Buy in Bulk: Angels’ FO Should Sign 2011 Prep Draftees
Sure, it's been a great year for the Angels' farm system -- recent alumni Peter Bourjos, Mark Trumbo, Jordan Walden, and Tyler Chatwood account for nearly a quarter of the team's production, according to Baseball Reference's WAR metric -- but it's been a down year on the Angels' farm, which is looking mighty thin as the 2011 season winds down. For a team facing significant roster turnover in the coming years while inexplicably choosing to pay down the ass-end of Vernon Wells' contract, that is a problem.
Sam Miller at the OC Register reported on Monday that the Angels are still negotiating with 2011 mid-round prep picks Wayne Taylor, Hunter Lockwood, and Dominic Jose. Each of those players falls into the not-quite-polished-enough-to-be-a-first-rounder, but could-be-a-top-ten-pick-in-three-years category. Signing some combination of these guys would add a much-needed shot of upside into an otherwise cheap draft (only $2.5 million so far). The clock is ticking, as the window for signing 2011 draftees closes for good this Monday at midnight.
Other notable, late-round guys whom the Angels drafted but failed to sign out of high school? Buster Posey and Brian Matusz...
Not every high-octane prep athlete can rapidly turn his tools into uber baseball skills, like Posey and Matusz did (or, for that matter, Trumbo or Bourjos). Case in point: not one of the Angels' six prep draftees drafted in the first three rounds of the 2010 draft cracked a full season team roster in 2011, and instead remained in rookie ball to polish their respective games. When a team commits six of its top seven picks to high school kids, only to see that kind of disappointing early return, there is good reason to tack towards older players in the next draft, if just for the sake of balance.
But that does not mean that the Angels should abandon the prep talent pool, which has yielded so many of their major leaguers over the last decade. Not one of the Bourjos-Trumbo-Walden-Chatwood cohort went off the draft board in the top two rounds of a draft -- in fact, only Chatwood was selected before the tenth round -- yet here they are in the big leagues, masking the deficiencies of more expensive free agent acquisitions.
Developing late-round high school athletes into major leaguers may not appear very efficient. The Angels selected four high school position players before taking Bourjos in the 2005 draft, and not one of those guys has sniffed the major leagues. Two haven't made it out of A-Ball. For every Flete Pete, attrition claims its share of PJ Phillips'. For every Trumbo, a gaggle of Doug Reinhardts. From a team's perspective, busts are the price of doing business.
Yet the whole draft and minor league system is even more inefficient when it comes to consuming human capital. It does its job, producing the best possible 25 man rosters across the league with a kind of rational, fiscal efficiency. But in terms of human capital, it chews up athletes in droves, felling the vast majority of big league dreams. Baseball America's 1997 study (hat tip to Stephen Smith via Ryanfea, most recently) breaks down the numbers, finding that slightly more than nine out of ten guys selected in even the second round flame out before reaching big-league regular status. By the time you get down to the tenth round, it's one draftee who carves out a starting big league role versus thirty-three who don't. So, for every Bourjos, Trumbo, and Walden cohort, the ambitions of approximately one hundred guys fall victim to attrition.
The Angels have beaten those odds consistently for more than a decade through good scouting, shrewd over-slot bonuses, an appetite for risk, and a willingness to trust their coaches with teaching athletes how to play the game. Yes, their failures tend to attract derision because their investments often defy industry consensus (I'm looking at you, Jake Locker). Their patience with toolsey, raw athletes also leads to some pretty horrific High A and Double A teams. Perhaps most damming from a fan's view, their drafts haven't yet resulted in a late round offensive superstar. But their willingness to take on prep projects is responsible for keeping the 2011 Angels competitive in a year when, frankly, they should have been sunk by every offseason decision they made regarding personnel over the age of 25.
To return to the original point: the Halos still have the opportunity to add high upside talent to their thinning system in 2011. It won't come cheap. Dominic Jose and Wayne Taylor each have Stanford commitments, giving them howitzer-caliber leverage in negotiations, so it may take Trumbo-type money ($1 million +) to sign either of them. Taylor is a catcher with defensive upside who also swings a power bat from the left side, while Jose is more the classic 4 to 5 tool outfielder favored by the Angels in recent years. Take a moment to check out their bios, here for Taylor and here for Jose. Hunter Lockwood, committed to the University of Oklahoma, might come a little cheaper. Like Taylor, he has a chance at developing into a power threat who sticks behind the plate.
Any one of these guys - or all three of them - could pull a Buster Posey and be first round material in three years. So if he wants to see that next Posey arrive in the big leagues wearing an Angels' uniform, Reagins needs to sign as many of these guys as possible. The Angels have to keep buying in bulk.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ok ,ok... say Posey signed with us... Where would we have played him? Ain't no way he gets Jeffy's spot.
Heck, he’d probably have been packaged to Texas via Toronto.
Should change my screen name to Stuck with Premium.
by stuck in Romania on Aug 12, 2011 9:58 PM PDT reply actions
3B would have been the obvious move since he played SS in college...
it was kind of an oddity that he moved to catcher when the Giants drafted him.
go long with extenze...i do
by angelsownredsux on Aug 13, 2011 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Sure, buying in bulk is one way to beat the odds
However, I recall a time about a decade ago, when Mathis was thought to be the #2 catching prospect in baseball, behind a guy named Joe Mauer, and both were thought to be budding monsters with the bat. That consensus, of course, turned out to be half right. No matter how good they look in college or AAA, it is still a completely different matter to get the high performance at the pro level.
Maybe the best strategy is to scout the hell out of Venezuela, the Dominican and other Latin America states, and sign the best toolsy players there: They can’t leverage an opportunity to play futbol instead of beisbol, and they’ll sign for less than Jake Locker (assuming someone hasn’t slipped them the number for Scott Boras’ satellite phone).
"The contract is brought up a lot. What it's going to take to get past it is winning. This organization took on the contract. I'm here to make them look good."~Vernon Wells
ya this is the approach the Rangers have taken lately...
and their farm system is riddled with promising Latin prospects, with plenty of promising high upside bats they signed this year(although most of their bonuses exceeded Locker’s).
go long with extenze...i do
by angelsownredsux on Aug 13, 2011 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions
I still say the best strategy for the Angels long term is to stay the course
you know, maybe trade/sign for Andrew McCutchen in like 8 years and pay him like 25 million per year.
Jim Bowden on Tony Reagins.
Style: Authoritative, brilliant baseball mind who works well in the trifecta with owner Arte Moreno and manager Mike Scioscia. Builds teams on pitching and defense up the middle. Active at trade deadlines, will trade prospects and has the resources to acquire All-Stars
Baaahhh
Another lost opportunity. The report is, no one signed:
The success of this draft now depends on whether or not the Angels make good with the college pitching projects they brought into the organization: whether Maronde can turn into a legitimate starting prospect, and whether Clevinger, Mutz, Waller, and Carlin turn big-time arms into pro performance. They didn’t draft a guy with extensive starting experience until the sixth round, or a starter with a really successful track record until the 8th round. These guys will be a lot of fun to watch, and there’s upside there, but it’s also a lot of pressure to put on your player development folks and the risk of striking out entirely is high.
So the question is "why did we not sign them?"
Was it due to poor draft strategy, taking kids who had little or no intention of signing with an MLB club now?
Was it due to poor financials, something that might lie at the feet of the current MLB team payroll level?
Was it due to reputation, that these kids might have been talked into signing with some team other than LAA?
Mike Scioscia has zero credibility to get mad at anyone, or anything. He is the reason Jeff Mathis plays baseball.
If he spends too much on draftees it must come directly out of his Del Taco expense account.
Pollyanna is dead. But don't get mad at me, I didn't kill her. Tony Reagins did.
Can't blame it on Bane.
Mike Scioscia has zero credibility to get mad at anyone, or anything. He is the reason Jeff Mathis plays baseball.
It's hard to exaggerate the ineffectiveness of this team's front office.
We paid nothing on the draft this year compared to other clubs, and we’ve been flopping big time on the international free agent market. Texas has simply been running circles around us this year.
What’s up with Arte? Is he done? Why didn’t we pay out?
by Turks Teeth on Aug 15, 2011 11:43 PM PDT up reply actions
I have to agree
It took longer for me to come around to that opinion — I kept assuming that the FO must be basing decisions on info that’s much better than ours. But I don’t see much of a guiding plan or strategy anymore, just an extravagant rush to spend in some circumstances, and an overly cautious hesitance to spend in other circumstances. The pattern isn’t very coherent and our most costly assets aren’t producing much in the way of results.
He's currently running the team in the red.
This is one area he can cut that, despite being extremely stupid in regard to the long-term health of the franchise, has little downside PR wise today.
Pollyanna is dead. But don't get mad at me, I didn't kill her. Tony Reagins did.
































