Obviously there is a lot that still has to happen, but I wanted to ask this hypothetical question, because who doesn’t love hypothetical questions, right?
Would you view it as a legitimate championship, or would you put an asterisk next to it.
Personally, it’s a legitimate championship and should be viewed as such. Here’s where I stand on this. It doesn’t matter if you play 162 games or 82, what matters is how you do in October. If the playoff format is the same, and you got to get through three of the best teams in order to win, I don’t think it makes a difference playing half a season. Plus, if there are more playoff teams added, then it’s actually more impressive coming out of the playoffs victorious.
I just wanted to ask everyone and hear what your different thoughts are on this potential subject.
- According to Evan Drellich of The Athletic, Major League Baseball “plans to deliver” its new economics proposal to the league’s players association Tuesday. The players will then review it as the two sides attempt to reach an agreement on how to proceed with a potential 2020 season amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
- This is a fun read. What an 82-game season will (and won’t) mean. If a player hits .400 over an 82-game season, does it really count? A lot of potential “what-if” scenarios here.
- Here are 15 free agents who could fill universal DH roles for NL teams during 2020 MLB season
- Is that World Series champ legit? 3 questions on how a shortened MLB season would be remembered