Joe Mauer 2009 SBN AL MVP
The catcher for the Minnesota Twins, might have seen his team robbed in the playoffs but Joe Mauer is the SBN AL MVP. Voting particulars are after the page break - some Angels made it, take a peek and see if you agree...
| Rk | Player | Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joe Mauer | Minnesota Twins | 24 | 3 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 371 |
| 2 | Ben Zobrist | Tampa Bay Rays | - | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 172 |
| 3 | Mark Teixeira | New York Yankees | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1 | - | - | 158 |
| 4 | Derek Jeter | New York Yankees | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 157 |
| 5 | Evan Longoria | Tampa Bay Rays | - | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 106 |
| 6 | Zack Greinke | Kansas City Royals | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | - | - | - | 92 |
| 7 | Miguel Cabrera | Detroit Tigers | - | - | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | - | 2 | - | 5 | 74 |
| 8 | Kevin Youkilis | Boston Red Sox | - | 2 | - | - | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1 | - | 69 |
| 9 | Chone Figgins | Los Angeles Angels | - | - | - | 3 | 4 | 1 | - | 1 | 3 | 1 | 60 |
| 10 | Jason Bay | Boston Red Sox | - | 1 | - | 4 | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | 2 | 54 |
| 11 | Kendry Morales | Los Angeles Angels | - | - | 4 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 39 |
| 12 | Ichiro Suzuki | Seattle Mariners | - | - | 1 | - | 2 | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 37 |
| 13 | Franklin Gutierrez | Seattle Mariners | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | - | 1 | 2 | 34 |
| 14 | Justin Verlander | Detroit Tigers | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 32 |
| 15 | Felix Hernandez | Seattle Mariners | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | 1 | 3 | 2 | - | 31 |
| 16 | Jason Bartlett | Tampa Bay Rays | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 22 |
| 17 | Alex Rodriguez | New York Yankees | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 18 |
| 18 | Roy Halladay | Toronto Blue Jays | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 16 |
| 19 | Adam Lind | Toronto Blue Jays | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | 1 | 4 | 16 |
| 20 | Dustin Pedroia | Boston Red Sox | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 4 | 1 | 13 |
| 21 | Bobby Abreu | Los Angeles Angels | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 12 |
| 22 | Aaron Hill | Toronto Blue Jays | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 12 |
| 23 | Mariano Rivera | New York Yankees | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| 24 | Torii Hunter | Los Angeles Angels | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 |
| 25 | Brian Roberts | Baltimore Orioles | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 7 |
| 26 | CC Sabathia | New York Yankees | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 6 |
| 27 | Carl Crawford | Tampa Bay Rays | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | J.D. Drew | Boston Red Sox | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 5 |
| 29 | Jon Lester | Boston Red Sox | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 5 |
| 30 | Jonathan Papelbon | Boston Red Sox | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 5 |
| 31 | Robinson Cano | New York Yankees | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 5 |
| 32 | Victor Martinez | Boston Red Sox | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 5 |
| 33 | Michael Cuddyer | Minnesota Twins | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 4 |
| 34 | Shin-Soo Choo | Cleveland Indians | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 4 |
| 35 | Michael Young | Texas Rangers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 36 | Jacoby Ellsbury | Boston Red Sox | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 |
| 37 | Jason Kubel | Minnesota Twins | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 |
| 38 | Alex Gonzalez | Boston Red Sox | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
| 39 | Nick Markakis | Baltimore Orioles | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
0 recs |
34 comments
Comments
Ben Zobrist? 2nd?
That was a suprise to see. He had a good season, but that was definitely a suprise to see.
We're putting the band back togehter.
by billhune on Nov 12, 2009 11:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Shouldn't be if you were paying attension. He was the best player in the AL not named Mauer.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 12, 2009 2:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I strongly disagree
I would have voted him tenth in the AL. I thought all the guys in the top ten were acurate just completely in the wrong order.
by ryanfea on Nov 12, 2009 2:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He was one of the 5 or 6 best offensive players in the AL this year.
But defense counts too and he was absolutely fantastic at it this season.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 12, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
5th or 6th best?
I guess so, until one actually looks it up. Then, once faced with reality, not so much.
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
by Stirrups on Nov 12, 2009 4:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My bad. I may have underrated him.
His OPS was 3th in the league among qualified hitters, tied with Tex. 4th in the league in OBP, 7th in SLG and his wOBA was 3rd. I really can’t see a legitimate argument that he wasn’t one of the Top-5 hitters in the league. Combine that with the fact that his defense was absolutely fantastic no matter where he played.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 12, 2009 5:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You wrote "5th or 6th best offensive players in the AL this year."
OPS = 4th (yep)
OPB = 4th (yep)
BB = 6th (yep)
But…
SLG = 8th
Triples = 10th
RBIs = 21st
Runs scored = 23rd
HRs = 23rd
Total Bases = 25th
Hits = 47th
Doubles = 50th
ABs = 57th
Oh, yeah, and AVE = 33rd
So…productive? Hell yeah. But “5th or 6th best in the entire AL”? Because he walks a lot? No, not so much.
(P.S. – Where do you need me to email your own sortable Excel spreadsheet of the offensive stats for the top 200 AL players based on plate appearances, already sorted on separate worksheets for each of the stats mentioned above?)
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
by Stirrups on Nov 12, 2009 11:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Did you actually look up his numbers? Or just look at his average and decide .297 wasn't good enough?
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 12, 2009 6:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No
It was his lack of RBI’s and runs scored that I didn’t like him. The creation of runs is the most important factor to me. Zobrist had 91 in each, much less than any of the top players. Zobrist did alot of things well but not great.
by ryanfea on Nov 12, 2009 8:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow. I didn't know anyone in 2009 thought RBI's or runs scored were important in judging a player overall performance.
Seriously, that’s absurd. RBI’s and runs scored are two stats that the batter have absolutely no control over. The batter has control over how hard he hits the ball. None, over who’s on base or who gets hits when the player is on base.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 12, 2009 8:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What a player is able to do when runners are on base is more important then what he does if nobody is on base.
I’ve only played baseball up to a high school level and I know it’s harder to get hits under pressure such as when runners are on and people including fans, teammates, coaches expect you to drive runs in. placing some importance in measuring moments when the game is the most difficault is neccessary. Also like swiss said a couple posts down, if you actually watch the game it should be clear that Texiera, Cabera, and some others played better.
by ryanfea on Nov 12, 2009 9:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure getting hits when runners are on is very important.
It’s not really a skill, but it’s important and Zobrist was exceptionally good at that too. RBI’s depend on people being on base in front of you. Teixeira had more RBI’s than Zobrist because he had more people on base in front of him. Zobrists numbers are off the charts:
Runners on:
Zobrist: .285/.412/.526/.938
Teixeira: .280/.391/.485/.876
RISP:
Z: .320/.454/.592/1.046
T: .264/.401/.471/.872
RISP w/ 2 outs:
Z: .310/.474/.569 /1.043
T: .355/.494/.597/1.091
WPA:
Z: 4.10
T: 3.58
At bats with runners on:
Z: 228
T: 307
Having more opportunities to drive in runners does not make you a better player, it just means you have more opportunities.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 13, 2009 5:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good stuff
Beyond the Boxscore Not a member? Sign up.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 13, 2009 7:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
RISP #s
are like cocaine – they are Sooooooooo addictive when a player you like has a good year, but when it is someone you hate you think they should be illegal
by Rev Halofan on Nov 13, 2009 10:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why he should actually be using RC/27
It’s a more sabremetric-acceptable measure anyway and, as it happens, In Runs Created Per 27 Outs, Zobrist actually trumps Tex 8.12 to 7.73.
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
by Stirrups on Nov 13, 2009 12:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My post was pretty clear I thought. Hitting with RISP isn't a skill.
I was only objecting to this quote in his post:
What a player is able to do when runners are on base is more important then what he does if nobody is on base.
And the numbers I used illustrated pretty clearly that this season, Zobrist was better at that.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 13, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure why the quote box turned into strike. Oh well.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 13, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
stay off the coke
i mean the risp
by Rev Halofan on Nov 13, 2009 11:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Theo Epstien on RBI's:
"You guys can talk about RBIs if you want, I just … we ignore them in the front office … and I think we’ve built some pretty good offensive clubs.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 12, 2009 8:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right, but here's the deal man
You do know who you’re dealing with, correct?
We Angel fans, for the most part, do have some comprehension of the importance of stats like wOPA, and that “fangraphy” goodness. But since our team can not be explained by numerical means almost every year (Bill James even said it himself), we know that is not the whole story.
We do appreciate your opinion on this stuff, but with all due respect your condescending tone reeks of Internet-know-it-all.
NA R.I.P.
by swiss mcgee on Nov 12, 2009 8:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I feel like I've been time-warped back to the year 2000 with this discussion.
The funny thing is that you are using stats for your argument too. You have just decided to use stats that are entirely useless (RBI, Runs).
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 14, 2009 3:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a bit of a stretch - Teixeira was definitely better
But I see where you’re coming from, especially when looking at Zobrist’s OPS+
NA R.I.P.
by swiss mcgee on Nov 12, 2009 5:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How wat Teixeria better? His OPS was exactly the same. Zobrist had a better OBP and wOBA, which is probably the best measurement.
Added to that he played 2B most of the season and played it fantastically. Even when he was playing RF, he was a plus defender still playing a tougher defensive position. I don’t see much of an argument for Tex being better player THIS season, especially considering defense and the positional adjustment.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 12, 2009 5:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's something you probably can't comprehend - Actually watching them play
I saw them both play a few times this year, and a few more times on the tube, and I thought Teixeira played better. I said it was a bit of a stretch…and I’m an impartial observer of these two guys – which should be worth something.
NA R.I.P.
by swiss mcgee on Nov 12, 2009 8:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've seen them both play plenty of times this season.
I watched Zobrist play about 100 times this year and saw Tex probably 15. Was Tex fantastic offensively? Absolutely. So was Zobrist. Teixeira had more plate appearances and was slightly more valuable offensively. Not because he was better offensively, but because he played more and accumulated more value. That counts. But he was also a 1B, which makes what he does for the team less valuable because of position sacristy. Is he a great defensive 1B? Yes. But Zobrist was a great defensive 2B and OFer, which is more valuable.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 13, 2009 5:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My first three votes went to Mauer, Jeter, and Morales
then it went…Teixeira, Cabrera, Lind, Longoria, Abreu, Kubel, and Suzuki.
Looking back on it, I should have had Figgins in there instead of Kubel or Suzuki (I was the only one to vote for Kubel).
I’d be happy to debate my picks.
by WiHaloFan on Nov 12, 2009 11:42 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Having Morales in your top 3 was probably a gigantic mistake.
You could argue pretty convincingly he wasn’t one of the 3 most valuable 1B in the American League. Figgins was significantly better than him. He should probably be in your Top-5.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 12, 2009 2:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
A gigantic mistake in a freaking sports blog vote
"Figgins' OBP is still over 40!" -Steve Physioc
by Figgi4life on Nov 13, 2009 7:56 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I would have expected
Miggy Cabrera closer to 2nd, and Youklis higher.
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
by Stirrups on Nov 12, 2009 1:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I would have guessed Morales higher than Figgy.
The only magic number now is #34
by Teixeira Who? on Nov 12, 2009 1:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Anyone else wonder why Alex Gonzalez got a vote?
I know it was for tenth but really? He played in just 44 games
I wonder if Bud Selig will give the Yankees a receipt with their World Series purchase
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Nov 12, 2009 2:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Lol
I didn’t see that until you pointed it out
"Figgins' OBP is still over 40!" -Steve Physioc
by Figgi4life on Nov 13, 2009 7:57 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was a joke.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 14, 2009 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















