Frankie is going to opt for Free-Agency!
Well, K-Rod came out and said what we all thought he would - that he will opt to test the free agency waters this winter.
He will NOT try to reach a deal with the Halos on an extension and his quote is a little pissy...

"I'm going to go out there and explore the market," Rodriguez said. "They had six years. They didn't get anything done with me.
Because he has so many saves this year, he is going to get a HUGE contract for 2009-2013. But, one reason he has so many saves this season has as much to do with the pathetic offense of the Angels as it does with K-Rod's performance.
In fact, his K/9 rate is down to about 9.0. It is usually in the 11.5-12.5 range. Also, his walk rate is up a bit too. He has walked nearly as many batters this season (26) in 42 innings as he walked in 2006 (28) in 73 innings.
Batters are getting better at laying off that nasty slider and his continued drop in velocity (down to 92-93 now) has made him more hittable. He will be looking for $15-18 million a year this offseason and will get it - but the trend in his stats is a little worrisome.
He is still really, really good. But his rate stats are going in the wrong direction.
Here is the article...
LA Times article on Frankie becoming a Free Agent
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
2 recs |
131 comments
Comments
where's the "none" option?
$15 million/per is WAY too much to be paying a guy that makes, what, 60-65 appearances throughout the year?
let him walk.
Mike Scioscia: He provides to unlike method of your team member.
by howiestheman on
Jul 14, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
chuch?
Mike Scioscia: He provides to unlike method of your team member.
by howiestheman on
Jul 14, 2008 2:07 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A word usually used at the end of a sentence to express agreement and/or excitement. similar to the word Amen.
"i got 5ive on it"
by Funke5ive on
Jul 14, 2008 2:23 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Urban Dictionary says it best...
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=chuch
I’m gonna holla at one of these fine hunnies. chuch.
by Downing Rules on
Jul 14, 2008 2:48 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hahahaha
Mike Scioscia: He provides to unlike method of your team member.
by howiestheman on
Jul 14, 2008 2:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
urban dictorionary updated
thanks
Mike Scioscia: He provides to unlike method of your team member.
by howiestheman on
Jul 14, 2008 2:48 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
mine 2...
i had never seen it written, but had heard it…i had to look it up. The fact that Snoop Dogg is in the #1 gives the word some serious reckoning.
by Downing Rules on
Jul 14, 2008 2:53 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree...
but – after Cordero gets $14 million per year I expect a younger K-Rod, fresh off a season where he might break the single-season save record will command more…
But, I’m with you – I wouldn’t go over $12 million per year.
by jimmuscomp on
Jul 14, 2008 1:25 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cordero got 11.5 per
Seattle I would like to thank you for sucking. It allows me to get back to my roots: Hating Fremont.
Kobe tell me how my ass tastes
by hauldog on
Jul 14, 2008 3:51 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I realize he may be slipping
Part of me says let him go. But the other part of me says he deserves it. I trust Reagins…
by Los Angeles de Anaheim on
Jul 14, 2008 1:19 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Me too.
And the great thing about being fans is that we get to bitch no matter what happens!
by Higz on
Jul 14, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He deserves it
and he’ll get it. Lets just hope we aren’t the ones paying it.
by HungryHunter on
Jul 14, 2008 4:00 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, you offer him whatever you can and offer arbitration
then let him do whatever he’s going to do. But at least this time we can be sure we get a draft pick.
However, Frankie didn’t say he’ll automatically go to the highest bidder. It may depend on what teams want to pick him up. I can’t imagine that K-Rod would want to play for someone other than a winner. We’ll have to see what happens.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 1:32 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
He's a poor kid from the slums of Caracas
Damn straight he goes to the highest bidder. This is his best opportunity to make hay while the sun shines.
Witty .sig goes here.
by scareduck on
Jul 14, 2008 5:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No sure I agree
I think he is thinking about the all time saves record
Seattle I would like to thank you for sucking. It allows me to get back to my roots: Hating Fremont.
Kobe tell me how my ass tastes
by hauldog on
Jul 14, 2008 5:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not saying we should low-ball him.
I’m saying that given $15 million from us vs $17 million from someplace like San Francisco, he might very well choose to stay here. Poor backgrounds does not make money the end-all be-all. Look at Vlad turning down more money from the Mets to come here.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 6:24 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But didn't the Mets rescind their offer?
I seem to remember the Wilpons got scared of his back injury issues.
Witty .sig goes here.
by scareduck on
Jul 14, 2008 8:19 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think so.
At least not the way I remember Stoneman telling the story. It’s reported in the original Angels site article that the Expos had offered at least $5 million more for him to come back, but I remember at least two other teams, the Orioles and Mets, also having higher offers on the table than we did.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 8:31 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Could be. The other thing is I doubt K-Rod will go to the Yankees since he
wouldn’t be the closer. I’m pretty sure Franky got all he wanted of being a setup guy. Which leaves the Mets and Boston (Going to Boston assumes they still want to convert Papelbon to a starter, which they’d be able to do if they got a proven closer like Franky to come) as likely buyers. The Cubs and Cardinals could also be interested.
*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!
by TheOptimist on
Jul 14, 2008 8:35 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Limey and I covered this pretty thoroughly in a different topic.
The Mets still have Wagner for another season, so they’re out unless they decide to move him somewhere else. The Cubs and Cards are both possibilities, but both also have much cheaper close-to-home options. Other possibilities are Detroit, though they may run out of money first, and after that you only have smaller markets and various teams for whom a closer should not be first priority, but may make it their first priority due to stupidity. This includes the Rangers and Dodgers.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 8:41 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, I could see the Dodgers doing it
It might even be a good enough deal for Frankie to bite, especially if tomorrow’s consultation with the team physician uncovers a substantial injury to Takashi Saito. On the other hand, who pays a lot of money for a closer these days?
Witty .sig goes here.
by scareduck on
Jul 14, 2008 9:28 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well that scared me
cause pretty much all I could think of is the Braves and they only won the 1 WS. Outside of Smoltz of course, they paid him.
by LosAngel on
Jul 15, 2008 1:24 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It maybe argued
If they actually had Smoltz closing for them during their run, they might won a lot more games. It seemed like their closer was either by committee, find a guy from the scrap heap or effective, but eventually mentally fragile Mark Wohlers.
by BBFan1 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:06 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You know the Yankees are going to be in the mix
Rivera is going to retire either this year or next and you know the Yankees are going to want to make a big splash. Having moved Joba from relief to starter there’s no next in line successor for the closer role. Even if they don’t sign Rodriguez, they’re going to definitely drive up the price
by ktrain203 on
Jul 14, 2008 9:14 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Once again: Rivera has 2 more years at $15 million per while putting up career numbers this year.
The Yankees will not be in the mix for anything other than a setup man, and K-Rod doesn’t want to do that.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 9:17 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rivera Retire?
He just signed a new contract and says he wants to pitch in the new Yankee Stadium
Seattle I would like to thank you for sucking. It allows me to get back to my roots: Hating Fremont.
Kobe tell me how my ass tastes
by hauldog on
Jul 15, 2008 9:11 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
if he is going to walk than
we NEED to bring someone up or start grooming someone to fill his shoes!
i think f-rod is a phenomenal closer but he gives me the impression that he is all about himself and not about the team. so lets do him one better and trade his ass for someone, we/reagins would be foolish to let him walk for nothing and he would be foolish to resign this guy for 15 mil per when his numbers are slipping!
frankie for a power bat straight up? what do you think?
by wallispdub1 on
Jul 14, 2008 1:50 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Arredondo = being groomed.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 2:01 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
perfect
so lets trade frankie, now i realize the backlash of letting a guy go that is going to set the all time saves record but he is going to walk and we shouldnt resign him, too much money!
the real test is does the front office have the stones to trade him?
by wallispdub1 on
Jul 14, 2008 2:16 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The picks we get as compensation could turn out to be nearly as good as what we trade him for.
Ok, not quite, but the two picks will be nice. Also, we are all complaining about winning the whole thing NOW. without Frankie, it is doubtful we can do that.
I AM THOR, GOD OF THUNDER. BOW TO MY WILL AND MY HAMMER!
by anaheim angels on
Jul 14, 2008 2:20 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
true
without frankie its doubtful to win it all, but with out our offense running on all cylinders its going to get tough to make it past the first round. i guess its a catch 22, we trade him for a bat and potentially lose the close games in the playoffs or we stick with him and potentially not be able to compete with high powered offenses.
but thats why the front office gets paid the big bucks!
by wallispdub1 on
Jul 14, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Uh...
In case you didn’t notice, while we have a potential future closer who can replace K-Rod, we also still have possession of the best closer in baseball for the moment. Right now thanks to K-Rod, Dondo, and Shields, 9 times out of 10 the opposition gets 6 innings to score, and after that it’s our game.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
umm
i do realize that the back end of our bullpen is an example of how to dominate, and i realize that teams only have 6 or so innings to jump out to the lead. but what im trying to say, probably not clear enough, is that we shouldnt let him go for nothing, he is not going to take any of our offers so lets trade him so we get something in return.
now im not purvey to the way free agency works, do we get something from the team that would pick him up in free agency? or are we just shit out of luck if we dont trade or sign him?
by wallispdub1 on
Jul 14, 2008 2:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
we would get
2 draft picks in next years draft
Howie for MVP!
by angels.vlad27 on
Jul 14, 2008 3:01 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Frankie will mist likely be a Type A Free Agent
so if we don’t resign him I think we’d pick up the 1st round draft pick of the team that signs him and a supplemental round pick.
by TheTypingFiend on
Jul 14, 2008 3:01 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ok
so assuming that its going to be a team in contention, were going to get a low first round draft pick. so were better off trading him.
with that said reagins would be crucified for trading him for anything less than a potential HoFer, but what if we trade him for 3 or so top tier prospects and build up our already strong farm system? just a thought, i’d hate for us to get hosed because this individual, f-rod, is chasing the all important $
by wallispdub1 on
Jul 14, 2008 3:29 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Could do
but assuming the team doesn’t sign any Type A Free Agents of their own we keep or own 1st Round Pick (Probably Low) get an Additional 1st Rounder and a Supplemental Rounder, plus we kept Frankie through the postseason, where he already has experience and helps us hold onto wins.
by TheTypingFiend on
Jul 14, 2008 3:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Future value
Frankie is invaluable to the team right now but his future value is uncertain. I can’t imagine going into the playoffs now without him. Do you really want Shields closing for us in Boston?
by HungryHunter on
Jul 14, 2008 4:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I vote for Jarrod Washburn for closer (see 2004 playoff abortion)
by Downing Rules on
Jul 14, 2008 4:22 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Give the guy a break
He only got one pitch in that AB :)
by HungryHunter on
Jul 14, 2008 4:28 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But Washburn is a lefty and David Ortiz is a lefty.
He got him out right? And then we won the World Series again? The lefty vs. lefty matchup always goes in favor of the pitcher. Why do you think Scioscia always sits Kotchman against lefties.
by snowhor on
Jul 14, 2008 4:30 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It was the right move though.
Ortiz, unlike Kotch, hit poorly against lefties. Wash, unlike Oliver, did well against lefties. K-Rod, at that moment, was gassed. He told Mike so on the mound. Our options were- A) Bring in closer Percival in tie game at opponents park. B) Bring in lefty Washburn who could potentially keep pitching in the even of extras.
Wash gave up the homer, but it remained the right call. That happens sometimes. The place where we lost that game was the ump calling Troy Glaus out on a pitch two feet outside with the bases loaded.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 4:39 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think I agree
Look at Ortiz’ stats in walkoff situations…the guy is a monster. He was the perfect player to have up in that situation.
by HungryHunter on
Jul 14, 2008 4:45 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep. The best option might have been just to give him a free pass
even though it put the winning run in scoring position.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 4:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
is this really news
didnt he say this already in march?
by ihearhowie2.0 on
Jul 14, 2008 1:53 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
btw i didnt vote
because id rather have 15 million to spend on offense. I know everyone(most everyone) loves K-Rod, but 15 million for a reliever with such a violent delivery is a bad investment. Has he had health issues? No.
I dont think the difference in production between frankie and shields, arredondo etc. is THAT great. definitely not more than 10% of our payroll great.
by ihearhowie2.0 on
Jul 14, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
woops
meant to say has he had health issues? No, but that doesnt mean theyre not in the future as his body slows down*
by ihearhowie2.0 on
Jul 14, 2008 1:55 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
why
are we so obsessed with th money angle… like its our own we are spending. Yes we should be concerned with the price of gas and other essential items, and yes sports stars do make way too much money, but at this point it’s all monopoly money anyways right?
Lets say that we would be willing to pay 14-15 mill a year for him and the winning ‘bidder” for his services are the Yankees who will pay him 17 million. Are we willing to let him walk over a couple of million? I can understand the releuctance but in the end just pull the trigger.
If all he does is win us 8-10 games more than his replacement closer would do (you figure 40 saves on average for K-Rod and 30 or so from a decent replacement) it is still worth it. What would we win the division by 3-4 games?
Suck it up, pay him the money hope he gives us a hometown discount and realize that it is our penalty for not locking him up last year for probably 4 years and 55 mil
Relax... Everything is fine
by Sinatrasratpack on
Jul 14, 2008 2:11 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok
For all the people who say “Its not my money” go ahead and just imagine that the question is a hypothetical “If you were the GM, would you…” You’re right, it isn’t your money…but it also isn’t your decision anyway, so its all hypothetical.
by HungryHunter on
Jul 14, 2008 4:06 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am willing to pay 4 years at 15 MM per.
Anything higher seems excesive. He averages 76 innings a year (excluding his rookie year and this one). 15 million is still alot. That is pretty much paying him 67,500 dollars per out he makes. Yes, it is during the most critical part of the game and his performance is the difference between a win and a loss.
IF K-rod leaves (just because he is going to test FA, doesnt mean that he will leave the angels) then we need to get another reliever. The only teams that theoritically have the funds to sign him are:
Cubs, Boston, Tampa, St Louis, NYM, Yankees, Texas, Detroit, Atlanta, Houston.
Not all of them are reasonable though. Immediately, the cubs, boston and yankees are pretty much eliminated since they already have closers. Tampa i would think would want to keep their payroll low, and probably would not make a serious effort, especially with the much cheaper Percival on their roster. Texas needs starting pitching more than relief, and they will probably need to severely overpay to add it. Detroit has bigger holes to fill, and they have Zumaya. Same with the Mets, they need other positions besides closer, and wont spend all their money on one player. Atlanta and Houston might be options, but i doubt frankie would go there, since they dont have great teams. That really just leaves St. Louis. Unless the management really convinces Frankie though, it would be a longshot for him to go there. A dark horse suitor might be cleveland though. They have a relatively low payroll, and could use a closer.
The only teams i think that would consider signing him are the Rays, Cards, and Indians. Maybe the Diamondbacks, but they have a decent closer already.
What is nice for is that not only will frankies 10 MM dollars come of the books, but so will GAs 12 MM and Garlands 12MM. Thats 34 million right there. If we can somehow pull of a trade of GMJ and only eat say 1/3 of his salary then thats another 7 MM a year. That means we could be going into the offseason minus 40 million dollars. What should we do with it? According to the Revs fanpost last year http://www.halosheaven.com/story/2007/10/10/33034/101 we have some time before we are going to go to arb with kotch, kendrick, etc.. (2011 and 2012). We could sign Frankie for a 3 year contract (09-12) and when the contract runs out, let him walk, pick up the draft picks, and free up cap to resign our core long term. Also, Lackey will need to be resigned after next year. Im thinking hell probably get about 4 years 60 million or so. Vlad will probably get alot cheaper after next season as well. Basically, we can afford to sign K-Rod without killing our entire cap (it would help if we could dump GMJ). But again, if we let Garland walk, then we would need another SP until the ASB when kelvim returns. I think that Moseley/ Adenhart/ Green hsould be able to get the job done.
But another real question is, “Could frankie be the first HOF player that could conceivably go in with the Angels logo?” How much is that worth to the angels? 15 MM sounds alot more reasonable now…
I AM THOR, GOD OF THUNDER. BOW TO MY WILL AND MY HAMMER!
by anaheim angels on
Jul 14, 2008 2:13 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hall of Fame
That’s were I think Frankie’s real value to the organization lies.
It just depends how much Arte and Tony are willing to pay for that.
by TheTypingFiend on
Jul 14, 2008 2:25 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Vlad
will be the 1st Angel HOFer
Go Angels!
by Four Ts on
Jul 14, 2008 3:48 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He better play here for awhile than
Seattle I would like to thank you for sucking. It allows me to get back to my roots: Hating Fremont.
Kobe tell me how my ass tastes
by hauldog on
Jul 14, 2008 3:50 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, but K-Rod would be the first one actually produced by the Angels system.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 4:32 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What about Percy
if he ever retires permanently?
And do you think the Kingfish has a chance?
Angels fan since '67
by red floyd on
Jul 14, 2008 6:25 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Percy- Outside shot if he can keep it going for a few more years.
Kingfish- I freaking wish, but no. Came out of the steroid era with 299 homers, no All-Star Appearances, and no hardware other than ROTY and a ring.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 7:51 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't forget his Silver Slugger and Comeback of the Year
Gather around, children, for the Legend of Mighty Kirk McCaskill
by HaloDutch on
Jul 15, 2008 11:54 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lackey
will sign for more than 4 years $15 million per. Look at Zito - the bidding might start there. Think along the lines of 6 years $20 million per.
by jimmuscomp on
Jul 14, 2008 2:45 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
look what happened to Zito, his contract hurt pitchers in general.
Because now absolutely nobody wants to be stuck with him
I AM THOR, GOD OF THUNDER. BOW TO MY WILL AND MY HAMMER!
by anaheim angels on
Jul 14, 2008 2:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I like this
good post
Relax... Everything is fine
by Sinatrasratpack on
Jul 14, 2008 2:53 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok, according to http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2005/01/los-angeles-angels-of-anaheim.html
the angels current payroll is 120 MM. Factor in these changes for next year
torii 1.5
vlad 0.5
GA -11
Garland -12
K-Rod -10
Kelvim 0.5
GMJ 1
Lackey 2
Figgins -4.75
Shields 0.75
Speier 0.5
Juan -2.025
Oliver 0.5
Quinlan 0.35
Morales 0.075
I didnt factor in Arbitration because im not sure who is eligible exactly and for how much. So im gonna add 5 mil to the total. Now say we resign figgy for about 8 Million a year. Also add in 15 mil for Frankie. That would leave us with a roster of…
C-Naps/Mathis
1B-Kotch, Kendry
2B-Howie
SS-Aybar, Izturis
3B-Figgy, Q
OF-Reggie, Torii, Vlad, GMJ.
SP- Lackey, Saunders, Santana, Weaver (Escobar?)
RP- O’day/Bulger/Bootcheck/AAA guy, Oliver, Speier, Dondo, Shields, Frankie.
Im confident that Moseley/Adenhart/Green will be able to be a servicable 5th starter until Escobar comes back. Now we still have alot of OFers, so lets hope we can somehow get GMJ to waiver his NTC and trade him while only paying about 3 MM of his salary a year. That would leave us a salary of 100 Million dollars (i feel like doctor evil). We have plenty of options here. We can make a run at Adam Dunn or other big bats. We could also resign Juan (i think about 6 Mil a year should do it, right?). Lets say we resign Juan for 6 Million, we have a payroll of 114 Mil even with frankies contract. Now we would have the funds to lock up our core (Kotch, Kendrick, Weaver, Saunders, Santana). And if we ever feel pressed for funds, we could flip K-Rod to the yankees, who would love to have him (after Rivera retires of course, in a season or two). We would have this team…
Lineup
3B-Figgins
2B-Howie
1B-Kotch
RF/DH- Vlad
CF-Torii
LF- Juan/Reggie
DH/Of- Kendry
C- Napoli/Mathis
SS- Aybar/Izturis (obviously with changes to the lineup depending who is in, and Wood and S-Rod)
and a rotation of…
Lackey, Saunders, Santana, Weaver, Moseley/Adenhary/Green until Escobar is ready
RP- O’Day/Bulger/Boot, Speier, Oliver, Shields, Arredondo, Frankie.
When Arredondo is ready, we trade Frankie for prospects.
We also have the money to pay Lackey’s salary (whatever it be)
I AM THOR, GOD OF THUNDER. BOW TO MY WILL AND MY HAMMER!
by anaheim angels on
Jul 14, 2008 3:05 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You spaceless posts are giving me epilepsy.
by 44FAN on
Jul 14, 2008 3:09 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sorry.
Ill use
spaces from now
on.
I AM THOR, GOD OF THUNDER. BOW TO MY WILL AND MY HAMMER!
by anaheim angels on
Jul 14, 2008 3:16 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Frankie would like you to be the accountant...
in the negotiations, though! ;)
by Downing Rules on
Jul 14, 2008 3:07 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no big deal.
42% feel his post-save antics are lame anyways.
load the spaceship with the rocket fuel... load it with the warriors...
by gdog009 on
Jul 14, 2008 3:48 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I seriously don't understand most of you people
Here you have the best closer in team history, a guy who is most likely of anyone to be a career-Angel Hall of Famer, who is still pitching very effectively, is still very young, and has developed a wicked change-up this year while reducing the stress in his mechanics (and weathering an initial rough patch because of it) ... and you all want to quibble over the difference between $14 million and $17 million year?
I will bookmark this thread, like I did when lots at this site whined like curs when we traded the immortal Jose Molina, and will shame you this time next year if the unlikely happens and we don’t sign Frankie to the most expensive closer contract in history.
Here’s the news—Over the past half-decade, Arte’s valuation has more than doubled, revenues have come close (I think), yet payroll is absolutely flat in inflation-adjusted terms. WE HAVE MONEY TO PAY LEGITIMATE HALL-OF-FAME TALENT. Your Beane-counting is better directed at GMJ signings than trying to hold onto the best reliever this franchise will likely ever see.
by mattwelch on
Jul 14, 2008 4:12 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree wholeheartedly with you. I just hope we can offset some of the salary with a trade
of GMJ
I AM THOR, GOD OF THUNDER. BOW TO MY WILL AND MY HAMMER!
by anaheim angels on
Jul 14, 2008 4:24 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought in a previous poll...
it was overwhelmingly shown that HH’ers are voting in favor of “show Frankie the money.” Myself included. Not sure what you mean by “most” in your title. We want this guy closing out games for the Los Angeles Angels for the next several years all the way to a trip to Cooperstown.
by Downing Rules on
Jul 14, 2008 4:26 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Angels fans
Have a bias against K-Rod, because of what they perceive as his attitude. They don’t like the mound antics, they don’t like the posturing [which maybe just his true, justified feelings about his situation] and it has become a self-fulfilling prophecy for K-Rod to leave and go to the Yankees for some big contract.
I have no problems with Scot Shields closing in 2008 [though he might not be suited for the role] and Jose Arredondo being groomed for another season to be the eventual closer, but fans’ emotion against K-Rod aside, the Angels will be taking a big hit if they let K-Rod walk.
by BBFan1 on
Jul 14, 2008 9:08 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't disagree with yoyur sentiments, but
I’m assuming money is a limited resource. If given the choice, I would rather give an extension to Lackey and tie him down for another 4-5 years than spend it on Frankie. If we can afford both, then great.
GA GA he's the man, if he can't do it, no one can
by Moondoggy on
Jul 15, 2008 8:06 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lackey is not even a consideration here
Lackey is the ace of the staff and he will get his. Do you think the Angels will let him walk, short of just being ineffective, beating up Mike Scioscia in an argument, et al. Unwittingly, he is the face of the franchise as far as anyone who follows the Angels are concerned.
It isn’t a matter of not being able to resign one or the other.
Money is a limited resource, but do you really think we are operating at the same constraints as the Florida Marlins or Oakland A’s? If the Angels let K-Rod go, they should let him go because they feel they have legitimate options to step up in place, not because they just couldn’t or wouldn’t pay him the market value [and probably a little bit more] for a closer.
For every player on the team, fans want to take care of, why is K-Rod the guy we have to screw over?
by BBFan1 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:17 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How come MW always has to be the voice of reason around here?
you can’t please all the folks all the time!
Frankie is Frankie and he is ours for the time being! Enjoy the ride while it lasts and trust Reagins/Arte and staff to make the right decision!
This is BAD Vlad and his band of wimps! (can't change it now, cuz the last time I did...he started sucking again!)
by K3YEROUT on
Jul 15, 2008 9:52 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Because it's more fun being irreverent than reasonable.
Especially when you have to keep repeating all the facts every three months or so to inform newbies and remind the irrational of all the facts.
Matt has the patience for being reasonable, consistently, here at HH. My excuse is that I, being the old fart that I am, tire easily.
by Stirrups on
Jul 15, 2008 11:39 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did you hear that Frankie is opting for free agency?
by Downing Rules on
Jul 15, 2008 12:26 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why are you harrasing old people?
This man had Paul Schaals card in his stingray spokes. How dare you.
Angel Pitching, Angel Defense - get past that.
by vladtheimpaler on
Jul 16, 2008 4:27 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
pay the man
When we are old, we may all have to buy pacemakers sooner than other teams’ fans, but at least we’ll have World Championships. Frankie is the best in the game right now, and I think he will continue to be for the next 3-5 years.
by yeswecan on
Jul 14, 2008 6:01 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
so closers win championships?
Mike Scioscia: He provides to unlike method of your team member.
by howiestheman on
Jul 14, 2008 7:07 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nah, they keep you from losing them at the last minute.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 7:26 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
See Robb Nen
Pay Frankie—the impact to the payroll won’t affect your or my day to day livelihood. Get pissed about high gas prices, but don’t fret if Arte has to shell out an extra $2 million per year for a top quality closer, antics be damned.
by Big Easy Halofan on
Jul 14, 2008 7:43 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no, but i don't think you can win one without one
We Angels fans are pretty spoiled—we’ve got the best closer in the game, performing at his peak, showing no signs of injury or other risks to his performance, and yet alot of folks around here are happy to let him go. Who is going to replace him? Nobody on the market can compare, and neither can anyone on this team. Making a 9-inning game one inning shorter is a HUGE advantage.
by yeswecan on
Jul 14, 2008 9:29 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But...
he IS showing signs of risk to his performance. His K/9 and BB/9 are going in the wrong direction. He is losing velocity and putting on more baserunners than he has in the past. Those are not imaginary stats – they are real.
by jimmuscomp on
Jul 14, 2008 9:35 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Mostly throwbacks to his ankel problem in April though.
His fastball is back up, and so are his K’s. Since May 1, he has 32 Ks to 17 BBs in 30.1 IP. Since June 1 he has 20 Ks, 10 BB in 18 IP. The main thing is that his slugging is down, and that’s because he’s allowing lefties to hit the changeup and roll over it rather than trying to strike them out. That’s helping his ERA stay down.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 10:39 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
having one
makes the post season a little more successful. compare Atlanta w/ NYY
GA GA he's the man, if he can't do it, no one can
by Moondoggy on
Jul 15, 2008 8:07 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
TRADE CHIT
Send him to Milwaukee and see what premium outfield talent they can get for him.
Witty .sig goes here.
by scareduck on
Jul 14, 2008 8:21 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If all Cleveland got for CC Sabathia was Matt LaPorta, what makes you think we'll get something better or more immediately usefull?
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 8:35 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not so worried about "immediately useful"
And maybe not necessarily Milwaukee (though they would have the most interesting pieces), but you get the idea.
Witty .sig goes here.
by scareduck on
Jul 14, 2008 9:25 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Are you kidding me?
Then our bullpen will suck.
Seattle I would like to thank you for sucking. It allows me to get back to my roots: Hating Fremont.
Kobe tell me how my ass tastes
by hauldog on
Jul 15, 2008 9:13 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No one's addressing
My biggest issue with no pursuing K-Rod in the off-season is how it will affect the rest of the pen. You CAN’T just throw in Bulger or Thompson or count on Speier figuring shit out. Losing K-Rod forces Shields, a great setup man that can go two innings and pitch four times a week, into the closing spot. We lose one inning in a close game right there. That means Arredondo’s going two. But let’s say he pitched two last night, and we need 7th, 8th and 9th locked up tonight. Arredondo 8th, Shields 9th. Who’s pitching the 7th?
The loss of K-Rod has a domino affect on the rest of the pen which, from what I’ve skimmed, isn’t being taken into consideration. So I’m with Welch. Sign the fuck.
by Sethy on
Jul 14, 2008 9:55 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Arredondo takes closer, not Shields.
Bulger’s looking about as good as you possibly can in AAA with a 0.64 ERA in 28.1 innings with 48 Ks to 12 walks and a 1.02 WHIP. He’s probably ready for some prime time.
But me? I want to resign K-Rod. I love everything about the guy.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 14, 2008 10:48 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What part of this story don't you understand
The Angels HAVE TRIED to sign him many times! He keeps rejecting the offers. He doesnt want to play for us anymore!
Write to the Angels front office. Get Tim Salmon's number 15 retired!
by KingF15h on
Jul 15, 2008 5:52 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Angels really didn't try.
He wouldn’t mind playing for us, I think, but he wants to see what his options are.
~Till the Halo burns out...
by Zu Long on
Jul 15, 2008 11:07 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Then we tie him down and beat him
until he gives in.
Angel Pitching, Angel Defense - get past that.
by vladtheimpaler on
Jul 16, 2008 4:31 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Anyone bring up Escobar?
Will he be healthy by next season? He could be in the running for closer. Or, others have mentioned splitting the role between Dondo and Shields, or maybe Dondo and a healthy Escobar.
I swear, if one more person tells me to "work smarter, not harder"...
by Rally Manatee on
Jul 14, 2008 10:59 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
ive been thinking the same thing
about maybe having escobar going back to closing out games if his arm cant take being a starter anymore
Casey Kotchman For President
by Sorbo182 on
Jul 15, 2008 4:03 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The cynic in me says Escobar's arm is done
And that is treading into the waters of a realistic perspective. Given his track record with injury, I sure as hell wouldn’t feel comfortable expecting him to take over closer duties.
by Big Easy Halofan on
Jul 15, 2008 7:43 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep. I agree.
Escobar might return in 12 months – but he won’t be anything like what we are used to seeing. If he returns to form, it will be in 2010 – after 18 months. Returning to full strength in 12 months with a labrum tear doesn’t happen as far as I can tell/remember.
by jimmuscomp on
Jul 15, 2008 9:32 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Il est fini
in my opinion…he’ll never be the same. (Crow happily served here, if I am proved wrong)
by Downing Rules on
Jul 15, 2008 12:28 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sign him
I’m with Matt.
K-brothers rule! (Kendrick & Kotch)
by halofan91 on
Jul 14, 2008 10:59 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Arredondo
This maybe a little stereotypical, but to me Arredondo still has the potential of being an emotional gascan with a 10 cent head. There will be a learning curve he has to go through and for those who want him to close as soon as next year, will not like what they see.
K-Rod had the stuff and the mentality the moment he stepped on a Major League mound.
by BBFan1 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:25 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
How has Arredondo been different?
He has been nails. His stuff isn’t what Frankie’s was in 2002, but I’ve NEVER seen stuff like that. The one exception might be early Doc Gooden. His curve was probably as devastating as Frankie’s slider and their fastballs were similar at that point in time.
by jimmuscomp on
Jul 15, 2008 9:31 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
From Heyman today
It’s hard to believe the Angels have let K-Rod get to within months of free agency. “It’s something I can’t control,’’ Francisco Rodriguez said. He didn’t sound all that disappointed, however. “The market’s going to change. Every year it goes higher and higher,’’ he said. One baseball exec predicted that K-Rod would get $15 million a year. “He’s better than Rivera,’’ that exec opined. I’m not sure that’s possible (even K-Rod wouldn’t agree—“I have a lot of work to do to be compared with him,’’ he said), but he’s pretty good.
Seems pretty humble to me…....................................................................................
Seattle I would like to thank you for sucking. It allows me to get back to my roots: Hating Fremont.
Kobe tell me how my ass tastes
by hauldog on
Jul 15, 2008 10:20 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
16+ million reasons to be humble.
by Downing Rules on
Jul 15, 2008 12:30 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was referencing his comments about Rivera
Since when is acquiring your market value a sign of hubris?
I am sure you requested to be paid below market at work so you could consider yourself humble?
Seattle I would like to thank you for sucking. It allows me to get back to my roots: Hating Fremont.
Kobe tell me how my ass tastes
by hauldog on
Jul 15, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
wasn't expecting a reply.
you won…next.
by Downing Rules on
Jul 15, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This is the part of pro sports that kills me
There is no such thing as team loyalty anymore. It’s all about the money. It makes me sick. These over-grown babies should just shut up and be happy they get paid as much as they do. There are people out there working A LOT harder making A LOT less!
Write to the Angels front office. Get Tim Salmon's number 15 retired!
by KingF15h on
Jul 15, 2008 4:49 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Think before you post.
Why should we expect team loyalty to exist when player loyalty doesn’t?
by Higz on
Jul 15, 2008 5:02 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I meant a player's loyalty for a team
Sorry
Write to the Angels front office. Get Tim Salmon's number 15 retired!
by KingF15h on
Jul 15, 2008 5:48 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah I know.
Let me rephrase.
Why would you expect a player to be loyal to any particular team when teams are not loyal to players?
by Higz on
Jul 15, 2008 6:04 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
good point
It still upsets me
Write to the Angels front office. Get Tim Salmon's number 15 retired!
by KingF15h on
Jul 15, 2008 6:13 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Professional teams
Only care about performance…loyalty is just a card to play for show on both sides.
by BBFan1 on
Jul 15, 2008 5:04 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It doesn't make you sick enough to rid yourself of MLB's product.
So long as people keep being fans, MLB revenue will allow players to make as much as they do.
by snowhor on
Jul 15, 2008 5:11 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've thought about stopping my support
One person tuning out wont matter
Write to the Angels front office. Get Tim Salmon's number 15 retired!
by KingF15h on
Jul 15, 2008 5:50 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs















