fans struggle with the Red $ox. I'm on a moderately slow line at work, so I load AN (which takes forever) and go to the comments page. I scroll to the bottom of the game thread, but for some reason, all the discussion is about action in the 4th inning when the game is clearly in the 9th. But wait! The scroll bar jumps up. More of the page loads so I scroll down. After about 20 seconds, I finally get to the bottom, step by step, only to have the page finish loading and scroll me all the way to the top. That's terrible.

When I say "posting scheme" I'm referencing comments. The preview-->publish isn't a welcome feature for fast-paced game threads (although I imagine I can turn this off somewhere?), and the way comments are segregated and indented still lags behind virtually any bulletin board software which has been available for the last decade. While the old system was equally terrible, it was more forgiving because it loaded faster and had the advantage of not occupying inches of screen real estate with avatars.

The interstitial ads I mentioned, along with "flash," were not well-described. Sorry. What I mean is that if I click on something and I'm not logged in, I'd prefer it to take me directly to the login page instead of graying out my page and popping up a notification asking me what I'd like to do. It's an extra step, just like UAC in Vista, and it's unnecessary visual crap. The ads are irritating because they're ads, and I understand there's little you can do about that. But then again, Google ads are typically low-profile and targeted.

There's, like, a million yards of space between the edge of the screen and the edge of the content, especially as you scroll further down the main page. Here's what I'm talking about:
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1568/smallhhmn8.jpg

Meanwhile, the rest of the page is so jammed with information and busy-looking that I ignore most of it. Look at this:
http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/1667/smallhh2iy0.jpg

That's ridiculous. And this is on a 19" monitor, not the 22" widescreen I have at home. Make the space fit the content, not vice-versa.

All in all, I'd liken this to going to your favorite restaurant and finding out the food sucks because they added 300 items to the menu. Instead of having one chef who was very good at fettucine alfredo, they now have 40 chefs who cook everything but nothing well.

I do appreciate that someone's listening, though. Thanks.

Northeastern University Huskies: Mediocre hockey, guaranteed.

by Carl Johnson on Mar 25, 2008 9:04 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Ah Crap

Now you are convincing me...

I agree about the speed - the avatars and "views" info seem to take a lot more memory then they should. Slow load times suck that is for sure.

But I have faith in the company to make the sites work great, bear with us, don't mind our construction dust.

by Rev Halofan on Mar 25, 2008 11:19 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

the way comments are segregated

can you explain what you mean by that?

I'm one of the guys that built the new SB Nation

by clockwerks on Mar 25, 2008 12:38 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

tabs

To me, at least, a tab over doesn't make sense for long threads. A reply to a reply to a reply gets crammed over in half the page anyway, and it then wraps and stacks the text. It's a failing of the format, but I always prefer the quote + reply format of bulletin board software over this. Often, there are so many comments after a first post that you've already scrolled 8 pages down and now have to scroll all the way back up to see it. I don't know how to fix it, but I figured I might as well whine about it and see if you guys can come up with something better.

Northeastern University Huskies: Mediocre hockey, guaranteed.

by Carl Johnson on Mar 25, 2008 1:35 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Look, be constructive

...now you are saying: recreate the logic of the internet. Thanks.

by Rev Halofan on Mar 25, 2008 1:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

not at all

I'm saying that you either need to make it a blog or a bulletin-board not a tabbed-over disaster.

Northeastern University Huskies: Mediocre hockey, guaranteed.

by Carl Johnson on Mar 25, 2008 6:32 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm with you about slow load times

But there are only so many ways to make a conversation appear logical within a thread. This is one of them. It is not the worst, it flows from point-to-point and the color coordination of new comments makes it easy to pick up later in the afternoon.

It is win/win to me. And the old HH was tabbed - ever get into one of those four-letter wide columns as the 88th comment to something in a thread? It is not like it is the most radical departure form the way things were.

by Rev Halofan on Mar 25, 2008 6:37 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

exactly

And I agree with you, the old way sucked. This is still the old way, with the addition of visual stuff that makes it more of a pain.

Suggestion? Look at the commenting system on Slashdot. It's got these little corners that help show more graphically who is replying to whom.

Northeastern University Huskies: Mediocre hockey, guaranteed.

by Carl Johnson on Mar 25, 2008 8:35 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

still listening

AN threads: Yeah, game threads are the focal point of our work to improve load times.

posting scheme: There is no way to opt-out of the preview, but we've found that it doesn't seem to slow anyone down. The threads you referenced on AN are a good example. We don't allow editing comments because we believe these threads are conversations and people reply to comments as they are written. So, we ask everyone to take the quick step of previewing what they've written before they post something that can't be changed. And I think many people have discovered that you can type a comment, tab to preview, hit return then hit return again to quickly post.

interstitials/modals: those are relatively rare and we display those only when there are two different roads to take: login or signup.

fixed width and busy-looking: As I said before we're working on the visual design and avatars.

thanks again for the feedback.

I'm one of the guys that built the new SB Nation

by clockwerks on Mar 25, 2008 9:45 AM PDT   0 recs

See, if it doesn't slow anyone down and people are just tab-return-returning through it anyways, then why have it? Obviously nobody is reading their comment again if they're doing that, so why force it on us?

Northeastern University Huskies: Mediocre hockey, guaranteed.

by Carl Johnson on Mar 25, 2008 9:58 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

previews

I wasn't suggesting that people are skipping reading the previews, I was just explaining that the extra step wasn't proving to be a stumbling block for anyone posting at the pace of a game thread. You can use keystrokes to efficiently post a comment.

I'm one of the guys that built the new SB Nation

by clockwerks on Mar 25, 2008 10:21 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

What I fail to understand is why it's not an option, I guess. If it's easy to skip, and you don't use it for half your comments, then why have it at all?

Northeastern University Huskies: Mediocre hockey, guaranteed.

by Carl Johnson on Mar 25, 2008 12:05 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Again, I'm not saying it's easy to skip. In fact, that's the reason why it's not an option - so it's not easy to skip. People can choose to ignore the preview at their own risk of posting something that didn't mean to, but they still have to take that extra and easy step.

I'm one of the guys that built the new SB Nation

by clockwerks on Mar 25, 2008 12:34 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

PREVIEW IS AWESOME

I have already caught a thousand typos on the PREVIEW - it makes for both an editing tool and a cooldown for hot-heads.

by Rev Halofan on Mar 25, 2008 12:45 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

agreed.

i love the preview.

and while i'm here, i love the indented replies. i don't read blogs that aren't that way, in fact.

john RIP samo

by angels4adam on Mar 25, 2008 2:39 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

For me -

Lots of game threads are going to be read via my iPhone. Slow loading times on that already, plus the preview-before-post thing (since I can't easily tab-return-return) means that it IS going to be a stumbling block for me.

As I said in the other thread, I'm confident in my spelling ability and I don't need the built in cooling off period. To me it's just an annoyance. Not one that's going to stop me from coming to the site (as I love HH and the overall design of the new site), but an annoyance nonetheless.

I'm not superstitious, but I'm a little stitious.

by lightupthehalo on Mar 25, 2008 1:29 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Just for me!?

:) That would be lovely. But a long time in the making, I'm sure.

It's okay - I'll still come here, even with the *sigh* extra click.

I'm not superstitious, but I'm a little stitious.

by lightupthehalo on Mar 25, 2008 3:22 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I like the new format...

and I like the preview. But, for those who do not like previewing, there should be a way to turn it off.

Shopping for a new signature, but ran out of money...

by Downing Rules on Mar 25, 2008 10:21 AM PDT   0 recs

ok, but if someone has preview turned off,

and says something stupid, we ban them.

john RIP samo

by angels4adam on Mar 25, 2008 2:41 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Looks like you are walking the line

j/k

Sea-at-ha-ha-ha that's funny.

by hauldog on Mar 25, 2008 2:59 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I like the new format as well

but I miss the link to view all the open polls. It was nice to be able to click on one link to view them, and go into the post to then see if i want to vote

Pain heals, Chicks dig scars, Glory lasts Forever!

by billhune on Mar 25, 2008 10:38 AM PDT   0 recs

really good feedback

thanks for taking the time to write out your input, especially the suggestions

I'm one of the guys that built the new SB Nation

by clockwerks on Mar 25, 2008 12:35 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Here's a request:

I often leave the game thread open in a tab in Safari for the duration of the game. I'll read, post, whatever...then have to look away for a few minutes to do something constructive, then come back and read, post, whatever again.

When I come back, it's often difficult to distinguish the posts that are new since looking away because the posts that were new when I first opened the thread, that have already been read, are still highlighted yellow. I'd like to see the yellow highlighted posts return to the normal white background reserved for "old" posts after a certain amount of time. Maybe after 5 minutes, those posts highlighted yellow as "new" revert to plain white, or "old" so I'm not re-reading stuff attempting to find the truly "new" dialogue.

Make sense? Other than that I'm pleased with the new format.

We'll be fine.

by ReggieBullits on Mar 25, 2008 1:49 PM PDT   0 recs

just hit z..

it'll scroll through the new comments AND unmark the read comments for you..

Here's to another season of baseball! Angels in '08!

by b0rd3rline on Mar 25, 2008 2:33 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

That'll work

Thanks.

We'll be fine.

by ReggieBullits on Mar 25, 2008 2:36 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm still learning

I did not even know that!!!!
For everyone who complains about too many whistles and bells there is a whistle or a bell that is useful!

by Rev Halofan on Mar 25, 2008 2:41 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

glad i could help..

lol.. if you look up, right before the comments start, it shows what keys do what..

Here's to another season of baseball! Angels in '08!

by b0rd3rline on Mar 25, 2008 2:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

c'mon rev!

z is sweet!

john RIP samo

by angels4adam on Mar 25, 2008 2:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

z is the best...

i liked c at first, but fell more into love with Z...

Shopping for a new signature, but ran out of money...

by Downing Rules on Mar 25, 2008 3:07 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yessssssss

"Z" lml rocks lml

by eyespy on Mar 25, 2008 7:36 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Thoughts on the new site

Pros:

  • Like the auto-refresh on new comments. This is, to me, the best feature of the new site (however see below)
  • Avatars make it a lot easier to figure out who's saying what on the threads. That's working out better than I thought it would. An option to disable them would be welcome.
  • Posting sidebar consistency. Before, you would get a blank sidebar after posting a comment. Now, everything is the same. That's good.

    Cons:

  • Constant whole-page refreshes make large gameday threads very CPU-intensive. This can be very annoying if you're trying to do actual work in another window. :-) It would be useful if there were a third option for auto-refresh, something like "auto refresh: yes/no/let me know when there are new comments and I can request a page refresh at that time". That way, I can expect my browser will be cogitating on a heavy page download.
  • I agree with Jane Doe upthread that there's a lot of visual clutter in the new site; it's part of the Perl philosophy that There's More Than One Way To Do It. It doesn't bother me as much as it does her, but I agree that unfortunately, this leads to a very messy site.
  • When you edit My Profile, why does it bounce you to My Dashboard? The user didn't ask to be sent there.

    Also -- thanks for the comment about 'z' upthread. Very useful.
  • Witty .sig goes here.

    by scareduck on Mar 25, 2008 4:26 PM PDT   0 recs

    Constant whole-page refreshes make large gameday threads very CPU-intensive. This can be very annoying if you're trying to do actual work in another window. :-) It would be useful if there were a third option for auto-refresh, something like "auto refresh: yes/no/let me know when there are new comments and I can request a page refresh at that time". That way, I can expect my browser will be cogitating on a heavy page download.

    There are no whole page refreshes, the new SBN system uses AJAX to get the new comments in the backgrounds and dynamically updates the page with new comments without a refresh.

    by foxpaw on Mar 25, 2008 5:19 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

    Huh

    It sure runs like it's doing a whole-page update. I mean, the browser locks up. Seriously.

    Witty .sig goes here.

    by scareduck on Mar 25, 2008 8:24 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

    Solution

    Keep the new format for those who like shiny things and have a low bandwidth alternative for those with iphones or live in a place with limited access to good internet.

    I brought sexy back, but they only gave me store credit....

    by PhiSlamma on Mar 25, 2008 4:33 PM PDT   0 recs

    BIG PROBLEM THERE

    It is not the tech that prohibits that, it is the nature of message boards - imagine a dickhead Mariner troll says some incendiary shit, everyone lashes out and then the guy quickly goes in and edits his post to make all of the responders look like complete idiots - an edit-post button is a troll's dream and a community's nightmare.

    by Rev Halofan on Mar 25, 2008 5:55 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

    Oh yeah.

    And the real reason here ;P

    Chart it up! Game on!

    by scottnak on Mar 25, 2008 5:55 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

    Oh (+ again)

    Love the "New Comments" pop up thing.
    Soo in love with that.

    Chart it up! Game on!

    by scottnak on Mar 25, 2008 5:56 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

    That...

    would make my life slightly harder, as I'd need to check for dirty cheaters in the game. And I don't want to waste anymore time.

    And that's what the preview button is for ;)

    Chart it up! Game on!

    by scottnak on Mar 25, 2008 5:55 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

    Bug Report during "Post a comment"

    if you type your own LINKS into a post manually writing the HTML code, when you preview or post, the finished link is changed to the thread in which you are posting instead of the intended link destination... meaning, I type < a href = "link" > fake link here < / a > manually. Click preview, mouse over the link in the preview and it says that the hyperlink properties are the page of the thread, not the intended link.

    If you use the link ICON within the "post a comment" editor, it links it just fine.

    Shopping for a new signature, but ran out of money...

    by Downing Rules on Mar 25, 2008 5:55 PM PDT   0 recs

    lost this post while posting

    Every picture loaded is firewalled and then the anti-virus program checks it. There is an additional layer of security in Firefox.

    If you dont use the firewall, the anti-virus and Firefox, you still have the problem of which image loads the slowest. If web pages were simply text and images resided within the web page, then you would eliminate part of the bottleneck.

    However, you have to evaluate the time spent in each process and the network error rate per packet. This is not a simple point at this and blame that.

    The way to figure this out technically is to start a program which measures time starting from the moment the web page is requested and tracks each part of the processing along the way.

    There is always a trade-off in every user application. One is how secure do you want your environment to be. Spyware blockers, anti-virus programs, firewalls, poorly written Java or XML code both on the server platform and on the client PC are just some of the issues.

    However, one of the major bottlenecks is always the packet error rate. The packets generated by the server may receive negative acknowledgments and have to resend. If the page has multiple servers sending pictures, ads and numerous other error prone processes, then the page can not complete loading.

    So sure moving from platform-a to platform-b can be a learning experience. It's like making a good meatloaf. Put it in the oven for too long and it comes out hard and not juicy. To get a technician to pinpoint the source of the bottleneck is time consuming and expensive. You can't just lower the time and temperature in the oven. You have to identify ALL the elements that currently exist in this computing process vs. those that previously existed and report.

    Now whether one can do anything about it, assuming the owner of this venture is willing to pay, is a different story.

    I'm Hudd! Goodbye Phys!

    by Hudd on Mar 25, 2008 9:15 PM PDT   0 recs

    Wider!

    In case nobody has noticed they added a new option to make the layout wider. It's in the first box on the left sidebar of the main page, or the first box of the right sidebar when reading a post.

    That said, clockwerks if you're still checking up on this thread, I noticed that if I click the Wide link before the page has finished loading it will revert back to Narrow when it's done.

    by foxpaw on Mar 26, 2008 9:42 AM PDT   0 recs

    ok, we'll check that out, thanks

    I'm one of the guys that built the new SB Nation

    by clockwerks on Mar 26, 2008 12:20 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

    Click the words not the picture

    That worked for me. It has never gone back to narrow.

    Sea-at-ha-ha-ha that's funny.

    by hauldog on Mar 26, 2008 2:56 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

    firefox works fine for me at home

    a second longer but no problems. At work, it is probably at about 5-7 seconds.

    by ladybug on Mar 26, 2008 11:22 PM PDT   0 recs

    Would it be possible

    to make the main page reload automatically as well?

    Also, I think it would be cool if the 'z' button worked on the main page as well, telling us what stories or posts have new comments it them so we don't have to scroll through the entire page.

    Just some thoughts.

    john RIP samo

    by angels4adam on Mar 27, 2008 6:25 PM PDT   0 recs

    Hey!

    An actual "post" button in addition to the "preview" button in comments?! Thanks for listening and adjusting accordingly!

    I'm not superstitious, but I'm a little stitious.

    by lightupthehalo on Mar 31, 2008 10:35 AM PDT   0 recs

    Fanshots

    Can you make the new posts on these bold. It is really hard to tell if I have read them or not. The "new" is light and does not stand out like it does in the fan posts.

    Thanks

    Sea-at-ha-ha-ha that's funny.

    by hauldog on Mar 31, 2008 10:56 AM PDT   0 recs

    new format sucks

    the new format is way too cluttered the old format was way better

    legen... wait for it... dary

    by thebigA on Mar 31, 2008 9:41 PM PDT   0 recs

    Comments For This Post Are Closed


    User Tools

    The 59th Most Valuable Sports Blog on Earth. Boo-YAH!

    FanPosts

    Community blog posts and discussion.

    Recommended FanPosts

    Small
    Angels to hold off on Tex...for now

    Recent FanPosts

    Small
    Mike Mussina to Retire. Hall of Famer?
    2439_small
    Teixeira
    Tsjpg_small
    Mariners found their man
    Wvufieldrush_small
    Excuse me while I puke
    Small
    Brandon Wood Gets Cut..