We know the young man, Mike Trout. We also know what happens to the ball when the young man hits it and can measure it with the oldest of baseball statistics or the newest, demonstrating he is, indeed, on track to be one of the all-time greats.
So for something new, this is a story about his bat: Old Hickory (the same company he’s been using since high school), 33.5" long, 31.5 oz., black barrel, rock maple, unfinished handle with a cup on the end.
After about 15 minutes, Mike showed up and immediately started off with a demo in the batting cage where we could watch his results real-time with a monitor they set up for each swing.
Most pitches come in at a +5 or +6 degree downward angle. Even going back to Ted Williams, the goal was to stay in the hitting zone as long as possible. Having a downward swing, (negative angle) will put the batter at a heavy disadvantage. The best players have an slight upper cut, +10 to +12 degrees (a line drive swing), or up to a HR swing like Stanton, which might be +20-25 degrees.
A few times during the demo after a cut, Mike stopped to look at the results himself on the monitor. Ideally, that quick stroke for him results in a time to impact of .125 seconds. Once, Mike noted that he felt he was a little long on one swing, checked the data, and yep, he was close to 0.150 seconds. Yeah, dude could tell he was .025 seconds slower. Let that minuscule time frame sink in the kind of skills Trouty has ingrained! Additionally, he shoots for that line drive swing, +12 degrees.
After the batting cage demo, Trouty sat down to talk about the integration of the product and what it meant for the game. He reiterated the biggest emphasis and market for this is the younger players in development.
We then had a chance for some Q& A. First, I queried Mike on how he was using it to make his swing better. He stated he wasn’t necessarily trying to make it "better", i.e., he wasn’t trying to improve his bat speed or optimize the impact angle. Exactly – why mess with the fundamentals of a swing that has already put him on track to be the best of all-time and produce such incredible results four years in a row? Mike said he basically was using it just to monitor and maintain his consistency, swing after swing. It was about making sure his attack angle was +10 to +12(a line drive swing) and time to impact, the short quick swing we often here about, where his baseline is about .125 seconds. We certainly can see the results in OPS+, WAR, and any other batting metric you want to use, but remarkably (or maybe not so remarkable), there is raw bat physics data that backs up why he has the those outstanding numbers: he has the best and most consistent swing in the game! Trout said he doesn’t really try to adjust his angle or speed based on the pitch, pitcher, or situation. He tries to maintain that consistency no matter what the pitch. In conjunction, he knows the zone where his swing best interfaces with a pitch, whether it be a fastball, has movement, or location: his "kill zone", if you will. Knowing this zone and his own swing helps him lay off pitches that don’t fit his profile. Having the knowledge of his swing and that quick swing, allows him to make "better choices and wait longer". He is able to lay off pitches that don’t work within his hitting zone.
He brings that same discipline to just a batting cage environment; he won’t swing at bad pitches in the cage for instance so as not to develop bad habits.
The main thing the smart bat helps batters at the most elite level is a steady feedback process to get their swing as consistent and ideal as possible for the individual. Makes sense - they’ve already demonstrated an ability to hit the ball to get this far already. For instance, Trouty might take twenty swings in the morning off a tee and aims to have ALL 20 match his ideal profile; he’s not trying to improve his bat swing, like time to impact nor try different attack angles.
While he’d been working in development with Zepp this winter, today was the first day he brought it out to show his team mates, and as expected, the guys were curious and a little competition started up between Trout, C.J. Cron, Craig Gentry, Daniel Nava, and Kole Calhoun. I tried to get a sense of the outcome, but the only thing I got was what we’d guess – Trout quantifiably had the best swing, stating he had to maintain his place at the top of the hill. He mentioned it was still early in the Spring, so the guys weren’t going to go all out but just seeing this new gear will quickly move it mainstream across MLB and my belief is that we’re already passed the ‘early adopter’ stage.
It was amazing to see and hear what a craftsman Mike is with his bat and his intrigue with the feedback that he was being given. For one, he stated he could tell with one swing if he liked a bat or not, i.e. how well-balanced it was. That’s what made the Zepp sensor in the knob all the more remarkable in that Mike stated there was no difference from his normal bat. Zepp admitted if this device interfered at all with the feel and balance of a live bat, the "project would be dead in the water". There were several moments that had me awestruck – Mike has the quickest swing in the game as I mentioned: 0.125 seconds to impact. On one swing, Trout knew his swing was ‘a little long’ and quickly checked the monitor. Yeah, longer meant 0.15 seconds to impact - Trout could tell the difference of .025 seconds. The other part was how Mike would take a swing in the cage, and then immediately would go over and check the data.