Jeff Weaver to Seattle?
Not that I am afraid of this coming back to haunt us or anything, but I am afraid of this coming back to haunt us.
Word is Nintendo has enough hydroponic profits they would have smoked with Zito that they are questioning why not go after Stoner #2...
My source says "Not 100%" (not yet like last year's inkwell) as Jeffo dug the Midwest Farmers Daughters in Saint Louie, but Boras will dig for the dough and it may be Emerald Green in a week or two...
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
0 recs |
28 comments
Comments
This counts
by Caseys Kiss of Death on
Jan 3, 2007 2:28 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Possibly...
by RichA on
Jan 3, 2007 8:45 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Last year's inkwell"
With all this talk about polls, Rev., any chance you create one regarding next season's offensive performance?
I'm just curious at what point lone Angel Great Vlad G. goes down with a season-ending injury. Not sure if super-Nap'z alone can carry the entire team?
Trivia: Has there ever been a 20 game losing pitcher with an ERA under 2.50? (I do not know the answer.)
by Bilko 420 on
Jan 3, 2007 9:15 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Manny "hate"?
by scareduck on
Jan 3, 2007 1:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
C'mon, scareduck
Some of the so-called hate I was referring to was along these lines:
"I'm almost at the point where I'd turn down any deal that wasn't an obvious winner for the Angels. I just don't see him being dominant after this year."
"Don't trade anybody. I like our young guys and don't want to lose anything of any consequence for someone who may soon be over the hill."
"Just say no to Manny. Just to be on the record. Keep Manny Ramirez off of the Angels."
"Hear, Hear. Manny would hurt the Angels more than he would help them."
"Vote no on Manny! Keep him in Boston!"
And yes, I actually do agree that most of the rumored trade proposals we've heard regarding Manny are untenable. But to flat out dismiss Ramirez as someone this team can't use?
That seems preposterous.
Weird, for some reason I just had a vision of Wally George when I typed the word "preposterous".
by Bilko 420 on
Jan 3, 2007 2:52 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
still mashing after all these years
obviously it wouldn't make sense to trade the angels' entire future for him, but trading a little of it would make a huge impact for the angels, and immediately.
by yeswecan on
Jan 3, 2007 5:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But for how long?
by Clutch on
Jan 3, 2007 7:36 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
good point
obviously hindsight is 20/20, but manny is just so good!
by yeswecan on
Jan 3, 2007 8:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, at least there's three of us
Anyway, I think most would agree that the Angels would never have traded for Manny years ago because his "salary was simply too outrageous" -- remember those grand old days? And I even thought last year's trade rumor centered around a package beginning with Wood, Kendrick, Marcia Brady, possibly Santana, and maybe even Mononucleic-man thrown in. Basically a veritable series of names that all here would have absolutely balked at and sadly, rightfully so. I believe this might actually be the beeping truck in Salt Lake 'duck was referring to.
I don't know, I guess my point is that in my humble Halos Heaven opinion, Manny is totally worth pursuing, without a doubt. If it's a gamble, it's one I would definitely make. No question. However, it doesn't seem like any of Boston's demands thus far rumored could possibly work for the Angels. I believe this last go 'round even had them asking for Shields, Santana, and Marcia Brady.
Vlad and Manny together as Arte's Angels? That would be unconscionable! And I don't even know what that word means...
by Bilko 420 on
Jan 4, 2007 4:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Because...
by scareduck on
Jan 4, 2007 6:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There are a very few here who'd agree with you
The basic dynamic here is that we don't need Manny, because we have DMac and Kotchman.
I completely agree with you though. Ramirez would've looked so good in a halo uniform. The only thing is, we've learned in the past three months that Stoneman is never going to make that trade, or any other significant one, unless a player blows up at the manager and then Stoneman is told to trade a guy. It's just not in the cards.
Manny's gonna go somewhere; it's down to the final 2 years on his deal, so he's gonna end up somewhere. I'm very interested to see where, because I do think it will be to an AL club, so will it be in our division?
I feel the same way about Andruw Jones. The consensus around here was that he wasn't worth the young players (pretty unbelievable, but it is what it is). To me, Jones might be the most interesting individual player story to follow this season. He will be unrestricted, so will the Braves move him, or will they do the same thing the Nats did with Soriano, and get zero in return? And if they do trade Andruw, where's he going? Please not in our division, please no.
by goodvibe61 on
Jan 4, 2007 11:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OK, I'll bite
What would your trade proposal be for Manny or Andruw?
by johnnyangel101 on
Jan 5, 2007 1:02 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There is no doghouse here
If you can still post, you are here.
If you cannot, you are johnsamo.
by Rev Halofan on
Jan 5, 2007 1:24 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Alas, poor johnsamo! I knew him, Horatio
by proletariat on
Jan 5, 2007 8:30 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wish someone would
by ineptituderunsamok on
Jan 6, 2007 12:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Moreno
So who would you have pitch? Take two starters out of our rotation and we are a very pedestrian team.
by hauldog on
Jan 5, 2007 9:16 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Facts
by jjackflash on
Jan 5, 2007 4:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well
by Clutch on
Jan 5, 2007 5:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You have a first name?
by cardinalwraith on
Jan 5, 2007 6:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
to simplify (oversimplify?)...
by yeswecan on
Jan 5, 2007 11:27 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yup
eppa rixey
jim scott (won 20)
and assorted others around the turn of the century and teens.
The closest on in modern era would be turk farrell in '62. He was 10-20 3.02
by ineptituderunsamok on
Jan 3, 2007 9:25 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
This was
by ineptituderunsamok on
Jan 3, 2007 9:45 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for the research, inep'z
A prediction: In 2007 John Lackey will lose approximately 18 games with an ERA of 2.48.
There will be a dramatic year-end showdown with the Mariners' Jeff Weaver in which 12 homeruns will clear the centerfield wall, four batsmen will be hit, and eight players ejected.
Lackey will suffer multiple stab wounds at the hands of Jose Guillen. Napoli's courageous and heroic feats will forever secure his position as undisputed team leader through 2012, as the Mayan calendar completes and the world comes to an end.
by Bilko 420 on
Jan 3, 2007 11:55 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Aww man ...
by eyespy on
Jan 4, 2007 9:17 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bavasi
by hauldog on
Jan 3, 2007 10:28 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
maybe...
by Hutch (someone took my name) on
Jan 3, 2007 11:35 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs















