Scoscia lines up the play-off rotation
Looks like he's squared away his play-off rotation.
No surprises - the last 4 starts of the season (and presumably the first 4 of the play-offs) will be in order:
1. Lackey
2. Weaver
3. Kazmir
4. Saunders
...with presumably Santana beefing up the 'pen.
Works for me.
about 1 month ago
The Limey
5 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
Works for me
Saunders is a career 3-0 in 4 starts in Fenway, and Kazmir’s success is well known at this point.
Lackey and Weaver don’t have the same record of success in Boston as do Saunders and Kazmir. This alignment is statistically the best one the Angels could ask for.
Weaver, on the other hand, is 27-12 in Anaheim, with a WHIP of 1.165. The Sox need to split the first two games, and the combo of Lackey and Weaver in Anaheim is a good bet to keep that from happening.
"He's not a Rhodes Scholar to begin with''~Theo Epstein, talking about Papelbon
by George Kaplan on Sep 30, 2009 2:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think this was the consensus on HH
We are the Los Angeles Angels of the late 2000s
by Higz on Sep 30, 2009 2:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This is what I suggested IMO
I like it, I think it gives us our best shot. Now let’s go kick some ass!!!!
First we had a Salmon and now we have a Trout, let's see the same results.
by angelskid2210 on Sep 30, 2009 3:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I approve.
What do you need a fancy suit for, Charlie, you ain't got no job to wear it to.
by clover_black on Sep 30, 2009 3:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This is what I wanted to see
I figured this is what Scioscia would do.
Play Wood already. Willits sucks.
by hauldog on Sep 30, 2009 9:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
