Bert Blyleven on Cooperstown Ballot Again
Who Should Make the Hall of Fame?
LOOK AT THE BALLOT AND ADD YOUR PICKS AND PANS IN THE COMMENTS SECTION...
In my perfect "Small Hall" Blyleven, Raines and Trammell get the call.
In facing the reality that some real turkeys (Jim Rice, Ryne Sandberg) have made it into Cooperstown, it is hard to shut the door on those deserving based on their superior careers to the lesser enshrined members.
Here are the nominees worth commenting on, followed by the rest of the ballot that is undeserving...
Roberto Alomar - YES. In my perfect world Small Hall I would say NO but in the real world where Ryne Sandberg is in the HOF, Rob-HIV gets a YES vote.
Bert Blyleven - YES, and if I only had one vote Bert would get it.
Andre Dawson - YES. In my perfect world Small Hall I would say NO but in the real world where Jim Rice is in the HOF, Dawson gets a YES vote.
Barry Larkin - YES. I would vote YES knowing it would at least keep him on the ballot, as he has an uphill battle having played in the shadow of Ripken and Ozzie, but it is important to lay a foundation and see how the consensus builds. I have no faith in the Baseball Writers to get any of these votes right.
Edgar Martinez - NO. This guy was such an Angel killer that I want to vote for him to ensure that he stays retired, but NO.
Mark McGwire - NO. He was a one-dimensional player and the gaudy numbers are byproducts of the juice. If Dave Kingman is not in the HOF, McGwire should not be either. Add to that the issue of character, which I believe is one of many important factors that should lead to enshrinement in Cooperstown, and seeing as he could not man up in front of congress, screw Mark McGwire.
Tim Raines - YES. If I only had two votes he would get my other vote. His tragedy is that he played in the shadow of Rickey Henderson.
Alan Trammell - YES. He makes my Small Hall with Bert and Raines. His biggest career mistake was not doing a hand summersault onto the field each opening day.
Kevin Appier - No; Harold Baines - No; Ellis Burks - No; Andres Galarraga - No; Pat Hentgen - No; Mike Jackson - No; Eric Karros - No; Ray Lankford - Who? No; Don Mattingly - No; Fred McGriff - No; Dale Murphy - No; Jack Morris - No; Dave Parker - No; Shane Reynolds - Who? No; David Segui - Who? No; Lee Smith - No; Robin Ventura - No; Todd Zeile - No
And here is hoping that the Veterans Committee adds Bobby Grich to the Cooperstown Roster.
1 recs |
47 comments
|
Comments
Looking at the list
Barry Larkin is a definite guy I would vote for. A SS that could mash like that I have no idea why MVP voters didn’t give him more votes.
Look at the NL MVP race in 1996.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/awards/awards_1996.shtml#NLmvp
I know Larkin won the MVP award the year before but 1996 was his BEST year and he finished 12th???? Whoever voted for Brian Jordan and Steve Finley above Larkin should not only have their voting rights revoked but should have never have been allowed on a baseball field again.
How the hell did Ellis Burks not WIN that year!
He had a better year than Ken Cam.
First we had a Salmon and now we have a Trout, let's see the same results.
by angelskid2210 on Nov 29, 2009 8:22 PM PST up reply actions
Well Burks played in a little league park.
Hit 99 points lower on the road and had 30 less Rbi’s on the road
Burks Home vs away splits 1996
It was known as the Coors effect, before humidors in Denver, Coors field played like Williamsport and gave up huge offensive numbers.
And the Rocks finished 8 games behind the Padres.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 29, 2009 10:22 PM PST up reply actions
Reasons-
Finley’s Astros finished ahead of the 81-81 reds and the Braves won their division. Very few MVP’s come from non playoff or .500 or below teams.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 29, 2009 10:24 PM PST up reply actions
David Concepcion
absolutely should be in the hall. He was a very important cog in the Big Red Machine. He is credited for kicking down the door and bringing Venezuelans into MLB (see Izturis wearing number 13) and he is credited as being the first to make the throw from shortstop to first with one bounce (instead of a straight throw).
He has won 5 gold gloves, appeared in 9 All-Star games (winning the All-Star MVP in 1982), and two Silver Slugger awards.
Also, he’s credited with being the one who trained and groomed Barry Larkin to be his replacement at shortstop.
I miss Hudler already.
Why he's not in, I'll never know.
I miss Hudler already.
by Teixeira Who? on Nov 29, 2009 5:24 PM PST up reply actions
Maybe because he wasn't a very good hitter?
Exact same career OPS+ as his contemporary, the (good fielding) Chris Speier, and also of his predecessor, Leo Cardenas. Does he have a significantly better argument than Bert Campaneris? Dick Groat? Maury Wills? I don’t see it.
And until the Hall inducts legitimately top-15 guys at the position, like Larkin and Trammell, I don’t see the point in belaboring/lamenting Concepcion. (Who was one of my favorite players, btw.)
I totally agree
Just what the hall needs more overrated players from an overrated team. The Big Redders get almost as much love as the Yankees. Tony Perez is a prime example. Batted .274 and never even won an MVP (Best finish was 3rd) was a 7 time allstar playing 23 years? That’s a hall of famer? but he played for the Big Reds. He wasn’t even the best first baseman in his league when he played. (Does anyone remember Steve Garvey? 74 MVP 10 All Stars NL Ripken record, same amount of WS appearances .294 BA)
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 29, 2009 8:32 PM PST up reply actions
Since when is batting average the only way to measure success?
Perez’ RBI numbers are outstanding (with his career high 129 in 1970). During the ’70’s, he was second in all of the MLB with RBI’s (behind teammate Johnny Bench). Yes, his average isn’t outstanding (although by no means weak).
Something else to consider is his influence in the clubhouse on and off the field (a requirement to get into the hall is to have an outstanding personality). Perez has, time and time again, been viewed as a great man, called “the heart and soul” of the Big Red Machine (something along the lines of our Torii Hunter). Garvey having illegitimate children running around and affairs on his wife doesn’t strike me as a role model. And yes, Garvey has appeared in as many World Series and has one less ring to show for it.
As much love as the Yankees? Have you ever considered that a team that good deserves some love and respect? Now, I hate the Yankees as much as everyone, probably more, but they are a legendary team. The ’27 Yankees, for example, deserve much respect. There is a distinct line between school boy crush (ESPN, Fox Sports) and genuine respect. The Big Red Machine attracts genuine respect.
Also, how is a team that won 3 NL West titles, 3 NL championships, 2 World Series rings, featured the all-time hits record holder, the rookie of the year catcher (who won 10 gold gloves, lead the NL in homeruns twice and RBI’s three times, 7 All Star appearances and the player of the year), one of the finest second basemen ever (the first to win back to back MVP awards) and one of the most accomplished managers in the game “overrated?”
Should Davey be in the hall? I think so but it’s debatable. Perez getting in is much harder to debate. If batting average was the only thing that matters, no he shouldn’t. Fortunately, it doesn’t.
I miss Hudler already.
by Teixeira Who? on Nov 29, 2009 9:04 PM PST up reply actions
*6 NL West titles
I miss Hudler already.
by Teixeira Who? on Nov 29, 2009 9:28 PM PST up reply actions
As for all around players
Gold Gloves;
Garvey-4
Perez-0
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 29, 2009 10:12 PM PST up reply actions
So because other good players were on the team an average one should be in?
The Reds get more respect than the Charlie Finley A’s of the same era who won more and beat the Reds heads up. Your reply shows the bias toward that team. Maybe if some of those A’s had joined the media like Morgan, Bench they would get more love.
And who said the Hall is for role models? As I said in another comment the Hall is full of guys who were great ballplayers and despicable human beings.
As for RBI’s shouldn’t he have led the league once if he was that great.
His best years were before the “Machine” era
Look it up i’ll wait
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/perezto01.shtml
Because Perez is a good guy he gets in the hall?
And as for analytics the following is from Baseball Reference
Hall Of Fame Statistics
Player rank in (·)
Gray Ink Batting – 129 (136), Average HOFer ≈ 144
Hall of Fame Monitor Batting – 81 (221), Likely HOFer ≈ 100
Hall of Fame Standards Batting – 41 (152), Average HOFer ≈ 50
He is below average as a Hall of Famer. He got in because of the media bias toward the “machine” he was maybe the 5th or 6th option on those teams behind Bench, Morgan, Rose, Foster and Griffey SR. Shouldn’t you be one of the top three guys on your team to be immortalized as one of the best of all time?
I get the Yankee love. Win 27 titles and some of your scrubs are going to be moved up to a level they don’t belong in. (Phil Rizzuto anyone?)
I am not a Dodger fan or a Garvey fan, but I am a baseball fan and I see that bias toward certain teams affects voting. I believe certain teams get more than they deserve, 74-76 Reds, and others are forgotten like the Tigers of the mid 80’s.
I am not one to keep players out, but I want them to deserve it. The baseball Hall is the only one anyone cares about because they don’t let everyone in like Football or Basketball.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 29, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions
The thing is I don't have a bias towards the Reds.
I agree that the baseball is the only one that matters and that teams do get pushed aside. (Ironically, the 84 Tigers were managed by Sparky Anderson). As for the Hall being for role models, “Voting shall be based upon the player’s record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played.” (Taken from Rule 5, BBWAA Rules For Election To The Hall Of Fame). Being a role model is a huge requirement, otherwise McGwire would be in already (by the same standard, I have no idea why Cobbs is in).
Also, the hall of fame isn’t only about the highest record setter or number one slugger, it’s also about those who were a vital part of a larger whole. Without Perez, there wouldn’t be a legendary Reds team. Was he the best on the team? No, but he was an absolute necessity.
Also, the Reds don’t have the same lore as the Yankees do. Winning 3 rings in the last 30+ years isn’t enough to justify bumping up lesser players. It may work for the Yankees but the same logic can’t be applied to Cincinnati.
I miss Hudler already.
by Teixeira Who? on Nov 29, 2009 10:33 PM PST up reply actions
A necessity yes, I see that
But a Hall of Famer? I do not agree. I’m not saying Perez wasn’t valuable to his team. Although with that lineup I’m pretty sure they would have been okay without Perez. I’m just saying his body of work does not hold up to the level of a Hall of Famer.
As for the integrity portion of the Hall criteria. Ty Cobb was the first man elected to the Hall of Fame, before Babe Ruth, Walter Johnson, Cy Young, Honus Wagner and Christy Mathewson with 98% of the original vote so I don’t think that was as big a deal then as it is now in our Politically correct world.
By the way nice points I guess we agree to disagree, although I am enjoying this discussion.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 29, 2009 10:44 PM PST up reply actions
Valid point
I guess it didn’t matter as much back then. And same to you bud, great stuff. Makes you think. :)
I miss Hudler already.
by Teixeira Who? on Nov 29, 2009 11:00 PM PST up reply actions
Alomar and Blyleven definitely
Alomar and Blyleven would definitely have my vote if I had one. If Alomar had played anywhere other than second base, he’d be out. I would also be likely to vote for Larkin and McGriff. If you include the playoffs, McGriff has 501 home runs and a World Series ring.
Depending on my mood, I could be persuaded to support McGwire and Dawson. Some days I feel Dawson did just enough to get in McGwire didn’t actually break any rules (Hell, there are many other cheaters and murderers in the Hall of Fame already). Other days, I feel Dawson could’ve done better if he didn’t play in Montreal and McGwire couldn’t do enough on his own with the performance enhancing drugs.
Blyleven definitely- Grich is the best player NOT in today-
Burt has excellent numbers, but he doesn’t have any of the MAGIC numbers. Overall, he was an outstanding pitcher for some good to mediocre teams. Ditto on Grich- he played in Joe Morgan’s shadow. Great offensive and defensive numbers, and simply a joy to watch play. My autographed Bobby Grich baseball is one of my most prized possessions, right behind my Klein bottle and my copy of “Who’s Who in Baton Twirling for 1957”- no, you can’t make that kind of shit up.
Bert is 5th all time with 3701 K's.
3000 k’s is still a HOF benchmark.
Nick would be proud.
by halofan4life on Nov 30, 2009 9:12 AM PST up reply actions
My picks, in order
My ballot always starts with the same question: Is he the very best qualified player at his position currently not in the Hall of Fame?
1) Alomar. Weirdly underrated now, despite 14 basically consecutive years of just FU excellence. One of the 10 best to ever play the position, and certainly the best qualified non-HoFers. Also, Bobby Grich (who is totally deserving) can’t get in if guys like Alomar are shut out.
2) Larkin. Again, best available shortstop, and a top 10 guy at that crucial position.
3) Blyleven. The best qualified starting pitcher not currently in the Hall of Fame, and by some distance. See Rich Lederer for more.
4) Raines. Maybe not top 10 at his position (which is a pretty high bar, especially for LF), but an awesome leadoff hitter, and probably the best qualified left fielder (depending on where you put Minnie Minoso and Sherry Magee).
5) McGwire. Who’s the best qualified first baseman on the outside looking in? I find the position very hard to rank, since a lot of people have spectacular but short careers (McGwire, Will Clark, Dick Allen), each of those three have trivial-to-significant character issue, then there’s the slow-and-steady, poor-man’s-Eddie-Murray types like Fred McGriff and (later) Rafael Palmeiro. And before you know it, it’ll be time to deal w/ Frank Thomas, Jeff Bagwell, Carlos Delgado, Jim Thome, Jason Giambi, and Todd Helton…. All that said, McGwire’s best 10 years were better than anyone else’s, so he gets my vote.
6) Trammell. Among shortstops with 6500 or more plate appearances, Trammell is 14th in OPS+ with 110 (the only qualified non-HoFer above him is Jim Fregosi w/ 112). He’s 15th in Runs (Donie Bush is the only non-HoFer ahead of him), 11th in Hits and RBIs (no one), 9th in HRs (Jay Bell). He was a World Series MVP, deserved the regular-season MVP in 1987, and played great for a long time. Certainly better than a lot of current Hall of Famers, and I don’t see anyone (besides Larkin) anywhere near him on the outside looking in.
The only remaining candidate on my bubble is Fred McGriff; I’d probably vote him in. He was a really great player for a very long time.
Lee Smith? I’d put Dan Quisenberry in way before him. Dawson? That’s just an ugly OBP, and there are better candidates in line ahead of him. Baines was usually very good, but how often was he great? Martinez didn’t have a long or high enough peak for a guy who didn’t play defense. Jack Morris was a helluva pitcher, and there are many such creatures (correctly) not in the Hall of Fame on account of they weren’t quite good enough. Mattingly is in line behind a l-o-t of people.
No Jack Morris?????
Dude was the number one big game pitcher from 1984 to 1991. How many championship teams did he lead the pitching staff for.
Oh and by the way I hated him when he played because he was so damn good.
As for Mc Gwire (another guy i didn’t like when he played);
The problem with the Hall today is no one is good enough for anyone. Either they played with a juiced ball or body or the expansion made things too easy or they didnt play for the Yankees or it wasn’t in an era when the press covered up every problem you have( do you think Mantle would be idolized today? No freaking way, he was a drunk, and a prick. he would be looked at as a failure because he didn’t set every record in the world)
Just because you are a douche doesn’t mean you weren’t great. Why would you “man up” to the losers in Congress? Because they called a meeting? What the hell right do they have to call baseball players before their adulterous immoral drug addict asses.
McGwire led the league in bombs 4 times and drove in 100, 7 times and was not a guy you wanted to face with the game on the line. Roid or no Roid he belongs in along with the rest of the juice monkeys of the era.
Because of the juice nobody gets in? ridiculous.
If Ty Cobb and the rest of the sheet wearers are in, these guys should be in. Because what is worse? Shooting yourself up? Or excluding an entire group of people because of their color?
I’ll take the roiders over KKK members every time.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 29, 2009 8:18 PM PST reply actions
Hall of Famers based on this year's ballot?
Just Blyleven.
And on the topic of the Hall of Fame, Dick Allen and Bobby Grich should be in the Hall.
Blylevin for sure!
On a side note thought, I think Mattingly should be in if Kirby Puckett is in. Virtually had the same numbers. They were both big names in their time. I think he’s not in because he was a Yankee that doesn’t quite match up with other HOF Yankees. But if Kirby’’s there, then he should be too.
But I also think the Hall is a mess and I don’t put too much merit into it. There is too many shouldn’t be guys and a few should be guys and it’s just a mess. So screw the HOF.
Happy Birthday to the ground!
If Mattingly had won a title he would be in.
Its what got Winfield in because he certainly didn’t do it because of his years with the Padres (although he was a stud). Mattingly is out because 82-94 is a bad era for the Yankees much like the 1965-1975 Yankees, the 82-94 Mattingly Era was devoid of playoff apperences, and as soon as he retired they won the division. If you compare his accomplishments to someone like the immortal HOFer Tony Perez it’s a no brainer to put him in but his lack of success in a Yankee uniform will always be held against him, which is the reverse Yankee effect. Good players on bad Yankee teams are overlooked, while average players on great teams are elevated.
Puckett is in because of his tremendous post season success,Two WS titles, walk off HR, in an era in which none of the big market teams were any good.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 29, 2009 10:35 PM PST up reply actions
Will never happen
Because he can’t read a door poster and lied about it for 15 years to everyone he ever talked to.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 29, 2009 10:47 PM PST up reply actions
I've got Blyleven, Jack Morris, and Moose Stubing
I’m using some advanced metrics tonight…
For a baseball blogger....
writing “Who?” after David Segui? Very professional. Yeah, he’s a no-name, but non-Angels fans could say the same about Bobby Grich. David Segui had lackluster numbers, but he was an above avg hitter for 5-6 years and had a decade long career, you should know who he is.
It’s like when the Rockies made the playoffs, a few years back, then all the national announcers and broadcasters proudly proclaimed they didn’t no who half the team was. WTF? It’s your job to know.
This is going to be my team, and we're going to rise together.
-Clipper Darrell
for a baseball blog poster
you sure have a hard time spotting sarcasm.
by Rev Halofan on Nov 30, 2009 12:20 AM PST up reply actions
I think he was the little guy on Fantasy Island who pointed up to the sky and hollered, "Ze plane! Ze plane!"
by Fan Since 1981 on Nov 30, 2009 2:36 PM PST up reply actions
My Picks
1. Barry Larkin – my favorite player on my former favorite team. Total class act, and a guy who could and did do it all. Need power? He hit 33 HR in 1996. Need a high OBP leadoff guy? Barry had an OBP of .390 or higher six times, and was .371 for his career. Need speed? He stole 30+ five times (and was successful on 83% of his steal attempts for his career). Need Gold Glove defense? Check. And he’s good on TV, too (MLB Network), not that it matters.
2. Bert Blyleven – it’s a travesty that he isn’t in already.
3. Alomar – I don’t think there’s any real debate over his credentials.
4. Tim Raines – quite possibly the second best leadoff hitter. I was shocked that he isn’t in already, but he had the misfortune of having his career exactly overlap that of the BEST leadoff hitter ever, one Rickey Henderson. Oh, and if he’d played in NY, Boston, L.A. or Chicago, there wouldn’t be any discussion either. Unfortunately for Raines, he played in Montreal. His stolen base success rate was around 85%…substantially better than Henderson’s. Eleven seasons of a .390 or better OBP. A fun guy to watch.
That’s it. Apologies to Alan Trammell. I look at him and see a guy who never led the league in anything and never won a regular season MVP. A guy who was a pretty good player for a long time. But I’m open-minded, and I’d want to hear all of the arguments in his favor. Jack Morris was a good pitcher for a number of years, and was at his best when it counted the most, but he just wasn’t sufficiently dominant. Was he that much better than Dave Stieb, Frank Viola or even Steve Rogers? Isn’t the case for Morris really based on one admittedly fabulous game (which he would have lost had Lonnie Smith been paying attention)?
I don’t have a rational reason for excluding Fred McGriff, who hit a ton of HR at a time when some folks were hitting a ton and a half…on steroids. I’ve never heard McGriff linked to PEDs. Maybe he played for too many teams, even though many of those were good teams.
I’m also troubled by Lee Smith’s candidacy. He was a very effective closer for a long time. I’m not sure who was better in his era. If one-inning closers belong in the Hall (and I submit that eventually they will), you can’t ignore what Smith accomplished.
McGwire – frankly, a bit one dimensional, and there’s the whole PED thing (though I actually respect him for not talking to Congress). Let’s assume McGriff was clean. If McGwire had also been clean, I’m pretty sure McGriff’s accomplishments would dwarf McGwire’s.
Edgar Martinez and Harold Baines miss the cut for me because they basically didn’t play the field, and so their #s needed to be dominant as hitters. They were both good to very good, but not consistently excellent.
Finally, a sentimental vote for Kevin Appier, whose contributions to the 2002 championship cannot be overstated.
Yeah Im with Jack........Appier gets the sentimental (contributor on only championship team of my lifetime so far) vote.....
LOL
Gimme Fewell, play with Fire, gimme that "W" I desire.....
by norcaliangelsfan on Nov 30, 2009 8:08 AM PST reply actions
EXPOS BABY!!!
andre dawson should be the next expo in the HALL!!!!!. it’s yet to be determined whether vlad goes in as a ’spo or as a halo. i have no preference… but i wanna see him in angel red next year
yup
all the more reason why they need to resign vlad. there’s gonna be a big A on s plaque somewhere
by expoforever on Nov 30, 2009 12:45 PM PST up reply actions
The Angels should, but Nolan Ryan pwned our ass.
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
And the Expos shouldn't
Gary Carter wanted to go in as a Met but the hall said no after the Wade Boggs fiasco.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 30, 2009 11:01 PM PST up reply actions
ray lankford
left handed hitter played mostly for cardinals. Believe he was in right field when Edmunds was in center. Segui- Mariners? and Baltimore.
by Ca1IFORNIA ANGELS on Nov 30, 2009 10:26 AM PST reply actions
Blyleven is the walking embodiment as to why, for Starters, WINS don't mean shit.
Had he played for a Baltimore or Cincinnati back in the 70’s, his victory numbers would have been off the charts and we would not be having these discussions.
And anybody who cusses on live TV gets my HOF vote, just for the hell of it. Even if I don’t have one.
(FYI, his brother is, bar none, the finest plumber in OC. I cannot recommend him highly enough!! Seriously.)
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
Thanks Rev
for giving a vote to Alan Trammel. I grew up in Michigan and was a big Tiger fan. Tram, Sweet Lou and Gibby were my favorite players and I always felt Trammel was not fully appreciated outside of Michigan. He should have been the 87 AL MVP (George Bell? come on). Maybe the support of Rev Halofan will turn the tide for a great Tiger.
If you are wondering why I became an Angel fan there are three reasons: A move to SoCal, Tiger baseball in the 90’s was terrible and my son (Gary Matthews Jr Jr) became an Angels fan.
by Gary Matthews Sr. on Nov 30, 2009 6:54 PM PST reply actions
Blyleven>Ferguson Jenkins
I guess drug sellin’ is a prerequisite for the Hall these days.
Nope another overrated franchise- the Cubs
They are worse than the machine reds, at least they won titles. What exactly have the cubs done? The White Sox have done more than the Cubs and that’s saying something considering they almost killed baseball and all.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Nov 30, 2009 11:04 PM PST up reply actions
No on lee smith?
All time saves leader when he retired… not to mention mentor to Percival.
by Balls and Strikes on Dec 1, 2009 12:49 PM PST reply actions

by 




















