The All-Decade Angels Team
As we are close to the end of the decade, I deem it an appropriate time for the unveiling of an "All-Decade Angels Team." This team is composed of all Halos from 2000 up until present . Tell me if you agree with my picks.
Starting at catcher, we would have our catcher from our glorious 2002 World Series Championship, Bengie Molina. While painfully slow, there was none like him behind the plate. He had a rocket arm, hit a solid .274 as a Halo from 2000-2005, while wining a couple Gold Gloves. Backing him up would probably be Mike Napoli as we haven't had many other good catchers the past nine years.
Over at first base, the starter would be Scott Spiezio who hit that crucial three run HR that got the Angels back in Game 6 of the 02 World Series when they were facing elimination. Mark Teixeira would no doubt be the backup had he played more games in an Angels uniform. Since he only played half a season, he has to fight with Casey Kotchman, Kendry Morales, and Darin Erstad (who many forget won a Gold Glove there in 2004) to be the 2nd string to Spiezio.
Now to second base where Adam Kennedy would no doubt start. He had a good 7 year run with the Angels and lets not forget that he was the MVP of the 02 ALCS vs. the Twins. Maicier Izturis and Howie Kendrick would fight to back up AK just as they are fighting for the position this year, but I might give it to Kendrick based solely on those hilarious Howard's TV commercials
At shortstop, I would give Orlando Cabrera the nod. He played stellar defense and won a Gold Glove in 2007. Fan favorite David Eckstein would back up OC because while Eck was much more popular, hustled more, and was faster, OC was better with the bat and the glove.
At third base is a landslide to Troy Glaus, the 2002 World Series MVP who set the Angels single season HR record with 47 in 2000. Backing him up would be the much faster and much better defesnively, Chone Figgins.
My left fielder would be Garret Anderson, perhaps the greatest Angels of all-time who broke most if not all Angels offensive records. His backup would either be current leftfielder Juan Rivera or hot-headed Jose Guillen.
In center field, I have a deadheat between Erstad and Torii Hunter. Hunter while much better defensively and probably offensively, he hasn't been a Halo long enough to beat Erstad who actually won a Gold Glove in 2000 and 2002 as the everyday center fielder.
In right field would definitely be Vlad Guerrero. While he is going downhill, he consistently gave the Angels .300, 30 HRs, and 100 RBIs a year for a few years. His 2nd string would be newbie Bobby Abreu who is destined for greatness in a Halo uniform.
My DH would be one of the greatest Halos ever, Tim Salmon who spent his entire career a Halo and hit nearly 300 HRs. I placed him at DH because Salmon, while a truer Angel than Vlad Guerrero and the everyday right fielder for many years, Guerrero was better defensively until maybe this year (Vlad's arm is like no other). His backup would be 2002 DH Brad Fullmer who came through many times in the clutch that year.
On the mound, I would send out our overweight but incredible pitcher Bartolo Colon who was the club's sole 20 game and Cy Young winner of the decade. Enough said. His backup on the hill would be John Lackey who won Gm 7 of the 02 World Series as a rookie, has a career ERA under 4.00 and is closing in on 100 careers wins.
My relief pitcher would be Scot Shields who has been our middle relief/occasional setup man holding games since 2001. His backup would either be Darren Oliver, JC Romero, or Scott Schoenweis.
Finally, my closer would be the wild K-Rod who set the single season saves mark last year and was untouchable as a rookie in 2002 up until his departure last year. His backup would be good but not as great Troy Percival who closed games during the championship season but whom K-Rod as since amassed as a closer.
There you have it. The All-Time Angel Team from the years of 2000 til present day. We've definitely had some great players on our club the past few years.
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
75 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
2000 - 09
is a decade… DUDE .. we are a MONTH AWAY not a year away. This decade is the ZEROES – 2000 – 2009. the next decade will be the 1s, 2010 – 2019
Get it? Any Angel wanting to make this list has two months (tops if we make the World Series and take it to game 7) to speak now or forever hold his “decade’s piece”…
Actually, if you want to make an issue of it, you are incorrect
Not to be argumentative, but the first year of our current numbering system was the year 1, not the year 0, so that first decade was from years 1 to 10, and counting forward a bit, our current decade is 2001-2010.
Seconded.
That’s why it was pretty lame to celebrate the 21st century in 2000.
Apologies in advance.
thirded
math. a bitch.
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
Put down the crack pipe
So you are saying that 1980 was part of the 1970s?
Yeah, right, bullshit.
A numeric decade can exist independent of a century. This decade spanned TWO centuries, pretty cool, eh?
by Rev Halofan on Aug 30, 2009 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
So let's use fingers and toes, shall we?
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
then
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20.
not:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
then
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
So (you can put your shoes back on now), it follows:
2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
not
2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009
then
2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020
not
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
Yep. That's the way it works. Like I said, math's a bitch.
But most people are crap at math, and get their reality from People magazine and Edgar Cayce. So common culture gets it wrong. Comon culture plops 1980 into 80’s, because the third digit is the same. Clever.
As long as “most people” aren’t doing the science and engineering on the planet, their ignorance shall remain my bliss.
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
Well it IS sunday
and you are sure as hell religiously sticking to the stipulations of the LORD‘s calendar, just make sure you don’t buy an coins dated BC (BEFORE CHRIST) if you are shopping at an antique store.
God Bless.
The Lord's calendar is wrong anyway
It is not really, truly, 2009 as we all know it and think it to be. Look it up.
And, in any case, it would not matter which calendar you chose to use as long as that calendar uses the base-10 numbering system. If it does, then the math is still a bitch.
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
I prefer that to the alternative: liking to be wrong...
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
i want to see your ass in church
sucking gregorian calendar ding dong. until then you are a cheap fraud.
by Rev Halofan on Aug 31, 2009 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Come on down. First Presbyterian Church of Orange. Sunday morning. 9am sharp.
I, personally, DO suck gregorian calendar ding dong. I, culturally, DO mentally frame “1980” as part of the 80’s decade and not the 70’s. But I do not launch scuds at those who know that I am being a cultural lemming. They got the math on their side.
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
LEt me put it this way
if they and you are too dumb to differentiate “Gregorian Decade 197” from “The 1970s” then you all are too dumb to see why “having math on your side” is worthless argument in a discussion that does not concern math.
What are you guys bitching about?
It’ll be 5770 in a few weeks.
Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch
The problem with the decades/century notation
Is that it is all semantics. There is no real first recorded year or a time when “time” begins. Time shouldn’t be understood as linear anyways since that has no real basis in the universe and only is a clever and easy way for humans to understand/grasp this abstract concept.
But seriously, it’s all semantics.
And while technically you’re right here Stirrups, the majority of people would not say that 1980 was part of the 1970’s.
RIP #34
Yeah, I realize that. And I did acknowledge it with the "common culture" references.
I was just helping support angelfan13 and rspencer when Rev went all ballistic on them.
We could go on more about what time is, or isn’t, but it would be tough (but maybe fun?) to keep the discussion in baseball terms.
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
At what point does common culture becomes the new reality?
I could have told Rev not to screw with an IT guy. My experience is that they always win and you always lose. It’s a binary world.
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.
Ah, but...
I am, in I.T. terms, practically paleolithic. Back in my day, our Computer Science 101 training mandated that analysis begain with the users of the application, then went to application data, then to the application itself. The purpose of IT infrastructure was to support the ability of the application to present the data that the user needs. The end user is the ultimate. Therefore they are ALWAYS right.
Nowadays it is more about bright and shiny objects. IT guys always want to make their lives easier using some new-fangled technology, and spend too much of their analysis time trying to find ways to justify what they want in terms of end user benefits. It’s all a lie.
And, in the real world, no two customers look at the same data the same way. In and end-user centric world, everything is shades of gray.
And, to your point, everybody’s perspective is their reality. Sometimes IT must arbitrate between two diametrically opposed concepts of reality, assuring that at least one party will be pissed off.
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
what i noticed about IT guys
is they have a GREAT idea for your system… pay them to not only install it, but to LEARN it… so they can go get a job with your competition with what you PAID them to learn.
There is a phrase for that: mercenary scum.
by Rev Halofan on Aug 31, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Most serious IT managers figured that out a couple of decades ago.
If an IT employee wants to get certified in some technology (other than ITIL), the employee pays for that education on their own dime, and their own time. For the very reason you cite.
Nobody likes paying the other guy to kick your ass. As true in IT as it is true in baseball.
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
good baseball metaphor
but at least when a team trades a player they have trained they theoretically receive something for it.
But nothing comes back if they DFA the guy.
Nothing, that is, beyond the frustration and humiliation and pain that comes from seeing the other team successfully take your money to use your investment against you.
In my previous gig, where I WAS an IT Director, I had my staff AND my vendors sign non-disclosures. It was a law firm, however, so I could not get away with non-compete contracts here in California, which is why I gave my employees the finger for trying to bill me for their education.
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
It’s a binary world.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world.
Those who understand binary and those who don’t.
Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch
by red floyd on Aug 31, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1010!
We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.
There are also 3 kinds of people in the world
Those who can count, and those who can’t.
Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch
by red floyd on Aug 31, 2009 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Angelfan13
is spot-on. These picks are perfect. I don’t think there’s anything to argue about. Nice job Angelfan13!
since 1961
no Jose
but overall good job
Aybar is a nowhere man, Sitting in his Nowhere Land, Making all his nowhere plans for nobody.
by princeton11loveshalos on Aug 29, 2009 5:03 PM PDT reply actions
Excellent picks
I’d put Erstad at first with Speez the backup, and I wouldn’t put Guillen anywhere near this party, but otherwise I think you’ve hit it pretty squarely.
Putting Ersty at first is kind of a consolation prize, because he absolutely must be a starter on this team, but while his greatest contributions were in CF, Torii has to be there. And by the end of the decade, Kendry may replace Speez in that lineup.
Erstad belongs on the bench behind Spiezio
He only good season was 2000 – the last season of the previous decade.
RIP Nick...
Jim Scully
Jim Scully Home
Erstad left his career on the Angel Stadium outfield and in the center field wall
and he hit a homer in Game 6 of the WS with a broken hand.
For these reasons alone Erstad must start on this team.
Without Erstad's glove in 2002
Our flyball-prone pitching staff assures the Mariners of a Wildcard berth.
by Rev Halofan on Aug 30, 2009 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions
I love Chupa, but...
Chupa over the Kingfish in Right????
Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch
Kingish Anchors the '90's outfield.
This decade he was more DH and in need of late inning pinch running replacement.
This team is our extended family, That's why we love them no matter what the record, no matter what the score.
by halofan4life on Aug 30, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Sp – Lackey
Closer – Perci
Setup – K-rod
8th – Donnely
Catcher Napoli
1st – tex
2nd – kennedy
SS – Orlando cab, if we win this year, Aybar takes it.
3rd – Glaus
lf – GA
cf – Torri
rf – Abreu
dh – Vlade
pinch hitter – kendry morales
In Kobe we trust!
Maybe
he anticipates a lot of extra inning games?
by Caseys Kiss of Death on Aug 30, 2009 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions
typo i meant to type 7th lol, seeing how our pitchers rarely make it out of the 6th lol. God our staff is terrible…. while this years offense and defense maybe the most talented/deepest we’ve had, our pitching staff is probably the worst we’ve had.
In Kobe we trust!
sorry but tex at first is a no go for me now
Kendry at 1st now. He’s been with the organization longer and he’s more of a badass
Aybar is a nowhere man, Sitting in his Nowhere Land, Making all his nowhere plans for nobody.
by princeton11loveshalos on Aug 31, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions
only thing i would have to disagree with is your backup relievers
i wouldnt put romero or schoenweis on this list. gotta be donnelly in there somewhere and i would put ben weber on there before either or those 2.
#34 Nick Adenhart Will Always Be Remembered
or Donnelly
Meet me @ the budweiser patio
by BigBangRobbDawgg on Aug 29, 2009 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions
MINE
SP- Lackey
C- Bengie
1st- Erstad
2nd- Izzy (my upset special)
3rd- Glaus
SS- O-cab
LF- GA
CF- Torii
RF- Vlad
DH- Salmon
Set-up man is shields, Closer i can’t pick too close to call for me tween Percy & Krod
my Bench: Figgy, AK, Naps, JR, Eckstein
Meet me @ the budweiser patio
by BigBangRobbDawgg on Aug 29, 2009 9:30 PM PDT reply actions
AK hit 3 HR's in an ALCS game....
and was our starting 2b for 7 years. I’d put Eck at SS because he was actually a better hitter than O-Cab. I’d put spezio at 1b.
while i appreciate the postseason heroics of both spezio and AK (and Eck)
erstad was the glue of the franchise for many a years with his grit. Eck had some good seasons but i dont think he was offensively superior to O-cab, and certainly not with the glove, and again my mancrush for izzy swayed my decision for him at 2nd… AK is no slouch and HK isnt either… tough decisions all around.
Meet me @ the budweiser patio
by BigBangRobbDawgg on Aug 31, 2009 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions
My Team
SP-John Lackey
CP-Troy Percival.Francisco Rodriguez
C-Bengie Molina
1B-Darin erstad
2B-Adam Kennedy
3B-Troy Glaus
SS-Orlando Cabrera
LF-Garret Anderson
CF-Jim Edmonds
RF-Tim Salmon
DH-Vladamir Guerrero
what do you think?
nope - Showboat McGloryhog was traded that spring:
March 23, 2000: Adam Kennedy traded by the St. Louis Cardinals with Kent Bottenfield to the Anaheim Angels for Jim Edmonds.
I disagree with 2 picks
Erstad should start at 1st, since Hunter would start in center
Eckstein should start over Cabrera at SS
RIP Nick. We will miss you!
Yeah
I was thinking about Hunter, but I couldn’t find a place to put him.
by br0nxb0mbers23 on Aug 31, 2009 7:42 AM PDT up reply actions
For an exercise in appreciation....we can do an all 90's team too...
C: Lance Parrish
1b: JT Snow
2b: Randy Velarde
3b: Tony Phillips
SS: Gary Discarcinia
LF: Garrett Anderson
CF: Jim Edmonds
RF: Tim Salmon
DH: Chili Davis
SP: Chuck Finley
RP: Percival
Yeah the outfield and DH is good. Pitching was pretty good. The infields were a disaster.
25 man roster for all decade team in 30 seconds...
C – B. Molina
1B – D. Erstad
2B – A. Kennedy
3B – T. Glaus
SS – O. Cabrera
LF – G. Anderson
CF – T. Hunter
RF – T. Salmon
DH – V. Guerrero
B – C. Figgins
B – D. Eckstein
B – B. Abreu
B – K. Morales
B – M. Napoli
SP – J. Lackey
SP – B. Colon
SP – J. Washburn
SP – E. Santana
SP – J. Saunders
RP – K. Escobar
RP – S. Shields
RP – J. Arredondo
RP – B. Donnelly
RP – T. Percival
CL – F. Rodriguez
RIP NA
I'd rather have Percy close, and K-Rod be a setup guy.
Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch
Percy was hardly light's out...
In the 90’s he was untouchable. But this decade? Especially in late 2002. I got sick to my stomach every time we took out K-rod to put in Percival and close.
and the post-season...
I checked Percival’s stats again for 2002. They were amazing. I guess I just remember him pitching up fatballs to Barry Bonds in the WS and getting roughed up in the LDS.
It was much more agonizing watching him in 2003 and 2004 I guess….2002 obviously ended just fine.
And yeah K-rod wasn’t perfect either when he was closing here.
How come...
Percival is so underrated. The Rays threw him down the river, and I think he was a great pitcher.
by br0nxb0mbers23 on Sep 1, 2009 6:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Some tough calls...
have to decide between one great year (abreu, arredondo, morales, etc.) or several solid years (anderson, salmon, lackey, etc.) for a number of players.
percival v. krod is a toss-up as far as i’m concerned. technically speaking, krod should probably be the closer of this decade and percy should represent the 90’s. percy was the closer for the world championship team, krod has the single season saves record. to be honest, i don’t give a shit which one closes.
RIP NA
Totally Agreed
It’s not like we are talkin about a real team.
Didn't come up here to read. Came up here to hit.
-Hank Aaron
by br0nxb0mbers23 on Sep 1, 2009 5:39 PM PDT up reply actions
No one would start Figgy?
To me, Figgy is an easy choice to start if we are discussing an all-decade team. If that means displacing Kennedy at 2B or Cabrera or Eckstein at SS, then so be it. Another possibility is to start Figgy at 3B and make Glaus the DH.
Wait it out
He’ll be there soon enough
by br0nxb0mbers23 on Sep 1, 2009 6:38 AM PDT up reply actions

by 



























