SBN A.L. Rookie of the Year
Matt Palmer wuz robbed
| Rk | Player | Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elvis Andrus | Texas Rangers | 6 | 9 | 6 | 63 |
| 2 | Andrew Bailey | Oakland Athletics | 11 | 1 | 3 | 61 |
| 3 | Jeff Niemann | Tampa Bay Rays | 3 | 5 | 3 | 33 |
| 4 | Rick Porcello | Detroit Tigers | 2 | 7 | 2 | 33 |
| 5 | Brett Anderson | Oakland Athletics | 5 | 1 | 3 | 31 |
| 6 | Gordon Beckham | Chicago White Sox | 1 | 2 | 8 | 19 |
| 7 | Nolan Reimold | Baltimore Orioles | 1 | - | 1 | 6 |
| 8 | Matt Wieters | Baltimore Orioles | - | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 9 | Brad Bergesen | Baltimore Orioles | - | 1 | - | 3 |
| 10 | Ricky Romero | Toronto Blue Jays | - | 1 | - | 3 |
| 11 | Travis Snider | Toronto Blue Jays | - | 1 | - | 3 |
0 recs |
16 comments
| Add comment
Comments
I would have voted for Rick Porcello
With Bailey second and Reimold third.
by ryanfea on Nov 10, 2009 12:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Palmer was absolutely robbed.
But its hard to argue against Andrus.
1 line siggy line because I was asked nicely. Go Angels! helpfindscottajob@gmail.com
by Slasher52 on Nov 10, 2009 1:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Is Palmer considered a rookie?
Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch
by red floyd on Nov 10, 2009 3:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
His first full season to be exact
....
by blast21dave on Nov 10, 2009 3:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought he had some number of innings with SF last year, and was over the ROY threshold.
Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch
by red floyd on Nov 10, 2009 6:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is true
According to here a pitcher would need less than 45 innings or have been with the club for 45 days or longer before the waiver deadline.
According to B-R Palmer pitched only 12.2 innings with the Giants, so it seems reasonable that he would qualify for ROY honors but why he didn’t get a single vote amazes me.
....
by blast21dave on Nov 10, 2009 6:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yessir.
I’m not saying he should have won, but to not get a single vote? WTF, mate?
1 line siggy line because I was asked nicely. Go Angels! helpfindscottajob@gmail.com
by Slasher52 on Nov 10, 2009 3:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I wasn’t expecting him to make rookie of the year, but to not get a single vote?? An 11-2 record with 3.93 ERA. I mean Brett Anderson was 11-11 with a 4.06 ERA and he was 5th in the voting. I know there are a lot of other factors besides one’s record that goes into the voting… but ZERO VOTES??
As usual Angel players seem to go unnoticed. Like at All Star time it’s rare to see a lot of votes for any of our players. And even if a couple get put on the roster who knows if they’ll even get put into the game (ahem, Joe Maddon). I mean, it’s not like the Angels were a first place team and not given playing time representation during the All Star game (ahem ahem, Joe Maddon).
by Hoppity Hooper on Nov 10, 2009 9:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone was against Matt palmer from the beginning and had formed a low opinion
of him from the start before he had the chance to prove himself. By then the other blogs had passed him off as some weird fluke they could not explain nor comprehend. I am not surprised he got excluded.
The 2009 Pregame Picks Winner and Iron Man of Halos Heaven.com
by 44FAN on Nov 10, 2009 1:29 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Not just the other blogs. Some of our members don't like Palmer and think his record is a fluke.
THIS… IS… ANAHEIM!!
by opiejeanne on Nov 11, 2009 12:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, his record was a fluke.
I’ll eat my hat if he wins 11 games again, but that doesn’t discount the great effort he put forth this year when no one expected much of anything. He should be a solid middle to long reliever for a few years.
1 line siggy line because I was asked nicely. Go Angels! helpfindscottajob@gmail.com
by Slasher52 on Nov 11, 2009 7:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anti Pitching bias
1. Bailey
2. Bergersen
3. andrus ?
Bailey performed great and for only 14/29 to give him any vote, especially when he received the plurality of firsts, is disheartening. Andrus was much less distinguished.
Matt Palmer did a great job, but votes were only allowed three slots. Matt Wieters? did they vote preseason?
Eat My Angel Dust.
by Angels95 on Nov 10, 2009 2:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
did they vote preseason?
Classic
The only magic number now is #34
by Teixeira Who? on Nov 10, 2009 10:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?
Matt Palmer was robbed?
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
by baetown415 on Nov 11, 2009 12:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Inasmuch as "he got completely ignored". NOT inasmuch as "he should have won".
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
by Stirrups on Nov 11, 2009 1:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I voted for Andrus
I honestly don’t remember the other two votes, I’m pretty sure Porcello was one of them.
As far as Palmer…I didn’t realize he was still eligible. A screw up on my part.
by WiHaloFan on Nov 11, 2009 4:44 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















