WAR: Replacement Team Wins

ZERO WAR - Christian Petersen

The recent resurgence of talk about WAR due to Sam Miller's article has got me thinking about the meaning of WAR itself: how many wins did a player contribute to the team over a replacement player. A replacement player is basically who the team would add to the roster (at the same position(s)) if the player under consideration was removed from the team. But this got me thinking... what if we removed all of the players? What if an entire team was filled with only replacement players? If WAR is doing a good job, shouldn't the number of wins from an all-replacement team (RT) be fairly fixed?

So I decided to run some numbers (for the 2012 season), to see how a team of only replacement players would do. For each team, I added the offensive WAR, i.e. WAR from the hitters, and added it to the pitching WAR, WAR from the pitchers. Then I took this total number of Wins Above Replacement and subtracted it from the actual wins each team had, calling this result Replacement Team Wins (RT Wins). For this exercise, I used Fangraphs WAR, since they had listings of team WAR more available.

Team W L Off WAR Pit WAR Total WAR RT Wins
Angels 89 73 37.4 10 47.4 41.6
Astros 55 107 9.6 8 17.6 37.4
Athletics 94 68 23.7 18.1 41.8 52.2
Blue Jays 73 89 15.8 7.6 23.4 49.6
Braves 94 68 29 18.5 47.5 46.5
Brewers 83 79 33.6 16.7 50.3 32.7
Cardinals 88 74 33.4 18.9 52.3 35.7
Cubs 61 101 13.5 7.7 21.2 39.8
Diamondbacks 81 81 26.6 21 47.6 33.4
Dodgers 86 76 20.3 16.8 37.1 48.9
Giants 94 68 29.9 14.7 44.6 49.4
Indians 68 94 11.9 7.8 19.7 48.3
Mariners 75 87 13.5 13.5 27.0 48.0
Marlins 69 93 14.8 15.8 30.6 38.4
Mets 74 88 19.3 12.5 31.8 42.2
Nationals 98 64 28.7 21.4 50.1 47.9
Orioles 93 69 15.3 16.6 31.9 61.1
Padres 76 86 25.6 5.7 31.3 44.7
Phillies 81 81 23.4 19.3 42.7 38.3
Pirates 79 83 20.5 12.2 32.7 46.3
Rangers 93 69 26.5 23.9 50.4 42.6
Rays 90 72 22.3 23.2 45.5 44.5
Red Sox 69 93 20.8 13.7 34.5 34.5
Reds 97 65 25.9 21 46.9 50.1
Rockies 64 98 17.9 12.1 30.0 34.0
Royals 72 90 17.3 15 32.3 39.7
Tigers 88 74 21.1 24.8 45.9 42.1
Twins 66 96 22.5 5.6 28.1 37.9
White Sox 85 77 18.9 18.2 37.1 47.9
Yankees 95 67 30.8 20.3 51.1 43.9

The results are a bit surprising. Now, the average RT Wins came out to 43.32, which is right on Fangraphs definition of a replacement level team. However, there are some broad deviations from this. Four teams are below 35 wins, with the Brewers the lowest at 32.7. Three teams are above 50, with the Orioles the highest at 61.1. The distribution seems pretty random with respect to actual wins, offensive WAR, pitching WAR, or total WAR. That is, I had trouble finding correlations.

The interesting thing is, some teams appear to be getting more wins from their WAR than others. For example, the Orioles managed 93 wins from 31.9 total WAR, yet the Brewers only got 83 wins from a whopping 50.3 WAR.

This makes me think that WAR doesn't represent Wins accurately. Perhaps runs created/saved isn't being calculated well, or the conversion from runs to wins isn't valid. I did some more calculations to look at how many wins a RT would have based on the number of wins determined from the PythagenPat algorithm, and there is the same, if not more, variation. I won't post the data, but have it available, if desired.

So why the variation? To be honest, I'm not really sure, and it embarrasses me to make a FanPost without any clear conclusions, so I'll at least throw out some thoughts.

  1. The definition of a replacement player still needs some work.
  2. WAR is merely a tool to compare players with each other. Cumulative WAR should not be used to compare teams.
  3. WAR actually converts a player's value in Runs to Wins using an approximation/variation of the Pythagorean Win formula, which itself often does not match the amount of games a team actually wins.
  4. There is some data I'm missing or not considering that influences the number of games a team wins other than offensive and pitching WAR (and luck).
  5. The variation is due to one or more of the issues described in Fangraph's explanation of WAR.

I'm curious to hear what you make of this. Does this discredit WAR in any way, or am I trying to read too much into it?

One more fun fact: The 2003 Detroit Tigers was pretty darn close to an all-replacement player team. Posting 43 wins, they had an offensive WAR of -0.7 and a pitching WAR of 3.8 for a Total WAR of 3.1. Nate Cornejo (1.9 WAR), Jeremy Bonderman (1.4), and Mike Maroth (0.6) had a combined 57 losses and yet had the top three WAR among pitchers on the team. Dmitri Young was the only other player on the team with a WAR over 1.0 at 2.1.

This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Halos Heaven

You must be a member of Halos Heaven to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Halos Heaven. You should read them.

Join Halos Heaven

You must be a member of Halos Heaven to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Halos Heaven. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.