Halos Heaven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: The Nova Blog for Villanova Fans!

More Valuable:K-Rod or Tex?

It has been a question all year for our halos whether  Fransisco Rodriguez would be resigned. Now another dilemma is posed:  sign  saves  leader K-rod, or slugger Mark Teixeira? Frankie is on pace to blow past the major league record of saves in a single season and eventually the all-time record. Tex, on the other hand is a likely future hall-of-famer coming into the prime of his career. So, the nice thing would be for both of them to stay in Anaheim, but Rodriguez's fame has gone to his head a little, and Teixeira may be asking for 200+ million. Who do you think is the priority?

 

G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB BB SO SB CS OBP SLG AVG
2008 113 419 73 120 29 0 22 86 215 73 76 1 0 .394 .513 .286
Career 860 3259 537 932 211 13 192 641 1745 418 677 12 3 .374 .535 .286

W L ERA G GS CG SHO SV SVO IP H R ER HR BB SO
2008 1 2 2.40 53 0 0 0 45 49 48.2 33 15 13 4 28 51
Career 22 16 2.38 385 0 0 0 191 221 432.0 284 124 114 34 192 561

Poll
Who should the Angels be more concerned with resigning?
Mark Teixeira
120 votes
Fransisco Rodriguez
9 votes

129 votes | Poll has closed

This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.

0 recs  |  Comment 169 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

let's look at the Tex argument...

Vlad’s career line: .322/.389/.574, avg. 36 HRs 117 RBIs
Tex’s career line: .286/.374/.535, avg. 36 HRs 121 RBIs

basically, your getting the production of 2 Vlads, and one of them is entering his prime. how do you not re-sign him?

i’ve said it before – i know KRod is great, but $15MM/per is ridiculous for a guy who’ll play 70 innings a year (on the HIGH side).

spend a couple million more, and give it to the guy who’ll keep you in games/change games with his bat and glove, and he’ll do it 160 games per year.

Mike Scioscia: He provides to unlike method of your team member.

by howiestheman on Aug 9, 2008 11:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

im not saying it will happen every game

but do you notice how many runs our new look lineup has scored in the past 3 games?

answer: enough to not even need frankie

before U-haul: closer on record breaking pace
with U-haul: (presumably) less save opportunities, hence less value in closer’s role

not saying frankie isnt valuable because we know thats not true, but if youre more willing to commit the money to the closer than the lineup changing slugger, youre doing so almost as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Choose closer over slugger, choose more tight games

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 9, 2008 11:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

very good point...

just like my Yankee fan friend complains that too much $$ invested in A-Rod means less quality pitching.

by Downing Rules on Aug 9, 2008 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They have $87 million coming off the books this year.

Their choice not to try and trade for Santana was based off their overrated pitching prospects, not money.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Our offense took off prior to getting Tex.

K-Rod continued getting saves due to other pitchers blowing up (see 14-11 game). The other pitchers have done less blowing up, ergo, less saves.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This assumes he can continue being an elite-level reliever for at least five more season, probably more.

The decline in his skills (higher walk rate, dropping K rate) suggest that may not be a reliable possibility.

The Hunt for a Red October ...and please keep telling Clutch to chill!

by cardinalwraith on Aug 10, 2008 2:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"decline in his skills" is a bit overstated these days

Frankie changed his mechanics this year, battled through an injury, and basically introduced a new pitch. Without looking, I’d guess the 2nd half of his year has been a helluva lot more Frankie-like than his first. And either way, no one has been hitting him.

by mattwelch on Aug 10, 2008 8:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This argument isn't even close.

Tex will play almost every game during the season.

Frankie will appear in between sixty and seventy games per season, and pitch only one inning per appearance.

Let’s not forget that the closer’s role is an artificial creation of a pretty senseless statistic: the save. The sixth, seventh and eighth innings are more likely to be instrumental in deciding a game’s outcome. Back in the “good old days,” managers used to bring in their relief aces to put out fires and get the team out of jams. This makes sense at face value, right? Bring in your best relief pitcher when the game is most on the line.

Sure the current way works, but the old way was a much more efficient and effective use of relief talent.

The Hunt for a Red October ...and please keep telling Clutch to chill!

by cardinalwraith on Aug 10, 2008 2:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

St. Louis Cardinals

27 Blown Saves this season. Doesn’t seem so meaningless when you cannot get one regularly.

by Rev Halofan on Aug 10, 2008 3:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You assume that all 27 of those blown saves have come during the ninth...

...which isn’t true. This is yet another lame part of the save rule. If a reliever comes into a game (at ANY point in the game, by the way) with his team leading by three runs or less (the much wanked-over save situation), and he allows the tying run to score, he is awarded a blown save. Doesn’t matter if it’s the sixth, seventh, eighth or ninth inning. Hell, it could be as earlier as the fourth or fifth. If you don’t believe me, ask anyone who has played fantasy baseball with Net Saves instead of Saves: middle relievers are just as eligible to be awarded a blown save as closers. And it blows.

So yeah, the Cards’ revolving closer situation with Isringhausen/Franklin/Isringhausen/Perez when TLR feels like it/Isringhausen again… has been pretty nightmarish. But you can’t pin all of the blown saves on their failures in the ninth. At least a few of them lay at the feet of their middle relievers.

I’m still right. The save is an arbitrary and meaningless statistic.

The Hunt for a Red October ...and please keep telling Clutch to chill!

by cardinalwraith on Aug 10, 2008 4:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

arredondo is technically more effective if you go off other stats

only difference is frankie gets a status-pumping stat for doing his job while our other relievers do not.

do i need to point out that the cardinals just won a world series with a rookie closing games? not a future hall of famer?

once again, im not making it sound like frankie is not good at what he does, because he is. Im just saying that new closers arise every single year. This team has shown it has a hard time landing impact, game changing offense. Why let one go that is completely elevating this team to a new level so we can keep a closer who is having a harder time striking guys out and whos command comes and goes.

papelbon came out of nowhere just 2 years ago and is a dominant closer that won a world series. They werent paying him 15 million dollars. We were, though, paying frankie about half of that last season to give up a walk-off to Manny WHEN IT MATTERED ie i dont care about save records. all it was was an indicator that we had good pitching and bad hitting. If youre into meaningless records, by all means keep frankie over teixeira

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

decided to look them up

and not just say arredondo had better stats in certain categories.

First, frankie has 48 innings to Jose’s 37, so I guess take the numbers for what you will if you think thats VERY significant

also, im not trying to say jose is better overall because frankies done it for a hell of a lot longer in bigger situations and i frankly dont believe hes better yet…all im getting at is that good relievers are not only out there, but a homegrown one is on our own roster.

The fact we’ve had both these guys appear through our own system and nobody close to mark teixeira’s total package on offense come through in that same time span is just my way of saying that the bat is clearly harder for the angels to come across and therefore more worthy of efforts to retain in my opinion

F=frankie, A=arredondo (duh)

ERA: 2.40(F), 0.97(A)
ER: 13 (F), 2(A)
Opponents Batting average: .300(F), .255(A)
WHIP: 1.25(F), 0.97(A)
K/9: (F)9.43, (A)7.54
BB/9: 5.18(F), 2.92(A)

So frankie strikes guys out more, which is a huge plus for your closer, but he counteracts it by walking more guys as well. Once again, people have extensive reports on frankie while arredondo is new and still getting figured out…so take it for what its worth

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

youre right, my bad

i read OBA as opponents batting average. Its On Base Average

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank You

I have mentioned before how the save stat is very overrated many of times. Don’t get me wrong I believe you need a solid back of the bullpen, but not at the $$$ F-Rod is talking about. With the BS (blown save) being charged to a pitcher at any time of the game it is tough to really say that the 27 games the Cards have been credited with blowing they had a win all but sewn up. That is crazy talk.

As you mentioned before there is so stupid ways to get credit for a save (Wes Littleton http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BAL/BAL200708221.shtml)

There is a reason that 7 National League teams out of the top 10 list are leading in blown saves. With the lack of DH and pitchers being taken out often there is more chance for error out of the pen.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah...

He got a save for that 30-3 football game, didn’t he.

Angels fan since '67

by red floyd on Aug 10, 2008 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nail Bitter

Saving a 27 run lead because you pitched 3 innings. Thats just another reason the save is a stupid stat in that it can be manipulated so many different ways.

The official scorer shall credit a pitcher with a save when such pitcher meets all four of the following conditions:
(a) He is the finishing pitcher in a game won by his team;
(b) He is not the winning pitcher;
(c) He is credited with at least a third of an inning pitched; and
(d) He satisfies one of the following conditions:
(1) He enters the game with a lead of no more than three runs and pitches for at least one inning;
(2) He enters the game, regardless of the count, with the potential tying run either on base, or at bat or on deck (that is, the potential tying run is either already on base or is one of the first two batters he faces); or
(3) He pitches for at least three innings.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

NO Save

He got the win today!

Whats your point?

Was harder then hell for the club to beat anyone by 3 or more for most of the season. As I said before saving a game is something that is manipulated and not always a true testament to the reason the club won.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

When did I speak of his current season or F-Rod?

I was speaking about the job of a closer in general. Speaking of merit what is yours? Is it just stats and a calculator? Is there any experience Doc?

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just the power of observation, an appreciation for details and a knack for being right.

Played little league, a bit in high school, wasn’t all that good. Plenty of experience in watching baseball and predicting outcomes though. Joe Morgan’s all the proof you need that experience playing the game =/= to knowing what you’re talking about.

As far as when you mentioned K-Rod, I believe this:

Don’t get me wrong I believe you need a solid back of the bullpen, but not at the $$$ F-Rod is talking about.

Was you.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stand by that

Thanks you for the reply back and honesty about your merit in the game.

My point on the solid back of pen is I would not be willing to shell out 15+ mill for a CL. I would look to use it in other ways. I don’t buy into that kind of money being used on a guy that will pitch maybe 70 inn. I believe that there is someone there that can be that solid back of the pen for you right now in Arredondo.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

By the way

was I right about the Doc part?

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope. ^_^

No doctorate. I am but a humble writer by trade and training.

As far as not paying a closer that much money, for me it’s a simple question of production. K-Rod delivers Arredondo may replace him, but with closer, the question of clutch comes into it. Rivera pitches better than K-Rod much of the time, yet K-Rod, at least this season, has been more clutch.

The other problem is who replaces Dondo in the 7th? Bulger looks good, but has yet to do anything in the majors.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Personally

I am not such a big believer in getting only 6 out of a starter. like to think this rotation can give you 6+. If not then they are chasing. As for filling that 7th there is a few guys if you go committee. By that I mean you use according to the situation. I believe you need to make sure you get Oliver signed for the next maybe 2 years. Not to mention you still have Speier for that 7th and Shields for the 8th.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Speier has fallen hard this year.

Ideally, you get more than 6 out of a starter, but in most rotations you do that regularly with two guys, in ours there are three… but that still leaves 2/5ths of your games. Not to mention even our good starters have off games or occasionally don’t get through the 7th.

Oliver is 36 and given the prices that good lefty relievers can command, I’m not sure he sticks around. There are a lot more teams willing to shell out $5 million a year for two years than $15 million for 5 He may actually be a hotter commodity than Franky next season.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Friend

I am good friends with his agent and have golfed with Olly a few times. I know he likes it here in So Cal and that he likes the winning atmosphere as well. If he can get 5 for another 2yrs or maybe 3yrs at 9 the 3rd being option with a buyout he would stay.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and ironically theyre a team that spent big on a closer

yet won a world series with a rookie closing

Also, yanks dont seem to be winning any world series lately with their giant contract Closer even with him arguably being the most dominant this year

Coredero working out really well for the reds too

and wagner blows many a save in NY, not to mention getting hurt

big money to your closer = enormous risk

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

BIg money to anyone = enormous risk.

They also haven’t won and WS since signing Jeter, Giambi, and A-Rod to 200 million-ish contracts. Using your logic, Signing Teixeira would also be the kiss of death.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ya except my logic said closers, not hitters

a batters swing is not as fragile as a pitchers arm and delivery

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Based on what?

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your Kidding right?

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope.

Any studies proving you are more durable as a position player than as a pitcher? Hard evidence?

K-Rod has been significantly healthier than Howie Kendrick, Mike Napoli, Casey Kotchman, and Dallas McPherson over their respective careers.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

HaHa

So you want to compare the defensive and offensive side of the game with someone who plays just one side of it. OK well since F-Rod has pitched a total of just over 430 inn in career which wouldn’t match say Lackeys total in 06 and 07 thats fine. Just hope you realize that is about 48 9inning games he has been involved in as a player.

Considering this point I would say that pitchers become injured more then players when you factor the amount of time they actually play. It is a fact that the overhand throwing is not a natural act, and therefore causes many injuries to the pitcher.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No one said it was fair.

I asked for evidence that Franky is more likely to be injured than Teix. Still waiting.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

Either one could get hit crossing the street. You know as well as I do that there is a greater chance for career ending injury with a pitcher then with a position player. That is the reason you see more years on a contract for position players then you do a pitcher.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A career-ending injury, maybe, but those remain infrequent and are getting more rare

as surgery techniques get better.

Just because teams chose not to do it doesn’t really make it a smarter strategy. And we aren’t talking about similar contract lengths anyway. We’re talking about 4-5 years vs 8-10 years. The point of my original post was that saying the Yankees aren’t doing anything while giving their closer big money isn’t a good argument. The Yankees are giving plenty of guys big money, not just their closer.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pitching

They have none. They blew a big portion on that bust Pavano (BAD SIGN) They had to talk Pettitte into playing and there best guy is Moose. They are awful when it comes to starting pitching. That is the reason they have been unable to get deep into the playoffs like they once did with a young Pettitte and veteran Pitchers with time left on the arm.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They have Joba as well., and their bullpen, outside of their encounter with us

has been pretty good. Wang has been injured this year as well.

Pavano was a bad signing, you are correct there, but the Yanks as we all know can absorb those. The larger problem was their unwillingness to trade overrated prospects Hughes and Kennedy for Johan Santana last season.

I’d agree with Pitching being > hitting though. Last time I checked, K-Rod is the one on the mound, and Teix is the one with the bat. ;-)

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quility SP

You have to be able to get to the later innings with the lead in order to make it matter as to who is closing. The Angels SP is heads and tails better then the Yankees even with Joba and Wang. Hell they were forced into the Joba SP role because of the lack of starting pitchers.

We agree that Lackey needs to be signed right? We also agree that they need to take care of Santana and Saunders as well right? They also need to make sure they take care of some of the other needs on offense. So with those thoughts something has to give. I am more then willing to give on the K-Rod situation and use some $$$ on the above mentioned along with Tex.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

IMO, Top priority this offseason, over Tex and K-Rod, has to be extending Lackey, and 2nd perhaps locking up Kendrick and Santana to contracts equivalent to those given to Longoria/Kazmir by the Rays. I’d really like to see Saunders repeat his success at avoiding linedrives for another season before we wrap him up. If he can do it great. If he can’t his K-Rate is probably too low to maintain his current effectiveness.

K-Rod and Tex are probably 3rd/4th.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sign

Lackey and Kendrick and Santana and I would be happy. I am a solid believer in pitching wins. So thats my concern with the team. You might say F-Rod is a pitcher so whats the deal. Well, I am also a believer that its thwe starting pitching and then defense that will win. Timely hitting is also part of the equation. Just see that guy that start 30 games on the bump play a bigger part in a teams win% then a closer

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, I'm with you there.

Honestly, if we win the WS this year, I’m half-inclined to say let Tex and Franky go, take our four picks, trade Aybar or Figgy for high-level pitching/OF prospects, call up Morales, Wood, and S-Rod and let ‘em play for a season. We’ve got a great chance of still competing with Texas/Oakland for the Division, plus we re-arm and get the kids a full-season to see where they’re at.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ya except thats never going to happen

big market, big payroll teams dont have firesales

it sounds to me like youd be better suited following the As since you seem to despise money, stars and love prospects

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i should have added a ;) there

because it sounded meaner in type than i intended it to sound

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

S'okay.

I’ve made similar statements with similar intent. And I’ve definitely been guilty of occasionally forgetting the smileys. _

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fire sale? Nah.

This would be more like letting Percival, Washburn, Glaus, Bengie and Erstad go to make room for K-Rod, Santana, D-Mac, Kotch and Napoli/Mathis. Hopefully with even better results this time.

As prospects come up, you make room in the pros based on relative cost vs expected production. That’s Angels baseball.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i just have a feeling that...

there are a lot more guys in the league capable of being a closer than being a gold glove, power hitting, switch hitting, position player who seems to have no excess baggage.

"Life is a luminous halo, a semi-transparent envelope surrounding us from the beginning of consciousness to the end."

by NoDakHalo on Aug 11, 2008 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who said K-Rod was the best closer in baseball?

I’m sure we can find a couple of power arms on waivers and fill the closer role in an instant. Is Derrick Turnbow out there? Is Armando Benitez still pitching? Maybe Robb Nen?

by BBFan1 on Aug 11, 2008 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

a lot.

krod wouldn’t even be the best closer on this team. i could probably come up with ten to fifteen guys in the american league who could have done what he’s done this season given his situation. of course that is solely based on this year’s performance, but i’d assume a majority of those guys aren’t going to choke just because they are now the closer for the angels.

"Life is a luminous halo, a semi-transparent envelope surrounding us from the beginning of consciousness to the end."

by NoDakHalo on Aug 12, 2008 1:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ziegler
arredondo
nathan
downs
balfour
rivera
morrow
soria
jenks
papelbon
johnson
carlson
linebrink
bradford
giese

all of these guys have lower era’s than krod, with a minimum of 30 innings pitched. all but bradford have lower WHIPs than krod, while bradford’s is only .02 higher than frankie. i’m not a huge stat head, so i’m not gonna dig too deep into it. it just seems like he’s more replacable, especially since one of those guys is already on our team. some say ‘dondo is too young and inexperienced. i just have a feeling those people weren’t saying the same thing when krod was up and coming.

"Life is a luminous halo, a semi-transparent envelope surrounding us from the beginning of consciousness to the end."

by NoDakHalo on Aug 12, 2008 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ERA means little for a closer.

Clutch is everything. Rivera’s gone head to head with K-Rod and lost TWICE. LOSING games is just as big as blowing saves, and Rivera’s done it more than K-Rod. WXRL has two people over K-Rod, Nathan and Lidge. Over the last 4 years, K-Rod’s lead the league twice, and blows the field away if you add up the scores.

Comparing ERA and saying they could have done the same thing is just not true. The pressure in the 9th is different, and the goal is different. Your job is to 1. Preserve the win, and 2. Not lose the game. Everything else is window dressing for a closer. Right now there are two guys doing it better than K-Rod.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 12, 2008 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

there is no definitive way to measure the stat...

i think a closer is more replaceable than most other positions. nothing i say is going to change krod lovers’ minds, and nothing they say will change my mind. that said, i love having krod as our closer, but this is all about making a choice, and if i had to make one, it’d be tex. i’m a fan of frankie, i like having him there, but i take a power hitting, gold glove, switch hitting first baseman over a solid closer. if we can affort both, i’ll take ‘em.

"Life is a luminous halo, a semi-transparent envelope surrounding us from the beginning of consciousness to the end."

by NoDakHalo on Aug 13, 2008 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you know you love my spelling.

"Life is a luminous halo, a semi-transparent envelope surrounding us from the beginning of consciousness to the end."

by NoDakHalo on Aug 13, 2008 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Closers seem replaceable right up until you find yourself in a position like the Tigers, Mets or Cardinals

right now, where no one in your bullpen, including the closer, seems capable of holding down a lead. Beane’s philosophy is that closers are easy to find. They’ve spent most of the season letting Huston Street close, with fairly disastrous results. Now they’ve handed it over to Ziegler. We’ll see if he lasts in the position.

Closers are easy to find. Guys who top the closer leader-board year-in and year-out are not.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 13, 2008 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bad Example

Why is it you continue to use other teams with no other possible closer in the pen as an example?

The argument is the Angels have someone in the pen that many believe can close games. Fact that you can replace a closer with a cheaper option is very true and been done. Not to mention it would not be the first time it was done by the Angels.

Lee Smith was being paid good money back in 1995 and 96, but the club traded L Smith and handed over the closers role to less expensive Percival in 96 with only 3 career saves and 74 inn under his belt. Remember he was a catcher, and had only 3 years of minor league pitching under his belt. It would go full circle years later when the club wasn’t willing to pay Percival, and went with a cheaper option F-Rod.

As for Street he has been battling injury for most of the year and last. Having neuritis is no easy thing to get past, and he has tried. Iz and Wainwright have been on the DL at times this year, and lets be honest Franklin isn’t a closer and is lucky to still be playing. There was not much reason to think that Iz was done. He saved 32 of 34 last year. Thats why they thought Wainright was available to be a SP.

When you talk about the Tigers they have also battled the injury bug when you talk about the pen. Fernando Rodney has been on the DL most of the year and of course you have Joel Zumaya who suffered injury in the off season and came back in late June only to find himself back on it again. Then you have Jones who is also on the DL right now. So hard to use those guys as an example about replacement.

With the NY Mets I don’t think they ever claimed to have a replacement for Wagner, but they should be looking for one. He has had to be slowed down because of arm problems, and now is on the DL. There has been serious issues with the pen, but thats not because they let the closer walk believing they had a replacement.

If you look at George Sherrill he had a total of less then a 130 inn pitched entering the season and had 4 saves in 8 save opportunities. He currently has 31 out of 37. Guy had not been a closer at any time in his career as a big leaguer yet made the All Star team. We are talking about a guy that wasn’t even drafted out of college, bad scouting I would say . ’ )

None of these teams have taken the approach, or spoke about having someone to replace the current closer. They had closers going into the season, and believed they were fine with the back of the pen.

If you want to argue what happens when Dondo goes down thats fine. I would trust that Shields would fill in nicely until his return. The club will have to do something with the pen should they let Frankie walk. I think Oliver would be a no brainer then. I think he is already, but it would become imperative if Frankie wasn’t signed. Of course a lot of good things going on with Jepsen this year.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 13, 2008 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dondo could blow up next year.

We don’t know what will happen once the league gets a better look at him. I hope he dominates for the rest of his career. But there’s a reason we waited two full seasons before giving K-Rod the job, and only handed it to Percival when Lee got injured in ‘96. That reason is that one season means very little in a reliever—especially when it’s their first year and no one’s got scouting reports on them. Sherrill is a great example. Last year he was a great set-up man, 2.37 ERA, tiny WHIP. This year he’s exploded.

You quote 31-37 like that’s a good thing. That’s an 84% save rate. If we had Sherrill instead of K-Rod, he’d be at least 42 of 50, with god only knows how many losses, and that’s not even considering K-Rod’s higher leverage index. 4 less wins erases our lead over the D-Rays, costing us home field advantage since, as I believe you are aware, they currently have head-to-head over us.. Including blown tie games, it’s probably closer to 5-6 more games in the loss column, with more still to be added in the loss column. There’s a REASON why Sherrill is 61st in WXRL at 1.260. BTW, 4.594 (K-Rod) -1.260 = 3.3 wins. The difference between Kotchman and Teixeira in 2007 was only 2.3 wins according to WARP. And we haven’t even finished the season yet.

Letting K-Rod go gives us, at best, two sub-three ERA pitchers in the back of our bullpen. Maybe that will be enough, and maybe it won’t. But there IS a significant difference between the K-Rods and Sherrills of the world. Just like there is a difference between Shields and your typical set-up man. K-Rod’s been the best in baseball at what he does for the last four years. We MIGHT have the answer in Dondo, whose innings MIGHT be replaceable by Bulger or Loux or Jepson. Oliver might be solid for yet another season despite being on the wrong side of 35. Or they might not. The question is whether the “sure thing” is worth $15 million per year. With the current market, I say hell yes, especially when that gives us Dondo and Shields in the wingman seats.

Obviously, you don’t have to agree. I know the sabr-y stuff isn’t your cup of tea. ;-)

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 13, 2008 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Need to be winning

in the 9th inning for any of this to really matter. I think

that the money is spent wiser when you give it to guys like

Lackey and some others.

Don’t know what Escobar’s deal is with the injury and Garland

is free to walk. So position guys need to be locked up as well.

I don’t buy into the if part of your debate about Sherrill. To

say that he would be like 42-50 with us is not true. That is

not the game of baseball. After all coming into the season he

was just 4 saves out of 8. With your theory or the theory of

SABR he would be 42-71. With your statement about him being

42-50 that throws the thing out of whack. Follow what I mean

Zu? Not so sure I am making myself clear with this or not.

Like I said in the previous post. If you want to say what

happens if Dondo blows up I hear ya. The reply to that would be

“the due theory”. F-Rod is due to blow up. Get where I am

coming from? Your reply might be then we use Dondo but then we

are doing it because we are forced. By the way I don’t think Smith was hurt. He was traded early in the season for C. McElroy because Smith did not like being the setup guy.

Hey on another note hows Aubrey Huff looking? Numbers have been sick since that time I spoke about how the Angels might consider looking into acquiring him.
.339 / .374 / .608 14Dbl 1Trp 10 HR’s 35 RBI’s

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 13, 2008 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty sure I agreed with you on Huff.

Trade Aybar, remember?

Him going 42-50 is what he’d do based on his current blown save %. His save % prior to this was as a setup man, and therefore higher, but immaterial. That it throws off the numbers is the whole point. That’s why Sherrill is a worse closer.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 13, 2008 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 13, 2008 10:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tex.

Next question.

DiSarcina is my co-pilot

by HaloDutch on Aug 10, 2008 2:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Tex all the way

But I’m sure if you asked K-Rod, Tex would be the least valuable player on the Angels. Since Tex’s bat hit the middle of our lineup, how many save opps has Frankie gotten?

Don't call me Desmond

by highlandhalo on Aug 10, 2008 8:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

To wit:

In 9 games with Casey Kotchman starting at 1B post break, we scored 63 runs for an average of 7 RPG. If you include a tenth game against Baltimore where he didn’t start but picked up a pair of ABs, it drops to 6.5 RPG.

In 11 games post-break with Mark Teixeira starting 1B, we’ve scored 73 run for an average of 6.6 RPG.

In 18 games post-break with Juan Rivera as a starter, we’ve scored 129 runs for an average of 7.17 RPG.

In 8 games post-break with GMJ as a starter, we’ve score 42 runs for an average of 5.25 RPG.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 11, 2008 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

???

U-haul will get a bigger contract, by a huge margin.

But the question of who we should resign might be K-Rod.

I think we’re going to lose both, unless we sign one for a deal that is way too long.

by elricsi on Aug 10, 2008 8:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Frankie is the equivalent of

Roger Maris. A few good years catapulting him to the top of the made-for-consumption-statistics game. He is already showing signs of coming apart, and I agree with all before me who have made the point of signing a position player who can play every day rather than a guy who is brought in to ostensibly pitch to batters.

I would say that Shields/Arredondo/Spier could have easily SAVED 50% of the games we handed to Cardiac Frankie.

by SocalAngelFaninOC on Aug 10, 2008 9:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That's an asine statement

The home run had been the game’s singular event (and statistic) for four decades by the time Roger Maris got around to breaking the record. His luck wasn’t that suddenly the stat become popular, but that he turned 26 years old in an expansion year, when a lot of people around his age were putting up crazy numbers. He was a very good player who had two great seasons, one of which was inflated by context, and his career was cut short from injuries.

Frankie has been great since his first inning in the major leagues. Among pitchers throughout the history of the game who’ve thrown more than 200 innings, he has allowed the fewest hits per 9 innings OF ALL F*ING TIME.

I’ll let that sink in.

If allowing 6.1 hits per 9 - his rate this year - is a “sign of coming apart,” then I’ll take more of those, please. (Considering that only two other pitchers - Troy Percival and Jonathan Papelbon - have had careers with a total that low.)

There are valid arguments against Frankie, but denigrating how fantastic he’s been isn’t one of them.

by mattwelch on Aug 10, 2008 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

F-Rod

I am guessing the player that dislikes the Angel trade the most has been F-Rod. I say this because since M. Teixeira was aquired F-Rod has been used just twice. Thats 2 times in 10 games. Prior to that F-Rod had pitched in 52 of the 106 games played. Might have something to do with the Angels being almost a full run better since getting Teixeira.

Just wondering how F-Rod’s WHIP has been Matt? Last time I checked that stat was a huge factor. Have to get on base to score and F-Rod allows a lot of that. Don’t get me wrong he has done well this year, but just don’t think it is wise to drop that kind of $$$ on a closer. Still believe there is already a closer in the system that can excel. All you need to do is look at Bobby Jenks (former Angel) and the 110 saves he has recorded (back to back 40 SV seasons) in less then 4 years already. Hell there is Kevin Gregg (former Angel) who has recorded 58 saves. Both these guys are currently playing in pennant races. Like I said there is a cheaper way to go about recording a save.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I get all that

But there isn’t a cheaper way to get what Frankie has been throughout his career, because unless your name is Mariano Rivera, no one really has been better. If we don’t want to shell out the $5-10 million raise (don’t forget: he’s making $10 mil already), and don’t want to guarantee 4-5 years on a guy with a violent delivery, and don’t want to throw huge money on 75 innings a year, I totally get all of it.

But let’s not pretend Frankie’s talent and results are replaceable, because they’re not. Even in a year with lousy (for him) K/9 & BB/9, he’s still allowing 6 hits per 9, still striking out 9.8 per 9, and will still probably set the save record. We will be worse at the closer spot, while letting a fan favorite and a future Hall of Famer walk.

There are arguments for doing that (which you and I have both mentioned) but those arguments aren’t that there’s a cheaper way to do what Frankie has done. I just want everyone’s eyes open before deciding that Jose Arredondo is the next Mariano Rivera.

by mattwelch on Aug 10, 2008 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wouldn't say..

Jose Arredondo is the next Mariano Rivera, but I will say he is capable of closing games in the bigs just like a few others I have mentioned. Arredondo has electric stuff. Let’s not forget that last years save leader was a guy no longer in the bigs. My point here is it did not effect their chance at the pennant or WS title.

Everyone is replaceable even Frankie Matt. I think it is a little premature to already have Frankie in the Hall. Is Troy Percival a Hall of Famer? If he does what he has been doing for another say 6-8 years on a winning team then he will have a chance.

That leads me to another thing about saves. A closer is only as good as the team he plays on. If they can’t have a lead in the 8th or 9th that guy sits. the fact that the Angels have been so good during the time Frankie has been the closer (just like M.Rivera Yankees) should not be lost. As Frankie sits for 2 plus hours watching his team play he isn’t helping the club score. How good is Frankie on a team like the Giants, Mariners, Nationals etc…

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 5:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Borrowski didn't affect his team's chances?

His team last a 4-3 series where the other team had home-field advantage due to the records being tied. If Borrowski loses just one less game, blows one less save, the Indians have home field instead.

Red Sox averaged nearly 10 runs per game in Boston, vs just 4 runs per game at Jacobs field that series.

I’d say he cost his team a lot.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really....

2007
Joe Borowski 45 SV 53 SVO
F-Rod 40 SV 46 SVO

So your saying that one guy cost the team home field advantage? What about all the times that the team had runner on 3rd less then 2 outs and didn’t get the guy home? So many factors involved that you can’t narrow it down to any one reason for losing home field advantage. Not when the season is so long. BoSox were the right team last year.

I am in no way saying that these 2 guys are the same guy just showing that blown saves happen, and that the Angels were only 2 games off the pace with the Red Sox and Indians. What if….........

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm saying that a better closer than Borowski, which was fairly easily obtainable, makes a difference.

The Angels were hurt going into the series and likely would have lost with or without homefield, as we were swept. Also, 3 games out of 6 is a much harder distance to make up than 1 game out of 8.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bingo

I’m saying that a better closer than Borowski, which was fairly easily obtainable, makes a difference.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A better closer than Borowski was easily obatinable.

A closer that is Franky’s equal is much harder to find. If small differences in quality does make a difference, than keeping the best in baseball at what he does might be a good idea.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree with

Frankie up with the better closers. Just think you can find a guy that has the ability to close and save games at the same rate as Frankie. I say this based on what I see with Jose Arredondo. As I said before he has electric stuff. Good enough to be a closer in the bigs and do it well.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The stuff is good enough.

We don’t know if he’s there mentally yet, but that’s less important than the question of who replaces him in the 7th.

We have Morales to replace Teix, after all.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Old saying

You can develope pitching but you acquire hitting.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You could interpret that as saying

we should keep our developed superlative K-Rod while Tex is replaceable. :-P

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

arredondo replaces krod

tell me whos equal to teix that plays first that we get for next year

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Morales is close enough to Kotch, I think.

Neither of those guys has hit their prime yet. Tex hasn’t made $20 million worth of difference over Morales. The question is whether K-Rod is worth $15 million over whoever replaces Dondo.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whats the formula

not so sure what the formula is but not so sure anyone is worth that sort of money to be honest with you.

I know there was already a lot spent on Morales and the signing, but I also know Tex rakes! I also know there isn’t one pitcher in MLB that would rather face Tex then Morales. Heck you might have to explain who you mean when you say Morales

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

dont say tex rakes

you know hes waiting with some obscure stat that says in cuba at night in august, morales’ VORP and OBP vs lefties is, like, SO much better than teixeira’s

its simple: morales is a prospect. Teixeira averages 30+ homers a year in the bigs. Its the same argument with kotchman. Kotch was a below average first baseman offensively for his position and had the potential to develop into a great one.

thankfully our ownership would rather win than dream about how good our first baseman could be in 3 years when our other stars are well out of their primes

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kotch below average?

Nah. He was average to above average, even this year.

I didn’t think Teix vs Kotch made a big enough difference to justify missing Kotchman’s prime for one year of Teix’s. Management disagreed. Most likely, we’ll never really know for sure who was right.

The question in this topic though, is whether the remainder of Tex’s prime is worth being stuck with him for at least four years, and possibly six, after he leaves it, at an increasing price the whole time, vs Morales during his prime at a much, MUCH lower price.

The nice thing about signing K-Rod is that he’s in his prime for the entirety of the contract he’s asking.

As far as stats that prove Morales is better, nope. Morales is entirely potential, and his potential may still not equal what Tex is right now. However, the cost disparity also factors in.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see that

and i agree that yes, youre gonna be stuck with the tail end of Tex’s contract when hes not going to be superman.

But thats most every free agent these days. Torii hunter will not be pretty in 3-4 years.

my stance has been that if we are spending this much money and presumably keeping guys like lackey, who will be in his 30s during a new contract, youre shooting to win in that window.

I dont see the point in limping in. If giving teixeira 7-8 years gives us a 4 year window where we’re a HEAVY contender to win a world series, i think you have to go all in. (forgive the lame poker terms)

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would agree.

But I don’t think Tex is the guy that gives us that chance. Frankly, I’d rather have John over the same period.

Torii actually might be prettier than you think, though. His best career comparables have aged pretty well. (Jermaine Dye being exhibit A)

I’m not trying to suggest that signing Teix long-term would be a GMJ-class mistake. I just don’t think it’s our best move.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They aren't afraid because he hasn't played much.

I don’t think many teams have nightmares about Dondo’s sinker yet. K-Rod’s curve is another story.

If there was a trustworthy formula, everyone would get it right. I tend to go by gut feeling based off numbers.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gut Felling

How is it gut feeling when it is based on numbers? Gut feeling is not modulated by conscious thought is it?

I know what I see and from my past experience of watching thousands and thousands of players and games that Morales is a player that will be a 260 guy with 15-20 HRs but Tex is a 280 30+ HRs

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In my case, it is.

The problem is the Morales is 6 years of .260 15-20 HRs, while Tex is likely four years of 280 30+ homers followed by a dropoff of increasing severity for the remainder of his career, of which at least 4 years will be for us.

One of those options costs $200+ million. The other is probably $20-$30 million, tops.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

10

I am not a huge fan of that 10 yr talk but I know there would be a lot of op-outs in a Boras contract anyways.

I know I would take the Tex contract everyday of the week and twice on Sunday over what was done with GMJ. Never liked the guy always looked at him as an above avg OF with no hitting ability.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah.

The GMJ signing is the only time I went ballistic at Stoneman. Over on the MLB board archives is a long post stating in very exact terms why it was a bad idea.

Anyway, see above on Tex vs GMJ. They are not the same thing, but I also don’t think a 10 year Tex contract would be on the same level as the 5 prime years at below-market rate that we got on Vlad.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Proven hitter

Thats what the team acquired. Fact is the team has developed Lackey, Santana, Saunders, and Weaver also F-Rod, Shields and others why they have gone out and gotten Tex, Vlad, Hunter, Figgy, Izzy

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also went and got Garland, Escobar, Colon, Oliver, Speier

While developing Kotch, Kendrick, Aybar, Garret, Napoli, Willits, Mathis. ;-)

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Garret

Only proven hitter as of now. Kendrick is a hitter but needs to do it over a longer period of time in order to fall into that proven hitter mode that the others.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You could say the same thing about Saunders and Santana.

Both have, at most, a single good 3/4ths of a season to their names.

Howie has at least hit .320+ for parts of two. Napoli has an ~.800 OPS for parts of 3.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not So

Santana was good in 2006 and after that season he was 28-16, and being counted on for a good 2007 season.

Saunders was 15-8 coming into this season. So to say these guys are just having a good 3/4 season is laughable. Maybe this isn’t explained in sabermetrics. But baseball people will tell you it isn’t luck

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wins?

A team stat? Really?

I might just as well point out that all the guys I mentioned have been on as many championship teams as the ones you mentioned.

Saunders and Santana were decent during their first two partial seasons, and Santana was BAD last year.

They have been good for 3/4ths of a season. Don’t need any sabre-stats, ERA does it all.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There was one?

What the hell are you talking about?

Has the 2 players you spoke about given there team a good chance to win when they have taken the hill? Even after the bad year Santana had he was 5 games over .500 (35-30) and going into his 25th yr. He is currently 13 games over .500. As for Saunders he has shown the ability to win and compete 16 games over .500 in the show.

ERA is a crap stat as well. You really look at that as a sign of a pitchers ability to win? Come on now.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wins are a function of team record, run-support and bullpen, as well as ability.

ERA may be crap, but it’s better than Wins, which have little to do with a pitcher’s individual ability. You have offense and bullpen protection to consider.

I mean really- you’re going to shoot down saves as a fluky stat and then give props to wins in the same topic?

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You Bet

What wins is pitching and the ability of the pitcher to pitch when in a tight game or a blow out.

I think a team record and who is first and who isn’t is based on ….......hold your hat….....but the answer is coming ….............and the answer is WINS With that little trivial information you have been given it should be really easy to figure out why a pitchers worth is valued on his wins and ability to give his team a chance to win.

If the SP doesn’t get his team in a position to win then there is no chance for a save. Isn’t the save based on the win?

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't you just say that the save was a bad stat?

Wins for a pitcher is giving credit to one guy for something the ENTIRE TEAM did. That’s why it’s a horrible statistic. The pitcher who gets a “win” isn’t even necessarily the person who contributed the most to said win.

With saves at least you’re getting credit for not giving up runs to preserve a lead that already existed. With a win, you could give up the lead countless times and have your offense pick you up again and again.

For the prime example of why wins and losses are horrible stats, you need only look at Weaver’s start against the Dodgers. He didn’t give up a hit in 6 innings and STILL “LOST.”

In the pantheon of meaningless statistics, the Win is king. It tells you nothing about the pitcher except that they often left the game with a lead.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pitcher

What or how do you determine the worth of a pitcher and his ability?

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

See below.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mean what's your next line here?

That two 8-7 guys really could replace Ryan?

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why would I say that

How would that come into play? Your the one talking about how wins aren’t how a pitcher is judged.

That line is more suited towards someone like yourself that doesn’t put a lot of credit on judging a pitcher by his win total. That my friend was said by you. Not me hot shot.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, it's by you, because two 8-7 pitchers

are just as good at “winning” during a season as a 16-14 pitcher., and wins determine how good you are.

Me? I look at a number of factors, like how many runs he gave up per nine-innings, his K-BB rate, how many innings he pitched, what his LD% was, maybe go into some more complicated metrics if I feel like it.

So know, the person letting Nolan Ryan go for a pair of scrubs is you, because to you “Wins” have relevance.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rather

“So no…”

Stupid typos.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So OFF

Your lost in your stats. There are many things that go into the way a pitcher has won but when its all said and done the bottom line is wins and loss. You tossing that line at me is fighting words and you need to slow down with your type.

I have been in this game a long time and still do it daily my friend. To say that you can replace Ryan with 2 8-7 pitchers is ignorant comment. It was then and still is so for you to toss that at me is way off.

Winning and losing is something your judged on daily in your life so not to put in stock in it when talking about SP in baseball is just crazy.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The bottom line FOR THE TEAM

is wins and loss. The bottom line for the pitchers is how well did you pitch. If your bullpen continually blows leads you left with and your offense sucks, so you end up losing a ton of games despite pitching pretty darn well, ala Matt Cain, 2007, it is not your fault.

If you win a bunch of games in spite of the fact that you continually gave up lots of runs and left with men on base, because you play on a good team with a good offense and good defense, and a good bullpen, ala Carlos Silva, 2004 (14-8), you are not a good pitcher, and it will catch up to you eventually.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

1972

Steve Carlton

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

346 IP, 310 Ks to 87 BBs, 1.98 ERA

Badass. Sign him up.

See? The stats I use still tell me whether a guy was good or bad. I don’t need to look at wins or question whether he won a Cy.

Wins and Losses will lie to you. Looking at the larger picture won’t.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Team 59-97

But according to you his recorded would be effected by the fact that the team wasn’t good, and it wasn’t. 27-10

I do appreciate how you wanted or tried to steer away from the bases of your argument
Wins are a function of team record, run-support and bullpen, as well as ability.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And in that case, ability easily trumped the other 3.

Though in truth, his run support wasn’t all that bad. But boy oh boy did the rest of the starters on that team suck.

Of course, the next season, he went 13-20. What happened to his proven winning ability? It seems that all his other stats got worse and (this one’s a shocker) he STOPPED WINNING.

And then ‘82-’83 were even more confusing. He posted nearly identical ERA and innings, but in one season he went 23-11, and the other was 15-16.

You know with all this fluctuation from year to year, it’s almost as if these wins and losses have a tangential relationship to his other statistics, but are also a function of the way the rest of his team played.

Now if due to increasing average fastball speeds, expansion teams, and the transformation of baseball into a multi-billion dollar industry, a pitcher was suddenly far more limited in the number of innings he pitched and therefore less control over what happens in a game, would the relevance of a statistic like Wins increase or decrease. Let us ponder this thought overnight.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Pondering here

You can do that and argue with yourself. Maybe someone will give you a job in the game and ask for your opinion. I mean you have the stats. I know maybe you can sign on for Paul DePodesta blog. He is a solid evaluater of numbers and how it equals a teams ability to win. Hell he has done wonders with the Dodgers and now the Pad’s HA
http://itmightbedangerous.blogspot.com/

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 11, 2008 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

25%

How is it that there was 4 ingredients in your recipe and now what amounts to 25% trumped the remaining 75% of the equation? Ability sure was under valued wasn’t it?

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 11, 2008 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't remember giving percentages

Oh wait… I didn’t.

But who knows? Maybe I will get a job with a baseball team. Already had one (grounds crew, AAA, whoo!) so how hard could getting another be? :-P

Or maybe I’ll content myself with simply talking with people on the internet and being right a lot. _

Either way, my future is pretty immaterial to the validity of the points I brought up, but you seem pretty desperate to talk about something else.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 11, 2008 2:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

16-14

winning pitcher that made at least 30 starts and showed the ability to pitch innings. Thats how I see that number.

I would also know he tied for team lead in wins then see he avg k inning and less hits then innings pitched. Lead league in shutouts and K’s so his run support sucked and he still managed to win 16.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

See, but that takes into account all these other stats.

Joe Saunders and Ervin Santana didn’t lead the league in K’s or Shutouts, and Ervin got pretty darn good run support his first two seasons. Joe has never been a great strikeout guy in the majors and has yet to pitch 9 innings in a game or 200 innings in one season in the majors.

During Santana’s 16-8 season he struck out a mere 141 people in 204 innings, had no complete games, no shutouts, and a bare 2-1 K-BB ratio.

I repeat: Saunders and Santana have 3/4ths of a good season. They have been decent pitchers in previous seasons, but have yet to prove they can maintain this production over a full season.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

2-1

That isn’t good? That will win more then lose. 23 yrs old and you have less hits then innings pitched and your WHIP is 1.23 with 200+ innings. 33 starts doesn’t make for a good full season?

No complete games is a reason? League leader had 6 and in a time when nobody finishes games because of the bullpen that isn’t a solid reason for crossing out a season. Don’t you find it odd then that everyone wanted Santana in trade talks.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wait so suddenly WHIP and innings pitched

and AGE matter? Hot diggity!

2-1 is okay but not great. 1.23 WHIP is pretty good, I’ll give you that.

So let’s say 1 3/4 of a good season from Ervin, and 3/4 of a good season from Saunders.

Now how about Kotchman- are you really trying to say that a .297 .372 .467 line with plus defense in 137 games as a 24 year old isn’t a good season?

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Better

Teixeira
.283 .390 .512 (NL)
.316 .435 .526 (AL)
.286 .394 .513 (Tot)

Kotchman
.214 .292 .310 (NL)
.287 .327 .448 (AL)
.286 .394 .513 (Tot)

Teixeira 24yr
.281 .370 .560
101 Runs Scored
112 RBI
38 HRS
Trumps Kotchman

Never said that the other stats on a pitcher don’t matter I said ERA is crap stat. I think the WHIP is a strong stat in determining a pitchers ability to get batters out. Runners allowed equal runs! Time spent in league also matters for the pitcher as well.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry

Teixeira
.283 .390 .512 (NL)
.316 .435 .526 (AL)
.286 .394 .513 (Tot)

Kotchman
.214 .292 .310 (NL)
.287 .327 .448 (AL)
.280 .323 .434 (Tot)

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow.

Hey, let me post, I dunno, Roy Halladay stat’s vs Ervin’s over the last three seasons, just because it’s so completely irrelevant to the rest of this discussion.

How does Tex enter into whether or not we had developed “proven” hitters? (That being the point of this arguement)

Answer: it does not.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 11, 2008 12:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Never said

that the org doesn’t develope hitters. I said you acquire them. It is easier to develope pitchers then hitters. That is a fact. If you can acquire a proven hitter thats what you do. Pitching is often home grown. You will have a few home grown hitters but there are many that fail. Look at the Angel drafts and you will see they have drafted Pitchers often 6 of the first 8 selections this year were pitchers. 12 of the first 16 picks in 2007 were pitchers. 10 of the first 18 draft picks were pitchers in 2006. Arms are valued.

You brought Kotch into a discussion that was about Santana and Saunders. You know your one argumentative person that has a tendency to put words into another’s mouth. Your always changing gears and going into another discussion. Whats with you.

You are talking to a baseball guy here and not some computer nerd that like baseball. Want to talk about the game and learn something great. Want to argue about the Angel players and other BS (don’t mean Blown Saves ) then go irritate someone else that buys into that crap.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 11, 2008 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not some computer nerd that likes baseball, huh?

Augh! My precious ego, it hath been skewered!

Look, what you said, WAY back there, was:

Garret

Only proven hitter as of now. Kendrick is a hitter but needs to do it over a longer period of time in order to fall into that proven hitter mode that the others.

I countered that Ervin and Joe hadn’t really proven anything either, at which point the debate about wins got started. We bring it back full circle, with me admitting that Ervin’s 2006 was a good year, and then asking about Kotch’s 2007 in return, arguing he could be considered a proven hitter.

Does the line of thinking make sense now?

I’m aware of and appreciate the merits of our draft strategy. Pitching > hitting, I already told you I agreed on that.

I just don’t follow the logic that says Saunders and Santana are “proven” now, while Kendrick and Kotchman are not.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 11, 2008 2:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sign them

I stated that the club needed to sign Santana and Saunders. You didn’t think that either was worthy of getting some sort of contract before they hammered the club in arbitration. I disagree with your thought, and believe they are worth a contract.

For some sort of reason you toss in Kotchman who at no time was mentioned in signing because he is no long with the team. Instead you bring him up about being a proven hitter. Can Kotch hit? Sure! Am I going to toss him in with the likes of Garret at this point in Kotchmans career? No! and I would not put Ervin in the same sentence as Pedro Martinez. Do I think E. Santana can pitch and be effective? Yes! Do I think he will for a long period of time? Sure do! Just not going to make him the All Star / Hall of Famer yet.

I would not say Kotch is proven because he had a year were he played in 137 games with 450 AB’s. 1 year doesn’t make you a “proven” player, but it does make me stand up and take notice!

Santana is currently sitting 13 games above .500 and is 25yrs old. He will have 700 inning pitched. I would say that was a little better then a good 3/4 season and you agreed.

As for Howie I think he can hit and will hit. Just can’t toss around the word proven on him when he is yet to have more then 350 AB’s in a season or play in a 150 games in any year. He won’t even make 120 games this season. Follow that thought? Sure he has hit and done well, but can he do it over a period of time (full season or 2)? Once again Santana has 4 seasons of 20+ GS.

As for Saunders you might be right with holding off on a contract unless your trying to get him locked up and not deal with arbitration. He is 27yrs old with a years service in the bigs. That puts him in the early 30’s before he becomes a FA. So maybe it is better to stay away unless you think hes going to end up being a guy making bank through arbitration.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 11, 2008 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, signing/not signing

Santana/Saunders was farther up in the topic and I agreed with you there.

This thread was about our ability to develop talent. You put out a list of pitchers we had developed vs hitting we had acquired. I responded with a list of acquired pitching vs developed hitting.

You then argued that Garret was the “only proven hitter as of now” on that list.

I argued that you could say the same thing about Saunders and Santana not being proven guys based on their play to date.

Then we got into the merit of wins as a stat. No where in that line was signing Santana or Saunders mentioned. I like Saunders and Santana. I simply do not see how you can argue that they are more “proven” than some of the hitters we’ve brought up.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 11, 2008 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I should be shot .........or YOU

So here I go with explaining the term/saying of you "develop pitching and acquire hitting". I should have my head examined for doing this because you will spin this whole thing into another conversation putting words into my mouth, but here it goes ………
Of the 11 pitchers currently on the active roster (25 man roster) 7 of them are drafted and signed by the Angels and brought up through the minor league system. Of the 14 remaining players on the roster only half (7) are signed and developed in the minor league system.
So the current 25 man roster has 64% pitchers home grown and the position player at 50%.
As for the 40 man roster that is 12 pitchers home grown and 7 from outside the organization. That amounts to roughly 63% of the roster being home grown. As for position guys that is 12 home grown players as well with 9 from outside the org. amounting to roughly 57%.
It is like that with many organizations in baseball. There is always an exception to the rule just like anything, but for ever it has been this way. It isn’t a slap in the face to the Angels player development at all.
As for your reply back that the club has acquired pitching as well and developed hitters the bottom line is the % is greater in the development of pitchers. Of course I knew there was Garland and Escobar and others like Oliver but when you break it down the % of home grown pitching is greater then the % of home grown hitters.
That is why when the Angels won the WS in 2002 I spoke about how it was nice to see a team win with 5 out of the 8 position players being home grown. Then you throw in the home grown pitching you know as an organization you have done something very special. That’s why I thought it very odd that the club got rid of Scouting Director Bob Fontaine Jr.
As for the debate about signing Santana and Saunders and if I spoke about that just see the part of this discussion that started with Quality SP. You spoke of locking up Kendrick/Santana like the Rays did with Longoria and Kazmir. By the way, I have always liked the stat; of how many games did the team win, when that pitcher started. Like The Angels have won 18 of the 23 games that Saunders has started.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 11, 2008 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow

sorry that the thing did not space out the paragraphs like I had done…...

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 11, 2008 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, how is it that WHIP measuring runners allowed

is a good thing due to runners = runs, but measuring the ACTUAL Earned Runs given up is a crap statistic?

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 11, 2008 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

call me when one of them makes an all star team

howie is the only one that has a shot and its only because his batting averages are inflated because he swings at everything

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who's calling?

Me or Zu?

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ZU

i agree with your point that we are great at developing pitching, but rely offensively on free agents and trades.

i love our prospects as much as the next guy, i just dont really have as much faith in the offensive ones as other people and would MUCH rather take the proven commodity. If we have a big budget, then use it!

look at our lineup. Figgins, Izturis, Tex, Vlad, Rivera, Hunter all came from outside farms.

I wouldnt say mathis, howie and GA carry this team

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd say we presently have people in our farm capable of doing so.

And I think there’s an argument that Kotch carried a big part of the 2007 team.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tim Salmon never made the all-star team.

Pick a different standard.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was wrong

That was a shame if I do say.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Christ!

Have either of you two guys ever heard of text messages? Instant chat? FFS I just broke my finger scrolling through this endless debate.

Don't call me Desmond

by highlandhalo on Aug 11, 2008 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

They should get together, have it out and then they can have make-up sex.

by snowhor on Aug 11, 2008 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, don't swing that way.

Feel free to take my place. :-P

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 11, 2008 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except that Jenks got injured, costing his team saves. They are second by a small margin.

With K-Rod, they are in first. Gregg has likewise been less effective than Frankie’s 92% save record. How much closer are the Marlins with K-Rod instead. This year we have a giant margin of victory in the division. Looking at all the prospects Texas and Oakland have been collecting, do we really believe this will remain the case in the future? Hell, if not for Frankie, does Beane sell out in early July, completely demoralizing his team? If not for Huston Street blowing chunks, does he do so? They were six games back at the break. How much closer are they if K-Rod and Street were reversed?

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Saves lost

The White Sox didn’t lose out on many saves like you mention or suggest. They blew one save during the time Jenks was on the DL. The blown save occured in the 11th inning, but they managed to win the game in the 13th.

Kevin Gregg has 25 SV in 31 SVO

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Franky has 45 in 49 chances.

If Gregg had the same number of chances K-Rod has, he’d have blown 10 games to Frankies 4. In other words, we probably wouldn’t have the best record in baseball anymore.

*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!

by TheOptimist on Aug 10, 2008 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jenks getting injured cost the rest of his bullpen in wear and tear.

They lost a close game to Texas right before the All-Star break, and their pitching has been deteriorating of late.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can't blame him

For the faults of the team. The team is not really built on pitching. They mash! Bats go cold they are cold. Good pitching beats good hitting and the Angel starters are good.

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

???

Chicago’s pitching is right behind ours in ERA, and until very recently they were better, while playing in a hitter’s park vs our pitcher’s park.

Their pitching falling down on the job as the season has worn on is a big part of the reason they are behind right now.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Buy into it

if it was early but with it being late in the season I think a lot of that falls on how O. Guillen has pitched some of the young arms a lot of innings. Angels have Lackey with just 16 starts and then there is Moseley with like what 6 and the scary 3 by Adenhart

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I realize we've had our own issues

though I’ll point out they lost Contreras for a while as well. And of course, Jenks got hurt for a while, which as I pointed out, strained their pen .Perhaps their young arms as well? And as I said, the opposing park factors makes a difference.

Ultimately I think the Angels are better at both. But K-Rod over Jenks would make a difference, I think. Maybe enough to push the Chi-Sox over the Twins.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you might be the most argumentative person on this site

far and beyond

this is where you say “what evidence goes to support this?”

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh no, I'd give you that. ^_^

I don’t apologize though. Argument/discussion is what this place is for.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe

except arguing with you feels more akin to discussing sports with skip bayless on espn. you just come off like youre trying to go out of your way to say things that bug people so you can argue endlessly about it

by ihearhowie2.0 on Aug 10, 2008 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No.

I say things that I believe are true. And I usually have better reasons for believing so than Skip Bayless.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jenks Out

Still don’t think that Jenks being out had a lot of effect on the team in total. They went 9-5 during his time out of the lineup. I do know that injuries are part of the came and they play into the way a team plays but P. Konerko being awful and hurt has played a bigger role

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Aug 10, 2008 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, you're probably right.

Thank god we didn’t give that guy a 5 year, $60 million contract after 2005, huh? Who’d have thunk he’d fall off this way the last two years, being a 1B in his prime… after all, bat-swinging is less fragile than pitching. ;-P

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

BJ Ryan was 30.

Frankie is much younger.

Konerko was only one year older than Tex is now.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Aug 10, 2008 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

K-Rod/Teixeira

K-Rod can give a flying F about whether or not he gets another save opportunity as long as the Angels are winning. Sure, he’d like to get as many saves as he can, but WHAT GIVES YOU ANY REASON TO THINK K-ROD DOESN’T LIKE TEIXEIRA OTHERWISE BECAUSE HE SUPPOSEDLY GETS LESS SAVES OPPORTUNITIES NOW?

by BBFan1 on Aug 10, 2008 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My previous comment

said “to ostensibly pitch to 3 batters”.
The 3 disappeared somehow.

by SocalAngelFaninOC on Aug 10, 2008 9:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We are not the NY Yankees

Lackey’s impending free agency in the near future from now definitely will play a large part of the K-Rod, Tex, GA decisions. Assuming he stays at 90% of what he is today, he will command a Johan Santana-like contract. Pitching is just so important in games. The simple fact is you can’t throw $80mil+ contracts to hitters every year. With that said, signing Tex makes more sense than throwing money at Figgins, who the Angels should trade for some more young pitching prospects.

Also for sentimental reasons, Frankie pretty much carried the Angels on his shoulders during the 02 playoffs. He’s tough, determined, and

I love LAC.

by oasisman on Aug 10, 2008 12:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Franky's been more valuable to the team, but the simple truth is we can't afford a

$15 million dollar closer. We might be able to afford Mark, depending on how much he’s willing to settle for.

*Visiting Angels fan* Never give up, never surrender!

by TheOptimist on Aug 10, 2008 4:22 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

In the 2009 WIKIO Rankings, Halos Heaven ranked 21st Most Important Sports Blog on Earth. Source: Wikio, December 2009.
Start posting about the Angels »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Jim Abbott Hitting in Spring Training 1991
031_small
Guide for Halos Heaven "Newbies"
34_adenhart_small
Should I Worry About Jered Weaver's Fastball Velocity?

Recent FanPosts

Brandon_wood_small
Case for the "unsexy" Angels minor leaguers
Brandon_wood_small
If you could redo the offseason.....
Brandon_wood_small
Does Spring Training determine a player's standing?
Brandon_wood_small
SIMPLE MLB Realignment
154737_alcs_yankees_angels_baseball_small
Texting for the score
Img_2290_small
KLAA AM830 The Drive/Throwbacks Sports Bar Fundraising Event
Images_small
Floating Re-Alignment: Revolutionary Idea or Simply Revolting?
Small
Um, why are the Mariners expected to win the 2010 season?
Angelsbathroom_small
Napoli, Mathis, and the Incredible Missing GIDPs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Boston College's Mike Sudol, right, is caught by Boston Red Sox shortstop Jose Iglesias while trying to steal second base  in the fourth inning of a baseball spring training game in Fort Myers, Fla., Wednesday, March 3, 2010. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

Blue Jays, Not Yankees, To Sign Adeinis Hechavarria

Florida Marlins starting pitcher Josh Johnson stretches before practice during baseball spring training Saturday, Feb. 20, 2010, in Jupiter, Fla. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Florida Marlins, Still Young And Still Good

Milwaukee Brewers' Rickie Weeks and Corey Hart take part in base-running drills during baseball spring training workouts Saturday, Feb. 27, 2010, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ralph Freso)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Milwaukee Brewers, Now With Run Prevention

More from SBNation.com >


Authors

34_adenhart_small RallyMonkey5