Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Sean Rodriguez is PTBNL in Angels Scott Kazmir Trade

According to reliever Rich Thompson, Sean Rodriguez is on his way to Tampa to complete the trade for new Angels' lefty Scott Kazmir.

Star-divide

This is from Thompson's twitter account - 

"Sad to see Sean Rodriguez heading to Tampa Bay, good luck to him he is an exciting player".

Good-bye, S-Rod. We hardly knew ye.

Sean is a very exciting player, and one the Angels could've had around for a long time, but it remains to be seen whether or not he can adjust to Major League pitching. If he can, and does succeed, this trade swings in the favor of Tampa. If he doesn't fix his swing and ends up a mediocre player, I still think we got the better deal. How about you all?

Poll
Is the Kazmir trade still good?
Yes, we got a great pitcher!
508 votes
No, we vastly overpaid
369 votes
Who's Scott Kazmir? And who's S-Rod?
20 votes

897 votes | Poll has closed

This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.

Comment 299 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

YAWN... Told ya so

If you listened to my appearance on Biggsy yesterday you would have already known this.

by Rev Halofan on Sep 1, 2009 11:45 AM PDT reply actions  

i tuned in right after you got cut off

and didn’t you say Walden was on the list too?

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Don't act like you called this Rev

You also said Walden was a possibility.

RIP Nick. We will miss you!

by KingF15h on Sep 1, 2009 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I announced on Biggsy yesterday

that my Walden report was erroneous and that it was S-Rod with Wilson and Alden simply on a list of players in case S-Rod is injured while still under club control (standard PTBNL protocol) – are you calling me out without having heard me on the Angels radio station yesterday?

by Rev Halofan on Sep 1, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes. Yes I was

I heard your original report, but didn’t hear you yesterday. My apologies my good Sir

RIP Nick. We will miss you!

by KingF15h on Sep 2, 2009 5:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

95.5 KLOS?

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pirate Radio?

What do you need a fancy suit for, Charlie, you ain't got no job to wear it to.

by clover_black on Sep 1, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Indie 103

indie103.com

www.13stoploss.com

by feNOMINAL on Sep 1, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

DJ Paul V

plays a great mashup show

R.I.P. King Ad-Rock #34

by Seik1177 on Sep 1, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rev

You busted my chops about my music choices on KLAA. I doubt we have few musical tastes in common.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Funny how both “big bosses” of the major blogs are claiming to have broken this story. “The other guy” claims that he got a message from one of SRod’s family members! Ooooh, how special. All I know is that I opened this site about 30 minutes ago and found out that SRod had been part of the deal. I went to OCR and found the other guy’s claim on Sam Miller’s BLOG

Rev, you were speculating, yawning here was unnecessary. The two of you are quite comical claiming you all broke this. What does it really matter?

I love this team.

by Downing Rules on Sep 1, 2009 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I love the yawn, especially considering he came over to Draysbay on Friday and proclaimed

that it was Jordan Walden when our mods had already been informed that it was in fact Rodriguez. Fantastic stuff there.

Tools Whore

by Tyler on Sep 2, 2009 6:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

He did admit he was wrong about Walden via radio / blog on 8/31 in the evening. You still loving that yawn?

I love this team.

by Downing Rules on Sep 2, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, because he spoke so definitively when speaking about Walden.

He posted a slight retraction as a comment, 100 comments into a thread saying there is a list with Walden and Rodriguez on it. Now he’s saying “yawn” to the confirmation of Rodriguez? I mean, really?

Tools Whore

by Tyler on Sep 2, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

hey dude

I went on the radio to give the straight scoop. Just because you didn’t listen to the Angels pregame show Monday doesn’t mean it did not happen. Tuesday, the host of the show made a point to remind his listeners that I broke the story before ANY news outlet anywhere.

by Rev Halofan on Sep 2, 2009 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's fine, I'm glad you broke the news to the public on Monday. Fantastic.

However on Friday, you declared with just about absolute certainty that Jordan Walden was in fact the PTBNL and then three days later and without a retraction on the site, your response to the news that it’s Sean Rodriguez is yawn? That’s incredibly arrogant and seems pretty unnecessary.

Tools Whore

by Tyler on Sep 3, 2009 5:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Rev FTW!!!

They want power, We want respect...

by SenorChuckles on Sep 3, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

What because he "broke" the story?

I was notified that it was Sean Rodriguez Saturday evening. I was also instructed to keep it off the internet, but hooray for him.

Tools Whore

by Tyler on Sep 3, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's journalistic conceit. An ancient tale.

He was acting in the role of a reporter and obtained information. Part of what drives a reporter is personal curiosity. Once he had the info, his curiosity was satisfied. Apparently he got the info on the condition of keeping it secret. That, my friends, is weak sauce. Once you get the info you bust your ass to verify the info from other sources that are not bound by secrecy, and do it fast before somebody else gets there first.

But being in on a secret made him smugly satisfied. The only thing left is the desire to share the info and demonstrate his ability to be “in the know”. Double smug satisfaction. However, this comes at the expense of keeping the secret. Keeping the secret keeps his importance. You and I are not worthy of the price of not keeping his secret and losing his imporance.

Oops! the role of reporter has been set aside. Sucks to be you, loser!

But when the news breaks elsewhere, the smugness turns to frustration, even impotence. All that is left is “Yeah, I knew that. And I knew that EARLIER, but…But…BUT…”

‘But’, my ass.

Tyler got scooped. Tyler lost. Tyler whines. Tyler seeks revenge by pointing to the earlier Walden miss. Tyler has the balls to attempt to rebuke Rev for not posting a full retraction of the Walden miss here on HH. Tyler suddenly – and conveniently – rediscovers value in the role of reporters.

Suck it, Ty. If you want to be in the information business, grow some backbone.

We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.

by Stirrups on Sep 3, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the trade is more equal

now IF Kazmir retutns to 2008 form

R.I.P. Nick Adenhart #34

by Vladd#27 on Sep 1, 2009 11:46 AM PDT reply actions  

I have no clear read on this trade now.

Either it’s equal, or the Angels got fleeced. Until a year from now, I think we won’t know, but it’s easier to think the latter than the former at this moment.

by Turks Teeth on Sep 1, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

True

How is anyone to know what the trade is worth until we see him pitch this season.

When I'm not at the stadium, I'd rather be watching my Halos back in Costa Rica!

by Dono Romantico on Sep 1, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought we got a great deal before this revelation....

now it seems much more even….

As I mentioned in the other post, this makes re-signing either Abreu or Figgins more critical.

Before we could have conceivably let them both walk and put S-Rod in the OF and Wood at 3B. Now we’ll probably re-sign Figgins and put him in LF, making the way for Wood.

by Nashdiesel on Sep 1, 2009 11:49 AM PDT reply actions  

i agree with this

If Figgins is going to the OF next year (which seems to be the case), S-Rod was trade bait anyway. Let’s face it, he wasn’t unseating Howie, Aybar, Maicer, Torii, Juan or Bobby (if he’s back). That leaves him in AAA… again.

Sean has the potential to be a very good player, IF he can adapt to MLB pitching. At the same time, Kazmir has the potential to be a very good #2, if not a #1.

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

if we try to move Figgy to the OF he'll walk for sure

is Juan Rivera invisible? he’s a lock for LF the next 2 years.

by Fred Fredrix on Sep 1, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know that we resign him.

I have the feeling after this season he’ll be in more demand, we won’t get the same kind of deal.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

LOL

You know he wants to play with Garret again.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know

I really don’t know.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

He did.

He’s on the free agent market again this year.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Angels have 15 days to negotiate with Figgins...

…before the others enter the picture.

My feeling is that resigning Figgins and Abreu will be top of the list of Angels’ priorities, and that they will get contracts done before the two weeks expire. I think it’s pretty clear already from Scioscia’s statements that he’d like to see those two in the lineup past this season.

by Turks Teeth on Sep 1, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sure that the Angels will offer

Arb. to all of those guys. And try to get a deal worked out immediately.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the Angels offer arbitration to everyone.

All five A-type free agents.

But I think it’s only Figgins and Abreu, and perhaps Lackey, that are priorities.

by Turks Teeth on Sep 1, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

What is arbitration exactly?

I get contract extension but how does arbitration work?

Angels 2009 WS Champs

by dan73962 on Sep 1, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

After a player...

has been in MLB for 3 years he has 3 years of arbitration before becoming a FA.

The team can offer or not offer arbitration. If it isn’t offered, the player is non-tendered and becomes a FA, I think.

If it is offered, the player and team submit salary numbers that they think are appropriate and an independent arbiter decides – after arguments by the agent and the team – which number is more appropriate and that becomes the salary for the coming year.

Always a one-year contract IF it gets to arbitration.

Most cases are settled after the arbitration is agreed to, but before the arguments in front of the arbiter. The team and player usually compromise.

Anyone can correct me if I am wrong here – just did that from memory.

RIP Nick...

Jim Scully
Jim Scully Home

by jimmuscomp on Sep 1, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Arbitration...

…both parties (owner & player) come up with a $ amount they figure the player’s services are worth’s. A 3rd party (arbitrator) assesses the relative value of the player (based upon “comps” or those of roughly comparable worth) and states the player should get…5 mil a year. If both parties agree, then the players services are retained for $5 mil for that year. If either party disagrees, then (in Figgy’s case) it would be off to free agency.
Arbitration is also available to non-free agents. I believe K-Rod’s final season in Anaheim was at an amount less that what he wanted. The arbitrator ruled in the Angels favor.

For potential free agents, I believe they submit to non-binding arbitration, wherea if the player does not have the option of free agency, the arbitration is binding.

by sothball on Sep 1, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Clarification

The arbitrator doesn’t really assess the player’s value. Rather, the arbitrator must choose either the team’s salary or the player’s salary. The arbitrator has no discretion to pick a different number.

by jjackflash on Sep 1, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also

if the player agrees to go to arbitration, that’s it. He does not become a free agent. He is bound to return to his team, either for his salary or for the team’s salary. The player becomes a FA only if he declines the arbitration offer.

If the team does not offer arbitration, the player becomes a free agent but cannot re-sign with the team until sometime in May (this last part may have changed).

by jjackflash on Sep 1, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah...I really screwed that up.

I should never try to post anything detailed from work. What a mess…

by sothball on Sep 1, 2009 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

from an LA Times story a few days ago...

He put in all this work for the Angels at third base, and yet he says he would not ask to stay there as a condition of signing with the Angels.

“As long as I’m in the No. 1 or No. 2 spot and I’m on the field,” he said, “it doesn’t matter.”
LINK

Rivera will start in either LF or RF. Bobby can become the new Vlad, shifting between OF/DH, and that’s if he comes back.

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

i agree

and if/when he doesn’t, Nappy can DH.

losing a player of Bobby’s caliber sucks, but it opens things up a bit.

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think it's that big really.

Scioscia has stated pretty forcefully in the media (which is rare for him) that he wants Bobby back. Bobby has done the same. I think this is a match.

It’s Vlad coming back that’s the big IF. I think they take his current salary and pour it into new contracts for Abreu, Figgins and Lackey. If you take what Vladdy makes now, split it three ways, and add it to what Abreu, Figgins and Lackey make now, you arrive at something very near the targets those players will be looking for: $10M Abreu, $11M FIggins, $15M Lackey

And we pretty much just rolled over Escobar’s contract to Kazmir.

by Turks Teeth on Sep 1, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Too many people blocking S-Rod.

If Kazmir continues to return to his previous form, this is still an excellent deal for us, it fills a hole that has been somewhat worrying me ever since we lost Nick. Now obviously, if S-Rod turns into a megastar and Kazmir puts up 5 ERA’s the next 2 years, we look like idiots, but as always, to get quality you have to give quality, and quite frankly we hadn’t really given enough, we looked the clear winner no matter what.

#34 Forever
Plugging the upside since 2006.
Never give up, never surrender!

by TheOptimist on Sep 1, 2009 12:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Still a good trade

There was no where in the next three years for S-rod to play. 2b is covered with Izzy and Howie, 3b is covered by Wood, SS is not an option. Although we have some holes in the OF, he is not an outfielder.

Good trade we use organizational depth to trade for an Org weakness SP. We get a top of the rotation type pitcher for two years to fill our #4 or #5 spot. I am excited to have him in the rotation this year eating up the #5 spot that has been awful with Osully and Bell. Not too mention a good young rotation the next two years assuming Lackey is gone. Weaver, Saundo, Santana, Kazmir and ???. Gives others a chance to audition for the #5 spot (Palmer, Osully and Bell)

Well done Ninja. I did think we would end up with sime sort of Bully arm on the waiver wire last night. But lets win with what we got

R.I.P. Nick, you are missed!

by P237 on Sep 1, 2009 12:01 PM PDT reply actions  

People keep saying S-Rod was blocked

but I don’t get it. Figgins walks as a free agent, slide Brandon Wood to third, and S-Rod can play short. Shazam! Problem solved.

Witty .sig goes here.

by scareduck on Sep 1, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Aybar becomes trade bait too...

Or S-Rod goes to 2nd for Howie to be dealt.

Thing is, Kazmir could probably have been had for Sweeney and Kendrick, don’t ya think? S-Rod didn’t have the MLB trade value because he hasn’t produced at the big league level…

I think trading Howie (or Aybar) probably could have made this a 2 for 1 deal instead of a 3 for 1 deal. All the more reason to have done it before July 31.

RIP Nick...

Jim Scully
Jim Scully Home

by jimmuscomp on Sep 1, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Aybar

Arte’s favorite Angel is not going anywhere.

by Rev Halofan on Sep 1, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

You've repeated that dozens of times

And nobody remembers…pay attention y’all!

In Remembrance of Nick Adenhart, Courtney Stewart, Henry Pearson. Heal soon Jon Wilhite.

I want Andrew Thomas Gallo to be a pinata, and the Angels supply the bats...

Oh, and W6G.

by Slasher52 on Sep 1, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think of it as kind of a drinking game

When Rev mentions the Arte love for Aybar, I take a shot of the strongest drink around me. usually that’s orange juice that has been left out for too long.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

I guess I need to start playing that drinking game…so Rev, again, who is Arte’s fav Angel?

In Remembrance of Nick Adenhart, Courtney Stewart, Henry Pearson. Heal soon Jon Wilhite.

I want Andrew Thomas Gallo to be a pinata, and the Angels supply the bats...

Oh, and W6G.

by Slasher52 on Sep 1, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ruff

Just the way your mother likes it Trebek!

In Remembrance of Nick Adenhart, Courtney Stewart, Henry Pearson. Heal soon Jon Wilhite.

I want Andrew Thomas Gallo to be a pinata, and the Angels supply the bats...

Oh, and W6G.

by Slasher52 on Sep 1, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

f'ing kills me

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Best bit ever

on SNL.

In Remembrance of Nick Adenhart, Courtney Stewart, Henry Pearson. Heal soon Jon Wilhite.

I want Andrew Thomas Gallo to be a pinata, and the Angels supply the bats...

Oh, and W6G.

by Slasher52 on Sep 1, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'll take "The Rapists" for $500, Alex.

That’s “Therapists”.
Oh, all right, I’ll play your game, Trebek!

Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch

by red floyd on Sep 1, 2009 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

"The Penis Mightier"

Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch

by red floyd on Sep 1, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I take "Famous Titties" for $300

Trebek: It’s not famous titties, it’s famous TITLES!

Dolly Parton!

Peanuts...Get your Overpriced Peanuts!

by Angel Hawker on Sep 2, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

THREEVE!

In Kobe we trust!

by robi s on Sep 3, 2009 2:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nor should he go anywhere

Aybar has developed into a .300 hitter with occasional power and is a gold glove candidate at short. He may not walk much, but that is a very valuable player.

I hate the idea of losing Sean-Rod just because it means we gave up too much. But I’ll get over it as long as Kazmir is healthy. At this point the ideal lineup for 2010 probably does not include Vlad.

LF Figgins
RF Abreu
CF Hunter
1B Morales
RF Rivera
C Napoli
2B Kendrick
3B Wood
SS Aybar

5 are homegrown. I’d like to see the people who love to say “Angel prospects never pan out” and refer to Dallas McPherson all the time take a look at how good the rest of these guys have become.

The HK-47 hitting droid is the finest line drive machine ever built

by RallyMonkey5 on Sep 1, 2009 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I get fined

For having 2 rightfielders in a lineup. Meant to put Abreu at DH.

The HK-47 hitting droid is the finest line drive machine ever built

by RallyMonkey5 on Sep 1, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Aybar = My least favorite Angel

He and GMJr make mental mistakes… and worse of the two is that Aybar makes them in pressure situations. GREAT when nothing is on the line but when precise execution is needed in a critical situation the guy boffs stuff up. He scares me… amazes me with great plays on a day to day basis but scares me when things get important.

la-and-ana.tumblr.com

by Anaheim of Anaheim on Sep 1, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

It hasn't just been that one play.

The guy roams in the outfield every game threatening to interfere with / injure Torii or Rivera… not to mention he could hurt himself. I don’t want to see any of that in the playoffs. I work a lot of Dodger games and have seen the same thing out of Orlando Hudson… they both scare the crap out of me when there are shallow.. yet high… fly balls… balls that the outfielders can catch but for some reason are routinely attacked by Aybar… this routine also trains our outfielders to have lazy leg.. meaning they know Aybar will run after it so instead of joggin in to catch it routinely they are walking in and watching Aybar.

We can’t afford to mess up ONE play in the playoffs.

la-and-ana.tumblr.com

by Anaheim of Anaheim on Sep 1, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Infielder's are supposed to go after that ball

until an Outfielder tells him not to.

*Ade-Rock 34*

by TheTypingFiend on Sep 1, 2009 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

exactly, until the of’s call off the if, the ss has gotta stick with it. It’s not aybars fault rivera and gmj dont speak up

In Kobe we trust!

by robi s on Sep 3, 2009 2:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

But before July 31st, we had no proof Kazmir's arm was still physically attached to his body.

Kazmir didn’t look nearly as attractive being a guy coming off the DL with a 6 ERA as he does now.

And Sweeney wouldn’t have been enough. They’d have wanted a pitcher back either way. Torres and Kendrick maybe, but the Rays are likely not interested in S-Rod as an infielder. They already have Zobrist. Rather, they are likely thinking about an outfield spot for him, which may be why S-Rod got sent down and started making outfield starts when we knew the Rays were looking at our system.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, scareduck is being awfully coy.

The organization does not value Wood or Rodriguez as highly as they do Aybar.

The organization does not value Rodriguez as highly as they do Kendrick.

It’s not even clear that they value either player as highly as they do Izturis, or Figgins.

And frankly, given recent performance, is it even clear they should? There is nothing to complain about in what Figgins, Aybar, Izturis and Kendrick have offered this season.

by Turks Teeth on Sep 1, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's why I don't look at players in terms of single component skills.

Rob Deer had crazy power as well.

I prefer to look at aggregate value, and the metrics that offer the best measure of that.

by Turks Teeth on Sep 1, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

ss and 2b arent typically power positions, they play small ball up there with the best of them

In Kobe we trust!

by robi s on Sep 3, 2009 2:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Aybar

Aybar has been great this year both on defense and offense, how do you value Aybar and his MLB experience and success against S-rod and him being unproven at the Major League Level?

The organization loves Aybar, he is not going anywhere. Especially after the year he has put up. Moving two unproven players (Wood and S-rod) over to the left side of the infield is not a very smart idea to having a solid defense

R.I.P. Nick, you are missed!

by P237 on Sep 1, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

hahah how can u forget about arte’s favorite player.

In Kobe we trust!

by robi s on Sep 3, 2009 2:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

With S-Rod being the PTBNL

Kazmir HAS to regain his form for this to be even a decent trade for the Angels. And given how Kazmir has looked this year (and even some last year), that’s a BIG if.

Kazmir’s a valuable asset, but the Angels overpaid. The chances that one of the other two prospects works out is probably less than 50%. But now that you throw S-Rod in there, chances are that Tampa Bay is going to have at least one good regular at very cheap cost.

I feel the need, the need...for speed!

by Gorbachav5 on Sep 1, 2009 12:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Over paid with what?

Sweeney and Torres didn’t have a chance at making the 40 Man Roster this year or the next. And Although S-Rod has potential, there isn’t room for him in the Angels farm system. Instead of sitting on a “hot” prospect, the Angels made the move to give up talent to get talent.

Next year’s middle infield will look identical to this years. Where would S-Rod play. However our rotation heading into the playoffs looks a lot stronger. And if Lackey doesn’t re-sign next year we still have a higher caliber pitcher to compliment Weaver, Saunders, Santana, and Palmer/O’Sullivan.

Where did we over pay?

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

S-Rod could play anywhere in the outfield as well though.

Throw him in at right, sign Figgy and put him in left, Juan to DH/ backup, Wood to third and watch ’em play. Or at least, that was my plan. >_>

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can't get with your ideals

If you don’t include Vladimir Guerrero. I’ll stand by my man.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Guys who can only play DH seem to be anathema to Mike.

He likes flexibility in the lineup. Even Fulmer could play first. Vlad’s adventures in the outfield are effectively over given what happened to him the last time he was out there.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

However there is Loyalty

And the face of a franchise. I think the Soth knows that a lot of the success he’s had since 2003 has come from Vlad’s abilities.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Loyalty is there, but it has limits.

We gave Salmon his shot in 2006 because he was cheap and we needed him. I’m not saying it’s impossible, it’s just that we’ve got a lot of power bats, with another in the pipeline in Wood. We don’t actually have a replacement .400 OBP leadoff man. That’s why I think we hit Figgins first. And the idea with keeping S-Rod is that he’d be significantly cheaper, and under our control for longer than Vlad will be.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with you.

We may offer Vlad arbitration, but I don’t think we offer him a contract extension out of the gate.

I think the organization will try to negotiate one-two with Figgins and Abreu. I think they offer arbitration to Oliver, Lackey and Vlad, but only enter concerted negotiations with Lackey of those three.

I think it’s not only ability at issue. I think you take a look at the recent CostCo fan event with Figgy. Thousands showed up, and they even had to schedule a second event. And it was precisely the audience they wanted: parents and kids, of every race and size.

Meanwhile, Abreu is everything that Vlad couldn’t be. He is the quiet productive veteran that can mentor young players, and who can speak English and Spanish fluently and work both audiences well. He’s a good interview…he’s the total package.

Vlad has been awesome, but if you’re going to invest in a player on the wrong side of thirty, they have to deliver in other arenas. Players like Hunter, Figgins and Abreu do that.

by Turks Teeth on Sep 1, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Like I said, I'm not sold on us keeping Abreu due to his age, poor range in right, not to mention

his cost which will almost certainly increase given the season he’s had. Though with S-Rod gone, it’s more of a possibility that we keep one of Vlad/Abreu. Our other option is to give Evans, or more likely, Chris Pettit a shot in Right. Or we could overpay Bay/Holliday.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that undervalues the aggregate package Abreu offers.

Particularly in mentorship and inter-team communication. Morales, Rivera, Izturis and Figgins have all partially credited their individual improvement to Abreu.

Abreu can no longer offer good defense, but he’s exactly the sort of player who ages well at the plate. His plate discipline is not going to evaporate overnight. With a few more ABs at DH, he’ll continue to offer excellent value at age 36 and 37. A two year contract with a club option for a third, assuming certain performance benchmarks are attained, seems like a decent gamble to me.

by Turks Teeth on Sep 1, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

We've been burned on a lot of deals with aging OF though. As much as I hate to say it

Salmon and GA both ended up going downhill much faster than hoped. Abreu’s power is diminished and it’s not clear how long he can stay around .300 as a hitter with his batspeed going down.

Don’t get me wrong… I like Abreu, and I think his effect on the clubhouse is an undeniable statement that we need a Tim Salmon-type at the hitting coach position. But I dunno if supplemental hitting coach is a good enough reason to pay Abreu the amount of money people will be throwing at him this offseason.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd let him walk....

  I like his OBP but his SLG numbers are not great and they are only going to get worse. Put Figgins in LF, Rivera in RF and let Napoli DH.

by Nashdiesel on Sep 1, 2009 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

There've been a number of articles recently addressing just this.

They point out that folks like Hunter and Figgins are the faces of the franchise now.

The problem with Vlad is not just age-related decline, post-season failure, or the decreasing time he’s spending on the field, it’s that he does not speak English and does not participate in a lot of community or charitable events.

That’s not a dig on single-language speakers. The organization has simply had a lot of trouble marketing him as the face of the franchise because he isn’t available to do lots of public events, or communicate effectively with the SoCal audience at large.

by Turks Teeth on Sep 1, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Move Kendry to 1B, get Sean Rodriguez back AND LETS GO WIN!!!!!!!!!!

That'll only happen if that one prospect is the second coming of Christ and redemption for mankind can only be achieved by smacking many balls out of the yard.
-The Limey

by anaheim angels on Sep 1, 2009 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

.......

Really… what the hell are you talking about?

by matt92130 on Sep 2, 2009 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

That is Acuda's signature

Play Wood already. Willits sucks.

by hauldog on Sep 2, 2009 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh...

I guess I should have known that…. good times. My bad.

by matt92130 on Sep 6, 2009 6:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol!

I love this team.

by Downing Rules on Sep 3, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

The quality S-Rod is the thing

The Angels gave up 18 years of control of 3 cheap players, one of whom had shown significant ability at the triple A level. I have no problem trading prospects for useful major league pieces, but there’s still a value on the prospects. By your logic, if someone hands me a million $1 bills but I live in Russia, I should trade those million $1 bills to some guy on the corner for a goat because the dollar bills are useless to me.

Well, they may be useless to me, but there sure as heck was probably someone out there who would give me more than a goat for that stash.

S-Rod had significant value. I thought the trade was about even when it was just the other two players. Two unproven minor leaguers with good potential for a struggling former ace. Yeah, that’s about right. But once you throw in a guy like S-Rod, the deal tilts well in favor of the Rays.

I feel the need, the need...for speed!

by Gorbachav5 on Sep 1, 2009 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wouldn't that be Andy Pettit

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 2, 2009 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not the best analogy
I have no problem trading prospects for useful major league pieces, but there’s still a value on the prospects. By your logic, if someone hands me a million $1 bills but I live in Russia, I should trade those million $1 bills to some guy on the corner for a goat because the dollar bills are useless to me.

Well, they may be useless to me, but there sure as heck was probably someone out there who would give me more than a goat for that stash.

In your analogy you placed a definite value by assigning $1M to the players, even though we have no idea how long a career—if any—will be enjoyed by Torres, Sweeney or even Rodriguez.

Perhaps it is better to look at all the players as shares in new-issue, small-cap stocks, while Kazmir is slightly more established and stable stock. Those shares of the new-issue companies might take off like rockets, might go belly-up, or might slowly appreciate in value over years. We don’t know.

The outcome of this trade won’t be known for years. Kazmir might regain much of the form he had a few years ago (under the tutelage of Butcher) and be a solid #2 or #3 in the rotation, which is a very valuable addition. Torres or Rodriguez might become valued members of the Rays, or may become cyphers who don’t live up to their hype. Few deals are as clear-cut as Pappas for Robinson.

"He's not a Rhodes Scholar to begin with''~Theo Epstein, talking about Papelbon

by George Kaplan on Sep 1, 2009 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree

Your analogy is flawed.

Million dollars still has a huge value, especially in Russia. If your are stranded on a deserted island that million dollars becomes fire kindling awfully quick. If you find a native who wants to trade the goat, you’d do it.

This trade amounts to Scott Kazmir for Sean Rodriguez. Sean Rodriguez is blocked in the middle infield. And for all accounts in purposes is blocked in the outfield. Sean Rodriguez isn’t going to contribute this year to the Major League Roster unless there are a lot of injuries.

Kazmir helps us win today and next year. Even if his wins and losses are about even, he helps us today. Rodriguez doesn’t. Sweeney doesn’t. And Torres doesn’t.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 2, 2009 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

it's a good move for s-rod...

he’s from florida, he’s going to a contender who has a similar approach as the angels, he’s not caught in the middle infielder/outfield jog jam and he’ll have a chance to start next year because of the iwamura (?) injury.

by thejd on Sep 1, 2009 12:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Iwamura came back over the weekend

The Rays seem pretty set in the IF with Pena, Iwamura, Bartlett and Longoria, and Zobrist to fill in wherever they need – SRod would be another utility type I guess?

by Matt UK on Sep 1, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Damn, I assumed that Iwamura had longer left before being a free agent

despite having the list of free agents open to check on Bartlett, I still missed it! I guess RF might be a possibility, Crawford and Upton are reasonably set in LF and CF, although I read they might be trying to shift CC before the deadline next season as he’s about to get uber expensive

by Matt UK on Sep 1, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Iwamura has a very cheap option for 2010 (4.25)

They still have the other Aybar (Willy) who has played almost 30 games at 2B. Of course there is also Zobrist.

There is a good possibility that S-Rod becomes the super sub for the Rays. Good luck to him and the Rays. Angel got a solid front of the rotation LHP with huge upside that is young and can dominate a game. You don’t trade nothing for something

Willie Mays Aikens is FREeeeeeeee

by Angel Aviator on Sep 1, 2009 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am saddened by this.

I know we didn’t have many options, but man…I dunno. I have the feeling we’re gonna end up getting hosed on this one. S-Rod could play anywhere on the diamond.

If Kazmir ends up ace-level over the next few seasons, it might work out, but given that we also gave up Torres and Sweeney… this one cost us. It’s not gonna be like Kotchman for Teix. If we lose on this, we lose BIG. The only way we win is if Kaz helps deliver a ring.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 12:12 PM PDT reply actions  

I wouldn't quite put it like that

but it has the possibility of being a disaster trade. S-Rod had plate discipline, a trait distinctly lacking in this organization. Kazmir is pitching better lately, but I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if he had been nursing some kind of injury that takes 18 months or more to recover from (what Tommy John normally takes, or shoulder problems).

Keep your fingers crossed, folks.

Witty .sig goes here.

by scareduck on Sep 1, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I agree.

The fact that S-Rod AND Sweeney were dealt is a little disturbing. Two of the offensive prospects not allergic to a walk left in the same deal. That irks me.

This trade went from being a B+ to a C for me right now. I’d think that with the level of prospects they got the Halos would have received some $$$ for the contract…

I don’t know – I’m really hoping Kazmir isn’t injured and can be a good #2 or #3 for the next three years.

RIP Nick...

Jim Scully
Jim Scully Home

by jimmuscomp on Sep 1, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

I dunno if plate discipline is the big thing we're going to miss.

I mean, S-Rod is K-ing in 28.6% percent of his PA. We’ve got Conger, who is pretty disciplined, and a few others besides him. I have the feeling it’ll be more about S-Rod’s power and ability to play anywhere than his ability to take another pitch here and there.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Even if Kaz plays

as a #2 or #3 guy, its still more contributions to the MLB Franchise then what S-Rod was going to do. I liked Rodriguez too, but he wasn’t going to make the Depth Chart next year either.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Again, could have been brought up as a power outfielder.

We would have had space, assuming we signed only one of Figgy/Vlad/Abreu

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well said

I am a huge fan of this trade. Kazmir is a great pitcher. We will be happy to have him.

by Brody on Sep 1, 2009 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

This trade helps us for a few years unless Kaz's injury troubles end up being bigger than we thought.

Which is a distinct possibility. The fact that we didn’t have an immediate opening for Rodriguez doesn’t mean that he didn’t have value, and a lot of it. As far as what kind of value Torres and Sweeney had… I’ll be honest, I thought Torres might have been the best of the group that’s above High-A at the moment. It’s hard to know though. He’s 5’ 10, his arm could explode tomorrow. Or maybe he ends up being a back of the rotation guy.

I just feel that with S-Rod in the mix we ended up giving too much away for what Kazmir is right now. And I have the same reservations that I did about Halliday, that being that he’s unlikely to make a giant difference in the playoffs. I recognize that the free agent market will be bad and there were plenty of good reasons to make this move.

But I suppose it’s a point that this trade wasn’t really about “win now” unlike others that were suggested. Kazmir was an ace pitcher, and the Angels saw an opportunity to grab him for a few seasons at less than the current ace market value. The only problem is really if he’s no longer an ace pitcher.

In the end, I have to stand by what I said. This one could hurt us if Kaz isn’t the Ace the Angels FO thinks he is anymore.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Completely agree...

We overpaid for what Kaz is right now. If the three prospects develop into 1.5 major league starters we’re on the losing end of this deal unless Kaz goes back to his previous skill level.

RIP Nick...

Jim Scully
Jim Scully Home

by jimmuscomp on Sep 1, 2009 8:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Really?

A 25-year old starting pitcher who’s under contract through 2012 (i.e., four pennant races) isn’t enough return for two guys who probably won’t make the majors until 2011 at the earliest, and one guy who doesn’t figure to be a starter on this team until 2010 at the earliest? Even if he’s not an ace, assuming Kazmir is healthy (a big assumption, admittedly) and able to make 80% of his starts over the next four years, that’s a damn good return. IMHO. Kazmir didn’t cost the Angels a single player from their 25-man roster, and may not have cost anyone who would have been on the 2010 25-man roster.

by jjackflash on Sep 1, 2009 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jack...

if this was a year ago I am with you. But his performance dropped big time this year. We don’t need another enigma in the rotation – we have Saunders, Santana and Weaver for that. I really, really like Kazmir, pre-2009, but I am worried that an injury is right around the corner.

By saying more than 1.5 starters I mean 2. So, say S-Rod becomes a starter and puts up .800 OPS seasons in 2010-2013 and Sweeney shows up in 2012 and puts up .820 OPS seasons for 6 years and plays 75% of the games. If we only get 3+ years of Kaz for that return and still have to pay $24 million to get that return, I’ll be burnt.

I can’t know this now – but if two of these guys turn into average to above average ML starters (which is a stretch) we lose this trade.

Even if Torres turns into a Darren Oliver type – that has massive value – a non-LOOGY LHRP is valuable. I hope you see my point – IF X and IF Y then Z. We don’t know yet, but it COULD turn out to be an overpay for Scott Kazmir from here on out. I hope not, but it could very well be.

Shit, I just remembered – I sponsor S-Rod’s BB-Ref page. Gotta alter the comment…

RIP Nick...

Jim Scully
Jim Scully Home

by jimmuscomp on Sep 1, 2009 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fair Enough

Keep in mind, of course, that if Kazmir does perform as we all hope, then in 2012 or whenever he’ll be a type A free agent and (assuming he leaves) the Angels get a couple of draft picks that effectively replace Sweeney and Torres (also assuming that draft pick compensation is part of the next CBA, which admitted is far from a sure thing).

If the Angels win the WS this year, I’ll consider it a worthwhile deal. If Kazmir remains a front of the rotation starter, it’ll be a worthwhile deal even without the WS (especially if Lackey leaves).

Meanwhile, Kazmir has already had more success at the big league level than Sean Rodriguez. IF he’s healthy, I suspect he will continue to be more successful.

by jjackflash on Sep 1, 2009 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I'll stand alone...

Maybe I’m the ever present optimist, but I don’t see this as a bad trade. I really hope Kazmir pitches lights out forcing a lot of you doubting Thomas’ to eat crow.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:41 PM PDT reply actions  

i think it's a fair trade

i’m calling it a win-win.

and i still like Kazmir’s potential

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

thank god I'm not alone

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

And me

If Kaz can become a Saunders type pitcher (ERA ~4.00, 6-7 K/9) and stay healthy, it’s a good trade – those type of pitchers don’t grow on trees, but I’d still like to see him pitch a bit deeper into games than I’ve seen him in the past

by Matt UK on Sep 1, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

very few good FA pitchers available for next year

by Fred Fredrix on Sep 1, 2009 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

That is true.

Something I remarked on earlier that there really not much out there this year. It’s pretty much big John, and a bunch of injury prone gambles.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Me Too

Rodriguez is blocked by several guys. He is an intriguing talent, but flawed (see his K-rate). Kazmir is now the youngest member of the starting rotation, and is here through 2011 (possibly even 2012, IIRC). Another year at AAA would do S-Rod no good, and would probably diminish his trade value. Plus, the Angels have yet another M-IF prospect in the pipeline in Alexi Amarista (age 20, .855 OPS at Cedar Rapids). It’s not as if the Angels needed Rodriguez either this year or next, and it’s not as if Kazmir is a rental.

by jjackflash on Sep 1, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jack..

A 20 y/o M-IF from Cedar Rapids w/ an .855 OPS is not the same as a guy putting up .1000+ OPS in AAA two years in a row. Wood and S-Rod were ready this year and the team decided to let them rot on the vine a bit longer instead of giving them a shot.

The only good part of this is that Kazmir has a ton of upside – but he has to live up to it now or this has the potential to be a very one-sided trade.

RIP Nick...

Jim Scully
Jim Scully Home

by jimmuscomp on Sep 1, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

M-IF

The point is simply that the Angels have another infielder in the pipeline. They already have more players than available spots at the big league level. The Angels were going to have to clear some room eventually. Mentioning Amarista was simply to highlight the fact that middle-infield remains an area of organizational strength. Were they going to leave Rodriguez in SLC for a third year of 1.000+OPS? Were they going to get a better player in return than Kazmir, without giving up anyone from the major league roster, and giving up only one pitcher?

by jjackflash on Sep 1, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hear Lackey is available

Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch

by red floyd on Sep 1, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

i maintain that his numbers this year were caused by injury (much like Saunders). he’ll be back.

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not this season

Maybe never again. I don’t make this trade. Time will tell.

Touch'em all

by THE VOICE on Sep 1, 2009 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm worried

but I will say that I don’t think we really will be able to judge this contract until the end of the 2011 season.

Witty .sig goes here.

by scareduck on Sep 1, 2009 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's my end of it as well. This isn't like some other trades where it's been pretty clear who won.

This one is going to depend on what comes of S-Rod and Torres, as well as Sweeney. Though to me, Sweeney was starting to look like D-Mac 2.0.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

D-Mac reversed...

Getting the whole injury thing done BEFORE he hits his prime…

by rghan on Sep 1, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not with Kazmir

Tomorrow may be the start of a black period for our beloved Halos.

Touch'em all

by THE VOICE on Sep 1, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

And maybe you are wrong

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 2, 2009 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

oh well.

Tell your statistics to shut up

by HaloDutch on Sep 1, 2009 12:42 PM PDT reply actions  

REAGINS CONFIRMS IT

"We feel we gave up a lot in moving Sean," Reagins said. "He’ s a quality baseball player and a baseball player in the true sense of the word. Very intelligent, great instincts, able to play multiple positions — I think that’s what made him attractive to the Rays. But with the depth we have in the middle infield we felt it was a move we could afford to make."
LINK TO STORY

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 12:42 PM PDT reply actions  

eah, we could afford it..

still stings a little though.

Tell your statistics to shut up

by HaloDutch on Sep 1, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it hurts a bit.

I hope he gets a chance to excel in TB. Shame he won’t get a shot in Anaheim. Still like the trade though, got to give something in order to get something.

In Remembrance of Nick Adenhart, Courtney Stewart, Henry Pearson. Heal soon Jon Wilhite.

I want Andrew Thomas Gallo to be a pinata, and the Angels supply the bats...

Oh, and W6G.

by Slasher52 on Sep 1, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

will Wood ever get a legit shot?

Without Srod and Sweeney there isnt much 3b comeptition for Wood anymore for awhile

by Asfan4ever723 on Sep 1, 2009 12:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Not to my knowledge.

I know S-Rod was getting time out there, but not Wood.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just 1B.

Which is intriguing to me, because Morales is a natural corner outfielder.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

that would be interesting

C – Napoli
1B – Wood
2B – Kendrick
3B – Figgins
SS – Aybar
LF – Rivera
CF – Hunter
RF – Morales
DH – Abreu?

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Line-up

This is fine-however-I still think Vlady has something left-Just use Wood Instead of Mathews-at 3rd short-first-outfield or DH-everday one of those spots-its reall tuff to do but he is a good athelete and he could then play everyday-kinda like being the 10 player-Wood and Isturis-addup the atbats for the year and with these two as kinda like back ups they would still get 450 atbats each maybe more-just trade Mathews for a good relief pitcher-even if we have to pay some money—we dont need him now-Willits also-they both have value and we need pitching always

by spc7@verizon.net on Sep 3, 2009 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought the Angels looked at his arm and range and decided

“no thanks.” Wood has the footspeed to play short has and a good arm. I would guess he can play outfield if necessary. I mean, Quinlan made the switch from 3rd to OF, and Q isn’t the natural athlete that Wood is.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kowbell is not

a natural outfielder. He does not have the speed to cover enough ground out there. At best, he can handle the position and make the routine catch. He’s obviously a great first baseman.

I’ll judge this trade in the future solely on what Kazmir does for us. I won’t think any less of it if Sean-Rod hits .265 with 40 homers next year. First of all, he probably does not get a chance to do that as an Angel. Second of all, if he does that he might help Tampa Bay knock Boston out of the playoffs.

So go Rays! Go Sean-Rod! Beat Boston! I hope to meet that team in the ALCS, because even if the Angels lost I could be happy for Joe Madden and his club.

The HK-47 hitting droid is the finest line drive machine ever built

by RallyMonkey5 on Sep 1, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Too early to call.

I’ll judge this trade in the future solely on what Kazmir does for us

Exactly. It’s too early to tell. Has he fully recovered from his injury? Can our conditiong coach and Butch help him to pitch more innings? Will his arm fall off? Will the boy sit in the chair? And what about…. Naomi?

Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch

by red floyd on Sep 1, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

You could be right about the Natural Outfielder

I didn’t follow his minor league career or Cuban National Team Career. But I heard when he signed he was a corners guy.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 2, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Who is # 1

"I am not impressed by your per-formence!" -GSP

by KubanKowbell19 on Sep 1, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Holliday

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am not a number... I am a free man!

Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch

by red floyd on Sep 1, 2009 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am truly a sad case...

I don’t think I’ve missed a single pop culture ref all season.

Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch

by red floyd on Sep 1, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

But a splendid move to reference that show

"He's not a Rhodes Scholar to begin with''~Theo Epstein, talking about Papelbon

by George Kaplan on Sep 1, 2009 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Credit goes to Fred Fredrix.

I just picked up his thread.

Angels baseball. We do what we must, because we can -- HaloDutch

by red floyd on Sep 1, 2009 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

reactions here are a good barometer

for the amount of faith that fans place in prospects.

We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.

by Stirrups on Sep 1, 2009 1:13 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

i was thinking the same thing

S-Rod’s K numbers just scare me… i like his power potential, but i don’t think his AAA numbers are who he really is. Can he be a solid, top of the order player? Sure, but he has a lot of work ahead of him to make that happen

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

He K'd in only 18-19% of his plate appearances in 200+ at bats last year

He’s changed his approach to fit the stadium context before, so I think he’s just been swinging from his heals this season.

by rghan on Sep 1, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would have rather seen S-Rod go in a Halladay package in the offseason

But this is OK, too, just not as great.

I just don’t see S-Rod otherwise having a future in this organization. Yes, TR should have gotten more for him, and it’s weird that he was packaged with two others, but so it goes.

RIP Nick Adenhart.

"When the Babe tries to call his shot, I hope Nick puts one in his ear."
--RallyMonkey5

by Clutch on Sep 1, 2009 1:17 PM PDT reply actions  

A guess

And only a guess:

1) The Angels move heavena and earth to sign Figgins.
2) Assuming (1) comes to pass, the team then trades Kendrick for a key piece of the puzzle, maybe part of a trade for Halladay or a similar front-line pitcher
3) Figgins goes to 2B, Wood to 3B
4) Lackey plies his trade elsewhere
5) Abreu signs a two-plus-option deal to stay
6) Vlad is retained, either through arbitration or economical multi-year deal
7) The world continues to spin

"He's not a Rhodes Scholar to begin with''~Theo Epstein, talking about Papelbon

by George Kaplan on Sep 1, 2009 1:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Figgins goes to LF

i hope Bobby comes back, but i’m not holding my breath. Bobby and Juan can DH.

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope

"He's not a Rhodes Scholar to begin with''~Theo Epstein, talking about Papelbon

by George Kaplan on Sep 1, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I sure like your take

Except there has got to be a way to keep Lackey. If Arte had 120 mil to pay for Teixera, and Escobar is off the books, and Vlad’s pay will be less, I have got to believe there is money for Lackey. Especially when it was either Reagins or Moreno who said they can afford to take on more salary for pitching in terms of Roy Halladay.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 1, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

If they acquire Halladay, then there goes that extra payroll salary

However, I still like a rotation of:

Halladay
Saunders
Santana
Weaver
Kazmir

And if they pulled this off and re-signed Lackey on top of that….then omgomgomgomgomgomgomg!!!!!!

RIP Nick Adenhart.

"When the Babe tries to call his shot, I hope Nick puts one in his ear."
--RallyMonkey5

by Clutch on Sep 1, 2009 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think you're looking at this accurately
Except there has got to be a way to keep Lackey. If Arte had 120 mil to pay for Teixera, and Escobar is off the books, and Vlad’s pay will be less, I have got to believe there is money for Lackey. Especially when it was either Reagins or Moreno who said they can afford to take on more salary for pitching in terms of Roy Halladay.

First of all, the comment made about Halladay was made before the trade for Kazmir, who brings with him over $20M in salary obligation over the next two seasons, plus an option for one more year for another $13.5M.

Second, in the context of the present rotation, Kazmir is replacing Adenhart, who was making first-year minimum; thus, Kazmir’s 2009 salary of $6M already blows the budget when compared to Adenhart’s $400K.

On top of that, both Saunders and Weaver will be first-year arbitration eligible, which means their salaries will jump from $470K each to $1M to $2M each, unless Reagins signs one or both to a long-term deal, as he did with Santana (less likely for Boras client Weaver).

So while the $10M for Escobar comes off the books, the financial outlay for the rotation alone will increase in other, significant ways and it is important to recall that payroll dollars are fungible—the team will also be wrestling with free agent demands from Abreu, Figgins, etc. Payrolls are not infinitely elastic.

"He's not a Rhodes Scholar to begin with''~Theo Epstein, talking about Papelbon

by George Kaplan on Sep 1, 2009 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

True… but with along of Escobar’s 10 Million coming off the books, you can also add

10M Escobar
10M Lackey
15M Guerrero
3.6M Oliver
1.1M Quinlan
5.7M Figgins
   5M Abreu
-————————
That’s over 50 Million a year that is freed up. We aren’t going to re-sign all of our free-agents. And some players will get raises through arb.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 2, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

What a shitty way to say it, Q...

K’s aren’t as bad as you think they are and his ability to draw a walk won’t go away in the bigs. See the season that Kendry is having this year? That’s S-Rod in 2011, IMO but w/ more OBP and less SLG.

Who cares if he K’s 150+ times a year if he has a .975 OPS? Oh yeah, folks who don’t know what they are looking at when they see stats.

RIP Nick...

Jim Scully
Jim Scully Home

by jimmuscomp on Sep 1, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

+1 here

K’s are not the end of the world, people.

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

They do NOT mean he will fail.

Need edit button.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

what Zu said

K numbers are not the end of the world, IF you are producing at the MLB level. Rodriguez has yet to show that at this level, for lack of playing time or whatever.

guys with huge K numbers + high OPS (Dunn, Reynolds, etc) are fine.

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rays fan here...

Mark Reynolds K’s like no other.

I’m pretty confident that, if available… any team in the Majors would snatch him up in a millisecond.

by Doug09 on Sep 1, 2009 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Gave up too much, but...

This still has the potential to be a very good trade when all is said and done. We have tons of good middle infielders right now…We’re relying a bit too much on Kazmir to be the pitcher he was the past three years, but if that happens, it’s probably worth it.

by Spird on Sep 1, 2009 1:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Adios S-Rod

good luck

We Will Win With What We Got.
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart, Marquis Cooper, Steve McNair, and Frank Grimes, or Grimey, as he liked to be called

by JoseGuillenSux on Sep 1, 2009 1:24 PM PDT reply actions  

BEST CAVEAT FOR ANGELS FANS

Please remember this: Scott Kazmir’s best season ever was when Mike Butcher was the pitching coach in Tampa.

I am sure Butcher made the push for this trade more possible by saying he believed he could do something to get a little bit more out of Kaz.

And you can bet that the Angels looked thru the medical records with the best medical advisors in the sports medicine field.

by Rev Halofan on Sep 1, 2009 1:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah, that's what's made the trade attractive to me

RIP Nick Adenhart.

"When the Babe tries to call his shot, I hope Nick puts one in his ear."
--RallyMonkey5

by Clutch on Sep 1, 2009 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do you really think Palmer, a minor league journeyman with "meh" stuff and okay control, is in anyway disappointed at

being moved to long reliever at this point in his career? Because personally I kind of doubt it.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not at all, but I don't think he was given a fair enough chance to stay in the rotation.

And I base part of this on what Butcher said about Palmer in a television interview earlier in the season. I think Palmer’s previous history has clouded Butcher’s judgement not to mention many fans on this board.

Hey la, hey, Halo...

by 44FAN on Sep 1, 2009 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

I ain't worried about Palmer

He’s done a fine job in long relief, and remains available to start if anyone gets hurt. Since pitchers get hurt, you know, all the time, Palmer will get his chances.

You can’t make it through a year with 5 starters. You need 5, and another 3-4 waiting in the wings just in case. The 2009 season should have made this obvious.

The HK-47 hitting droid is the finest line drive machine ever built

by RallyMonkey5 on Sep 1, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Be that as it may, in my book Palmer's taken over as our #1 long relief man, he's

been absolutely stellar out of the pen. Moseley was never half this good.

#34 Forever
Plugging the upside since 2006.
Never give up, never surrender!

by TheOptimist on Sep 1, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Makes me think longingly of the days...

When one team or the other would be up by 7 runs and we could look down at the bullpen and see Kevin Gregg geting warm.

I feel the need, the need...for speed!

by Gorbachav5 on Sep 1, 2009 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Matt Palmer has fanboys?

Wow.

I feel the need, the need...for speed!

by Gorbachav5 on Sep 1, 2009 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

RIP Nick Adenhart.

"When the Babe tries to call his shot, I hope Nick puts one in his ear."
--RallyMonkey5

by Clutch on Sep 1, 2009 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does this trade help the Angels this year?

I say it does. And I understand about how developing cheap talent creates opportunities to pay for “premium” players, but the opportunity to win the World Series is now.

I’m not saying let the next generation of Angel fans pay the debt of the 2009 season, but it seems like the last few years, the Angel front office knows what they’re doing. If S-Rod becomes Chase Utley 2.0 in 2011, good for the Rays. In 2011, we’ll be talking about the next group of middle infielders being blocked by Kendrick, Aybar, Wood, and Izturis (or possibly Chase Utley 1.0).

And hopefully, we’ll be talking about the second Angels world championship.

by WiHaloFan on Sep 1, 2009 1:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Aiming low, huh?

Cause I hope that by 2011, we’re talking about the real possibility of a three-peat dynasty.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Okay, you got me

But, one domination at a time.

by WiHaloFan on Sep 1, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sure hope we didn't get Bedarded!

I was hoping to see a lot of S-Rod in LF next year, though that was on the assumption that Figgy will walk. Now I’m not so sure we’ll let him go — I can see signing him for a hometown discount, giving him a LF glove, and having Rivera & a re-signed Abreu split RF/DH.

No matter what happens, our roster will be more expensive, and our outfield defense will continue to suck.

On the bright side, we have a better chance of winning this year, plus some decent Lackey insurance, and the possibility that Kazmir may find his 2005-08 form.

by mattwelch on Sep 1, 2009 2:28 PM PDT reply actions  

It's not like Soth was ever gonna play him anyway!!!

Here’s hoping he does well, except against the Halos.

W6G!

by Monkeyspanked on Sep 1, 2009 3:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Great take Matt...

We have a better chance at winning in the post season this year and now we don’t have to grossly overpay for Big John. I guess there is also a good chance that Kaz starts pitching like he used to with Butch helping out.

However, I have a bad feeling about this trade. These 3 guys can better than league average major leaguers. I was hoping the third guy was Wilson or Evans or Pettit. Rodriguez fit our club very well. Lots of versatility, hard worker, homegrown, good fundamentals. Hope Kazmir can pitch like an ace this October.

by land4sale on Sep 1, 2009 3:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Man

I’d rather have lost Wood. I just don’t like Kazmir for this team. Whatever. He better continue well.

"Figgins' OBP is still over 40!" -Steve Physioc

by Figgi4life on Sep 1, 2009 3:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Need your guys' help...

I’m new here and most of my ranting about the Angels has come via Facebook. Someone needs to go set these people straight. Its depressing to have to put up with Figgins being called a minor league player and someone else wanting to give Brandon Wood the keys to the city.

by Anthony C on Sep 1, 2009 3:45 PM PDT reply actions  

+1

Facebook’s stupid

"Figgins' OBP is still over 40!" -Steve Physioc

by Figgi4life on Sep 1, 2009 4:53 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Makes sense

I realized this would happen when Sean wasn’t called up to from AAA today. I thought the Rays would pick up Bobby Wilson instead, since they already have a good set of middle infielders, but it works out. The Angels need a defensive catcher more than another middle infielder (if Jeff Mathis is your idea of a defensive catcher, I can recommend an optometrist).

Rodriguez is stuck behind Figgins, Aybar, Izturis, Kendrick, and Wood as it is. Who knows how long it could be before the Angels have a starting spot available at 2B or SS. Hopefully the kid now gets a chance in the big leagues. He’s earned it.

by Suboptimal on Sep 1, 2009 4:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Happy for S-Rod, Sad as an Angel fan...

I’ve been watching and rooting for this guy for awhile. Hes a flordian though and will get a chance to play everyday. Good luck to him…Hope we dont regret it.

Do it for Nick '09

by BryanHarvey'sMoustache on Sep 1, 2009 4:11 PM PDT reply actions  

3 points

1. As WiHaloFan said above – the major league club is better now, we are more likely to win this year, I think this is certain
2. We can’t keep sitting on middle infielders – if you can turn one into a top-quality 25 year old arm (even one with inherent risk), I’m not going to argue
3. Proven major league pitching > unproven minor league hitting

Having said that, the potential long-term down-side on the trade is greater than the potential upside, but, we’re not the Royals and we’re not the Rays – we can afford to take that risk.

If you don’t have a shy, you’re never going to win a coconut

I see red people

by The Limey on Sep 1, 2009 4:28 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

A Fair Deal...for the Angels short-term, Rays long-term

I’ll say it up front—I’m a Rays fan, but have some past loyalties to the Angels too, so I’ve got some mixed feelings about the trade….but I like it a lot more for the Rays wth Rodriguez in the mix…

Overall, it makes sense for both teams. For the Angels, I think Kazmir will be better than bullpen fodder, and better than the #5 as some seem to think. His fastball is down from a steady 94 to more like 90-92, and his wicked slider is not the same as in 2007. But he can be dominating against good teams, and he’s proven he can work through adversity. I think pairing him with Butcher instead of Hickey is an upgrade for Kaz’ psyche. But he was a team player—loved Maddon and respected the Rays organization—and will fit in fine with the Angels. On the Rays he was a #2 starter with a solid rotation of very solid (but mostly underachieving) Shields, Garza, Price, Niemann. This year, oddly, Niemann—the rookie #5—is having the best year of the bunch, and that is why the Rays may not make the playoffs. The loss of Kaz will not significantly effect the Rays.

For the Angels, he has the talent to be a #2 or 3, but could easily be a #4, a big upgrade for the Angels—fans should not be worried from a quality standpoint. He has pitch count issues, and can be fragile. He may have already peaked at 25, then again, he is only 25, and in different hands could do well. Remember, this was a guy who was the number #1 on a bad team, and still led the majors in Ks, went 13-9 with a solid ERA in 2007. The Rays won 66 that year. This move has to help the Angels this year.

That said, the Rays have been very crafty in trades since Friedman et al have taken over. With few exceptions, they have gotten the better end of the deals they’ve made. Garza and Bartlett for Young stands out, but they also got Zobrist as a sleeper from Houston—a thrown in it seemed—in the Huff trade. Dan Wheeler came in that trade too—an off year this year, but very solid last year. Navarro is a serviceable remnant in a trade that went nowhere for the Dodgers, and though the Jackson deal to Detroit looks good for the Tigers, watch Matt Joyce next year. This one will also look good for TB. The Rays have proven adept at scouting unproven talent, and while I don’t know much about the the first two they got, their upside looks pretty good, and the Rays may have caught them before their value blossomed. Rodriguez, on the other hand, looks to be the real deal, and will likely be a steal in the same way the Rays picked up Bartlett from the Twins—the Rays held out for him in the Garza-Young deal, and that’s the same dynamic here….

Either way, the Rays would have likely moved Kaz in the offseason. As it is, they got value in return, and at least one likely starter relatively cheaply.

I do think that Joe Maddon has proven to be highly adept in working with young players—he had all those years in player development for the Angels—and this is a big factor in how the Rays make deals.

Score this one an immediate hit for the Angels—particularly if Kazmir maintains his recent form—but a bigger potential upside for the Rays.

I like the deal both ways, but I’ve got to be excited as a Rays fan…

…best of luck to the Angels down the stretch…

by Calif on Sep 1, 2009 4:33 PM PDT reply actions  

I say it's still a good deal.....

S-Rod isnt gonna be getting everyday AB’s for us this year or next and he’s done all he can at AAA…….

once again….its all Figgy’s fault lol.

But thats okay.

Godspeed Nick - RIP - 1986-2009

by norcaliangelsfan on Sep 1, 2009 4:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Remind me

What was so bad about Stoneman again?

# Halo Heaven Fantasy Champ 2008 #

by UK Halo on Sep 1, 2009 5:26 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

From the looks of it from some of these people on this board...

He is Jesus Christ for never making any moves.

S-Rod isn’t getting us a win this year in October.

Kaz will give us a damn good chance.

What is there to debate?

What do you need a fancy suit for, Charlie, you ain't got no job to wear it to.

by clover_black on Sep 1, 2009 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

S-Rod also isn't getting us a loss this year in October

Kazmir also gives us a damn good chance of that.

I feel the need, the need...for speed!

by Gorbachav5 on Sep 1, 2009 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

There is a 50/50 Chance Kazmir gives us a loss.

There is a 100% Chance that S-Rod wasn’t going to even play in the playoffs.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 2, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

What is so funny to me

is that everyone was all over management for not making any deals. There were attacks because we needed to get O’Sullivan/Bell out of the rotation, and management was “doing nothing” to fix that.

Now look at everyone’s reaction when management does something.

Everyone should step back and think about the meltdown that they had last year when we traded away Casey. That ended up being a great trade, even without Teix re-signing. Casey was not the loss everyone predicted, Teix was our most consistent hitter at the end of last season, and Morales has been a huge upgrade over Casey. I trust management to make these decisions.

by Brody on Sep 1, 2009 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who was all over management for not making any deals?

You know, there’s not a whole lot of group think on this site. People have wildly variable opinions on some of these issues. Saying “everyone” did something like complain about deal-making is a bit inaccurate, to say the least.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

"Everyone" is obviously hyperbole

I’m fairly certain that George Kaplan started a thread about this, and it had numerous endorsements. I don’t care enough to name everyone who shared that view.

by Brody on Sep 1, 2009 8:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chalk me up on that side...

at least this year with pitching. We needed it.

Let’s just say I’d rec the Ninja if he wrote a fanpost about it.

by BruinHalo on Sep 1, 2009 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey - I applaud the guy for stating the obvious

SRod was packing his bags for Durham. It was clear when SRod was not called up what had happened, the front-office screwed up the communication.

by mustard_man on Sep 2, 2009 6:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

My Take

So far we have gave too much in this trade. Took a huge contract for an average (this year) injury plagued pitcher and gave up 2 blue chips and 1 High Level Prospect. If Kazmir starts pitching to his potential then maybe it will even out.

You will be forever in our hearts, Nick Adenhart.

by haloak on Sep 1, 2009 5:54 PM PDT reply actions  

and what if Torres and Sweeney never make the Big Leagues?

and whats to say S-Rod will get his K-rate in check and continue to hit for power against proven Big League pitching?

You talk about hypotheticals for Kaz, yet you dont mention any for the 3 guys the halos gave up?

How fair is that?

Godspeed Nick - RIP - 1986-2009

by norcaliangelsfan on Sep 1, 2009 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Let's say all four suck...

Then the Rays thank you for eating $24 million

by td32 on Sep 1, 2009 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

As td points out, it's kind of a difference in number of chances, and money spent.

Even if all three prospects suck, the Ray’s still have an additional 24 million with which to buy other players over the next few seasons. Conversely, if Kaz sucks, the Angels have 24 million less to spend on other players.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Sep 1, 2009 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lets hope for the best though. Kazmir does have the potential.

If we win the World Series this year I can care less about S-rod and the other two.

You will be forever in our hearts, Nick Adenhart.

by haloak on Sep 1, 2009 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ii like this more than the teix trade

They addressed a big issue for the rest of the season, and also don’t have to worry about him leaving for a few years. Injury issues are with every pitcher. Just look at Ervin, Lackey the last 2 years, Saunders, Escobar etc. Unless Kazmir is unable to pitch in the playoffs this year due to injury, I like the trade even if it included a guy who has looked clueless against major league pitching. Ii like the risk, and I am glad they weren’t serious about winning with what they had.

by Quinlan's Goofy Swing on Sep 1, 2009 6:52 PM PDT reply actions  

Kotch and Marek have done zero since leaving

The Teix trade was a win for the Halo if the draft choices make it; otherwise the trade was a wash.

by mustard_man on Sep 2, 2009 6:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Still a good trade

Kazmir is younger than anyone in our infield, remember. Still time to develop and hit his prime, and he is an elite starter when he’s healthy. To give up 3 prospects for that is exceptionally good. S-Rod has tremendous upside, but a MASSIVE hole in his swing that could hinder his abilities. He Ks more than Wood, who I still think projects much better.

by Caseys Kiss of Death on Sep 1, 2009 9:49 PM PDT reply actions  

We traded strength for strength

We had extra infielders; they had extra starters

Probably a good trade for both teams.

A couple of points, though:
When Kazmir was the same age as Alexander Torres (21), Kazmir was making 32 major league starts, going 10-9 with a 3.77 ERA, along with 174 K’s. Torres’s age 21 season has included 152 K’s….in the California and Texas leagues. Torres is a nice prospect, while Kazmir is actually DOING it.

While Kazmir was the same age as Sean Rodriguez (24 – last year), Kazmir was going 12-8 and leading his team to the World Series. S-Rod was leading….well, SLC….nowhere. Sean’s a good prospect, no doubt, but Kazmir is a legitimate top of the rotation starter. One does not find those growing on trees; one rarely find those available at the young age of 25.

"There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you." - Woody Hayes

by johnnyangel101 on Sep 1, 2009 10:29 PM PDT reply actions  

Plus

If Kazmir continues to enjoy the same success he has had thus far, he’ll wind up costing a lot less money than it would take to obtain that production on the free agent market. Meanwhile, the Halos have more M-IF than they can shake a stick at, with more to come.

by jjackflash on Sep 1, 2009 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I bet they can shake a stick at quite a few...

although if its a big enough stick, it might be pretty heavy.

i guess i never understood that phrase…

by BruinHalo on Sep 1, 2009 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

when in Rome?

Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34

by howiestheman on Sep 1, 2009 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

When in Rome

Eat at La Campana. It’s a great little neighborhood restaurant about a 5 minute walk from the Pantheon. I learned (after eating there) that the place has been in business since 1518.

by jjackflash on Sep 2, 2009 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

"I really need to discard these three jacks in my hand"

’Because they are blocking my ability to draw a 2, 3, and 4 of spades. And with my ace and 5 of spades, I would OWN this pot!"

We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.

by Stirrups on Sep 2, 2009 12:01 AM PDT reply actions  

Apples to Oranges.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 2, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not from how I am reading a lot of posts around here...

…more than willing to suspend reality and posit that proven big league talent such as Figgy, Abreu, Izturis, etc. are of less strategic value than players who are still minor leaguers and yet to demonstrate an ability to displace the incumbents. The players “still in the deck” are extremely valuable, as valuable if not more than the current roster incumbent players “in hand”.

We don't have a Bullpen. We have a Cowpen. Before we get to call it a Bullpen these guys gotta grow a pair.

by Stirrups on Sep 2, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can you dumb it down for me please.

RIP Nick Adenhart 4/9/09

I blog about the Angels at The Diamond Aces

by Jay Cal on Sep 3, 2009 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Congrats to the Rev/we had to make the deal

I listened to Biggs program yesterday and he gave full credit to Rev Halofan for being the first to identify the PTBNL.

The death of Adenhart necessitated the move. The most promising young pitchers can’t be expected to be ready to step into starting roles next year, and I think Adenhart would have done better than the kids, Palmer, and Loux in emergency starting roles. Kazmir gives us the opportunity to excel in the playoffs and wait for the kids to be ready in two years. Hopefully he gives us at least three stellar years with the Halos.

I think Scioscia has already decided on Kendrick at 2B, Aybar at SS, and Wood at 3B in the future, so barring an injury I don’t think Sean Rodriguez would have been able to earn a starting job next Spring even if he outperformed the incumbents.

Had Adenhart not died, I think it’s very possible the Angels don’t do the Kazmir deal, surrender the prospects, and take on the contract.

by California Cajun on Sep 2, 2009 9:36 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I think a lot would be different

if that accident would have never happened.

Aybar is a nowhere man, Sitting in his Nowhere Land, Making all his nowhere plans for nobody.

by princeton11loveshalos on Sep 2, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Angel Roster

I totally agree with the trade—the Angel line-up is as good as we need-I loved Garret Anderson-but Bobby has done great and willl be for at least 3 more years—Napoli and Mathis—-Morales-Quinlen—Isturis-Kendrick—Aybar-Wood—Figgins—-Hunter-Abreau-Rivera-Vlad—Mathews-Mo line-up change needed—-Just Pitching—-Weaver-Kazmir-Saunders-Santana-(sign Lackey)—-5 great starters—Fuentes-Jepson-Arredondo-Palmer-Louix- and(shields) and others
that leaves 1 or 2 spots and we can find that -we might even have that in house-if not we sure have room for trades and there are many we can get even for next year

by spc7@verizon.net on Sep 3, 2009 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

The fan base appears to have been "Angelized"

For years Angel management has been criticized about being reluctant to pull the trigger on deals with regards to taking on salary and parting with promising young players.

The the Angels acquired Scott Kazmir.

It seems like so many fans were scared to death about giving up the PTBNL. Kind of a role reversal.

The team has succeeded in “Angelizing” the fan base. Now the fans have been converted to the club’s way of thinking!

by California Cajun on Sep 2, 2009 9:49 AM PDT reply actions  

After Kazmirs performance today, im feeling alot better about this trade

In Kobe we trust!

by robi s on Sep 3, 2009 2:40 AM PDT reply actions  

small sample size.

I love this team.

by Downing Rules on Sep 3, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

it left me hungry for more. I love how when saundo, lackey, weaver, santana, and now kazmir all seem in gear (knock on wood) our offense vanishes. Man its always something.

Hope KC will revive us like it did in june

In Kobe we trust!

by robi s on Sep 4, 2009 3:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

This is a serious rotation if everyone is on their game. Gotta wake them bats up. Maybe it was “Jobu” throwing out the first pitch the other night in Seattle that screwed us up? Did we piss off Jobu?

I love this team.

by Downing Rules on Sep 4, 2009 8:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

value menu sample

Tell your statistics to shut up

by HaloDutch on Sep 4, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kazmir Trade

This was really a no-brainer and a very good trade for the Angels and the GM-Kazmir can help us now-We have a great line-up and have started no less than 15 pitchers this year and we still are the best in the League (sorry Yamkees-but we are) and Kazmir will only make us better-Lets just hope or bull-pen holds up—We will be in the World Sieries—and probably against the Dodgers and we will win it all this year-And Please-Please Let Mr Vin Scully (the best broadcaster that ever lived call the world sieries—please dont let the angels Hudler et all call anything) Broadcast the entire World Sieries—That being said the Angels will probably beat the Dodgers-and the Angels do deserve it—We need the DH in the NL now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!—-The Al is a much better league —-by far

by spc7@verizon.net on Sep 3, 2009 7:26 PM PDT reply actions  

scully can suck it. He is the most boring person i’ve ever heard but i guess he goes along perfectly with the most boring team in the world. i don’t know how they still have fans.

In Kobe we trust!

by robi s on Sep 4, 2009 3:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree

Scully is 100 times better then our announcers. Make that 1000 times better.

by Ca1IFORNIA ANGELS on Sep 7, 2009 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Halos Heaven is the Number #1 Angels Fan Blog according to QUANTCAST. Our Angels Fan Site is YOUR Angels Fan Community!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
The Angels and Why You Became a Fan

Recent FanPosts

California_angels_1979_small
Angel fans in Peru
Small
LEGIT Nationals Trade Proposal
Ga_pissed_small
UP AND IN Podcast on Halos Farm
Keepcalm3_small
Trades that make sense? Trout for Harper
Small
Wale – Albert Pujols Ft. Rick Ross & Fabolous
Small
What about John Lannan?
Jeredremembersnick_small
What Angels merch do you all own?
Prof_small
Pujols is Reporting a Week Early
7700243_chargers01mzp_400_small
MLB Fan Cave Candidate
Rangersfail_small
What do you look like

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Leaders of the Free World

4323_1105939621665_1622022962_290465_5300842_n_small Rev Halofan

Mostinterstingman_small cupie

Tn96_small WiHaloFan

Whammy10_small blast21dave

Fearless Crew

N1222371_8709_small scottnak

Halos2_small Stirrups

Anarangels_small Mayheminthehood

Cant-tell-if-trolling-or-just-very-stupid_small linkbruin

Avatar_small rghan

Alternate-club-logo-no-highlight1_small RexTookMyStash