So you think you can predict? [Last Week!]
Well, we've certainly had some interesting feedback to the recent results of these so-called-experts giving their opinions on how the 2010 season will turn out... and well, perhaps it would be interesting to see if some of us would be willing to predict as well. How would our guesses compare to those of the so-called-experts.
Of course, just remember this is all for kicks and fun.
So, I'm sure you would love to join in, you have until March 1st to make your picks.
Rules:
- You must select a number of wins for every team (if all teams are not picked = DQ)
- This contest only pertains to the regular season. Tiebreakers / Playoff games will not be included.
- In addition to using the form, you must also comment something in the comments. It doesn't have to be what you picked, just a sign to me that you actually used the form. No comment below = DQ.
- You may change your picks as many time as you want. Just use the form again.
- The So-Called-Experts will also be included in this contest. If you find any more predictions out there, feel free to add them in the comments.
- Deadline is March 1st, 11:59:59PM. The timestamp when you submit the form must be before this time.
Scoring:
- For each team, I will calculate the difference between your picks and their actual results.
- The differences will be added up to give your Final Score.
- The lower your Final Score the better it is.
- Tiebreakers will be the following:
--- 1. Number of teams you've picked wins perfectly
--- 2. Number of teams you've correctly ranked in each division.*
--- 3. The difference between your picks and the actual result for the Angels
--- 4. The difference between your picks and the actual result for a randomly selected team.
--- 5. Repeat 4 until all teams are exhausted or tie is broken.
--- 6. Random draw.
* If two teams have the same number of wins, and their ranks are ambiguous, either rank they take up will be considered correct (that is, if two teams are tied for 2nd, 2nd & 3rd are "correct")
2010 MLB Standings Picks!
If you believe some team will get <41 wins or >120 wins, you must leave a note in the comments.
Note: When you submit, it will redirect to the confirmation screen. It wont redirect part of the screen like usual.
89 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here we go...
Try’d to do these without even looking at last years records so may luck be on my side!
by lightupthehalo29 on Feb 1, 2010 12:05 AM PST reply actions
Note to Rob Neyer
I did this drunk as shit…so when my predictions come up spot on….consider quitting and taking up alcoholism.
Let's make it "another halo victory" for Rory...
by BryanHarvey'sMoustache on Feb 1, 2010 12:26 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd, but extra credit for still having enough weekend staying power to be partying hard late Sunday night.
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
Hung the f' over
And 5 on the way to tomorrow’s hangover. Same philosophy but slightly different angle.
my predictions
if you wanna see them, look at the spreadsheet. I used absolutely no scientific reasoning behind my picks, just gut feeling..
Until spring training starts - let's go Cardinals and Suns!
I think I got all mine added up to 2430, which is the magic number
At least I think it is the magic number.
My Playoff picks:
AL West: Angels
AL Central: Twins
AL East: Yankees
AL Wild Card: Rays
NL West: Diamondbacks
NL Central: Cardinals
NL East: Phillies
NL Wild Card: Mets
"Just another Halo victory" - Rory Markas
You and I both...
…then at least have one thing on PECOTA…
We have a NON ZERO chance of our predictions being exactly correct. PECOTA doesn’t add up. Which, of course, they explain the reasoning behind. Which, of course, I call just dumb. At least give yourself a one in a million chance of being right…
Time to see what Wood's got!
ps... scottnak...
…thank you for doing this. i’m going to laugh really hard when random Angel’s fans nail the predictions better than all the sophisticated systems.
Time to see what Wood's got!
100% winged it without adding up to the magic number
Most of them dont even make sense, if I come anywhere close to winning I deserve a job at ESPN
I brought sexy back, but they only gave me store credit....
Let's see
I picked the Doyers behind the Giants and Rockies. God, I hope I’m right.
Sorry Seattle, 2010 still isn't your year.
Picks done.
I guess I should have totalled my wins for each league and then seen if they equaled the number of teams for that league multiplied by eighty-one (or 162? not sure which). It’s after 4AM and mathmatics is very low on the totem pole at this moment.
But, then again, when the Pirates play the Nationals are we sure there will be a winner.
Thanks Scottnak, fun stuff’s cool.
Who goofed? I've got to know.
My Playoff Picks:
My Playoff picks:
AL West: Angels
AL Central: Twins
AL East: Yankees
AL Wild Card: Boston
NL West: Rockies
NL Central: Cardinals
NL East: Phillies
NL Wild Card: Dodgers
So exactly like last season?
Except with the Rockies and Dodgers reversed. Eh.
"Just another Halo victory" - Rory Markas
Ya...
I really went out on a limb there and took a chance huh….
Sometimes you have to go with your gut.
I think
The Pirates will win 135 games this year and face the Royals who will win 128 in a classic World Series
My prediction as of 12-11-2009- Wood .265 avg, 20 HRs 70 RBIs and an above average glove at 3b
This is tough.
The time is out of joint; oh cursed spite, that ever I was born to set it right.
by chairmanofthebar on Feb 1, 2010 8:26 AM PST reply actions
Halos win the AL West Again!!!!!
Twins have a big year!
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working. I do that for probably another hour after lunch too, I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. - Peter Gibbons
by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 1, 2010 9:20 AM PST reply actions
submitted
first round of blind guesses was at 2429, so i gave one more W to the Halos.
I picked the same AL playoff teams in the same order as last year, but I took the Marlins in the WC with the Rockies taking the West.
The big question is if this is the year the Reds stop just being trendy to pick to do well.
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart - Always an Angel
Done
Be sure to take the average when this is all done. My money is that the average does better than 98% of us.
Absolutely
There will be a bunch of yummy stats to throw around after everyone has their shot :P
RIP Nick Adenhart :(
Every season the Pirates are not contracted
It is a surprise.
by Rev Halofan on Feb 1, 2010 11:56 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
2010 Playoff Matchup Predictions
Wild Cards:
AL – Rangers
NL – Braves
ALDS Matchups:
First Series – Angels v. White Sox
Second Series – Yankees v. Rangers
NLDS Matchups:
First Series – Phillies v. Dodgers
Second Series – Cardinals v. Braves
"You gotta have nuts." - Torii Hunter / Part-Time Nemesis of the HH Reply Function
I guess I missed, my blind guesses added up to 2400
it seems improbably that the angels will win the division for 4 years in a row, but I cant bring myself to think that any of the other teams are good enough to challenge us for the crown.
The mariners may win 2 of every 5 games by a score of 1-0 when felix and lee pitch but will lose the next 3 games 5-1 with that weak ass offense. Seriously, where are the runs gonna come from? Griffey will break down by June and Guillen will implode by July.
Same goes for the A’s. How are they going to score runs? They may win some games 1-0 or 2-1 but if the other team scores more than 2 runs, I’d bet they lose 90% of the games.
The rangers intrigue me, they could be good this year- or they could flop. I personally bet they do pretty well until the wheels fall off in late august/ september. Vlad will break down and injuries will decimate their hopes. Maybe Ryan and co. will spend a ton at the deadline to get help, but I’d bet it comes at the expense of their farm system. This will hurt their chances at building the kind of teams the angels have for the past few years- young solid teams built from within to keep costs down- adding necessary FA’s to fill one or two gaps.
Anyway, I see the angels battling it out and clinching the west around Sept 24th. They dont have the “stars” the experts like to see, but this is a team built to score runs, and keep the other team from doing so. No real “all-stars” but no weaknesses either.
by Balls and Strikes on Feb 1, 2010 12:13 PM PST reply actions
Not picked yet. Just having a random observation...
If enough folks make picks, there should surely be enough data to create a statistical comparison of “random-assed-guesswork-by-bleacher-rats” versus the various formal projections. The range of guesses should be chartable into bell curves of expected wins for each team which, to be topical, could be mapped against the first order and second order deviations of PECOTA (well, the corrected PECOTA numbers, at least).
IF (and I cannot over-emphasize the IF here) the results are similar then, when all is said and done, something like PECOTA adds no new information. That kind of result might actually open up a line of possible inquiry that suggests that the designers of the various projection methods may have inadvertently created a mathematical representation that reinforces what they already know, rather than a system to create new information that predicts what is currently unknowable. That would be huge.
(This brain fart has been sponsored by the fact that scottnak already eliminated 50.6% of all possible options based on his own personal experience.)
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
Or we are all just scottnak's guinea pigs.
I hope he does not just youthanize us when he is done with his experiments.
The 2009 Pregame Picks Winner and Iron Man of Halos Heaven.com
Better than him "old-en-izing" us!
;)
I love this team.
by Downing Rules on Feb 2, 2010 4:11 PM PST up reply actions
Apparently PECOTA's margin of error is +/- 7 wins...
…according to that tosser Neyer.
If you apply that margin of error to a projected record of 81-81 (i.e.a range of 74-88 wins applied to a fair coin toss for every game played) for every team over the last 5 years, you would have had them technically correct 46% of the time – 69/150 teams finished within that range since 2005.
So basically, any monkey with a coin can get about half of the way there, and anyone with the most basic knowledge of the game can tell you the truly mediocre teams and the exceptional ones, which just goes to show what little additional value these fabled projection systems offer.
I see red people
Psychic Friend Network says
Brandon Wood hits 43 HRs and wins ROY. The Angels have four 20 game winners in Weaver, Kazmir, Santana, and Saunders. Brian Fuentes is abducted by aliens and comes back to Earth with an uncanny ability to save games without drama.
???
didn’t try to figure out the magic number just went with what I thought eacht eam would win
I have lived long enough to see all three of the Pro teams I suport win a championship everything else is iceing on my cake
Someone just pick last year's numbers.
So I just did under the name “LAST YEAR’S NUMBERS”
I’d love that to win.
Bug
I aubmitted picks, hit enter, got “your’re not done yet”. Had omitted the Reds in the NL Central. Paged back, did it again. Same. Paged back, did it again, same. Hit refresh, all picks wiped out. Oh well ………….
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on Feb 1, 2010 3:01 PM PST reply actions
Everything got logged fine...
First time you did omit the NL Central, but it worked fine…
“You’re not Done yet” refers to the fact you need to comment here.
And anyway your picks aren’t going to count if you think EVERY TEAM is going to only win 40-something games.
RIP Nick Adenhart :(
Done
scottnak, can you provide a link to the picks, so I can verify mine equal the magic number?
I love this team.
That's what she said.
Yes, it was necessary.
by lightupthehalo29 on Feb 2, 2010 12:29 AM PST up reply actions
Go Angels!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cant Wait!
Put Kendry Morales at 1B, and move Sean Rodriguez to 3B......NOW LETS GO WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What do I get when I get them all right?
by HalosBiggestFan on Feb 2, 2010 2:03 PM PST via mobile reply actions
One whole year of absolute friggin' anguish because you shot your wad on an Internet blog while Vegas was there to be had.
Had I owned the Pittsburgh Pirates, I could have saved America.
by Stirrups on Feb 2, 2010 5:05 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Angels win with 90
Whole division finishes .500 or better.
Howie hits over .320.
Aybar hits .300 again.
Mariners finish last.
97
been accused of “drinking the kool aid” more times than I can count. I’m glad to see you got some as well with your pick of 101
Only real change I've got over last year is in the NL
Giants in the West, Cubs in the Central, Phils in the East, Cards WC
I predict
we come up short yet again, but still end up praising Artie. Whatever.
It's Always Somethin'
I have us winning 89
Tex 87
M’s 86
A’s 77
its going to be close this year in the AL West
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart #34
98 for the Homeboys...
Angels
Tigre’s
Rays
W/C = Yanks
Rock’s
Brewers
Fish
W/C = Phil’s
People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~Rogers Hornsby
dunzo
"Precious in the sight of the Lord, is the death of His Saints." - Psalm 116:15 Rest In Peace, Nick.
Mandatory comment
Wild guesses completed.
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on Feb 22, 2010 7:41 PM PST reply actions
"Call me know for your free reading"
Done
"Sometimes I'm a Closer... Sometimes I make it Closer"
by Big Perm on Feb 23, 2010 2:30 PM PST via mobile reply actions
...Carry the 1...
…calculate R-squared…
…collate the divisional totals…
…wipe away the merlot stains…
…and DONE!
"Sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
Checked
in. I only had to ask myself, “What is the opposite of what computer generated projections would say?”
exhausted....
but made the deadline
by sunshine thermometer on Feb 28, 2010 5:53 PM PST reply actions
Playoff Picks
Angels, Twins, Yankees
WC: Red Sox
Giants, Cardinals, Phillies
WC: Cubs
Howie for MVP!

by 


























