Just how much do the Angels have to win to win?
A couple of years ago, I used a handy Excel sheet (that my math-whiz dad created) to calculate how well the Angels had to do to stay in first place and keep the Rangers from catching them.
Now, sadly, it's time to do almost the opposite calculation--how many games do the Angels have to win in order to catch the Rangers and force a 1-game playoff for the division?
This assumes that the Angels and Rangers win and lose games at the right time.
First, I've heard rumors that the Rangers have a tough schedule coming up over the remainder of the season (excluding games against the Angels, apparently). Let's assume they go .500 over the remaining games. That brings their total record to 91-72 for the season. In that case, in order to also go 91-72 for the season and tie the Rangers, the Angels must go 26-14 over the final 39 games--a .654 winning percentage.
The Angels have done that before. At this point though, with the steadily flailing offense and messrs. Mathis, Wells, and the suck-of-the-week it looks like a pretty tall order.
Now let's assume the Rangers just bomb out the rest of the season and have a 1995-esque collapse, going, say, .400. That brings their final record to 87-75. To beat that, the Angels have to go 22-17, or .554, over the remaining games. That is slightly higher than the Angels's current winning percentage of .526 and so seems somewhat doable. By that same token, if this is what the Angels do and the Rangers go .500, then the Angels will finish something like 4 games out. Just bad enough to miss the playoffs for the second straight year but maybe not bad enough for Arte to step in and say enough is enough.
Finally, what happens if the Rangers keep on their current winning percentage of .577? In that case (depending on whether I round the calculator down to 57% or up to 58%), the Angels have to go either 28-11 or 29-10 to tie the division. That's a .724 or .734 winning percentage. In other words, the Angels have to catch absolute fire to win this thing in that case.
Perhaps at some point I'll look at these calculations for getting the wild card. As for winning the division, however, it looks like the Angels could conceivably win the division but that it will be pretty ridiculously difficult for them to do so. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news--let's hope the Angels can pull out all the stops and win this thing!
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
this makes me sad
I take it you don't have the DOV Secret Decoder Ring
You need to drink more ovaltine
-Quad Fin Rider
by DAD OF VLAD on Aug 17, 2011 3:47 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Science.
Sometimes somebody just has to accept the call to duty and step up to the task of doing all the hard slogging through the data to prove empirically what everybody assumes to be obvious.
Mike Scioscia has zero credibility to get mad at anyone, or anything. He is the reason Jeff Mathis plays baseball.
It is.
There is a backstory involving my son, a scientist and fellow HH’er, that we need not go into here.
Mike Scioscia has zero credibility to get mad at anyone, or anything. He is the reason Jeff Mathis plays baseball.
Come on Texas collapse!
"Its like when i’m right…i’m right… and when i’m wrong…i could have been right..so i’m still right cause i could have been wrong"-Chevy Clarke's Twitter
by ryanfea on Aug 17, 2011 4:42 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
A lot.
Captain, there are doubt's...
"It’s a good opportunity to show we have the strength to respond" - Arsene Wenger, 2011
I say lose now and don't get my hopes up!!
Jerks!!
"Every time I think I’m out, they pull me back in" -George Costanza
by Howie's Batting Title on Aug 18, 2011 1:45 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
I think they did.
Pollyanna is dead. But don't get mad at me, I didn't kill her. Tony Reagins did.
I say start youth movement now!
I am ok with the Angels not making the playoffs this year because, honestly, we don’t deserve it and we won’t be able to compete with the real MLB bats in the league.
I would be much more interested in seeing Trout, Conger, Chatwood, and Richards possibly, develop their talent in the MLB than to see more suckiness of the Angels lately.
Vernon Wells / #10 / LAA / LF 2011-2014
2011 - $23M
2012 - $21M
2013 - $21M
2014 - $21M
Are you going to take Rev's hint any time soon to shorten the thread inches on your sig?
Against stupidity the very Gods themselves toil in vain.
by Stirrups on Aug 18, 2011 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs

by 


























