Kaleb Cowart; Top Angels Prospect #7
7) Kaleb Cowart, 6/2/92 -- 3B, Advanced Rookie Ball
.283/.345/.420 with 7 HR and 11 SB
I'm surprised at how much slack folks are cutting Cowart for his underwhelming season in the Pioneer League. Other sites have ranked him second, third/fourth, and fifth in the Angels system based on his all-star caliber tool package. Folks just don't seem especially alarmed at his problems with offspeed stuff and the consequent 25%+ strikeout rate he posted in rookie ball. They accept how raw our 2010 first round, $2.3 million bonus baby has remained through a full season of pro development, yet still project him to be a middle of the order hitter.
I went back through the decade's advanced rookie ball rosters to see how teenagers with similar rookie ball performances have fared, specifically those with K-rates above 20%. Here's the list: Mark Trumbo (20.7% K-rate), Ryan Mount (21.0%), Sean Rodriguez (21.2%), Peter Bourjos (24.0%), PJ Phillips (26.1%), Brandon Wood (26.5%, though he was a year younger than Cowart), and Angel Castillo (29.6%). There are some obvious busts there, but also some pretty good players. For me, the salient point is that none of them have ever really resolved their strikeout issues, even if they've found ways to succeed despite that flaw in their game. Cowart's K's aren't likely to just go away, and that's going to be prohibitive unless the secondary skills come along quickly.
Additional points of reference include Alberto Callaspo, our current switch-hitting, defensively-gifted third baseman, who K'd in exactly 4.3% (not a typo!) of his Pioneer League PA's at the same age as Cowart; Luis Jimenz, who fanned just 14.1% of the time, though he was a year older; and, at the other extreme, Josh Bell, the former Dodgers prospect and aspiring Orioles third baseman who often comes up as a comp for Cowart, and who also struck out in 26% of his PA's as a nineteen year-old in the Pioneer League. So far in the majors, 35% of Bell's PA's have ended with a K.
On the other hand, Cowart did a lot of things right in Orem: he improved his left-handed cut, ending up with a .303/.359/.466 slash line with seven homeruns from that side (including the playoffs), and showing flashes of power up the middle and to the opposite field. He had the bat speed to turn around good fastballs, shooting linedrives from line to line. His defense was spectacular at times, despite the disconcerting error totals, and his glove now projects as average to above average. That's a pretty good collection of skills to have, and there's still a chance that he takes a huge step forward next year.
Cowart's swing is similar from both sides of the plate. He uses a big leg kick to load, which probably compromises his ability to adjust to offspeed stuff. Even when he doesn't whiff, he often gets too far out in front and rolls over on a pitch, tapping far too many weak grounders to his pull side from both sides of the plate. We're likely to see his timing come and go as he develops, leading to wild swings in his numbers from month to month. Despite the big kick, Cowart's stride forward his modest, so he stands tall on a surprisingly narrow base throughout his cut, which is unusual for a power hitter. That keeps him upright at the point of contact, and helps him to stay on top of the ball. It seems to me that his cut is geared more for linedrives than for distance power, and my sense is the Angels want it that way for now.
Weirdly, his hitting mechanics seemed simpler in high school. He set up on a wider base then and loaded with a toe tap instead of his present high leg kick. It's unusual for a young player to move away from those kind of mechanics and add a big, potentially extraneous motion like the leg kick. Strange.
Cowart is a risky project. However, unlike most guys, he also has a workable exit strategy: just a year and a half ago, consensus had it that he could be a frontline starter. If he bombs as a hitter with Cedar Rapids, then it should be clear to him and to the organization that his future is on the mound, which in any case may be his best possible outcome. My fear is that he hits .250/.290/.370 with a 25% K-rate, which wouldn't be horrible for the Midwest League, but it wouldn't reflect any improvement either. Those numbers would likely be enough to keep him on the hitting development track, but at that point he'd be a year older and, in my mind, much further from projecting as an everyday MLB player.
To hell with mediocrity. Here's to boom or bust in 2012.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yeah, I saw those Pioneer League stats and didn't much like them.
Hopefully 2012 is decisive one way or the other.
At some point maybe you’d like participate in my prospect ranking revolution, in which we bifurcate prospect promise into two stacked rank lists: “ceiling” guys and “contributor” guys. The former being the traditional “this guy has all the tools to be a top major leaguer, but there’s an 80% likelihood that he’ll flame out before reaching the bigs”. The latter being “this guy doesn’t necessarily project as elite but there’s an 80% likelihood that he contributes at the MLB level in some sense”.
Scouting-driven “ceiling” lists drive me batty — they’re inevitably full of the good body fantasies that Moneyball, despite its issues, was actually on point in mocking. I’d like an alternative, without sacrificing huff-puff of the traditional scout stack rank.
Two prospect lists: one of kids “built for excellence”, one of kids “likely to contribute” with the 80/20 rule applied to each. You’ll see the Cowarts and Grichuks on the former, and the Kalhouns and Napolis on the latter.
Where the two lists intersect is where we’ll find farm gold.
I agree, for the most part
Sickles is beginning to differentiate his grades too, though so far he’s applied that concept only to different groupings of “C+” players.
After the top ten, I’m planning to do surveys covering “arms/bats to dream on,” and “arms/bats that can help soon.” Originally, that seemed like a quick and dirty way to cover as many guys possible, while also acknowledging just how short the system currently is on prospects who fall into both categories.
Ultimately, though, this is all about assigning relative value to players, so you have to make judgement calls that rank players from both groupings into a single list. Is your point that the reasoning behind those value assignments — the balancing act between tools and skills — should be more systematic and transparent?
In the past, I’ve used a simple discounting system — I stack up WAR ceiling in one column, and the %-chance I believe a player has of making that ceiling in the other, and then rank according to the product of those two assumptions. I use that to cross-check an original, “from the gut” rankings. Sometimes I go back and adjust the original ranking, and other times I’ll play with assumptions in the WAR/likelihood ranking, and given a tie I will favor the higher-ceilinged player, but I do try to make the two lists match in the end.
Because I tweak values according to my own inclinations, it’s more thought exercise than scientific process. How would you propose systemizing it?
I don't see it. Damon is more of a finesse high average scrappy speed guy.
Cowart seems like a power hitter who, in a perfect world may be Chipper Jones. Chipper isn’t really like Damon at all.
RIP Nick Adenhart
by miketrout on Jan 16, 2012 1:19 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
yea I see him more as a slower version of Dave Hollins
who could hit for a bit more pop than Dave did.
Jim Bowden on Tony Reagins.
Style: Authoritative, brilliant baseball mind who works well in the trifecta with owner Arte Moreno and manager Mike Scioscia. Builds teams on pitching and defense up the middle. Active at trade deadlines, will trade prospects and has the resources to acquire All-Stars
The sample size is way too small just yet for viable comparisons
"When my mother was pregnant with me, they did an ultrasound and found she was having twins. When they did another ultrasound a few weeks later, they discovered that I had adsorbed the other fetus. Do I regret this? No, I believe his tissue has made me stronger. I now have the strength of a grown man and a little baby."
Hopefully he's not the next Casey Kelly.
Way over-hyped with no real production. Tools are not enough. This isn’t the NBA.
by moralesforpresident on Jan 16, 2012 10:52 AM PST via mobile reply actions
STILL has upside, Mr. Callaspo does.
"If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base." ~Dave Barry



























