Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Angels Fifth Starter Poll

Hawaii 5-7 ?!?!?!

The Angels rotation is Jered Weaver, Dan Haren, C.J. Wilson, Ervin Santana and then a misty fog. With so much depth at some positions (OF, 1B, DH), the team is not really built to withstand a lengthy ache or pain to the arm or arms of the front four.

And so there sits Jerome Williams with the inside track, Garrett Richards as the crown prince of seasons future, Trevor Bell squeezed out of the bullpen and too good to be 2012's Matt Palmer Salt Lake redux and then... well and then a steep cliff.

With LaTroy Hawkins splashing in, the bullpen back of Hisanori Takahashi, Scott Downs and Jordan Walden seems solid, with optionable Bobby Cassevah and Man at Work Rich Thompson on the periphery as well. If it is a game of musical arms to be played at the Bullpen Preschool of Anaheim, there is league average depth and not much more. But do we really need a reliever in the form of Ryan Madson or a fifth starter in the mold of Roy Oswalt? What do you think?

Poll
The FIFTH STARTER for the Angels in 2012 should be:
Trevor Bell
79 votes
Garrett Richards
113 votes
Jerome Williams
807 votes
An Unsigned Free Agent
154 votes
Four Man Rotation
54 votes

1207 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 96 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ryan Madson, if we could get him cheap, would be fantastic

I’m talking a two year deal, maybe 10-11 million per. Anything more than that, foggedaboudit. If we skip Madson, Luis Ayala could be pretty useful – he had a great season last year, but doesn’t have a track record of success. As for a fifth starter, screw it; Williams/Richards should be enough to hold it down.

Mark Trumbo: 2011 Rookie of the Year

by nicolasville on Jan 2, 2012 1:44 PM PST reply actions  

I think the market has dwindled enough on Madson

To push it to 7-8 Mil per year.

CJ Wilson is OUR douche now!

by ryanfea on Jan 2, 2012 1:53 PM PST up reply actions  

That kind of money for a dude

who pitches one inning a game, 4 or 5 times a week?

Unlike this cat, my love for the LAA will never die.

by NathanielS on Jan 2, 2012 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes

It’s called a closer

Light up the Freakin Halo!

by marshgr on Jan 2, 2012 3:55 PM PST up reply actions  

A "proven closer"?

Lols

Unlike this cat, my love for the LAA will never die.

by NathanielS on Jan 2, 2012 5:52 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Appropriately blunt:

“Roles are bullshit. Your job is to throw strikes when I put your ass out on the mound.”

- Dick Radatz, as pitching coach of the North Shore Spirit, 2004

"If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base." ~Dave Barry

by LAASurfin on Jan 2, 2012 9:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Paying relievers a lot of money hardly ever works out, unless you’re Mariano Rivera. The role is the role of a pitcher that throws strikes, 4/44 or whatever he’s asking is ridiculous. There are better options.

Unlike this cat, my love for the LAA will never die.

by NathanielS on Jan 2, 2012 10:19 PM PST up reply actions  

The dude was worth 2.2 WAR last year

Granted, maybe that’s not worth 10 million a year, but in a market where closers of his value are vastly overpaid (see Papelbon, Jonathan), he would come as a relative bargain. He doesn’t walk a whole lot of batters, and strikes out batters at a good rate. I would sure as hell love to have a guy come in the ninth and not walk a ton while dealing with batters with as little cardiovascular stress as possible.

Mark Trumbo: 2011 Rookie of the Year

by nicolasville on Jan 2, 2012 8:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Proven?

How long has Madsen proven himself for? He shouldn’t get Papelbon type money, that droop lipped special needs hurler has been good for years. Madsen’s been good for what? One and a half?

He’s barely crossed the Turnbow level of Proven Closerdom. I’d rather go with what we have and switch to Downs at closer if Walden sucks…. and not pay Madsen.

Tim Salmon + Yankee cap = HOF.

by gitchogritchoffmypetis on Jan 2, 2012 9:29 PM PST up reply actions  

The Mendoza Line for closers

The Turnbow Level—I like that. And to carry that it its logical conclusion, we all know what happened when Milwaukee saw flashes of competence in Derrick Turnbow:

The Brewers signed him to $6.5M/3 before the 2006 season, and by July the name of the Brewers’ closer was Francisco Cordero. Turnbow got progressively worse, to the point he was sent to the minors (a year later and still making $2M a year) and went full Nuke Laloosh.

Yes, please, let’s extrapolate a small sample of success into a fat, guaranteed, multiyear deal, and hope he crosses the Turnbow Level.

I vote that this term become an official part of the HH Lexicon, effective today.

"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read" ~Groucho Marx

by George Kaplan on Jan 3, 2012 4:03 AM PST up reply actions  

Vernon Wells was worth 6.7 WAR in 2006

That fat deal he signed sure guaranteed more of the same in the years which followed, didn’t it?

"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read" ~Groucho Marx

by George Kaplan on Jan 3, 2012 4:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Madson hasn't had a bad year since '06

And he was a starter then. He’s consistently put up a WAR of approximately 1.5 in relief the past five years, with 2.2 last year. No, he hasn’t been “closer worthy” for that whole time, but he was a damn solid closer last year. The peripherals are there, and there’s absolutely no reason why he shouldn’t hold up for a two year deal. Anything more than that is plausible but too much of a risk.

Wells is irrelevant – he was solid before then, no doubt, but he was undone with the help of injuries, and that was a ridiculously risky deal anyway. Madson has been a workhorse reliever. Nobody is immune from injury and regression (especially relievers), but as far as relievers go, Madson would definitely rank among the most durable. He’s a better pitcher than anyone in our bullpen not named Downs (they’re probably about equal). We don’t know how Downs would do in the closing role, especially with his drop in K’s, but we sure know what Madson can do.

Mark Trumbo: 2011 Rookie of the Year

by nicolasville on Jan 3, 2012 11:13 AM PST up reply actions  

WAR is silly.

Just look at save percentage when evaluating relievers.

Fernando Rodney had a great save percentage and then was terrible for us. The lesson learned with that is only sign relievers with a greater save percentage than Fernando Rodney or just don’t sign Fernando Rodney ever again.

After this off-season, I have no recollection of this Del Ninja character we used to discuss.

by snowhor on Jan 3, 2012 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Weaver to Downs to Madson sounds great

Also works using Haren, Santana, Wilson, or Williams.

by JeffJoiner on Jan 2, 2012 7:10 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Madson's One Season As A Closer

is causing his market to fall to maybe 1 or 2 year status. He should be selling himself as a solid option as a set up man or closer, who can be dominant in both roles, but does not have the track record to be penciled in as the closer. Still would be a great pick up for this bullpen.

by RyÅn Krol on Jan 3, 2012 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

The poll is so far in favor of Jerome that it looks like a middle finger.

As in: Yeah, I’ll be the fifth starter. Thanks.

Winning doesn't matter. -Lyle

by 5thStarter on Jan 2, 2012 1:56 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Bold prediction for 2012

Jerome Williams is the Vance Worley of the Angels.

Winning doesn't matter. -Lyle

by 5thStarter on Jan 2, 2012 2:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Vance Worley?

Lucille Ball’s best friend?

"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read" ~Groucho Marx

by George Kaplan on Jan 2, 2012 3:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Man

you just really dated yourself.

This is a sig.

by Caseys Kiss of Death on Jan 2, 2012 10:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes, but I always insisted upon a chaperone

I know how forward I can get after a couple of drinks.

"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read" ~Groucho Marx

by George Kaplan on Jan 3, 2012 3:49 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Jerome earned it. Great find in the bargain bin.

Pilot to bombardier!

by Pipo on Jan 2, 2012 1:59 PM PST reply actions  

I would really like us to pick up someone else in FA.

Jerome did great, but the lack of depth is troubling. There are ALWAYS injuries, so we should be finding ways to mitigate that upfront.

I think that 5th starter is a much bigger need than another reliever, even as good as Madson has been, and would be cheaper, imo.

In the long run men hit only what they aim at. Therefore, though they should fail immediately, they had better aim at something high.
Walden

by matthiasstephan on Jan 2, 2012 2:04 PM PST reply actions  

I heard Trumbo can pitch.

Abreu can play center and Trout can catch.

by Halowitz on Jan 2, 2012 2:05 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Trumbo

can actually run it up there in the mid 90s

by BigGame48 on Jan 2, 2012 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

This

He has a hell of an arm. He’d probably be okay in RF if we didn’t have Hunter.

Mark Trumbo: 2011 Rookie of the Year

by nicolasville on Jan 2, 2012 7:01 PM PST up reply actions  

One reason I'm not as worried as most

About giving Trumbo a shot at the hot corner. He’s got a cannon, and he’s used to reacting to hot shots from in tight.

Don't call me Bugs. Although Bugs Bunny could do it all on the baseball field.

by highlandhalo on Jan 3, 2012 6:43 AM PST up reply actions  

that last sentence can be interpreted in one too many ways

"You realize that Ive been posting on AN since 07 on this name and I am one of the most rec'ed posters there right?" - Some tool named Designatedforassignment from Athletics Nation

by 2pintsofbooze on Jan 3, 2012 9:37 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm cool with Jerome, but I voted for Trevor

The way Bell’s been used makes me think the FO (at least the old one) had soured to him for one reason or another.

I don’t understand why he hasn’t gotten more of a chance seeing that he’s still only 25 and boasts a five-pitch repertoire. If not for the crazy .371 BABIP against, his numbers would be fine.

I’m hoping he’s the first to take the mound if Jerome doesn’t pan out.

"Why [pitcher wins] should be taken as a record of the pitcher's ability is a conundrum to which no one has as yet vouchsafed an answer." M.G. Lloyd; Baseball Magazine - 1908

by Nathan Aderhold on Jan 2, 2012 2:13 PM PST reply actions  

I'd like it

if they at least stuck him in the pen as a long man

he’s not doing us any good in AAA

"id take 5th Dimention Wormhole Rivera over Wells any day of the week"
-clover_black

by the king of CERA on Jan 2, 2012 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Voted Bell as well

Williams do fine holding down that 5th spot but Bell has more upside in my opinion.

by BigGame48 on Jan 2, 2012 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I've always liked Bell

For the past two years I’ve wanted him to get a shot when Kazmir and Chatwood were struggling. I figured I would rather give him a chance than watch a guaranteed walk or two per inning.

by JeffJoiner on Jan 2, 2012 7:08 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Isn't BABIP only a fluke when high IF it's an aberration?

Like, if Bell was putting up a career .310 BABIP year after year, and suddenly spiked like that for one season, maybe it’s a fluke. But if your BABIP is particularly high with no record of ever being low, that’s not necessarily “crazy,” so much as you’re just throwing immensely hittable stuff.

This is a sig.

by Caseys Kiss of Death on Jan 2, 2012 10:04 PM PST up reply actions  

depends on the sample size

the larger and more consistent sample size the better it sticks to the statistical model

by Rev Halofan on Jan 2, 2012 10:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, that's sorta what I mean

it’s too soon to simply say he’s been unfortunate with a .371 BABIP, because there’s no track record or sample size in which he was anything but a .371 BABIP.

This is a sig.

by Caseys Kiss of Death on Jan 2, 2012 10:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Bell's career BABIP is .371

But his batted ball data suggests it should be .323.

Bell does throw “hittable stuff” but he’s been pretty unfortunate so far.

by BigGame48 on Jan 2, 2012 10:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure it'll come down, too

but I don’t think you’re unfortunate for a high BABIP until you actually show you’re better than someone with a high BABIP.

In the scheme of things, especially across a small, small sample size like Bell’s, the difference between a .323 BABIP and a .371 BABIP is literally an extremely small number of balls falling in…I don’t see that as unfortunate so much as maybe a failure to execute precise location on some pitches. Maybe if he had better spotted 5-10 pitches in his short career, he has 5-10 balls not hit as sharply.

This is a sig.

by Caseys Kiss of Death on Jan 2, 2012 10:50 PM PST up reply actions  

He also pitched with a Rivera/Abreu/Hunter outfield

I’m pretty sure that contributed to a few balls finding a place to land.

by JeffJoiner on Jan 3, 2012 4:05 PM PST up reply actions  

If Kuroda or Oswalt can be had cheap, I say make a run at them.

If not, i’m cool with sticking with Williams or even Bell.

YOU DON'T KNOW THE POWER OF THE DARKSIDE.....

by halofolife on Jan 2, 2012 2:49 PM PST reply actions  

There is no place for common sense here, son

Best you be moving along, now.

"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read" ~Groucho Marx

by George Kaplan on Jan 2, 2012 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

rec'd

I think it’s funny when people say that our rotation goes off a cliff after the #4. Many teams’ rotations go off the cliff after #3 or even #2

The rotation is set. improve the bullpen.

"id take 5th Dimention Wormhole Rivera over Wells any day of the week"
-clover_black

by the king of CERA on Jan 2, 2012 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

+1

Light up the Freakin Halo!

by marshgr on Jan 2, 2012 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Brody makes the point already, sort of....

But most teams would be pretty glad if they had our top four and any nameless pile of #5 prospects with Bells repertoire and non-fright inducing track record, or Williams and Richards stuff.

I voted for Williams because, if you remove a couple bogus, dead arm looking relief appearances he had last year his stats look great, he’s got awesome movement on his pitches and good make up. Goes after guys. I think he’s going to be a very good pitcher.

If he were a shiny new prospect instead of a reclamation project we’d all be looking forward to his first full season.

And he’s got soul. And he’s super bad.

Tim Salmon + Yankee cap = HOF.

by gitchogritchoffmypetis on Jan 2, 2012 9:43 PM PST up reply actions  

You had me at he's got soul. Not too mention being super bad.

But, if we can solidify our SP with another FA that’s relatively cheap, I say go for it. Might as well improve our strength.

YOU DON'T KNOW THE POWER OF THE DARKSIDE.....

by halofolife on Jan 3, 2012 1:07 AM PST up reply actions  

My biggest problem with this argument is ...

that one defines roles for #5 starter throughout the season.

I understand that there is a limited amount of funds, players available for a roster, etc. But why would you, purposefully, choose an inferior player if you can get a better one. One need not settle for a #5 starter, just like when we signed Wilson we weren’t thinking, ‘Good, finally a decent #4 starter.’ He is a pitcher, and a good one. I want a pitcher, and a good one, out there every day.

I don’t want days when we have a ‘#5’ pitcher against someone elses ace. With our first 4 pitchers, I feel they can all compete, day in and day out, with every ace out there. That is what I would like to see in our other pitcher. I think that is more important than an additional arm in the bullpen, and I think we have the resources to improve there as well.

Do we ‘need’ to? Of course not. Do we have an amazing, enviable rotation as is? Of course.

Could we be better? Always. And I think this is the place to discuss it. My feeling is that starting pitching is a place we could improve. More than the bullpen. More than at 3B. There are decent, or sometimes stellar, options out there (or rumored to be out there) in FA and via trade for starting pitching. I see less options for the other things people discuss, and this is a place we could improve.

Williams, Richards and Bell aren’t it, for me, imho.

In the long run men hit only what they aim at. Therefore, though they should fail immediately, they had better aim at something high.
Walden

by matthiasstephan on Jan 3, 2012 3:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Call me crazy, a dreamer perhaps....

But I think Jerome “Suger Bear” Williams will be as good or better for us this year than Oswalt or most of the other available pitchers who will cost us a lot more money or prospects. It could be fun to pick 4 or 5 available pitchers and see how he does compared to them this year.

I’m betting he’s gonna have very little pressure on him at that #5 spot, and he’ll get “lifted up” by his rotation mates as they all start trying to NOT be the guy who has the bad start, one up each other, etc.

Plus Soul/Super Bad/Pink Glove.

Tim Salmon + Yankee cap = HOF.

by gitchogritchoffmypetis on Jan 3, 2012 10:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe, but we already have Jerome under contract ...

so, bringing in Oswalt lets them compete for that spot. Let them figure out who is going to be better, and we have options if either Oswalt’s back can’t hack it or Jerome doesn’t perform to last years level.

I don’t buy that Richards or Bell is ready for that role, at least not long term.

In the long run men hit only what they aim at. Therefore, though they should fail immediately, they had better aim at something high.
Walden

by matthiasstephan on Jan 4, 2012 6:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh. Another point for Jerome.

“Maybe, but we already have Jerome under contract … "

We signed him already. He’s a big splash.

Tim Salmon + Yankee cap = HOF.

by gitchogritchoffmypetis on Jan 4, 2012 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Let's sign Fielder

And have him compete with Pujols to play first base.

by Brody on Jan 4, 2012 9:39 PM PST up reply actions  

How about this???

We don’t need to do anything to this team. We are done with Pujols, Wilson and Iannetta. I will take Bell, Williams, or Richards in the 5 spot!

If we do anything, let’s add a reliever. We really don’t need anything else.

Light up the Freakin Halo!

by marshgr on Jan 2, 2012 4:00 PM PST reply actions  

This makes too much sense

You are spot on with this post. The rest of what we need to do involves figuring out which players to play and what their roles are. We need to figure out what to do with out DH/OF logjam of Trumbo, Morales, Wells, Bourjos, Trout, Hunter, Abreu. We need to figure out all of the bullpen roles and what to do with Conger. My assumption is that the budget is already to its breaking point and the return on any pitcher we pay for is going to fall far short of the investment. I’m OK with paying more for parking for Albert Pujols. I’m not OK with paying more for parking for Ryan Madson.

by jco on Jan 3, 2012 8:50 AM PST up reply actions  

You have to give it to Williams.

His performance at the end of the season gave the team a much needed lift. There is no way he should not be given a chance to start at the beginning of the season. It is his job to lose. If he cannot get it done then the other options provided should be considered.

Mathis is finally gone. Only good things can happen now.

by Angelsrthebest101 on Jan 2, 2012 4:17 PM PST reply actions  

4 man rotation

The neighbor is a cranky irish expat. He if wanted no snakes, he shoulda stayed in Ireland.
-Moondoggy

by DAD OF VLAD on Jan 2, 2012 4:18 PM PST reply actions  

1971 Baltimore Orioles

Mike Cuellar 38 starts, 20-9
Jim Palmer 37 starts, 20-9
Pat Dobson 38 starts, 20-8
Dave McNally 30 starts, 21-5

The remaining 16 starts were shared among 3 other pitchers (McNally missed 6-7 starts between mid-July and mid-August). In essence, there was no 5th starter. That didn’t seem to hold the Orioles back.

"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read" ~Groucho Marx

by George Kaplan on Jan 2, 2012 8:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Please Be Aware.

The MLBPA is now watching your house and monitoring your communications. Please do not think things that piss them off. Thank you.

Tim Salmon + Yankee cap = HOF.

by gitchogritchoffmypetis on Jan 2, 2012 9:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Williams

He earned first crack it last year.

by JeffJoiner on Jan 2, 2012 7:03 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Tough call, should the response to your first crack comment be a Ron Washington or Mike Napoli joke?

After this off-season, I have no recollection of this Del Ninja character we used to discuss.

by snowhor on Jan 3, 2012 1:04 PM PST up reply actions  

In 10 games, Williams was 4-0 with an ERA of 3.68.

A fluke? Maybe. But for now, he’s earned a spot in the rotation.

A wise man does not need advice and a fool won't take it.

by angelslogic on Jan 2, 2012 8:42 PM PST reply actions  

GET MADSON.

SWOOP IN AND NAB KURODA (If he wanted to stay with the Dodgers, there is a good chance he wouldn’t mind playing for the Halos).

WIN WORLD SERIES.

LATHER, RINSE, REPEAT.

"F it, let's pitch." - Ervin Santana

by Chzburger Jones on Jan 2, 2012 9:08 PM PST reply actions  

ANGELS

MADSON CAN’T CLOSER FOR SHIT!!!!!! WE PAY HIM MILLIONMNS? F**K NO0!!!! BUT WALDEN CATN CLOSER FOR ASS!!!!! BROXTON AND KUO ARE THE REAL CLOSER! GENUINE DEVELOPMENT BY DODGERES!!!!!!!!

F**K NO FOR MADISONS SHIT!!!!! AND BRGIN TETH DH TO TEH NL!!!!!!!!

"id take 5th Dimention Wormhole Rivera over Wells any day of the week"
-clover_black

by the king of CERA on Jan 2, 2012 9:57 PM PST up reply actions  

SPC7, dude. SPC7.

If the Halos don't care about the way they play, then why should I?

by red floyd on Jan 3, 2012 2:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Poor Sprid.

I always confuse his name with SPC7 even though their content is remarkably unsimilar.

After this off-season, I have no recollection of this Del Ninja character we used to discuss.

by snowhor on Jan 3, 2012 1:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I like to turn the crazy dial up to 11 every now and then

"id take 5th Dimention Wormhole Rivera over Wells any day of the week"
-clover_black

by the king of CERA on Jan 4, 2012 12:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Fernando Rodney for #5

See we had it all mixed up. Fernando Rodney actually is bad with stress. If we put him in at the #5P spot, in a less stressful atmosphere. He would give us 7 solid inning is dramatic
baseball. Pull him off the Free-Agent list and give him one more chance.

- This message has been brought to you by the No Respect Rodney Fan Club

Beware!!

by Creamsicle Power on Jan 2, 2012 9:33 PM PST reply actions  

no

From Svaldbard! A viking in the true sense, but like the Angels; and we’ve started our own little “No respect Rodney Fan Club here.” Revenues from this effort bring us enough food to get by in the cold winter months, so please push for Rodney’s return in So.CA! – Thanks!

Beware!!

by Creamsicle Power on Jan 8, 2012 12:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Spam spam spam spam, spam spam spam spam!!!

If the Halos don't care about the way they play, then why should I?

by red floyd on Jan 8, 2012 3:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I vote for whoever earns it in ST

"You realize that Ive been posting on AN since 07 on this name and I am one of the most rec'ed posters there right?" - Some tool named Designatedforassignment from Athletics Nation

by 2pintsofbooze on Jan 2, 2012 11:05 PM PST reply actions  

I also like this approach

Williams, Bell, and Richards show up to Spring Training with an open competition. Winner gets the 5 spot, one guy heads to the bullpen for long relief duty and the other goes to Salt Lake to stay stretched out.

I love internal competition. It sets a competitive mood from day one of Spring Training.

by JeffJoiner on Jan 3, 2012 9:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Isn't that partially how Jeff Mathis earned the top catcher spot every year?

Judging him on a strong spring (along with that strong postseason) while ignoring everything you know about him from the rest of his professional career.

After this off-season, I have no recollection of this Del Ninja character we used to discuss.

by snowhor on Jan 3, 2012 1:10 PM PST up reply actions  

so in this case I'm not really sure what you're trying to say

Williams should get the job because he pitched good at the end of last season, even if he looks like dog shit in ST?

"You realize that Ive been posting on AN since 07 on this name and I am one of the most rec'ed posters there right?" - Some tool named Designatedforassignment from Athletics Nation

by 2pintsofbooze on Jan 3, 2012 1:24 PM PST up reply actions  

No, I'm looking at it from the other perspective, a player overperforming.

If one of these guys is lights out in spring, I wouldn’t overvalue that over everything thing else we know about him. The team should have an idea on where these three rank beforehand based on what we’d expect them to do and then use spring performances to judge whether or not to deviate from that ranking.

Obviously, if a player is pitching like dog karmis, then yeah, dump that guy.

After this off-season, I have no recollection of this Del Ninja character we used to discuss.

by snowhor on Jan 3, 2012 3:09 PM PST up reply actions  

if a guy is lights out in ST then I'd say he earned the right to go every 5th day

since the #5 spot is not solidified with anyone yet. If the guy ends up faltering a month into the season then you switch him with whoever they have pitching well. The problem with the Mathis stuff is that when it became clear his hitting in ST was more of a fluke than realized talent, he was never siphoned out for better performers. I doubt that would happen with a SP though (see Kazmir, Piniero).

"You realize that Ive been posting on AN since 07 on this name and I am one of the most rec'ed posters there right?" - Some tool named Designatedforassignment from Athletics Nation

by 2pintsofbooze on Jan 3, 2012 3:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Having Williams As A Solid Option As 5th Starter

is a plus, but the other options dont’ excite me much anymore. Richards I’m all for, but I’d rather have 2 young promising prospects in addition to Richard rather than continuing to hope Bell finally gets it. Or, the Halos could add on a 5th starter on a 1 year deal and make Williams a solid long man in the pen.

by RyÅn Krol on Jan 3, 2012 5:07 PM PST reply actions  

Keep Jerome in the rotation

he was shit out of the pen

"id take 5th Dimention Wormhole Rivera over Wells any day of the week"
-clover_black

by the king of CERA on Jan 4, 2012 12:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Halos Heaven is the Number #1 Angels Fan Blog according to QUANTCAST. Our Angels Fan Site is YOUR Angels Fan Community!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Summation of the Angels 2012 season so far
Sinatra2_small
Sign the petition to end "Buttercup"
Angelsbathroom_small
JCVW: Vernon Wells Has Been a Consistent .222 Hitter Since 2010

Recent FanPosts

Morales-mainx-large_small
Albert Pujols – A Man of Faith
Kendry_morales_small
The Most Frightening Word in Baseball: "Rebuilding"
Avatar_small
By The Numbers: MLB Starting Pitchers
Small
Angel Games Boring?
Angelmike_small
Terry Smith. You make the call.
Nick_small
Are the Angels the anti-Rangers?
Wrigley_field_small
A Serious top 5 of why Pujols is below the Mathis line.
Angelmike_small
The Top Ten Reasons Albert Pujols is hitting below 200

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Leaders of the Free World

4323_1105939621665_1622022962_290465_5300842_n_small Rev Halofan

Mostinterstingman_small cupie

Tn96_small WiHaloFan

Whammy10_small blast21dave

Fearless Crew

N1222371_8709_small scottnak

Halos2_small Stirrups

Anarangels_small Mayheminthehood

Cant-tell-if-trolling-or-just-very-stupid_small linkbruin

Avatar_small rghan

Alternate-club-logo-no-highlight1_small RexTookMyStash

Celebrity Chefs

306996053509_0_0_small PhiSlamma

Angelsbathroom_small mattwelch

Angels_ywc_album_small yeswecan

34_adenhart_small RallyMonkey5

Userpic-105-100x100_small Suboptimal

The_prior_art_cover_small Turks Teeth