Eric Byrnes -- To Sign or Not To Sign
Eric Byrnes is going to get a nice contract in free agency at the end of the year. Few players play with his passion, heart, and hustle while still putting up great production.
Eric Byrnes [2007]: .310/.373/.503, 16 HR, 61 RBI, 67 R, 21 2B, 7 3B, 27 SB, 122 OPS+, 35.7 VORP
His MLV (Marginal Lineup Value) is higher than Derek Jeter and Jose Reyes. His VORP (Value Over Replacement Player) is higher than Ryan Howard and Manny Ramirez. His PMLV (Positional Marginal Lineup Value) is higher than Alfonso Soriano and Mark Teixeira. He plays the same position as Alfonso Soriano yet has outproduced him this season in nearly every category --minus HR (by one), R, and SLG-- including in the sabermetrics.
I'm just wondering here (and maybe I do too much of it), but he does fit the Angels system nicely. He's a hustle player. He steals bases, he hits for solid power, solid average, gets on-base at a reasonable rate, and plays solid defense. He just seems like one of those players who gets the most out of their talent (i.e. Figgins, Willits). Would anyone be opposed to signing him in free agency this season? He's 31 years old. He'll be 32 by next season. He's making $4.575-million this season which will probably jump him up to around $8-million during free agency this season. We signed Gary Matthews for five-years, $50-million. He's making $6-million this season in salary. I'm saying that so people understand where I'm coming from with inflation and performance. We wouldn't have to give Byrnes more than a two-year deal. He'd be able to play LF next season should Anderson get injured next season at all. I know we have Willits, but Byrnes would be better than Willits next season for us for all intensive purposes. His [Byrnes] versatility in the outfield makes him very valuable to us on days where Vlad, Matthews, and Anderson need days off. He hits great off of lefties, righties, at home, on the road, at night, and during the day. His only downfall might be that he is notoriously dead in the second half of the season. He's a .290/.352/.499 hitter in the first half of the season before dropping to a .240/.300/.400 hitter in the second half of the season.
Would anyone be opposed to signing him, other than the fact that he is a former Athletic? I guess that's my question.
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
0 recs |
43 comments
Comments
Byrnes Baby Byrnes
by Kokey8 on Aug 3, 2007 12:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
by Kokey8 on Aug 3, 2007 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yoda. Your link didnt work (w3)
by Kokey8 on Aug 3, 2007 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I saw him introduce the D-Backs/Braves game Sat.
by scareduck on Aug 3, 2007 12:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
As for whether the Angels should sign him
by scareduck on Aug 3, 2007 12:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
and Chase Field is a hitter's park
why in the world do people keep thinking we need outfielders?
no way we sign him. no way.
by rbrianc on Aug 3, 2007 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have the exact same impression
by kdoc on Aug 3, 2007 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i love
by Sorbo182 on Aug 3, 2007 12:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
career year
Stoneman bites and he'll end up paying premium and receiving along the lines of the 270/310/480 line he put up last year.
by jpeiper on Aug 3, 2007 2:11 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
But, if he does that ...
I think his average season is pretty much what he did in 2004. He hit .283/.347/.467 with 20 HR, 73 RBI, 39 2B, 17 SB, and a 109 OPS+.
by WeaverMania on Aug 3, 2007 3:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
can some one post his Home/Road splits this year?
i live in Phoniex - we don't him. trust me.
btw, the last guy FA signed that lived in Phoenix metro was Shea.
by rbrianc on Aug 3, 2007 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Home/Away
Away: .308/.376/.491, 8 HR, 25 RBI, 36 R, 22 BB, 17 SB
by WeaverMania on Aug 3, 2007 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks interesting and impessive
by rbrianc on Aug 3, 2007 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Before you guys go a second further
by Caseys Kiss of Death on Aug 3, 2007 4:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I already mentioned it in the original post
by WeaverMania on Aug 3, 2007 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
Until I forget that lesson 10 minutes from now.
by Caseys Kiss of Death on Aug 3, 2007 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No thanks
If Willits isn't enough for you, then don't worry, Juan Rivera will be back next year. His contract is up, but we'll be able to keep him through arbitration, he doesn't have enough time for free agency yet.
by RallyMonkey5 on Aug 3, 2007 6:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Free Agent Dollars
by Rev Halofan on Aug 3, 2007 9:12 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If ARod opts out...
would you "do what it takes" to get ARod? the lakers shocked the world getting Shaq and then Kobe when they did. i vote for winning the ARod sweepstakes. i trust Arte will find a way to make Vlad happy too.
by SCHalo on Aug 3, 2007 9:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Terry
by hauldog on Aug 3, 2007 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
his topic last night
the ones i heard: Jim Thome and Mike Piazza
by SCHalo on Aug 3, 2007 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
by mattwelch on Aug 3, 2007 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barry, ARod, Griffey Jr, Ecsktein
One of these things just doesn't belong,
Can you tell which thing is not like the others
By the time I finish my song?
Did you guess which thing was not like the others?
Did you guess which thing just doesn't belong?
If you guessed this one is not like the others,
Then you're absolutely...right!
by rbrianc on Aug 3, 2007 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hint: one of them has WS Rings
the others have been the best in the game the last decade.
by rbrianc on Aug 3, 2007 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ooh! I know! I know!
by Stirrups on Aug 3, 2007 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Terry posted the Question to Scoc
Personally I would have to say either Morneau or Reyes.
by Seik1177 on Aug 3, 2007 10:41 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Willits
It is nice to be a spontaneous dirt-dog, fan-favorite, but Byrnes kind of comes off as fake [and/or] a flake.
by Halos2002 on Aug 3, 2007 4:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
not sure where he would fit
by UCIHalo on Aug 3, 2007 5:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Not opposed to it
I'm not saying it has to be Byrnes, but someone with comparable numbers, would fit in well.
by billhune on Aug 3, 2007 6:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Byrnes ...
by highlandhalo on Aug 3, 2007 7:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Are we talking about the idiot
by TheTypingFiend on Aug 3, 2007 7:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Go after championship talent
by mattwelch on Aug 4, 2007 11:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wait...
I thought that's why we let Glaus go.
by TheTypingFiend on Aug 4, 2007 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
two more reasons
- Billy Beane's a "genius" - yet he let him go.
- The A's clubhouse is known for being full of free spirits. Byrnes is one of them - yet they let him go.
BTW, the Snalkes offered him $7.5 million/year. he wants $10 million. and that's why negotiations wer called off.
by rbrianc on Aug 4, 2007 3:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
As Jesse Jackson on an old SNL skit would say
Arizona Diamondbacks outfielder Eric Byrnes agrees to $30 million, 3-year contract extension.
by Fan Since 1981 on Aug 7, 2007 2:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















