Gene Autry = Liar?
Over at his Future Angels blog, Stephen Smith recently gave some inside skinny on working for the City of Anaheim back when Gene Autry was crying foul over the Rams coming into (and rendering butt-ugly) the Big A. Excerpt from a long post:
Shortly after the deal was announced, the Angels filed suit. Autry claimed he was blindsided by the deal, and was aghast that his fans might have to park in a concrete structure instead of a flat open surface.
Working inside the City Manager's Office, I saw documents which proved Autry was a liar.
Autry's Angels executives were regularly briefed on Rams negotiations. They had shown no interest whatsoever. In fact, they seemed to like the idea because the stadium capacity would increase from about 42,000 to 65,000, meaning more tickets to sell. And if truth be told, the Angels rarely drew enough spectactors to use those parking spaces that would be in the structure.
Some speculated that the executives had failed to keep Autry informed, which seems rather implausible.
What convinced me Autry was lying was that, while publicly saying he didn't want his customers to park in a supposedly dangerous structure, privately his lawyers were offering to drop the lawsuit if Anaheim would give Autry ten acres of the parking lot to build a museum. So it was clear he didn't give a damn about fan safety and convenience. He wanted a piece of the pie after the fact.
Whole thing here.
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Oh my...
Rantings of a man with a very little penis. I am away, or I would take the time to counter every bit of his rants, Call me a “Mark?” Son, we pay for what we like, if that means $1 or $200, my choice.
"The Smarter I get, the More I Have To Learn"
whew
for a second there, I thought Hapyorange was talking about my posts, but then I realized I never referred to him as a “mark.” That, and the fact that I’m relatively certain he’s never spoken to my wife.
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.
When you get back
I personally would enjoy a rebuttal (as would the whole community here to be sure) as your history with the franchise is unparalleled (at least among the living).
by Rev Halofan on Dec 13, 2009 12:07 PM PST up reply actions
yes, please!
"Precious in the sight of the Lord, is the death of His Saints." - Psalm 116:15 Rest In Peace, Nick.
by angels4adam on Dec 13, 2009 12:33 PM PST up reply actions
HIs Dad's Orange Grove
was eminent domained for the stadium and he grew up sittng at gaems with Gene Autry.
by Rev Halofan on Dec 13, 2009 12:38 PM PST up reply actions
Poor Stephen Smith
All alone in that ivory tower of his. You kids get offa my lawn, etc. I used to like him for his knowledge of the Angels’ minors, then I realized he was just a pompous ass. I mean, he even manages to trot out the old “our culture’s skewed priorities” chestnut about ballplayers’ salaries versus schoolteachers. The more apt analogy is between, say, a professor teaching at med school; it takes a lot of specialized training and dedication and above-average talent to get there; people get paid based on what they can fetch in the market.
Witty .sig goes here.
"Don't feed the troll"
I love this team.
by Downing Rules on Dec 21, 2009 9:25 AM PST up reply actions
Isn't all of this confidential information?
He’s discussing things that were revealed in settlement negotiations. Not that I have a the gist of the post.
When it comes to settlement negotiations between Anaheim & the Angels....
… I would prefer it all came out. Given that Anaheim taxpayers have been put on the hook multiple times for the stadium, and successive owners have acted just like you’d expect oh-please-don’t-leave tenants would (i.e., laughing to the bank), I’d go maximal on disclosure.
Does roughly zero to dull my admiration for Autry, btw (or Moreno, for that matter).
If the representation is over
I think settlement negotiation details remain confidential, but it’s subject, I think, to the consent of either or both parties to reveal it. It seems this guy might have accessed some things that were a matter of public record—that, and the duty of confidentiality, I think, usually just extends to the counsel representing the two sides. City Manager’s Office probably had no business revealing any of this stuff, though.
RIP Nick Adenhart.
"When the Babe tries to call his shot, I hope Nick puts one in his ear."
--RallyMonkey5
I am struggling mightily to keep from flinging epithets at Smith
But it seems to me that, regardless of whether his accusations are true, this was mighty small of him.
Why kill (or curse) the messenger?
If his allegations are true, then there is no reason to hate on him. If they are untrue, obviously that is different.
But why deliver a message YEARS after Autry died?
Nick would be proud.
by halofan4life on Dec 18, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions

by 


















