And Besides, it is possible that if Napoli was included in a deal that the Jays would be interested in using Napoli as a DH just like the Angels have considered.

buck is sort of like a jeff mathis actually. i can imagine napoli would be PISSED if not only did he get traded to toronto, but he still only played half the time.

I like the idea of Abreu, Johnny Rivers, and Hunter in the OF, Vlad and Naps splitting time at DH.

I am not worried about more bats, frankly, but more about the rotation and bullpen.

As long as the deal includes no Angels players that are good at baseball or anyone likes then the deal is JAWESOME!

This list includes:
Aybar, Morales, Napoli, Weaver, Saunders, Santana, Kazmir, Jepsen, Bulger, Wood, Reckling, Bourjos, Kendrick, Hunter, Abreu, and possibly Shields.

This leaves:
Fuentes, Izturis, SOS, GMJ, Mathis, and any A/AA/AAA scrub to be traded for Halladay.

Strangely, though, the list of players the Jays even want are:
Aybar, Morales, Napoli, Weaver, Saunders, Santana, Kazmir, Jepsen, Bulger, Wood, Reckling, Bourjos, Kendrick,

Conversely the list that they care less about is:
Fuentes, Izturis, SOS, GMJ, Mathis, and any A/AA/AAA scrub

I am fine with almost anyone else that we may have to give up. But giving up Napoli, especially when we have very limited catching depth beyond him, and other power-options such as Vlad leaving, just does not make any sense for this club to do. Yes you have to give up something to get something, but including Napoli would just be counter-productive—kind of like how the Angels were reluctant over the summer (and should be now) to give up two MLB starting pitchers for Halladay.