Random baseball trivia for a Monday
OK, you're bored at work, so why not use your brain for something useful, like answering a random baseball trivia question? That's more like it!
Presumably you're clicking away like an automation voting Chone Figgins into the All-Star game, but in between clicks, try to answer this one:
Q. Only two (2) pitchers in Major League history have "struck out their age" in a single game (ie., struck out 18 batters at the age of 18 ..., etc.). Name those 2 pitchers!
First correct answer wins a beer from highlandhalo in London (sorry, you've got to buy your own flight tickets!) Good luck!
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
I remember Kerry Wood and.....
RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09
by vlad IS my man on Jul 6, 2009 5:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
...Feller?
please be right………..
RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09
by vlad IS my man on Jul 6, 2009 5:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
vlad IS my man is the winner!
Bob Feller of the Indians struck out 17 Philadelphia A’s on Sept. 13, 1936, aged 17.
Kerry Wood of the Cubs struck out 20 Astros on May 6, 1998, aged 20.
Well done, you win the beer from highlandhalo! … now you just gotta get to London :)
Don't call me Desmond
by highlandhalo on Jul 6, 2009 7:21 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll have to come up with a harder one for my next edition of Monday trivia ...
… unless someone else can come up with another good one to keep this thread going.
Don't call me Desmond
by highlandhalo on Jul 6, 2009 7:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking Wood, but there's no way in hell I'd have got Feller.
Angels fan since '67
by red floyd on Jul 6, 2009 9:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ok, let's try to make up one that might be a little harder:
Winner of this one gets another beer from highlandhalo (you’re welcome, highland!), all existing caveats about travel expenses still apply.
Figgy has a 35-game hitting streak on the line as he steps to the plate in the bottom of the 8th with the bases loaded, having gone 0-3 to this point in the game. With the Halos in the lead, this will probably be his last chance to extend his streak. The count is 0 balls and 0 strikes.
The next thing you know, without ever touching the ball with his bat Figgy is on first with an RBI and his hit streak remains intact. Oddly, the official box score the next day refuses to record any notion of an at-bat for Figgy in the 8th. Officially, Figgy got on base and drove in a run without ever appearing at the plate!
What happened?
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
by Stirrups on Jul 6, 2009 12:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh Jeeebus
I’ve got no idea the answer to this one … it was meant to be trivia, not riddles! :) This one makes my brain hurt.
Don't call me Desmond
by highlandhalo on Jul 6, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope. That would show up in the box scor as "HBP".
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
by Stirrups on Jul 6, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll say
Catcher’s interference
We're putting the band back togehter.
by billhune on Jul 6, 2009 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Winnah!!
Catcher’s interference is that rare anomoly within the rules of baseball that is not totally surrounded by 125 affiliated rules which would make it jump prominently to mind.
It is that rare rule which would allow an offensive player to collect RBIs, keep a hitting streak alive, steal bases, score a run, all without ever taking an official at-bat. It’s also one of those rules that allow the offensive team to pick and choose the outcome of an event on the field, shoudl that event be more favorable than the result of Catcher’s Interference.
That Halos had a guy pretty good at collecting Catcher’s Intereference. Darin Erstad.
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
by Stirrups on Jul 6, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Woo Hoo!
Now all I need to do is pay for a ticket to London, and I can collect a free beer.
We're putting the band back togehter.
by billhune on Jul 7, 2009 5:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Be happy to oblige
Don't call me Desmond
by highlandhalo on Jul 7, 2009 6:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A hit requires the ball hitting the bat
“Figgy has a 35-game hitting streak on the line as he steps to the plate in the bottom of the 8th with the bases loaded, having gone 0-3 to this point in the game. With the Halos in the lead, this will probably be his last chance to extend his streak. The count is 0 balls and 0 strikes.
“The next thing you know, without ever touching the ball with his bat Figgy is on first with an RBI and his hit streak remains intact. Oddly, the official box score the next day refuses to record any notion of an at-bat for Figgy in the 8th. Officially, Figgy got on base and drove in a run without ever appearing at the plate!”
Catcher’s interference would be over-ruled if Figgins got a basehit on the play. He would have to swing the bat and hit the ball to get a basehit. Your question states “without ever touching the ball with his bat.” Was this question thought up by Sarah Palin the basketball player?
Now if you change the question and have Figgy 0-for-0 with three walks (Figgy did walk three times Monday night) leading to his final at bat and catcher’s interference was called the 35 game hitting streak would still be intact but not added to. It would still be an active 35 game hitting streak.
The unfortunate thing about the press going ga-ga over hitting streaks instead of consecutive games reaching base safely on a hit, walk, or hit by pitch is the emphasis on the individual over the team. When Gene Garber struck out Pete Rose on ball four to end Rose’s 44 game hitting streak in that last at bat the press (and Rose) was treating a walk as a failure. More should be done to promote the consecutive games reached base safely record over the consecutive games hitting streak.
by Yetijuice on Jul 7, 2009 7:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OC had what... a 62 game on-base streak?
Angels fan since '67
by red floyd on Jul 7, 2009 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OC was only 22 games short of the record!
Consecutive games reaching base (official) (only includes outcomes that increase on-base percentage: base hit, walk, or hit-by-pitch)
• 84 – Ted Williams, Boston Red Sox – July 1 through September 27, 1949
by Yetijuice on Jul 7, 2009 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
10.23 Guidelines for Cumulative Performance Records
(b) CONSECUTIVE-GAME HITTING STREAKS. A consecutive-game hitting streak shall not be terminated if ALL of a batter’s plate appearances (one or more) in a game result in a base on balls, hit batsman, defensive interference or obstruction or a sacrifice bunt. The streak shall terminate if the player has a sacrifice fly and no hit.
Interpretation: This does not refer to the last at bat of the game for a batter but ALL his at bats in the game. The only way a batter’s hitting streak will continue without a hit in the game is is he goes 0-for-0. An 0-for-1 game will kill the streak even if his last at bat resulted in catcher’s interference. Say the batter was 0-for-1 before his last at bat. The batter then reaches first base on catcher’s interference. The batter is still 0-for-1 and his consecutive game hitting streak has ended.
by Yetijuice on Jul 7, 2009 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
10.02 Official Score Report
10.02 OFFICIAL SCORE REPORT
The official score report prepared by the official scorer shall be in a form prescribed by the league and shall include:
(a) The following records for each batter and runner:
(1) Number of times batted, except that no time at bat shall be charged when a player
(i) hits a sacrifice bunt or sacrifice fly;
(ii) is awarded first base on four called balls;
(iii) is hit by a pitched ball; or
(iv) is awarded first base because of interference or obstruction;
by Yetijuice on Jul 7, 2009 7:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have a seperate Rule question
I was out to lunch yesterday and was watching the Ysankees – Blue Jays game. A-Rod was hit by a pitch that bounced before it hit him. The umpire automatically awarded him first base. I was under the impression that if a ball bounced before it hit someone that it wouldn’t be a hit by pitch
We're putting the band back togehter.
by billhune on Jul 7, 2009 9:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It is a HBP
If a batter swings at a pitch that hits him it is ruled a strike and NOT a hit by pitch. If the pitch bounces and hits the batter without him swinging it is a hit by pitch. If the pitch bounces and the batter swings and hits a home run it is a home run. Unswung strikes on bounced pitches are for cricketeers only!
544th ARTW, Offutt AFB, Omaha, Nebraska summer of 1971: I answered the phone. The person on the line asked is Major Douglas Van Allen there? I replied he is out to lunch. The entire office cracked up laughing! I had never heard the “out to lunch” expression before!
by Yetijuice on Jul 7, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs





























