Want Some Positive Mojo, Play the Rookies
At the beginning of tonight's game thread, I expressed frustration that rookies Mike Trout and Hank Conger were not in the line-up. I also suggested that it appeared they would see little playing time for the remainder of the series (possibly wrongly in the case of Trout). Trout and Conger did make appearances in the game, but not until the 7th inning when the game was well out of reach and the Angels were losing by ten runs.
Here is the list of changes made in the bottom of the 7th inning:
R Thompson relieved J Williams.
M Trout in right field.
M Trumbo in left field.
R Branyan at first base.
H Conger catching.
Just after these changes were made, the Angels offense roared to life and an 11-1 wipeout eventually became an 11-7 respectable loss. No, the rookies didn't directly contribute all that much to the offensive comeback. But I for one can't help but feel how their presence in the line-up and on the field positively affected the team's "mojo."
Last week, on August 18, rookie Mark Trumbo hit a two-run, walk-off home run in the bottom of the 9th inning against these same Texas Rangers, which ended an otherwise listless performance by the team and started a 6-game winning streak. The rookies came in tonight and turned the game around. I hope to see them in the starting line-up tomorrow...if for no other reason than their positive mojo.
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
29 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sometimes Mojo is a Mofo.
My response to your letter of February 19, 1976, is - kiss my ass.
Sincerely,
Bill Baxley, Attorney General
by sheisalovelyladyandmyapologiestoher on Aug 27, 2011 12:12 AM PDT reply actions
This is otherwise known as the
“If you play your best players, you field your best team and have the best chance of winning” effect.
It has to do with the stRanger pen being the suck
But it also has to do with players playing to win no mater how good/bad the pitching is. Not just playing because the coach pencils you into a spot.
by eyespy on Aug 27, 2011 12:51 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Hear Hear!!!!
Play the rookies especially in the too-large-for-Vernon-Wells-to-patrol outfield in Arlington!
"Grantland Rice, the great sportswriter, once said 'It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game.'
Well, Grantland Rice can go to hell as far as I am concerned." - Gene Autry
It's typically easier to hit when pitchers are grooving you pitches with an 11 run lead.
With that said, I would still prefer to see Mike Trout and Hank Conger.
I've got nothing.
Trout especially
When he was called up, Scioscia said he would be starting (or maybe it was playing) about 4 times a week. At this point he hasn’t started since Sunday. Instead we have Wells (whose lack of offensive prowess has been well-documented) and Bobby Abreu (who’s hitting .268/.326/.315 vs lefties).
Scioscia seems to be employing the platoon for Wilson and Conger with Mathis catching Weaver. We’ll see more Conger once we see more righties.
Bottom-line: "Mojo" is a joke
The team was on a 6 game winning streak at the start of the game, what happened to the “mojo” with that?
The Halos usually play well against the crappy teams, and don’t show up against the good teams. The game was over well before the 6th when it was 11-0; the comeback after that was meaningless as the game never was in doubt.
I’ll say it again: the 2011 Halos are a tease.
What happpened to the mojo at the beginning of the game?
Trout and Conger were not in the line-up.
A wise man does not need advice and a fool won't take it.
Lets look at this logically
During the 6 game win streak, Conger and Trout were both in the starting line-up for one game. In that one game, Conger and Trout combined for no hits.
Trout was in a total of 4 of the 6 wins, however one of those 4 games was a late inning pinch-hit role. During those 4 games, Trout had a total of 4 hits.
BUT THE MOJO
no really, ill role with this mojo talk.
Its the only thing left to hold on to… trouts approach looks 100 percent better at the plate than vernon, and his defense in the field is much better.
At this point.. is there really that much to lose?
What do you need a fancy suit for, Charlie, you ain't got no job to wear it to.
by clover_black on Aug 27, 2011 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions
"Logic" is my name. And I agree with you.
But this is a light-hearted post that is not fact/stat driven. It deals with intangibles and nuance.
A wise man does not need advice and a fool won't take it.
Tease is probably right.
I’ve been optimistic about this team for the first time in two years after the Wells/Abreu platoon and more playing time for Conger & Trout plans were announced. I’m starting to wonder if I’ve been fooled as it looks like Soth is going to be his proven vets in the lineup old self.
AWB - Thank you, Arte.
Just remember what happened to Austin Powers when he lost his mojo...
Never underestimate the power of mojo.
More Howie please...
Shakeup
We constantly hear that Trumbo’s walk-off was the key to our resurgence. But there were also meetings with Mathis, Wells, and Abreu followed by major lineup shakeup including the rookies for the Baltimore series. The offense numbers surged! Aside from playing one of the worst teams in baseball, I think the shakeup energized the team and focused the veterans. After Scioscia saw a spark or two from Wells (who has been making meaningful contact recently) and Abreu he pulled back from the shakeup plan. He’s got to stay with it!
MOJO = ANGELS ARE 12-3 IN GAMES Mike Trout STARTS!
How much more OBVIOUS does it have to be??? Some players are simply winners and it appears he is one of those kind of players…the stats bear that out thus far at all levels.
I have heard the announcers (Mota) say what their record is when he appears in a game, but never when he starts. They play 9 innings for a reason.
He has appeared in 4 other games as a late inning replacement and the team is 1-3 because verNone’s damage has already been done either with the bat (see “lack of”) or with the glove (see “lack of”)!
I have grown weary of making essentially this same post about the team’s record when Mike starts…nose on your face Soth!
I feel
that the streak had to do with the release of dead weight- Wells and Mathis in particular were weighing down the team with poor defense and weak “swing at first pitch” at bats for the former, and non clutch batting from the latter. Limit these two from being on the field on a regular basis! Play Conger, play Trout, play anyone but Vernon Smells and Jeff Mathshits!
Gimme a cigarette
This post isn't about mojo potatoes?
What do you need a fancy suit for, Charlie, you ain't got no job to wear it to.
No, for that go
A wise man does not need advice and a fool won't take it.
by angelslogic on Aug 27, 2011 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions
Mojo from dacing




I hope this works
I take it you don't have the DOV Secret Decoder Ring
You need to drink more ovaltine
-Quad Fin Rider
My line up for tonight against the leftie Wilson
1-Bourjos-CF
2-Callaspo or Izzy-3B (indifferent between the two, like both of them)
3-HK-2B
4-Hunter-RF
5-Trumbo-1B
6-Wells-DH
7-Trout-LF
8-Aybar-SS
9-Wilson-C
This is a huge game for the team and the line up choice is tough. I put Wilson at C because he and Santana have seemed to click (maybe it does not matter and Conger should catch, maybe I think too much like Soth). I started Wells because he seems like he is hitting again and we need some pop. We don’t have a lot of good choices against lefties —I would like to see more playing time for Branyan against righties.
Angels in 2011!
One part of this post is very significant:
This is a huge game for the team (.)
I couldn’t agree more. Indeed, I feel that whichever team wins tonight will win the AL West, and the other, of course, will stay home.
I love Hank,
but he has 16 career plate appearances against lefties.
That’s not to say he shouldn’t ever be getting starts against lefties (I don’t really know) but starting him last night would have been asking him to do something he has almost no experience at doing. In such a critical game, that’s a pretty poor idea.
The team stunk yesterday, blaming any individual player is weak sauce IMO.
Well idk about you guys but i think putting in the rookies is a good idea.
Now I have been reading what a lot of people have been putting and it all makes sense.
It makes sosh job hard, should he put hank in against a leftie whenm he has no exsperience against them at this level?
but than again if he doesn’t put him in he is being waistted on the bench, also with trout he says he wants to play him and trout has been doing pretty well. BUT he wants his vederans to step up and show his rookies how to play.
it is a hard desision and I personally think he made the wrong choice.
Like most of you I think he should put Trout in LF and Wells at DH, I want to see Hank play more but I understand why he isn’t playing….well I hope I’m wrong and he didn’t make the wrong choice, besides I haven’t seen 4000 games! haha ;)
Are you sure he was safe? It looked like an out to the entire statium. Well bad call Blue.
Trout's actually in the lineup today!
No Conger, but I’m not terribly surprised.
Santana pitching and we’re facing a lefty, so other Bobby gets the start. He has a .787 OPS against lefties this year.
Pray for Mojo

Trout in the lineup tonight, so looks like it worked.
by Big Easy Halofan on Aug 27, 2011 3:05 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs

by 






























