Chris Paul on Clippers Good for the Angels? Halolinks!
The Angels signed superstar Albert Pujols last week for a record-breaking $250 million. And now the Clippers have just signed dynamic point guard Chris Paul. Repeat: The Los Angeles Clippers.
How often do I get a chance to link to the Christian Science Monitor?
La Russa says Pujols is 'disappointed there wasn't more enthusiasm from the Cardinals
Tony La Russa believes the divorce of the defending World Series champions from their three-time National League MVP last week was "unavoidable."
La Russa is such a lawyer.
Let California Angel Fans Babysit Albert Pujols Now - Ladue-Frontenac, MO Patch
I hope the overpriced star finds happiness at the beach.
In case you think just anyone can write an intelligent baseball article, Bozo Baer's "Baer Facts" column will convince you otherwise.
Pujols is in Anaheim, but Trumbo's an Angel
Weird article fawning over Trumbo like a protective younger sister.
Mike Trout visits Millville Angels during fundraiser | NJ.com
Mike Trout hanging with the kids, being a good guy, mentioning that he got a 3.4 GPA in high school (double my college 1.7, fwiw).
Jarrod Washburn is Now Property of Seattle ...6 years ago today at Halos Heaven everyone shrugged that we were letting a great Angel go.
Stoneman: No Zito ...5 years ago today at Halos Heaven everyone panicked that we weren't doing anything.
The Dan Haren Trade: Glass Half Empty for the Angels ...4 years ago today at Halos Heaven I panicked that the A's had netted a major haul with their trade of Dan Haren. Most everyone told me to chill.
77 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ladue-Frontenac Patch? Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..............
What’s next, an editorial from The Independence MO Pennysaver? What a bunch of passive-aggressive pussies!
I really like Rev's comments being highlighted like that
Good change! Easier to track than the italics
RIP Nick Adenhart
+1
Where were you on December 8th, 2011 - Pujols Day?
by Rally Manatee on Dec 16, 2011 12:25 PM PST up reply actions
If Pujols mashes 40 HRs and leads us to the World Series
I really don’t care if he’s a “true” Angel
by stevefinleyallstars on Dec 16, 2011 7:43 AM PST reply actions
Having not followed NBA basketball closely for years, and generally disliking Kobe, I've been a closet Clippers fan.
I think it’s GREAT that the Clippers brought in CP. Now, if only Sterling would move their games to the Pond….oops…Honda Center.
It was fun to watch the Temple of Kobe get shaken and stirred.
Napoli's 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th homers of the year (four more than Jeff Mathis' career total) rained down on Angel Stadium like knives from the ceiling.
What did the angels ever do to be constantly compared to the god forsaken clippers
What do you need a fancy suit for, Charlie, you ain't got no job to wear it to.
by clover_black on Dec 16, 2011 8:06 AM PST reply actions 9 recs
I understand being bummed...
But St. Louis is just coming out looking like a bunch of whiny little brats in this whole thing. Your team blew it. Pure and Simple. They initially tried to lowball the best player in the MLB. Not only that, but their FRANCHISE player! Now they’re engaging in all kinds of personal attacks, saying he lied about his age, attacking his faith. Give me a break! I can’t believe I rooted for those douche bags.
And shame on those in the media criticizing Albert Pujols for leaving St. Louis. If he had joined one of the media’s chosen franchises they would be heralding the deal. Instead, they’re complaining about lack of loyalty. This just sickens me. Welcome to Anaheim, Mr. Pujols. We will treat you well here. You will be loved and adored by one of the greatest, possible the most underrated fan bases in the country here. Within the first month of playing here you will have forgotten all of those selfish little babies back in Missouri. You will be wondering why you didn’t come here sooner.
by firebird81 on Dec 16, 2011 8:55 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
I'm actually going to be in St. Louis tomorrow.
And I plan on proudly wearing my Halo gear.
YOU DON'T KNOW THE POWER OF THE DARKSIDE.....
Yeah, my cousin doesn't think it's a good idea.
But F%CK it, i’m gonna represent.
YOU DON'T KNOW THE POWER OF THE DARKSIDE.....
My sister who has tons of in-laws in Stl. said their hormones are raging over losing
Pujols. I told her to tell them the writing was on the wall, down the sidewalk, down the street that he was leaving. Those people are slow to get the message over there.
Napoli's 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th homers of the year (four more than Jeff Mathis' career total) rained down on Angel Stadium like knives from the ceiling.
My Cards fan buddy at work says that he knew Pujols was gone when LaRussa resigned.
If the Halos don't care about the way they play, then why should I?
DO IT!!
Pretty stand up move if you ask me
"I Bleed Angel red"
by Angels Angel on Dec 16, 2011 10:43 AM PST up reply actions
I'll try to take a picture by the Arch downtown.
In my Halos gear of course.
YOU DON'T KNOW THE POWER OF THE DARKSIDE.....
That Mike Trout article is well written
I particularly like the reference to Oaklyn, California.
by Big Easy Halofan on Dec 16, 2011 9:20 AM PST reply actions
Never been to oaklyn?
its near sam hancisco.
What do you need a fancy suit for, Charlie, you ain't got no job to wear it to.
by clover_black on Dec 16, 2011 9:28 AM PST up reply actions
only if the citizens are honeybaked.
What do you need a fancy suit for, Charlie, you ain't got no job to wear it to.
by clover_black on Dec 16, 2011 9:48 AM PST up reply actions
Hey! That's not true!
Its the end of finals week so we are celebrating by getting . . . oh wait. Damn.
www.LosAngelesRams.org
CALIFORNIA ANGELS . . . ANAHEIM DUCKS . . . CALIFORNIA GOLDEN BEARS
1920 • 1921 • 1922 • 1923 • 1937 • 1947 • 1951 • 1957 • 1959 • 2002 • 2007
WTF?!? how can you compare the Clippers to the Angels?!?!? thats ridiculous the Angels have a Title
the Clips dont……..Halos have been constantly relevant for the past 10 years…the Clips are only relevant once every 10 years!!….cant wait til the damn season starts so all these bandwagon Clips fans can shut up…..LAKERS STILL RUN THE CITY CLIPPER FANS!!!
Dallas Cowboys Super Bowl Champs Tony Romo Super Bowl MVP
-Me, October 3,2011
by KB_24 on Dec 16, 2011 10:16 AM PST reply actions 5 recs
They are not trying to compare the history of the Angels and Clippers
The only thing that is being compared is the fact that both the Angels and Clippers have consistently played second fiddle to the Dodgers and Lakers respectively. The “big brother” franchises have always had the spotlight here, and it is certainly fair to compare them, especially since the Angels and Clippers both brought in game changing superstars, which causes the spotlight to at least be shared evenly for the first time ever.
If I had to root for a local NBA team, it’d probably be the Clippers, but I’m a Suns fan and will simply enjoy Nash and Hill ball into the sunset! Go Suns!
Go Angels!!
Faith Focus Finish
And ESPN will not let you forget that the Lakers run the city.
Napoli's 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th homers of the year (four more than Jeff Mathis' career total) rained down on Angel Stadium like knives from the ceiling.
ESPN: Lakers, YankSux, Tom Brady and TIM TEBOW!!! All the time!!!
If the Halos don't care about the way they play, then why should I?
yea right! go to espn.com theyre basically giving the keys to the city to the Clips already...."LA Kings"
dont give me that crap that espn loves the Lakers cause they dont….THEY ARE A MIAMI HEAT NETWORK! hence the Heat Index on their site
Dallas Cowboys Super Bowl Champs Tony Romo Super Bowl MVP
-Me, October 3,2011
Lakers is all they talk about on ESPN radio, you're not fooling me KB.
Max and Marcellus are obnoxious with it.
"One time, when we got back to the locker room, all of our clothes were gone," Trout recalled. "They left me a Lady Gaga costume and I had to wear it."
710 ESPN is the Lakers home station
this is like complaining that KLAA and Rodger Lodge talk primarily about the Halos
"You realize that Ive been posting on AN since 07 on this name and I am one of the most rec'ed posters there right?" - Some tool named Designatedforassignment from Athletics Nation
by 2pintsofbooze on Dec 16, 2011 11:58 AM PST up reply actions
I listen to 710 to hear David Courtney's voice in the offseason
and for Max Kellerman’s Jewish jokes.
well Duh! just like 2 pints said! what do you want them to talk about? The Knicks?
710 is our home but im talking about espn.com and all the guys over at Bristol they dont like the Lakers!
Dallas Cowboys Super Bowl Champs Tony Romo Super Bowl MVP
-Me, October 3,2011
insult to the Angels
not only have the Angels been esp relevant since Soth took over they at least won a few times before that. the clippers are the definition of a cursed franchise….this is all propaganda to dig at our Lakers while Jim Buss tries to make us a laughing stock.
clips have a long way to go just to put up more achievements at staples center than the sparks.
slap to the face to the the Angels IMO
Clips havent even played a damn game and yet they wanna be the hottest ticket in town…..yea they can be entertaining and all that crap….we’ll just keep winning period
Dallas Cowboys Super Bowl Champs Tony Romo Super Bowl MVP
-Me, October 3,2011
Sorry to nitpick, Rev
But your post on the Dan Haren trade was 4 years ago—2007!
Light up that halo! RIP, Nick.
That's the
1.7 GPA talkin’!
Jeff Mathis (Pseudonym Lyle Spencer) is History... Zang!
by Halo Hurricane on Dec 16, 2011 1:07 PM PST up reply actions
Trout had to tell the little school kids about his Lady Gaga hazing?
That experience must have scarred Trout forever. LOL
Napoli's 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th homers of the year (four more than Jeff Mathis' career total) rained down on Angel Stadium like knives from the ceiling.
Billy Madison>the corpse from Weekend at Burnie's>Jimmy Buss
God help this once-proud franchise now that this dolt has taken the reins.
Can we put Jeanie in charge instead?
If the Halos don't care about the way they play, then why should I?
Love this 1-2 punch from Baer
“He could become a broken-down horse, and the Angels will be stuck with the tab. I wish him well and wish the Cardinals well, too.”
Winning doesn't matter. -Lyle
Yes.
It is possible that Albert Pujols will forget how to play baseball. That is a possible scenario.
by Halowitz on Dec 16, 2011 11:50 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
"I wish him well...
…but let’s not forget the possibility that he could forget how to play baseball and become a total bum."
Winning doesn't matter. -Lyle
lol, or he could eventually lose some power and a few of his home runs will fall for doubles instead
Pujols isnt fielder; He does more than hit home runs.
A big part of albert’s game is taking walks and getting on base. unless some major injury happens to his head, you dont forget how to take a pitch outside the zone. Maybe he doesnt hit 45 home runs a year for the whole contract, but I would bet he keeps getting on base just like he always has and is a major offensive contributor for the whole 10 years.
by Balls and Strikes on Dec 17, 2011 9:11 AM PST up reply actions
The notion that the Angels are in Los Doyers shadow irks me to no end.
The carpetbagging Los Doyers moved to LA in 1958. The Angels were enfranchised in 1961. The A’s didn’t make it to Oakland until 1968.
The Angels were the first AL team in California, on the west coast, and in the Pacific time zone for that matter. They draw their name from a venerable PCL franchise tradition that dates back to the dawn of west coast baseball. The Doyers are transplants, and not organically connected to the region in the ways that the Angels are. The Doyers’ sole connection to the tradition of the LA Angels of the PCL consists almost entirely of ripping off their last cap logo before the team moved to Spokane Washington after being bought and moved there by Walter O’Malley.
Speaking of O’Malley, he almost killed the team that would become the Angels in its crib when he objected to Bill Veeck having a stake in the ownership of the AL franchise. Thank God for Gene Autry picking up the entire expansion effort when the original proposed ownership arrangement was vetoed by O’Malley. Then Mr. Autry had to buy the Angels name off of the carpetbagger. O’Malley also got a sweetheart deal for the stadium at Chavez Ravine, and it is on some level entirely unfair that the Angels could never get a like deal before the region built out as stadium issues have always plagued the Angels.
If there is any second fiddle status to the Angels, it is almost entirely stadium related. We weren’t allowed to play in the Coliseum by the AL Commissioner. Long Beach wanted the Angels to bear their city’s name in exchange for their cooperation in securing a site. Anaheim, until the refurbishment agreement, was contented to allow the team to call itself the California Angels. Blah blah blah. This identity crisis all goes back to 1961 and having a team without a stadium.
The Angels still hold the best mark ever for a an expansion franchise’s first season. Since 1973, the Angels have been using the DH, and they don’t play NL style ball unless at NL parks. I can’t stand watching pitchers whiffing at sliders, so I have never been an NL fan.
And If you’re into AL ball in the Southland, the Doyers have never cast a shadow over the Angels, as they weren’t ever an option.
What I would love to see over the next ten years is this:
1) For Mr. Moreno to buy or buy and rebuild the Big A to make it team owned. Get Anaheim out of the equation entirely except for the geographic fact that this is where the stadium is physically located. Get rid of the Disney rocks while this is done.
2) End the pretense that the team is in Los Angeles. It’s simply not. If you don’t want to be in the shadow of Los Doyers, don’t put yourself into it. There is no marketing advantage in the LAA moniker. The regional fans know that the Angels are in the OC, and the national ones don’t care.
The caps have a haloed “A” on them. They are iconic that way. The jerseys, home and away, make no mention of LA. Just end it. Acknowledge reality. Make your own identity and stick with it. The Angels have almost always been the team of the OC and, ahem. Riverside County. Just deal with it. It’s not as if the Angels are shunned in the LA media market with $3 billion over the next 20 years. Quit acting like the also ran trying to worm a way into an LA identity and embrace that Angels Baseball is bigger than a place name—it is a home for anyone who wants to become part of the same “congregation.” You can be from Eureka and be an Angels fan if you want. They aren’t from Los Angeles, they belong to anyone in the world who wants to belong in return. They even belong to a guy like me living in the Willamette Valley in Oregon who only sees the Angels live once or twice a season when they are at Safeco Field.
3) Reclaim the CALIFORNIA ANGELS moniker. Lay claim to all of it. Revitalize the state outline logo with the star in SoCal with an update. Have the flashback uni sport the interlocking CA with the embroidered halo rather than the LA one. The road uni should feature a navy blue Angels cap with a red bill as a permanent connect to an actual past.
4) The Doyers are in disarray. Capitalize upon it. Their star power is Matt Kemp and a bunch of stiffs. We have El Hombre. We have a division we can dominate by outspending and outplaying the Senators. If the Angels can add one or more rings in the next decade they, and not the Doyers, capture the imaginations of a new generation of young baseball fans. That is how you get out of the “shadow.”
Ah Look! My California Angels are now all grown up!
by Canard on Dec 16, 2011 12:14 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
So what's your stance on the OSU/Oregon rivalry?
Also, be a Timbers fan. It’s fun.
As for the Angels thing, I’d like the idea of being the California Angels again but I think we’ve gone through enough name changes. Let’s stick with LA and move on.
"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon
There really isn't a rivalry here between Oregon and OSU anymore.
UW is Oregon’s biggest rivalry and has been for a few decades now. The Beavers, even at their best, are little more than spoilers.
As to the Timbers, sorry but I don’t appreciate soccer. It makes a Steve Trachsel pitched game look energetic.
As for the identity of the Angels:
Los Doyers’ out of town scoreboard identifies us as ANH. I would be mildly upset by that were it not true.
This team will always be the California Angels to me. I even refused to buy the all red cap until we made the 2002 wild card. I had to acknowledge that it least it wasn’t the winged A that I refused to even look at in stores.
My point is that this team has in fact built tradition over the past 50 years, and I don’t particularly care for it being disregarded as if it didn’t matter so that some folks could pretend the team is 45 minutes north on the freeway—in a place it hasn’t been headquartered in since 1966.
Whether that makes me a reactionary, a stick in the mud, whatever, that is my cross to bear. This franchise will never be as venerable as the Yankees, Red Sox, or whomever that goes back deep into the dim mists of baseball. Even the carpetbaggers in blue and white have a bit more of time on the coast and more glory in their trophy cases than we do.
This franchise did have a stable identity between 1973 and the Disney meddling. That shouldn’t be so casually tossed aside for whatever ephemeral benefits supposedly come from claiming the team is from Los Angeles.
Ours is the oldest continually located franchise in all of the current AL West. Ours is the biggest market team in its division and finally acting both its age and its size. I’m all for an update. I like the red alternate jersey. I happen to think it would look even better with a navy/red ball cap with the “A” on it, even the updated A logo on it, but this franchise would best be served by growing up on its image and not only keep one eye on the future, but also keep one foot in the best of its past.
The “LA” obsession is this franchises’ white whale. The Pujols signing affords the franchise the star power to break contact with the LA self-deception forever and lay claim once again to the entire market. The California Angels should do that by laying claim to its longest standing identity, not its short and nomadic one from 1961-65.
Ah Look! My California Angels are now all grown up!
Ugh I toss and turn feverishly at night dreaming of a blue and red away cap.
Even California Angels of Anaheim would be better, if that’s what needs to be done. Arte changed the name to Los Angeles because he saw that, after New York, the Dodgers sold more merchandise than any other franchise. Of course, there’s not a stitch of Angels apparel anywhere that says Los Angeles on it. I work at Lids and see all the kids buying these awesome caps that say “Pittsburgh” and “Chicago” and “Los Angeles” on them and I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that if we sold one that said “California” across the panels, we wouldn’t be able to restock them fast enough.
by Halowitz on Dec 16, 2011 1:20 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Also, when are they going to bring back the Sunday sleeveless tops?
Or did that dream die with the Napoli trade?
Rec'd for "California Angels of Anaheim"
Probably the best suggestion for how to make a bad naming situation better.
Winning doesn't matter. -Lyle
You must be a Beaver fan
Duck fans look down on the Beavers rivalry.
"I have something 95 percent of all those All-Stars only wish they had: a World Series ring. If I had to choose between that and being an All-Star, it would be no contest. I’d grab the gold ring and never look back." -Tim Salmon
Nope I went to UCSB, no ties to any Football team in Oregon
I was born in Anaheim. Live in Portland now. I will say your average Duck fan is an entitled douche though.
Willits? Check. Reagins? Check. Mathis? Check
Nope. I'm a Slug. But I'm a Gaucho Dad.
If the Halos don't care about the way they play, then why should I?
Santa Cruz isn't a bad gig either
Congrats to your offspring!
Willits? Check. Reagins? Check. Mathis? Check
You are free to disagree
The reality on the ground is that only the most graying fraction of the Ducks’ fan base remembers the Beavers as peers.
Other than during one shining moment in 2000, the Ducks have pounded the Beavers every time both have had something at stake in the Pac.
Ah Look! My California Angels are now all grown up!
I could not agree more . . .
I don’t care what they are officially called, they will always be the California Angels to me. No other MLB team in this state has the kind of connection to California like the Angels do. Unfortunately, I do not see it changing back any time soon.
California > Both Anaheim and Los Angeles
www.LosAngelesRams.org
CALIFORNIA ANGELS . . . ANAHEIM DUCKS . . . CALIFORNIA GOLDEN BEARS
1920 • 1921 • 1922 • 1923 • 1937 • 1947 • 1951 • 1957 • 1959 • 2002 • 2007
They already have "California" angel snapbacks.
They sell like crazy, the outline california logo is consistently sold out as well. The angels are in the top search on hat club’s website.
A Navy over Red ball cap with the current logo would sell plenty as an authentic road cap.
Basically a 59Fifty with the color scheme of the alternate BP cap:

Ah Look! My California Angels are now all grown up!
I have one like this but its CA Angels logo instead
go long with extenze...i do
by angelsownredsux on Dec 16, 2011 3:56 PM PST up reply actions
I have this cap because I don't like the all red, but the stretchy fabric it is made of
feels like I am wearing a damned rubber band around my head. I wish I could find a normal adjustable old style one.
"One time, when we got back to the locker room, all of our clothes were gone," Trout recalled. "They left me a Lady Gaga costume and I had to wear it."

by 


































