LOB Leaders
Here's an update as of Apr 18. I've switched the LOB/RBI number from a pct to a number that represents how many runners would be left on base for every run driven in. ex: Aybar has 14 LOB and 3 RBI, his LOB Ratio is 4.67 which means he'll leave 4.67 runners stranded for every 1 he drives in. Lower number is better obviously. Angels stats first:
RBI LOB Ratio
| Aybar | 3 | 14 | 4.67 | |
| Abreu | 7 | 27 | 3.86 | |
| Hunter | 6 | 18 | 3.00 | |
| Matsui | 8 | 24 | 3.00 | |
| Morales | 6 | 27 | 4.50 | |
| Rivera | 7 | 17 | 2.43 | |
| Kendrick | 5 | 20 | 4.00 | |
| Izturis | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | |
| Wood | 18 | inf | ||
| Mathis | 3 | 14 | 4.67 | |
| Napoli | 1 | 4 | 4.00 | |
| Evans | 1 | |||
| Wilson | 1 | |||
| Willits | 3 |
AL Leaders in LOB next. I also included their RBI and their ratio since high LOB totals don't necessarily mean a bad ratio if enough runners are driven in. Overbay and Lopez are the worst of this group, Callaspo and Cuddyer the best.
| LOB Leaders | LOB | RBI | Ratio |
| Morneau, Min | 36 | 8 | 4.50 |
| Cuddyer, Min | 31 | 10 | 3.10 |
| Kouzmanoff, Oak | 31 | 6 | 5.17 |
| Granderson, NY | 31 | 7 | 4.43 |
| Overbay, Tor | 30 | 3 | 10.00 |
| Callaspo, KC | 29 | 10 | 2.90 |
| Ordonez, Det | 29 | 9 | 3.22 |
| Abreu, LAA | 27 | 7 | 3.86 |
| Morales, LAA | 27 | 6 | 4.50 |
| Peralta, Cle | 27 | 4 | 6.75 |
| Lopez, Sea | 27 | 3 | 9.00 |
| R Davis, Oak | 27 | 5 | 5.40 |
| M Young, Tex | 26 | 6 | 4.33 |
Next we have a group of guys who are stone cold so far, in no particular order:.
| Coldest | LOB | RBI |
| Wood, LAA | 18 | 0 |
| C Davis, Tex | 20 | 1 |
| Teagarden, Tex | 14 | 0 |
| Hamilton, Tex | 17 | 2 |
| Ichiro, Sea | 20 | 3 |
| Griffey, Sea | 11 | 1 |
| Hudson, Min | 22 | 4 |
| Punto, Min | 11 | 1 |
| Laird, Det | 16 | 1 |
| Santiago, Det | 16 | 0 |
| Pierre, Chi | 15 | 1 |
| Pyrzienski, Chi | 13 | 1 |
| LaPorta, Cle | 20 | 1 |
| Hafner, Cle | 20 | 3 |
| Ortiz, Bos | 23 | 2 |
| Ellsbury, Bos | 14 | 1 |
| Martinez, Bos | 22 | 4 |
| Jones, Bal | 18 | 2 |
Last but not least, the best performers in the first 2 weeks.
| Bestest | LOB | RBI | Ratio |
| Cruz, Tex | 14 | 15 | 0.93 |
| Choo, Cle | 12 | 12 | 1.00 |
| Pedroia, Bos | 15 | 13 | 1.15 |
| And Jones, Chi | 7 | 6 | 1.17 |
| Pena, TB | 15 | 12 | 1.25 |
| Wells, Tor | 15 | 11 | 1.36 |
| Wigginton, Bal | 14 | 10 | 1.40 |
| Izturis, LAA | 7 | 5 | 1.40 |
| Cabrera, Det | 21 | 14 | 1.50 |
| Crawford, TB | 12 | 8 | 1.50 |
| Podsednik, KC | 9 | 6 | 1.50 |
| Gutierrez, Sea | 14 | 8 | 1.75 |
| Mauer, Min | 18 | 10 | 1.80 |
| Longoria, TB | 18 | 10 | 1.80 |
| Youkilis, Bos | 11 | 6 | 1.83 |
| Jeter, NY | 17 | 9 | 1.89 |
| Quentin, Chi | 22 | 11 | 2.00 |
| Burrell, TB | 10 | 5 | 2.00 |
| Lind, Tor | 21 | 10 | 2.10 |
| Pennington, Oak | 21 | 10 | 2.10 |
| J Guillen, KC | 22 | 10 | 2.20 |
| Barton, Oak | 16 | 7 | 2.29 |
| Kotchman, Sea | 19 | 8 | 2.37 |
| Konerko, Chi | 19 | 8 | 2.37 |
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
12 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is a pretty interesting analysis
It’s sort of like the hitter’s verson of Inherited Runners Scored or whatever it’s called.
I wonder how you woud factor in situations where a hitter causes a run to score but doesn’t get an RBI. For example, if you GIDP but a runner scores from 3rd on the play, you don’t get an RBI if I remember right.
"You gotta have nuts." - Torii Hunter / "CommNate is way overrated" - PhiSlamma
I think that example actually points out one problem with LOB...
A double play is worse than LOB, but isn’t included in the LOB number. In the event that a run scores on a double play though, I don’t think you worry about that (under the same logic that prevented it from counting as an RBI to start with).
There should be a Runs by Fielder's Choice stat.
Although it’s probably pretty negligible over the span of a whole season.
I'm wearing a "Markas" patch on my sleeve this season.
by Rally Manatee on Apr 15, 2010 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions
I like and support this
Will be very curious to see monthly updates and how much it correlates with our overall success.
by The OC Disorder on Apr 14, 2010 9:25 AM PDT reply actions
Who are the ones being left on base?
These are just more numbers to clog up the tubes with. What does it prove?
The A’ss score more run than the Skanks, but because the leave more on base, have a weaker average(?). But the Rays score less, and leave less on base, have a better average(?).
What part of the line-up is being left on base the most? Top, middle, or bottom third, of the batting order? How many outs are the batters facing when they have MoB before them? What bases do these MoB occupy when they get left stranded? How many of these MoB have been stranded by more than one batter during that inning? The questions can go on, and on , and on …
LOB’s, and it’s brother-en the GIDP, and two things that you will get a lot of when you have a successful team. Remember now. It is easiest to score more runs, to win more games, with more men on base. Think of that as the MoB rule. All these other things that will happen between the white lines are just part of the game.
I can see it's value in that it measures the effeciency of your lineup in producing runs to an extent
If you are scoring a ton but also leaving a ton on base, you’re not being as efficient as a team that scores about the same but leaves less men on base. Ideally you’d want to get the most out of your scoring opportunities.
"You gotta have nuts." - Torii Hunter / "CommNate is way overrated" - PhiSlamma
by Commander_Nate on Apr 14, 2010 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions
I think it's interesting
but shouldn’t you look at RBI’s as a percentage of runners on base when you have come to bat.
For example – you show Hunter with 4 RBI’s ans 11 LOB, when it should be 4 RBI’s and 15 men on base when he comes to bat, for a .267 %.
You would also need to take into account HR’s, which are RBI’s not associated with a man being on base when the batter come to the plate.
We're putting the band back togehter.
Ideally yes but that's what I meant when I said I kept it simple
because I don’t have time to go through all the box scores to gather all of that extra data.
I am fan various years ago.
by Fred Fredrix on Apr 14, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions
This would deal with the double play problem as well as the home run problem.
I think it could be a good stat to have if someone could create a fancy formula to plug in to their spreadsheet that already handles all this miscellaneous data.
Tracked through Sept 2?
Quitter.
by snowhor on Apr 14, 2010 1:20 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
updates in the first post
I am fan various years ago.

by 


























