Playoff Readiness
Over at Light Up That Halo!, I want to start a weekly series inspired by Baseball Between the Numbers. The book's final chapter, "Why Doesn't Billy Beane's Shit Work in the Playoffs?" was inspired by a quote from A's general manager Billy Beane in Moneyball. When asked why the Oakland A's, despite their string of regular season successes, have had such trouble in the playoffs, Beane proclaimed that the playoffs are a crapshoot. The A's of the lastdecade have not been defective, but merely the victims of bad luck.
While we've long since derided that concept as typical Fremont whining, especially after the A's were swept in last season's ALCS, Beane is essentially correct. There may be no better proof for that fact than the Cardinals' World Series victory last season despite an 83-win season. While admitting that, in some part, luck determines playoff outcomes, Baseball Prospectus authors Nate Silver and Dayn Perry decided to determine what factors, if any, correlate with playoff success. They found three possessing solid correlations, and interestingly none involve the offense.
- Closer WXRL - Because the postseason inherently self-selects the best teams, the outcomes of playoff games are often close. Thus, a club's ability to hand even the slimmest of leads to a dominant closer can give it a needed edge over a potent opponent. However, they found that it is only the closer that really matters; the performance of the bullpen as a whole had a much weaker correlation with playoff success.
- Pitching Staff Strikeout Rate - While Silver and Perry actually found that a pitching staff's batting average against has a solid correlation with postseason success, they chose to measure the staff's strikeout rate instead. While a groundout or flyout is just creates the same outcome as a strikeout, they argue (with some proof) that good hitters have an ability to take advantage of finesse pitchers. Because playoff teams tend to have more quality hitters than the average team, a club blessed with power, strikeout-oriented pitchers will be able to neutralize that advantage and pacify even playoff-caliber offenses.
- Fielding Runs Above Average (FRAA) - FRAA is a measure of how many runs a defense prevents over the league average, adjusted for stuff like ballpark factors. Silver and Perry argue that a team with both strikeout pitchers and an efficient defense will be very difficult to score against. In order to get a hit against such a team, a hitter must first be able to hit a fair ball off the pitcher, and second, hit the ball past the defense. They argue that defense matters in the playoffs because playoff teams have more quality hitters who can hit the ball harder and put more pressure on the defense.
- While I realize that I may be getting ahead of myself--the season is barely half over and the division is far from won--but I think this season's team has as good a chance to make the postseason as any since the destined 2002 squad. So, let's see how the Halos do:
Closer WXRL: Frankie Rodriguez, 2.267 wins, 7th among closers
Strikeout Rate: 7.04 K/9, 6th in the majors
FRAA: 18 runs, 6th in the majors
As expected, the Angels' pitching staff has been pretty effective, ranking among the top 10 in K/9. This success comes despite the struggles suffered by Halo hurlers, most notably at the back end of the rotation and the front end of the bullpen. The defense is much improved over last year's squad, which had an FRAA of 9 runs. The source of this improvement is likely due to greater position stability, especially at center field (Matthews) and first base (Kotchman). The most perplexing thing to consider is Frankie's relatively low WXRL ranking. Last year K-Rod was first among closers with 7.301 wins added. Can his statistics explain the difference?
ERA WHIP DIPS K/9 BB/9 BAA BIPA LVG
2006 1.73 1.10 2.57 12.10 3.45 .197 .275 2.00
2007 2.27 1.17 2.41 12.34 3.52 .211 .301 1.41
Frankie's current WHIP and ERA are higher than last season, and he is a bit more hittable this year. Oddly, he is striking out more batters while walking more of them. However, Frankie may be a victim of bad luck, as an average BIPA/BABIP is .290. Most interestingly though, it appears that he has been used in less important situations than last year, as his leverage score is significantly lower. Perhaps the Angels, enjoying a more potent offense compared with last year's squad, have provided Frankie with fewer save opportunities, or perhaps he has enjoyed more two- or three-run lead (and thus safer) opportunities. It may also be possible that Scioscia is using Frankie in more non-save, and therefore less important, situations. Nonetheless, because Frankie's peripherals have, on balance, remained about the same, it's possible that he will see some improvement. I have every reason to believe he'll bounce back and once again be among the top three closers in WXRL.
For a bit of context, let's see how the 2002 squad stacks up in these categories:
Closer WXRL: Troy Percival, 6.149 wins, 4th among closers
Strikeout Rate: 6.19 K/9, 22nd in the majors
FRAA: 70 runs, 5th among the last 180 teams participating in the playoffs
The factoid that jumps out immediately is the 2002 squad's FRAA. I did some additional research, and an FRAA of 70 runs is ridiculous. It is clear that this team was one of the top defensive clubs of the past two or three decades. While Percy did not display the dominance of Frankie's 2005 campaign, he was certainly one of the elite closers in baseball that year. Remember that he was perfect in postseason save opportunities that year (as opposed to say, Rob Nenn). The one factor in which the 2002 squad pales in comparison to this season's team is pitcher strikeout rate. This is not so surprising. A rotation comprising of Jarrod Washburn, Kevin Appier, Ramon Ortiz, Aaron Sele, and rookie John Lackey/Scott Schoeneweiss is undoubtedly inferior to the squad's current rotation.
For some contemporary context, let's examine the team many consider the best in the majors this year, the Boston Red Sox.
Closer WXRL: Jonathan Papelbon, 3.627 wins, 3rd among closers
Strikeout Rate: 7.09 K/9, 5th in the majors
FRAA: 11 runs, tied for 7th in the majors
Paps has been lights-out as expected. The Boston pitching staff is just a hair better in K/9 than the Angels, though admittedly it would be better with a full season of Schilling and Beckett. The Sox defense is a bit less effective than the Angels', but not by much. A 9 run differential probably means a difference of a win between the two clubs.
Conclusion
Admittedly, in any best-of-five or best-of-seven series (especially between teams of comparable ability) luck may be the determining factor of playoff success. That said, if Silver and Perry are correct, and if even a small part of luck is the reside of design, the Halos should be more as equipped for postseason success as any of the current top-ten teams in the game. The rotation is among the elite, and the much-improved Halo defense is at least above average. One cause for concern, however, is closer Frankie Rodriguez. While he has not suffered a drastic regression, his performance has dipped a bit, it remains to be seen if he can maintain the level of dominance he exhibited last season.
This does not mean that these factors are completely deterministic, however. As the Halos learned in 2005, an entire postseason series can turn on unaccounted-for factors such as the amount of rest (or lack thereof) between series and blown calls on dropped third strikes by dunce Doug Eddings. Nonetheless, we have reason to be at least guardedly optimistic about the Angels' postseason hopes.
This Fan-Post is authored by an independent fan. Tell us what you think and how you feel.
0 recs |
18 comments
Comments
It's 3am now...
by darkangel01 on Jul 6, 2007 3:04 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's the short version
by melvintoast on Jul 6, 2007 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice analysis
by johnnyangel101 on Jul 6, 2007 7:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Very interesting stuff
While it seems obvious that luck plays a huge part in playoff success, it is comforting to know that the Angels look pretty good in the categories that do display some correlation.
by Dogman on Jul 6, 2007 9:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Love the analysis, disagree with premise
As I argued in some other thread, while last year's Cardinals might have been the worst World Champeen ever, they shared a characteristic common with other allegedly undeserving WS winners (like the '03 Marlins) -- some of their great players were hurt during the season, then healthy in the playoffs. There's three good reasons they'd made the postseason in five of the previous six seasons, and they're named Jim Edmonds, Albert Pujols and Mark-Scott McGuire-Rolen. The Cards' Big Three missed nearly 100 games in '06 & played hurt, while their pitching staff sucked. And they still would have probably lost had the Mets not lost a couple of their best players for the playoffs, and Detroit not suffered the biggest deer-in-headlights case since the '54 Indians.
Beane's 2000-03 playoff teams couldn't run the bases (hello, Jeremy Giambi!), couldn't field particularly well, and depended disproportionately on taking walks. When you have a one-dimensional offense (even two-, when you count the home runs), you can neutralize it by throwing strikes (see the current travails of Willits, Reggie). The Yankees stopped winning World Series right about the time they embraced Giambi-ball, instead of Brosius-ball.
Even the current A's teams are unbalanced, with an extreme pitching-and-defense set-up. I think every single recent World Champion has been a pretty balanced club. The Cardinals and Angels just managed to do it without dominating rotations.
by mattwelch on Jul 6, 2007 9:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Did Cardinal Wraith's analysis tell you anything?
Baseball players aren't dice. They're not even ping pong balls in a box. They don't play with the same probability of hitting or not hitting everyday. Motivation and clutch play are factors. If Kirk Rueter had started game 7 2002 things may have turned out differently. If Spiezio grounds into a double play things may have turned out differently. Some players choke under pressure and some thrive. And some overcome their lack of confidence over time.
The Angels nearly went to the world series in 1986 except that Dave Henderson clutched up. Unfortunately for the BoSox, they lost the world series because Billy Buckner didn't. Buckner should not even have been on the field as it was the 10th and they didn't need his bat at that point. No analysis could have predicted those dynamics.
You generally have to have some good pitching some good defense and some good hitting to win a world series. But sometimes you can do it without all of those. The Marlins did it without good hitting. Anything is possible in baseball. Tatum ONeil and Jackie Earl Haley could be the best little league players in the San Fernando Valley.
by melvintoast on Jul 6, 2007 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marlins could hit
by mattwelch on Jul 6, 2007 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clutch? Not hardly
Right. The fact that Donnie Moore was pitching with a shoulder injury that would eventually end his career had nothing to do with his leaving one up.
by scareduck on Jul 6, 2007 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay so basically your strengthening my argument
by melvintoast on Jul 6, 2007 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Clutch" as an ability is bogus
by scareduck on Jul 7, 2007 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clutch is an ability that is
However, Robert Horry apparently plays for the Spurs because every year in the playoffs he goes nuts. Of course in the NBA, the regular season is pre-season so the play-offs is the regulars season but I think you get the point
If clutch isn't an ability then why doesn't the best team statistically win? You're saying teams don't choke, they just randomly fail?
by melvintoast on Jul 7, 2007 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it's impossible to quantify
As to the choking part, see Ecclesiastes 9:11.
by scareduck on Jul 8, 2007 7:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you talking about a fantasy sports team?
by melvintoast on Jul 8, 2007 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not a complete stathead...
by cardinalwraith on Jul 6, 2007 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't read the book but concerning stat
<P>
Also the correlation is characterized as solid. What probability of accuracy qualifies as solid? There's no real information here. It's just touchy feely stuff. All these stats are based on OPD. The Angels have mostly good OPD so it's not surprising that mostly good stats.
by melvintoast on Jul 6, 2007 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post
by scareduck on Jul 6, 2007 10:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
More, data, yay!
Tigers
Closer WXRL: Todd Jones, 0.509 wins, 24th among closers
Strikeout Rate: 6.40 K/9, 19th in the majors
FRAA: 3 runs, tied for 12th in the majors
Indians
Closer WXRL: Joe Borowski, 1.756 wins, 15th among closers
Strikeout Rate: 6.43 K/9, 17th in the majors
FRAA: 3 runs, tied for 12th in the majors
Brewers
Closer WXRL: Francisco Cordero, 1.750 wins, 16th among closers
Strikeout Rate: 7.16 K/9, 4th in the majors
FRAA: -3 runs, tied for 17th in the majors
Mets
Closer WXRL: Billy Wagner, 3.043 wins, 4th among closers
Strikeout Rate: 6.77 K/9, 14th in the majors
FRAA: 25 runs, tied for 2nd in the majors
Braves
Closer WXRL: Bob Wickman, so low I can't even find him on the charts, but 1.6 wins last year
Strikeout Rate: 6.78, 13th in the majors
FRAA: -5 runs, 18th in the majors
Dodgers
Closer WXRL: Takasi Saito, 3.93 wins, 2nd among closers
Strikeout Rate: 7.68 K/9, 1st in the majors
FRAA: -6 runs, 19th in the majors
San Diego
Closer WXRL: Trevor Hoffman, 2.50 wins, 5th among closers
Strikeout Rate: 6.71, 15th in the majors
FRAA: 9 runs, 9th in the majors
by cardinalwraith on Jul 6, 2007 11:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















